Deed of Assignment | Assignor | Assignee

Assign your property to another with a "deed of assignment".

Transfer your property to another person

Last updated on 16 November 2023

1. What is a Deed of Assignment? 

A Deed of Assignment is a contract where the owner (the “assignor”) transfers ownership over property to another person (the “assignee”) by way of assignment. The assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor and assumes all the rights and obligations to the property.

2. When do you need a Deed of Assignment?

A Deed of Assignment is used when the owner wants to transfer ownership (and the rights and obligations) over property to another person.

3. What information do you need to create the Deed of Assignment?

To create your Deed of Assignment you’ll need the following minimum information:

  • The type of assignor (e.g. individual or business) as well as name and details (e.g. nationality and address).
  • The type of assignee (e.g. individual or business) as well as name and details (e.g. nationality and address).
  • Brief description of the property to be assigned.

4.  How much is the document?

The document costs PHP 400 for a one-time purchase. Once purchased you have unlimited use and revisions of this type of document.

You can also avail of Premium subscription at PHP 1,000 and get (a) unlimited use of our growing  library  of documents (from affidavits to contracts); and (b) unlimited use of our “ Ask an Attorney ” service, which lets you consult an expert lawyer anytime for any legal concern you have.

Click  here  to get this document

assignment vs deed

9 Eymard Drive, New Manila Quezon City Owned and operated by JCArteche’s Online Documentation & Referral Services

assignment vs deed

Back to Top

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Create Documents
  • Ask An Attorney
  • How It Works
  • Customer Support

Logo

Assignment of Deed of Trust Vs. Deed or Grant Deed

A grant deed is used to transfer ownership rights in real estate.

A grant deed is used to transfer ownership rights in real estate.

Jupiterimages/liquidlibrary/Getty Images

More Articles

  •   1. What Is the Difference Between the Deed of Absolute Sale and the Deed of Assignment?
  •   2. What is an Assignment of Trust Deed?
  •   3. Warranty Deed Vs. Deed of Trust

Property rights in real estate are valuable and invariably the subject of a legal document called a deed. To transfer ownership rights in real estate, a grant deed is commonly used. When a loan is obtained to purchase real estate, a deed of trust is often used to give the lender rights in the real estate to secure repayment of the loan. An assignment of deed of trust is used by a lender when it sells its loan secured by a deed of trust.

Property Deeds

Real estate transactions that involve the transfer of property rights require a deed to ensure the transfer of rights is effective. All deeds are written documents that include a description of the affected real estate and the names of the persons whose property rights are being transferred. Although not legally require to make the transfer effective, deeds are routinely recorded with the local government office responsible for recording real estate transactions. A recorded deed gives the public notice regarding property rights in a particular parcel of real estate, such as ownership, easements and liens. Recording a deed can also protect a property owner against future claims that his property rights are invalid.

A grant deed is used to transfer real estate ownership from one person to another. The transfer of ownership can be for a full parcel of real estate or just a portion of the real estate. Grant deeds are most often used in real estate sales between an unrelated buyer and seller. However, a grant deed may also be used to transfer ownership as a gift. When a grant deed is used, the person transferring ownership rights is promising to the person receiving ownership rights that these rights have not been previously transferred to anyone else.

Deed of Trust

A deed of trust is used in a three-party transaction involving the repayment of a debt. The first party is a real estate owner or buyer who is borrowing money that can be used for any purpose, but is typically used to fund the purchase of the real estate. The second party is the lender, such as a bank or other financial institution, providing the funds to the borrower. To secure repayment of the loan, the borrower signs a deed of trust which transfers legal title to his real estate to a third party, called the trustee, who can be any individual or company that does not have any interest in the loan or real estate. The borrower continues to have the beneficial use of the property with the trustee only taking action if the borrower defaults on his loan. If the lender and borrow cannot work out a resolution of the default, the lender can instruct the trustee to conduct a foreclosure sale of the real estate and deliver the sale proceeds to the lender to repay the loan.

