Eurekaselect logo

Current Nutrition & Food Science

Editor-in-Chief: Pau-Loke Show Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Science and Engineering University of Nottingham Malaysia Selangor Malaysia

ISSN (Print): 1573-4013 ISSN (Online): 2212-3881

New Foods, New Consumers: Innovation in Food Product Development

  • Quinta da Alagoa, Estrada de Nelas, Ranhados, 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal.,Portugal

Volume 12, Issue 3, 2016

Page: [175 - 189] Pages: 15

DOI: 10.2174/1573401312666160608120727

research paper on new food product development

Background: Today, new lifestyles, higher incomes and consumer awareness are creating consumer demand for a year-round supply of high-quality, diverse and innovative food products. However, when it comes to innovation, the food sector is less changeable when compared to other sectors, such as high technology. Still, in the past decades much and important developments have been achieved in several areas related to foods and the food industry.

Methods: A systematic review of scientific literature was conducted on Science Direct. The topics investigated were: aspects related to innovation in food development (such as the transfer of innovation, open innovation, collaborative innovation and consumer perception and its role in the developing process); the innovation in the food industry (particularly regarding the processing technologies and packaging, which are two prominent areas of innovation in this sector nowadays); the innovation in the cooking sector (particularly in regards to the molecular gastronomy and science based cooking).

Results: A total of 146 articles were included in the review and the aspects focused allowed confirming that innovation has been recognized as a key driver of economic growth. Within the framework of ‘open innovation’, a number of key issues related to the acquisition of external knowledge in food technology must be taken into consideration. Food product development is highly dependent on the consumer perception and acceptance, and hence it is of utmost importance to include the consumer in the development process to minimize failure probabilities. The sectors of the food industry where important developments and innovation are registered include the processing technologies and the packaging systems, where the latest progresses have produced very significant outcomes.

Conclusion: The present work allowed verifying the latest improvements and trend towards food product development from two perspectives, the product itself and the industrial processing. This sector is undoubtedly a major key for the success and competitiveness nowadays in the food industry.

Keywords: Food innovation , sensory perception , consumer acceptance.

Graphical Abstract

research paper on new food product development

Current Nutrition & Food Science

Title: New Foods, New Consumers: Innovation in Food Product Development

Volume: 12 Issue: 3

Author(s): Raquel P. F. Guiné, Elsa C. D. Ramalhosa and Luísa Paula Valente

Affiliation:

Abstract: Background: Today, new lifestyles, higher incomes and consumer awareness are creating consumer demand for a year-round supply of high-quality, diverse and innovative food products. However, when it comes to innovation, the food sector is less changeable when compared to other sectors, such as high technology. Still, in the past decades much and important developments have been achieved in several areas related to foods and the food industry.

Export Options

About this article.

Cite this article as:

Guiné P. F. Raquel, Ramalhosa C. D. Elsa and Valente Paula Luísa, New Foods, New Consumers: Innovation in Food Product Development, Current Nutrition & Food Science 2016; 12 (3) . https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573401312666160608120727

Related Journals

Current Nutraceuticals

research paper on new food product development

Current Functional Foods

research paper on new food product development

Current Probiotics

research paper on new food product development

Recent Advances in Food, Nutrition & Agriculture

research paper on new food product development

Letters in Functional Foods

Related Books

research paper on new food product development

Functional Foods for Health Maintenance: Understanding their Role in Cancer Prevention

research paper on new food product development

Green Extraction Techniques in Food Analysis

research paper on new food product development

Algal Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals: Benefits, Opportunities, and Challenges

research paper on new food product development

Micronutrients: The Key to Good Health

research paper on new food product development

Capillary Electrophoresis in Food Analysis

research paper on new food product development

  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Journal Insight
  • Current Issue
  • Volumes /Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Graphical Abstracts
  • Fabricating and Stating False Information
  • Research Misconduct
  • Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
  • Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
  • Increase Visibility of Your Article
  • Archiving Policies
  • Peer Review Workflow
  • Order Your Article Before Print
  • Promote Your Article
  • Manuscript Transfer Facility
  • Editorial Policies
  • Allegations from Whistleblowers
  • Announcements
  • Forthcoming Thematic Issues
  • Guest Editor Guidelines
  • Editorial Management
  • Ethical Guidelines for New Editors
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Abstract Ahead of Print 11
  • Article(s) in Press 54
  • Free Online Copy
  • Most Cited Articles
  • Most Accessed Articles
  • Highlighted Article
  • Most Popular Articles
  • Editor's Choice
  • Thematic Issues
  • Open Access Articles
  • Open Access Funding
  • Library Recommendation
  • Trial Requests
  • Advertise With Us
  • Meet the Executive Guest Editor(s)
  • Brand Ambassador
  • Author's Comment & Reviews
  • New Journals 2023
  • New Journals 2024
  • Alert Subscription

Related Articles

Restricted access panel.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List

Logo of foods

Trends of Using Sensory Evaluation in New Product Development in the Food Industry in Countries That Belong to the EIT Regional Innovation Scheme

Katarzyna Świąder.

1 Department of Functional and Organic Food, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW–WULS), 159C Nowoursynowska Street, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland

Magdalena Marczewska

2 Department of Organization and Management Theory, Faculty of Management, University of Warsaw, 1/3 Szturmowa Street, 02-678 Warsaw, Poland; lp.ude.wu.zw@akswezcramm

Associated Data

Data is contained within the article.

Sensory evaluation plays an important role in New Product Development (NPD) in food industry. In the present study, the current trends of using sensory evaluation in NPD in the food industry in countries that belong to EIT Regional Innovation Scheme (RIS) were identified. The research was conducted in the first quarter of 2020. Computer assisted self-interviewing (CASI) technique for survey data collection was used. The sample included 122 respondents representing RIS countries that are the EU Member States and European Horizon 2020 Associated Countries that are classified as modest and moderate innovators according to European Innovation Scoreboard. The analysis presented in the paper allowed to describe the methods of sensory evaluation that can be used to support NPD in the food industry, identify the trends of using sensory evaluation in NPD in the food industry companies in RIS countries. The research results showed that almost 70% of companies apply sensory evaluation methods in NPD. The larger the company, the more often the methods of sensory evaluation are used in NPDs. Almost 60% of companies employing 51–100, 101–1000 and more than 5000 people, respectively declare the use of expert (analytical) test. However, regardless of size, most companies prefer consumer (affective) test to expert tests. Based on the results, it seems that the potential of usage sensory evaluation methods is not yet fully exploited in the food industry.

1. Introduction and Background

One of the basic conditions for the development of the company and its long-term success is its innovation [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Innovative companies are able to respond to the challenges of the world around much faster and more effectively than non-innovative ones [ 1 , 4 ]. Companies, both small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and large corporations, have begun to consider innovation as an integral part of their strategy in order to create a lasting competitive advantage and to adapt the products or services offered to the needs of consumers, which has led to a greater need for teams mainly involved in the development of new products [ 1 ].

New product development (NPD) is “the process of designing a new product, producing it and bringing it to market” [ 5 ]. The definitions of the new product proposed by Fuller [ 6 ] are as follows “A product not previously manufactured by a company and introduced by that company into its marketplace or into a new marketplace” or “The presentation or rebranding by a company of an established product in a new form, a new package or under a new label into a market not previously explored by that company”. NPD is based on customized procedures, models and is supported by appropriate tools; thus, it brings significant benefits in terms of production costs, product quality and supply chain availability, which is crucial for success and business development [ 5 ]. Moreover, it is one of the ways to increase the company’s profitability [ 6 ]. However, we must bear in mind that the success of a new product depends on many factors and in some cases the development of a new product may involve a high risk [ 5 , 7 , 8 ].

There are many different types of new food products on the market, such as line extensions [ 6 , 8 ] (e.g., new flavors for an ice-cream), repositioned existing product [ 6 ] (e.g., oil as one of the main constituents of mayonnaise or vegetable paste), new form or size of existing product [ 6 ] (e.g., instant oatmeal in ready to eat cup), reformulation of existing product [ 6 ] (e.g., sugar-reduced or sugar-free cakes), repackaging of existing product [ 6 ] (e.g., infant food containers changed from glass to squeezed), innovative products [ 6 ] (e.g., the plant-based analogue of tuna meat), creative products [ 6 ] (e.g., 3D printing food). However, one must remember that consumers purchase products regardless of their category, but rather because they meet their needs [ 9 ]. The growing awareness of consumers and their needs for natural, safe and healthy food [ 10 ] as well as consumers preferences for personalized, customized food products have led to diversity in the food market [ 5 ]. These changes led to new food trends such as functional food [ 10 , 11 ] with their healthful properties and nutritional value [ 10 , 12 ], novel food or use of nanotechnology in food sector [ 11 ].