Assignment of Deed of Trust

Loans that are secured by a deed of trust often include repayment terms that extend for several years or more. From a lender’s perspective, a loan secured by a deed of trust is a fairly safe investment when the value of the real estate is sufficient to repay the loan in the event of a borrower's default. This aspect makes existing loans secured by a deed of trust suitable for sale from the original lender to another lender during the life of the loan. To complete the sale of a loan secured by a deed of trust, the original lender uses a document called an assignment of deed of trust to transfer its rights in the deed of trust to a new lender.

  • FindLaw: What Are Property Deeds?
  • Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute: Deed of Trust
  • California Department of Real Estate: Trust Deed Investments -- What You Should Know?

Joe Stone is a freelance writer in California who has been writing professionally since 2005. His articles have been published on LIVESTRONG.COM, SFgate.com and Chron.com. He also has experience in background investigations and spent almost two decades in legal practice. Stone received his law degree from Southwestern University School of Law and a Bachelor of Arts in philosophy from California State University, Los Angeles.

Related Articles

What is the difference between the deed of absolute sale and the deed of assignment, what is an assignment of trust deed, warranty deed vs. deed of trust, land sale contract vs. trust deed, what is the redemption period in tennessee, what is the collateral assignment of a life insurance policy, how to assume a promissory note, transferring a deed of trust to a granddaughter, owner finance laws, definition of 'trustee' in real estate, certificate of title vs. deed, foreclosure right of redemption & tenant's rights in maryland.

Zacks Research is Reported On:

Zacks Investment Research

is an A+ Rated BBB

Accredited Business.

Copyright © 2024 Zacks Investment Research

At the center of everything we do is a strong commitment to independent research and sharing its profitable discoveries with investors. This dedication to giving investors a trading advantage led to the creation of our proven Zacks Rank stock-rating system. Since 1986 it has nearly tripled the S&P 500 with an average gain of +26% per year. These returns cover a period from 1986-2011 and were examined and attested by Baker Tilly, an independent accounting firm.

Visit performance for information about the performance numbers displayed above.

NYSE and AMEX data is at least 20 minutes delayed. NASDAQ data is at least 15 minutes delayed.

logo

  • assignments basic law

Assignments: The Basic Law

The assignment of a right or obligation is a common contractual event under the law and the right to assign (or prohibition against assignments) is found in the majority of agreements, leases and business structural documents created in the United States.

As with many terms commonly used, people are familiar with the term but often are not aware or fully aware of what the terms entail. The concept of assignment of rights and obligations is one of those simple concepts with wide ranging ramifications in the contractual and business context and the law imposes severe restrictions on the validity and effect of assignment in many instances. Clear contractual provisions concerning assignments and rights should be in every document and structure created and this article will outline why such drafting is essential for the creation of appropriate and effective contracts and structures.

The reader should first read the article on Limited Liability Entities in the United States and Contracts since the information in those articles will be assumed in this article.

Basic Definitions and Concepts:

An assignment is the transfer of rights held by one party called the “assignor” to another party called the “assignee.” The legal nature of the assignment and the contractual terms of the agreement between the parties determines some additional rights and liabilities that accompany the assignment. The assignment of rights under a contract usually completely transfers the rights to the assignee to receive the benefits accruing under the contract. Ordinarily, the term assignment is limited to the transfer of rights that are intangible, like contractual rights and rights connected with property. Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court , 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950).

An assignment will generally be permitted under the law unless there is an express prohibition against assignment in the underlying contract or lease. Where assignments are permitted, the assignor need not consult the other party to the contract but may merely assign the rights at that time. However, an assignment cannot have any adverse effect on the duties of the other party to the contract, nor can it diminish the chance of the other party receiving complete performance. The assignor normally remains liable unless there is an agreement to the contrary by the other party to the contract.

The effect of a valid assignment is to remove privity between the assignor and the obligor and create privity between the obligor and the assignee. Privity is usually defined as a direct and immediate contractual relationship. See Merchants case above.

Further, for the assignment to be effective in most jurisdictions, it must occur in the present. One does not normally assign a future right; the assignment vests immediate rights and obligations.

No specific language is required to create an assignment so long as the assignor makes clear his/her intent to assign identified contractual rights to the assignee. Since expensive litigation can erupt from ambiguous or vague language, obtaining the correct verbiage is vital. An agreement must manifest the intent to transfer rights and can either be oral or in writing and the rights assigned must be certain.