It is not difficult to develop a recipe for a new product, but it is difficult to develop a new product that meets the expectations of the assumed number of consumers and is profitable to sell [ 8 ]. Every manufacturer’s dream is to have their new product on the shelf as soon as possible and to sell it with great success, but the pathway from idea to shelf can be long and winding and leads through different stages of the process of designing new products. New product process proposed by Cooper [ 13 ] assumes the following stages: (1) new product idea; (2) costumer defined, internally defined, idea refined; (3) project formally opened; (4) development; (5) prototyping; (6) field trials; (7) launch. O’Sullivan [ 8 ] presents NPD process from the inception to the shelf divided into the following steps: (1) ideation; (2) project pre-planning; (3) validation of proof of concept; (4) process optimization and up-scaling; (5) commercialization; (6) pre and post-approval and shelf-life testing. The commonly used framework listing the main stages in the NPD process is based on four stages: (1) opportunity identification; (2) product design and development; (3) testing; (4) introduction and launch [ 14 ]. Azanedo [ 5 ] points out, however, that currently in the development of new food products (NFPD), the NPD models used need to be modified in order to better and more effectively support the food industry. Moreover, the study suggests that the most attention should be paid to areas such as meeting consumer demands, consumer preferences and sensory characteristics of products, taking into account the seasonality of ingredients and the traceability and safety of final products, and the large-scale production of food with respect for the environment and the supply and distribution of local ingredients.

In the process of designing food products, it is important to recognize the needs of the customer, direct the designed product towards them, and then communicate and explain the value of this designed product to the consumer [ 9 ]. Consumers buy image, comfort, nutrition, using their senses, sensory sensitivity, they buy sensory properties. That is why sensory methods are an important, integral tool that should be used in NPD process. When designing products, the most important quality feature of a product is its direct relationship to satisfaction, perception and ultimate acceptance by the consumer of the sensory qualities of the product [ 8 , 15 ].

Sensory evaluation and new product development are strongly linked. Sensory analysis methods can be used at many stages of the design process to assess the quality of the product and the expectations of consumers and their reactions to the product. Following the framework indicating the importance of sensory evaluation in NPD [ 5 , 8 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] this empirical research aims to identify the trends of using sensory evaluation in New Product Development in the food industry companies in countries that belong to EIT Regional Innovation Scheme (RIS) by addressing research questions listed below. There are only a few studies tackling application of sensory evaluation methods in food industry companies that focus on general trends and compare the use of sensory evaluation methods between companies of different size and those that value the most diverse stages of the NPD process. Thus, this paper seeks to fill this research gap by addressing the following research questions:

RQ1 What methods of sensory evaluation can be used to support NPD in the food industry?

RQ2 What are the trends of using sensory evaluation in NPD in the food industry companies in countries that belong to EIT Regional Innovation Scheme (RIS)?

RQ3 What sensory evaluation methods are used by companies that tend to value the most a specific stage of the NPD process?

RQ4 What are the differences in applying sensory evaluation methods among companies of different sizes from RIS countries?

The first research question will be answered based on desk research results and literature review, whereas the answers to the questions 2-4 will be based on the results of empirical research.

The article proceeds as follows. First the research background along with the research aims are presented in the introductory part. The next section of the paper is devoted to sensory evaluation methods, their use and importance in NPD process with the focus on food industry. The third part of the paper describes methods used for the analysis, along with data selection and extraction process. It is followed by the presentation of results of a pilot study aimed to identify the trends of using sensory evaluation in New Product Development in the food industry in countries that belong to EIT Regional Innovation Scheme (RIS) and its discussion. The paper ends with concluding remarks and future research directions.

2. Sensory Evaluation in New Product Development

Sensory tests have been used since people began to assess everything that can be used by them and to distinguish between good and bad, from water and food, starting with and ending with weapons and other objects. The increase in trade, on the other hand, has inspired the formal application of sensory testing significantly [ 17 ].

The history of “sensory” analysis also dates back to the wars, when efforts were made to provide the American forces with acceptable food [ 17 ]. The early 1900s gave rise to a professional taster and consultant in emerging industries food, beverages, and cosmetics. The term “organoleptic examination” was then used to describe allegedly objective sensory characteristics. However, these tests were still often subjective rather than objective [ 17 ].

International interest in food and agriculture in the mid-1960s and on into the 1970s, the energy crisis, food production and raw material costs, competition and market internationalization have created opportunities for sensory evaluation [ 22 ]. The course of events has made sensory evaluation a recognized scientific specialty [ 17 , 22 ]. Sensory evaluation is defined as “a scientific discipline used to evoke, measure, analyze and interpret reactions to those characteristics of foods and materials as they are perceived by the senses of sight, smell, taste, touch and hearing” [ 18 , 22 , 23 ]. Sensory evaluation, like other scientific methods in which we take measurements, is based on taking measurements in a precise and accurate way, considering the sensitivity and aiming at avoiding false-positive results [ 24 ]. In order to be considered a reliable method, sensory analysis must be based on the skills of a sensory analyst to optimize definition of the problem (what should be measured) and test design (produce the desired accuracy of results), instrumentation (selected and trained panelists) and interpretation of results [ 17 , 18 ].

When assessing the characteristics of a food product, we first assess its appearance, then its odor, texture/consistency and flavor/taste [ 17 ]. The reaction to a sensory stimulus, on the other hand, can be divided into three different dimensions: qualitative perception, quantitative perception, and hedonic reaction [ 25 ]. In order to obtain that information, we must use analytical or affective methods during the sensory evaluation [ 16 , 17 , 22 , 25 ].

The purpose of analytical tests is to assess in detail the sensory quality of a product, while affective tests are used to measure the acceptability or preference of a product by consumers [ 8 , 25 ]. The basic goal while choosing sensory evaluation methods is to match the right test with the right question that we want to answer. Among the analytical tests ( Table 1 ) that are mainly evaluated by the panel experts, we can use the discrimination test to determine if there are sensory differences or similarities between products, without describing their nature. We can use the Triangle test, Duo-trio test, Two out of five test. As far as the nature of the differences between products is known, we can use a grading test such as paired comparison test, to position different products according to their sensory characteristics. A ranking test can be used to assess noticeable differences between several products depending on the intensity of the difference, and a scoring test may be used to assess the specific intensity of the sensory characteristics of products. In the analytical test, a descriptive test (called sensory profiling) is very often used to describe and evaluate both the intensity and quality of perceived product characteristics, i.e., Quantitative Descriptive Analysis®, Texture Profile® [ 8 , 18 , 22 , 25 , 26 ].

Types of most popular analytical and affective tests used in sensory evaluation.

Source: Own elaboration based on [ 8 , 18 , 22 , 25 , 26 , 27 ].

Apart of above-mentioned methods, there are new one called rapid sensory evaluation methods, that are more flexible, simple and easy to perform and can be used with semi trained assessors or naive assessors such as: flash profiling, ultraflash profiling, ranking test, napping, free sorting, optimized descriptive profiling, ideal profile method, check-all-that-apply, temporal dominance of sensation [ 8 ].

Sensory acceptance of the product by the consumer, its hedonic reaction, can be assessed using an affective test ( Table 1 ). This may be a paired comparison test, in which the consumer chooses the sample he or she prefers or likes most from two or more, or a ranking test, in which the consumer rank the product according to his or her preferences, whereas in order to determine the scale of preference among the products or the degree of pleasure/liking the product gives, a hedonic scoring test with scales can be used [ 22 , 25 , 27 ]. An example of a qualitative affective sensory test is the focus group, a rapid method to test the product and packaging concepts and ideas [ 8 ].

Sensory evaluation of a product, including both the analytical sensory evaluation carried out by a panel of experts and the affective test carried out on consumers, allows to obtain more information about the product being analyzed, its quality and to verify factors influencing its acceptability by consumers, which facilitates work on improving the quality of the product or its reformulation [ 10 ].

It is quite common practice in food companies to use inappropriate sensory analysis methods for specific research purposes [ 8 ].

Both affective tests and analytical (expert) sensory tests can be use on each step of new product development ( Table 2 ). During ideation, the initial project planning and validation of proof-of-concept affective test, such as focus groups, can be used, but also methods such as free elicitation, information acceleration (IA), Kelly repertory grid, laddering, lead user technique and Zaltman metaphor elicitation technique (ZMET) are recommended. The stage where both the affective test and the sensory test can be applied is process optimization and up-scaling, where the sensory acceptance test (affective test) can be applied, as well as the analytical test: a descriptive test such as the Quantitative Descriptive Analysis® and a rapid test such as the Ranking Descriptive Analysis. A very important aspect during the commercialization of a product is to carry out sensory Acceptance Tests. Carrying out Consumer Tests is also very important during pre- and post-approval tests and product durability tests [ 8 ].

Use of sensory evaluation methods on each step of new product development.

IA *, information acceleration; ZMET, Zaltman metaphor elicitation technique; QDA ® , Quantitative Descriptive Analysis; RDA, Ranking Descriptive Analysis. Source: Own elaboration based on [ 8 ].