Note that an assignment of an interest is the transfer of some identifiable property, claim, or right from the assignor to the assignee. The assignment operates to transfer to the assignee all of the rights, title, or interest of the assignor in the thing assigned. A transfer of all rights, title, and interests conveys everything that the assignor owned in the thing assigned and the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor. Knott v. McDonald’s Corp ., 985 F. Supp. 1222 (N.D. Cal. 1997)

The parties must intend to effectuate an assignment at the time of the transfer, although no particular language or procedure is necessary. As long ago as the case of National Reserve Co. v. Metropolitan Trust Co ., 17 Cal. 2d 827 (Cal. 1941), the court held that in determining what rights or interests pass under an assignment, the intention of the parties as manifested in the instrument is controlling.

The intent of the parties to an assignment is a question of fact to be derived not only from the instrument executed by the parties but also from the surrounding circumstances. When there is no writing to evidence the intention to transfer some identifiable property, claim, or right, it is necessary to scrutinize the surrounding circumstances and parties’ acts to ascertain their intentions. Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998)

The general rule applicable to assignments of choses in action is that an assignment, unless there is a contract to the contrary, carries with it all securities held by the assignor as collateral to the claim and all rights incidental thereto and vests in the assignee the equitable title to such collateral securities and incidental rights. An unqualified assignment of a contract or chose in action, however, with no indication of the intent of the parties, vests in the assignee the assigned contract or chose and all rights and remedies incidental thereto.

More examples: In Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs ., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998), the court held that the assignee of a party to a subordination agreement is entitled to the benefits and is subject to the burdens of the agreement. In Florida E. C. R. Co. v. Eno , 99 Fla. 887 (Fla. 1930), the court held that the mere assignment of all sums due in and of itself creates no different or other liability of the owner to the assignee than that which existed from the owner to the assignor.

And note that even though an assignment vests in the assignee all rights, remedies, and contingent benefits which are incidental to the thing assigned, those which are personal to the assignor and for his sole benefit are not assigned. Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc ., 519 N.E.2d 153, 158 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988). Thus, if the underlying agreement provides that a service can only be provided to X, X cannot assign that right to Y.

Novation Compared to Assignment:

Although the difference between a novation and an assignment may appear narrow, it is an essential one. “Novation is a act whereby one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party.” In a novation, a third party successfully substitutes the original party as a party to the contract. “When a contract is novated, the other contracting party must be left in the same position he was in prior to the novation being made.”

A sublease is the transfer when a tenant retains some right of reentry onto the leased premises. However, if the tenant transfers the entire leasehold estate, retaining no right of reentry or other reversionary interest, then the transfer is an assignment. The assignor is normally also removed from liability to the landlord only if the landlord consents or allowed that right in the lease. In a sublease, the original tenant is not released from the obligations of the original lease.

Equitable Assignments:

An equitable assignment is one in which one has a future interest and is not valid at law but valid in a court of equity. In National Bank of Republic v. United Sec. Life Ins. & Trust Co. , 17 App. D.C. 112 (D.C. Cir. 1900), the court held that to constitute an equitable assignment of a chose in action, the following has to occur generally: anything said written or done, in pursuance of an agreement and for valuable consideration, or in consideration of an antecedent debt, to place a chose in action or fund out of the control of the owner, and appropriate it to or in favor of another person, amounts to an equitable assignment. Thus, an agreement, between a debtor and a creditor, that the debt shall be paid out of a specific fund going to the debtor may operate as an equitable assignment.

In Egyptian Navigation Co. v. Baker Invs. Corp. , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30804 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2008), the court stated that an equitable assignment occurs under English law when an assignor, with an intent to transfer his/her right to a chose in action, informs the assignee about the right so transferred.

An executory agreement or a declaration of trust are also equitable assignments if unenforceable as assignments by a court of law but enforceable by a court of equity exercising sound discretion according to the circumstances of the case. Since California combines courts of equity and courts of law, the same court would hear arguments as to whether an equitable assignment had occurred. Quite often, such relief is granted to avoid fraud or unjust enrichment.

Note that obtaining an assignment through fraudulent means invalidates the assignment. Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. It vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments. Walker v. Rich , 79 Cal. App. 139 (Cal. App. 1926). If an assignment is made with the fraudulent intent to delay, hinder, and defraud creditors, then it is void as fraudulent in fact. See our article on Transfers to Defraud Creditors .

But note that the motives that prompted an assignor to make the transfer will be considered as immaterial and will constitute no defense to an action by the assignee, if an assignment is considered as valid in all other respects.

Enforceability of Assignments:

Whether a right under a contract is capable of being transferred is determined by the law of the place where the contract was entered into. The validity and effect of an assignment is determined by the law of the place of assignment. The validity of an assignment of a contractual right is governed by the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the assignment and the parties.

In some jurisdictions, the traditional conflict of laws rules governing assignments has been rejected and the law of the place having the most significant contacts with the assignment applies. In Downs v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co ., 14 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. 1964), a wife and her husband separated and the wife obtained a judgment of separation from the husband in New York. The judgment required the husband to pay a certain yearly sum to the wife. The husband assigned 50 percent of his future salary, wages, and earnings to the wife. The agreement authorized the employer to make such payments to the wife.

After the husband moved from New York, the wife learned that he was employed by an employer in Massachusetts. She sent the proper notice and demanded payment under the agreement. The employer refused and the wife brought an action for enforcement. The court observed that Massachusetts did not prohibit assignment of the husband’s wages. Moreover, Massachusetts law was not controlling because New York had the most significant relationship with the assignment. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the wife.

Therefore, the validity of an assignment is determined by looking to the law of the forum with the most significant relationship to the assignment itself. To determine the applicable law of assignments, the court must look to the law of the state which is most significantly related to the principal issue before it.

Assignment of Contractual Rights:

Generally, the law allows the assignment of a contractual right unless the substitution of rights would materially change the duty of the obligor, materially increase the burden or risk imposed on the obligor by the contract, materially impair the chance of obtaining return performance, or materially reduce the value of the performance to the obligor. Restat 2d of Contracts, § 317(2)(a). This presumes that the underlying agreement is silent on the right to assign.

If the contract specifically precludes assignment, the contractual right is not assignable. Whether a contract is assignable is a matter of contractual intent and one must look to the language used by the parties to discern that intent.

In the absence of an express provision to the contrary, the rights and duties under a bilateral executory contract that does not involve personal skill, trust, or confidence may be assigned without the consent of the other party. But note that an assignment is invalid if it would materially alter the other party’s duties and responsibilities. Once an assignment is effective, the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor and assumes all of assignor’s rights. Hence, after a valid assignment, the assignor’s right to performance is extinguished, transferred to assignee, and the assignee possesses the same rights, benefits, and remedies assignor once possessed. Robert Lamb Hart Planners & Architects v. Evergreen, Ltd. , 787 F. Supp. 753 (S.D. Ohio 1992).

On the other hand, an assignee’s right against the obligor is subject to “all of the limitations of the assignor’s right, all defenses thereto, and all set-offs and counterclaims which would have been available against the assignor had there been no assignment, provided that these defenses and set-offs are based on facts existing at the time of the assignment.” See Robert Lamb , case, above.

The power of the contract to restrict assignment is broad. Usually, contractual provisions that restrict assignment of the contract without the consent of the obligor are valid and enforceable, even when there is statutory authorization for the assignment. The restriction of the power to assign is often ineffective unless the restriction is expressly and precisely stated. Anti-assignment clauses are effective only if they contain clear, unambiguous language of prohibition. Anti-assignment clauses protect only the obligor and do not affect the transaction between the assignee and assignor.

Usually, a prohibition against the assignment of a contract does not prevent an assignment of the right to receive payments due, unless circumstances indicate the contrary. Moreover, the contracting parties cannot, by a mere non-assignment provision, prevent the effectual alienation of the right to money which becomes due under the contract.

A contract provision prohibiting or restricting an assignment may be waived, or a party may so act as to be estopped from objecting to the assignment, such as by effectively ratifying the assignment. The power to void an assignment made in violation of an anti-assignment clause may be waived either before or after the assignment. See our article on Contracts.