Besides new product development, sensory evaluation can also be used in other product development activities, such as product prototype evaluation [ 8 , 28 ]; product concept fit [ 8 , 28 ]; pilot plant scale-up; cost reduction study by substituting or modifying ingredients [ 28 ]; process change [ 29 , 30 ]; ingredients changes for example caused by reduction of salt [ 20 , 21 , 31 ], sugar [ 21 , 32 , 33 ], or fat [ 21 , 31 ] or purchase specifications change [ 19 ] as well as product improvement and optimization of product formula [ 34 , 35 ].

Moreover, sensory evaluation methods are used to supports marketing and marketing research activities [ 19 , 28 ], beginning with new product development and assessment of market potential, continuing through tracking product performance, and contributing to special assignments such as developing tests. They can be used in sensory marketing as data to support or challenge advertising claims [ 36 ]. Sensory marketing defined as “ marketing that engages the senses of consumers and influences their perception, judgement and behavior” examines how acoustic, tactile and olfactory sensory stimuli influence decision making processes and the formation of consumer attitudes and can thus be used for advertising design and effectiveness [ 36 ].

Sensory evaluation is also used to compare the quality of competing products [ 37 ]. Consumer test can be used to define the most important characteristics of food affecting purchasing decisions, identify preferences and to know consumers when purchasing food products [ 12 , 37 ].

Sensory evaluation methods can be used in several food industry departments; however, they are mainly used for quality control and product research and development (R&D) in big companies [ 17 , 19 ] so their potential is not yet fully exploited in the food industry.

Sensory evaluation methods can be used for shelf-life assessment of food products [ 38 , 39 , 40 ] and new technologic that can extend product durability and quality such as pulsed electric fields [ 29 , 30 ]. Changes in the sensory characteristics of food products affect the determination of their shelf-life, and the freshness of a product’s safety and quality are characteristics to which consumers are now paying increasing attention [ 40 ].

Expert tests such as sensory descriptive analysis and consumer test can be well used to investigate exotic, authentic, ethnic, or artisanal foods [ 23 ] such as green tea [ 41 , 42 ], soy sauce [ 43 , 44 ], kimchi [ 45 , 46 ], tofu [ 47 , 48 ], dates [ 49 , 50 ] as well as innovative one such as tea-infused yoghurts [ 10 ] or plant-based yogurts made from almond, cashew, coconut, hemp or soy [ 51 ].

There are many possible ways to apply sensory evaluation in NPD in the food industry. Companies can use analytical and affective (hedonic) sensory tests and choose from a variety of sensory methods that can be used at different stages of the NPD process and allow the different characteristics of food products to be studied and consumer reactions to these products and their expectations.

3. Materials and Methods

The study was conducted as a part of the project “Summer school on the New Product Development for the food industry” (2020 edition) financed by the EIT Food under Horizon2020, which aimed to address contemporary challenges related to NPD in the food industry. The research was carried out as a pilot study (part of the project) to identify the trends of using sensory evaluation in New Product Development in the food industry in countries that belong to EIT Regional Innovation Scheme (RIS); thus, the research sample was composed of respondents representing these countries. The EIT’s Innovation Communities are strengthening the innovation ecosystem in parts of Central, Eastern and Southern Europe and have been set up to increase the number and business maturity of start-ups coming from these regions [ 52 ].

The EIT RIS countries are the EU Member States and European Horizon 2020 Associated Countries who are classified as modest and moderate innovators according to European Innovation Scoreboard [ 53 ]. These are Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain, as well as Albania, Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Faroe Islands, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia, Turkey and Ukraine. Modest and moderate innovators show an innovation performance below the EU average. Since NPD is one of the dimensions of countries’ innovation performance, it seems important to analyze it, especially in the context of countries which are not best performers, in order to identify the ways to boost its development, as well as explore and design new potential pathways to support it.

The data used in this research were collected through computer assisted self-interviewing (CASI). This technique allows to collect data from respondents who complete the survey questionnaire via computer without any external assistance. The use of such research method is based on the assumption that respondents can read and understand the questions well enough to give precise answers [ 54 ]. The questionnaires were conducted in the first quarter of 2020, before the CODIV-19 pandemic.

The sample included 122 respondents representing RIS countries. All participants have agreed to participate in the study and received a link to the questionnaire for them only. If respondents provided their questionnaires with missing/unreliable data, they were excluded from the sample analyzed ( n = 8).

The respondents were employed in companies from the food industry and performed various jobs related to NPD. Most of them were food technologists, project/program managers or C-level executives. The characteristics of the respondents are presented in ( Table 3 ). Respondents differ in gender, age and length of professional experience in the food sector.

The characteristics of the respondents ( n = 122).

* number of respondents. ** STEM, Science, Technology, Engineering and Math; STEAM, Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math.

The respondents were employees of food industry companies of various sizes, where SMEs constituted almost three quarters of the sample. Further, almost 40% of the sample were micro enterprises with fewer than 10 employees and around 20% represented small enterprises. Table 4 presents details on sample characteristics.

Sample characteristics ( n = 122).

** AL, Albania; BG, Bulgaria; CZ, Czech Republic; EE, Estonia; ES, Spain; GE, Georgia; GR, Greece; HR, Croatia; HU, Hungary; IT, Italy; LT, Lithuania; LV, Latvia; ME, Montenegro; PL, Poland; PT, Portugal; RO, Romania; RS, Serbia; SI, Slovenia; SK, Slovakia; TR, Turkey; UA, Ukraine. * Number of respondents.

The questionnaire was composed of questions of different types, i.e., single-choice questions and open-ended questions. Most of the questions had already defined answers to choose from; however, in many cases, there was space left for participants to write additional comments. The questionnaire used in the study was related to various aspects of NPD and sensory analysis, including average length of NPD project, most important stages of NPD, application of sensory evaluation in NPD, sensory methods used in NPD, use of consumer tests to verify consumer preferences or acceptance for the developed product and use of expert tests performed by a panel of trained experts to determine the quality of products. The obtained data were analyzed considering the sample of companies from RIS countries in general, and also taking into account the specificity of companies of different sizes and comparing the importance of a specific stage of NPD and its impact on the use of sensory evaluation. Sample survey questions and answers are presented in ( Table 5 ).

Sample survey questions and answers.

* STEM, Science, Technology, Engineering and Math; STEAM, Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math; CEO, chief executive officer, CTO, chief technical officer, QA, Quality Assurance.

4. Results and Discussion

On the basis of the studies carried out, it is worth pointing out that the NPD projects in the analyzed food sector companies are relatively short ( Table 6 ), i.e., 34.4% of the companies claim that they manage to develop and introduce an entire project within a year, and 41.8% need less than 2 years to complete it. The companies argue that due to market dynamics and growth they have to act fast in order to be competitive.

Average length of New Product Development (NPD) project.

* Number of respondents.

One of the main factors influencing product development is the speed with which the product is placed on the market. If this process took too long, the research previously carried out may no longer correspond to reality, e.g., demographic consumer segments initially identified as potential buyers and optimistic users may have changed their minds about wanting to buy the product [ 8 ]. Moreover, because the development of a new product may involve a high risk [ 5 , 7 , 8 ] it is worth running the NPD process relatively fast.

According to Dijksterhuis [ 55 ], 50 to 75% of newly developed products placed on the market are disposed of, which is far from the assumed financial targets. More than 90% (some say it is even 98%) of all NPDs in the food and drink industry fail, while the remaining 10% (or rather 2%) have been extremely successful, and the final prize is huge [ 8 ]. The main research problem behind the high failure rate of new products is the lack of understanding of consumers’ motivation and choice. Therefore, the research on consumer behavior should be used more effectively to address this problem [ 55 ].

Sensory evaluation seems to be an important element of NPD in RIS countries. 67.2% of analyzed companies claim to apply sensory evaluation methods while working on new products.

Sensory food science is a discipline that is increasingly used and needed in order to better understand the factors influencing consumer preferences. Sensory evaluation is an essential tool for use by the food industry now and in the future, when, due to social and industrial needs that are consumer-oriented, their use will increase in the future [ 18 ].

There are differences in applying sensory evaluation among companies from RIS countries, which value the most different stages of NPD. It is not surprising that the use of consumer assessment tests, expert tests and other sensory evaluation methods is most common among companies, which see “sensory quality of the product and its acceptability by consumers” as the most important stage of NPD process ( Table 7 ). However, “developing a product recipe, selection and safety of raw materials, its health-promoting properties” is seen as crucial in the NPD process by more than one fourth of the researched companies and within this group sensory evaluation, along with consumer assessment and expert tests are also seen as valuable. Table 7 presents the use of various sensory evaluation methods by companies that tend to value the most a specific stage of the NPD process. E.g., 74.4% of companies that see as the most important stage of NPD “developing a product recipe, selection and safety of raw materials, its health-promoting properties” apply sensory evaluation in NPD, 66.7% use consumer tests, and 46.2% use expert tests. This means that there are some companies that use both types of tests, and other focus only on one specific test.

Most important stages of NPD and use of sensory evaluation.