Noncompete Clauses and Assignments:

Of critical import to most buyers of businesses is the ability to ensure that key employees of the business being purchased cannot start a competing company. Some states strictly limit such clauses, some do allow them. California does restrict noncompete clauses, only allowing them under certain circumstances. A common question in those states that do allow them is whether such rights can be assigned to a new party, such as the buyer of the buyer.

A covenant not to compete, also called a non-competitive clause, is a formal agreement prohibiting one party from performing similar work or business within a designated area for a specified amount of time. This type of clause is generally included in contracts between employer and employee and contracts between buyer and seller of a business.

Many workers sign a covenant not to compete as part of the paperwork required for employment. It may be a separate document similar to a non-disclosure agreement, or buried within a number of other clauses in a contract. A covenant not to compete is generally legal and enforceable, although there are some exceptions and restrictions.

Whenever a company recruits skilled employees, it invests a significant amount of time and training. For example, it often takes years before a research chemist or a design engineer develops a workable knowledge of a company’s product line, including trade secrets and highly sensitive information. Once an employee gains this knowledge and experience, however, all sorts of things can happen. The employee could work for the company until retirement, accept a better offer from a competing company or start up his or her own business.

A covenant not to compete may cover a number of potential issues between employers and former employees. Many companies spend years developing a local base of customers or clients. It is important that this customer base not fall into the hands of local competitors. When an employee signs a covenant not to compete, he or she usually agrees not to use insider knowledge of the company’s customer base to disadvantage the company. The covenant not to compete often defines a broad geographical area considered off-limits to former employees, possibly tens or hundreds of miles.

Another area of concern covered by a covenant not to compete is a potential ‘brain drain’. Some high-level former employees may seek to recruit others from the same company to create new competition. Retention of employees, especially those with unique skills or proprietary knowledge, is vital for most companies, so a covenant not to compete may spell out definite restrictions on the hiring or recruiting of employees.

A covenant not to compete may also define a specific amount of time before a former employee can seek employment in a similar field. Many companies offer a substantial severance package to make sure former employees are financially solvent until the terms of the covenant not to compete have been met.

Because the use of a covenant not to compete can be controversial, a handful of states, including California, have largely banned this type of contractual language. The legal enforcement of these agreements falls on individual states, and many have sided with the employee during arbitration or litigation. A covenant not to compete must be reasonable and specific, with defined time periods and coverage areas. If the agreement gives the company too much power over former employees or is ambiguous, state courts may declare it to be overbroad and therefore unenforceable. In such case, the employee would be free to pursue any employment opportunity, including working for a direct competitor or starting up a new company of his or her own.

It has been held that an employee’s covenant not to compete is assignable where one business is transferred to another, that a merger does not constitute an assignment of a covenant not to compete, and that a covenant not to compete is enforceable by a successor to the employer where the assignment does not create an added burden of employment or other disadvantage to the employee. However, in some states such as Hawaii, it has also been held that a covenant not to compete is not assignable and under various statutes for various reasons that such covenants are not enforceable against an employee by a successor to the employer. Hawaii v. Gannett Pac. Corp. , 99 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Haw. 1999)

It is vital to obtain the relevant law of the applicable state before drafting or attempting to enforce assignment rights in this particular area.

Conclusion:

In the current business world of fast changing structures, agreements, employees and projects, the ability to assign rights and obligations is essential to allow flexibility and adjustment to new situations. Conversely, the ability to hold a contracting party into the deal may be essential for the future of a party. Thus, the law of assignments and the restriction on same is a critical aspect of every agreement and every structure. This basic provision is often glanced at by the contracting parties, or scribbled into the deal at the last minute but can easily become the most vital part of the transaction.

As an example, one client of ours came into the office outraged that his co venturer on a sizable exporting agreement, who had excellent connections in Brazil, had elected to pursue another venture instead and assigned the agreement to a party unknown to our client and without the business contacts our client considered vital. When we examined the handwritten agreement our client had drafted in a restaurant in Sao Paolo, we discovered there was no restriction on assignment whatsoever…our client had not even considered that right when drafting the agreement after a full day of work.

One choses who one does business with carefully…to ensure that one’s choice remains the party on the other side of the contract, one must master the ability to negotiate proper assignment provisions.

Founded in 1939, our law firm combines the ability to represent clients in domestic or international matters with the personal interaction with clients that is traditional to a long established law firm.

Read more about our firm

© 2024, Stimmel, Stimmel & Roeser, All rights reserved  | Terms of Use | Site by Bay Design

Assignment of Deed

Table of contents, assignment of deed of trust.

An assignment of deed is used to show the deed of a property changing from one party to another, such as when a sale is made. It is used as the written proof to show who has rightful ownership of the property. When someone is purchasing property and decides to sell it before they have paid it off, an assignment of deed form would be used to transfer the rights and everything associated with the property over to the new owner.

When a debtor transfers real estate to a creditor, the  Assignment of Deed  is the legal document used to record this transfer. This happens when a lawsuit is filed on a property owner for a default in payment and the court’s rule in favor of the creditor; this is one example of when the deed of assignment would be put in to use. It’s used to show that the property is being transferred from the ownership of the defendant and given to the plaintiff that won the case and awarded the property.

It’s important to understand what these documents mean as they pertain to public property records as well as  personal background checks  into an individual. This could be exactly the type of information you need to help you gain a better understanding on someone or his or her history. It could also be in your own public background information if someone knows where to look for it.

Public records will always contain the history of who owns real property and the details on that property as it exchanges hands or ownership is passed. Anyone who knows how can access basic information about a deed or its assignments.

When a property owner uses an assignment of deed of trust, they are assigning ownership of the property to someone else and this is a very important document that should be kept in a safe and secure place. There are also public records kept on these types of documents and you should be able to request a copy – sometimes at a fee – should you need one.

The  Assignment of Deed  will also specify the rights the other person will receive along with the deed. As property transfers ownership like this, a recital is usually included as well which shows how many people and the identities of who has owned the property before. This allows you to see how many times the property has transferred hands over the course of its history.

Now that you know more about this particular property document, you will understand it when you use it. Whether you need it for your property or you are searching the  property records  of someone else for some reason, this information will be very beneficial to you.

We know that these types of legal matters can be confusing to the average person and that’s why we strive to make it easier to understand by giving you the basics here. Assignment of deed of trust documents do not have to confuse you anymore.

IMAGES

  1. deed of assignment vs deed of donation

    assignment vs deed

  2. DEED OF ASSIGNMENT.docx

    assignment vs deed

  3. Property Title? Deed? What's the Difference?

    assignment vs deed

  4. Deed of Assignment

    assignment vs deed

  5. What is a Deed of Assignment? Definition and Examples

    assignment vs deed

  6. Deed of Assignment

    assignment vs deed

VIDEO

  1. WHY LAND IS THE THE BEST INVESTMENT

COMMENTS

  1. Assign your property to another with a "Deed of Assignment" -

    Last updated on 16 November 2023. 1. What is a Deed of Assignment? A Deed of Assignment is a contract where the owner (the “assignor”) transfers ownership over property to another person (the “assignee”) by way of assignment. The assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor and assumes all the rights and obligations to the property.

  2. Assignment of Deed of Trust Vs. Deed or Grant Deed

    Assignment of Deed of Trust Vs. Deed or Grant Deed By: Joe Stone A grant deed is used to transfer ownership rights in real estate. More Articles 1. What Is the Difference Between the...

  3. Assignments: The Basic Law

    Basic Law of Contracts. The assignment of a right or obligation is a common contractual event under the law and the right to assign (or prohibition against assignments) is found in the majority of agreements, leases and business structural documents created in the United States.

  4. What's the difference between a mortgage assignment and an ...

    Assignments of Mortgages and Deeds of Trust. An assignment transfers all the original mortgagee's interest under the mortgage or deed of trust to the new bank.

  5. What is an Assignment of Deed & How Does it Work

    Assignment of Deed of Trust. An assignment of deed is used to show the deed of a property changing from one party to another, such as when a sale is made. It is used as the written proof to show who has rightful ownership of the property.