In theory, sensory analysis is applied at many stages of new product development. Affective tests, e.g., focus group, can be used at the product concept stage, while from the assessment of a prototype, affective methods such as examining product preference or acceptability can be used. Analytical research, e.g., discrimination tests, can be used to optimize the product, e.g., nutritional optimization of the product related to the reduction or exchange of sucrose in the product. However, to determine the quality of the product prototype and the differences between the variants, it is worth using Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA®). In order to obtain more complete information about the product, descriptive analysis can be carried out in parallel with sensory affective analysis and consumer testing and instrumental measurements. Before a product is placed on the market, Multivariate Data Analysis (MVA) can be used to correlate sensory descriptive analysis with factors affecting the consumer [ 8 ].

There are three most popular sensory methods used in NPD in the food sector in RIS countries ( Figure 1 ), and discrimination test is the most popular one (37.8%). However, companies usually use more than one method in order to verify, compare and combine the results of sensory methods used.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is foods-10-00446-g001.jpg

Sensory methods used in NPD.

The discriminatory test is a powerful sensory evaluation method in terms of its sensitivity, which provides reliable and important results that, because of its effectiveness, have saved companies a considerable amount of time, money and effort [ 22 ].

Sensory methods can be used at many stages of the NPD, so it is important to use them at many stages, but you can see that discriminatory methods are most often used, and the use of methods depends on the purpose of the research.

Companies from the sample tend to value consumers opinions. Of the companies, 63.1% use consumer tests (affective tests) to verify consumer acceptance or preferences for the developed product. Interestingly, the average number of consumer test participants differs significantly between the companies form the sample. On the one hand, almost 33% of companies collect information from a small number of consumers, i.e., ≤30. On the other hand, over 33% conduct consumer assessment on relatively big samples of more than 100 consumers ( Figure 2 ). As confirmed by other researchers, consumer acceptance testing can be used during the product development and optimization based on 25–75 individuals, while a large number of consumers (more than 100) is used in consumer tests before product lunch [ 8 ].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is foods-10-00446-g002.jpg

Average number of consumer test participants.

Interest in consumer (hedonic) research in both basic psychophysics and applied and consumer food research has increased significantly in recent years. Research on the identification of differences in the hedonic response to chemical stimuli has become the basis for a better understanding of the role of sensory, perceptual, cognitive and genetic factors influencing consumer food preferences and choice. Now that the consumer market has become more crowded and competitive, applied product research is not only investigating which products are more popular with consumers than others, but it has become more important than ever to discover the basic segmentation of consumers [ 56 ].

Compared to other types of sensory evaluation methods, expert tests performed by a panel of trained experts to determine the quality of products seem to be rather unpopular among companies representing food industry companies from RIS countries. Only 42.6% of these companies perform expert tests. There are several primary reasons mentioned by the food industry companies from RIS countries why such tests are not popular. First, these companies do not employ such experts and are not willing to outsource such service. Second, these companies have no knowledge or experience in this field, thus prefering to use other, better known methods of sensory evaluation. Third, the sensory quality of products is assessed by company owners, management board or employees and friends. Among secondary reasons for not using such tests, companies list high expenses and lack of need. However, looking at the answers given by the companies from the sample, along with additional justifications, it seems that companies representing the food industry in RIS countries do not have sufficient knowledge in the field to use expert tests.

The use of sensory evaluation methods differs among companies of various sizes from RIS countries. In general, the bigger the company, the more popular and used sensory evaluation methods in NPD ( Table 8 ). Most of the companies, regardless of size, prefer consumer assessment tests over expert tests. However, almost 60% of companies employing 51–100, 101–1000 and above 5000, respectively, declare to use expert tests. These results seem to confirm the research results presented by other authors stating that the bigger the company, the wider knowledge and application of sensory evaluation methods.

Use of sensory evaluation in companies from RIS countries by company size.

Consumer assessment tests run by companies of different sizes vary in average number of consumer test participants. Almost 60% of companies employing 1–10 employees run these tests on the sample of ≤30 consumers. Companies employing 11–50 and 51–100 employees prefer samples of 31–50 or more than 100 consumers; more than 40% of companies employing 101–1000 people conduct these tests with more than 100 consumers, whereas 33.3% of those employing 1001–5000 run tests on the samples of ≤30 and more than 100 consumers, respectively. Not surprisingly, almost 82% of the biggest companies tend to research more than 100 consumers at a time.

When it comes to specific sensory methods used in NPD by companies of different sizes, consumer acceptance tests are the most popular among those employing 1–10 and 1001–5000 employees, whereas discrimination tests are more widely used by those employing 11–50, 101–1000 and above 5000 people.

Sensory evaluation is beginning to be applied in many food companies, and research results of other authors also confirm that its adoption depends, among others, on the size of the company [ 19 ]. For example, in the case of large companies such as Puleva Biotech S.A., Spain, sensory testing is carried out daily in several departments, i.e., quality control, research and development and marketing. In the case of small companies, the situation is completely different. Small companies do not have the structure, personnel and/or qualifications to carry out sensory research, although they are aware of its existence and effectiveness. Medium-sized companies try to include sensory evaluation as one of the modern tools to improve their efficiency and thus their income [ 19 ].

All in all, sensory food research can contribute to understanding consumer response to emerging trends in food production, processing and consumption. In order to make better use of sensory research, it is necessary to allow access to appropriate university training programmes, funding for fundamental research and multidisciplinary cooperation [ 18 ].

5. Conclusions

The analysis presented above, based on desk research and CASI, allowed to answer the research questions (RQ) outlined in the introductory part of the paper.

Thereby RQ1 allowed to describe the methods of sensory evaluation that can be used to support NPD in the food industry. Companies can benefit from the many achievements of the scientific discipline of sensory evaluation, and they can use analytical and affective sensory tests. They have many different sensory methods at their disposal, which can be used at different stages of the NPD process, from the idea and conception of the product to its launch and subsequent approval, which allows them to assess both the quality of the product and the factors influencing consumers and their purchasing decisions.

RQ2 addressed the trends of using sensory evaluation in NPD in the food industry companies in RIS countries. The research results showed that almost 70% of companies apply sensory evaluation methods in NPD; however, among them there are the following three most popular ones: discrimination test, descriptive analysis and consumer test. Moreover, the companies generally value consumers opinions and more than 63% of them uses consumer assessment tests to verify the match between the products they offer and expectations of consumers. Nevertheless, looking at the answers given by the companies from the sample, along with their additional justifications, it seems that companies representing food industry in RIS countries do not have sufficient knowledge in the field to use expert tests, which may lead to the use of unsuitable methods of sensory analysis to achieve the research objectives set companies.

RQ3 was aimed at identifying sensory evaluation methods that are used by companies, which mostly tend to value a specific stage of the NPD process. First, it allowed to identify that more than one fourth of the companies from the sample see “developing a product recipe, selection and safety of raw materials, its health-promoting properties” as the most important stage of the NPD process, almost one fifth values the most “creating a new product, idea”, whereas around 10%, respectively, treat “ensuring the safety of produced food” and “sensory quality of the product and its acceptability by consumers” as highly important. Second, the analysis allowed to link specific sensory methods used with companies valuing different staged of NPD. Almost 82% of companies that value the most “sensory quality of the product and its acceptability by consumers” apply sensory evaluation methods in NPD; 73% use consumer assessment tests, and 64% use expert tests. The knowledge of sensory evaluation methods and their application is really high in this group of companies, compared to the whole sample. Among other groups of companies identified based on the stage of NPD process they value, 70% of companies focused on “creating a new product, idea” use consumer assessment tests and 67% of those focused on “developing a product recipe, selection and safety of raw materials, its health-promoting properties”. The knowledge and application of different sensory evaluation methods is diverse among companies representing different groups; however, interestingly, companies focused on “obtaining funds/grants” and “product distribution” seem to disregard expert tests.

RQ4 allowed to characterize the differences in applying sensory evaluation methods among companies of different sizes from RIS countries. Sensory evaluation is increasingly being used in many food companies, and the use of these methods depends to a large extent on the size of the company. Among the companies analyzed in the RIS countries, it can be seen that the larger the company, the more often the methods of sensory evaluation are used in NPDs. Almost 60% of companies employing 51–100, 101–1000 and more than 5000 people, respectively, declare the use of expert (analytical) test. However, regardless of size, most companies prefer consumer (affective) test to expert tests. Consumer tests are most popular among companies with 1–10 and 1001–5000 employees, while discrimination tests included in analytical test are more frequently used by companies with 11–50, 101–1000 and over 5000 employees.

All in all, it seems that the potential of usage sensory evaluation methods is not yet fully exploited in the food industry. Since this pilot study has been carried out on a sample including many countries from a specific group (RIS countries), a further study is planned to analyze a specific group of companies from selected RIS countries in order to take a closer look at specific sensory analysis methods used in the development of selected food products.

Drawing on research results presented above, future research directions in investigating the importance of sensory evaluation in NPD in the food industry may also include the following topics: focus on analytical test or affective test, one sensory method, one method and one country only; focus on SMEs from specific branch of food industry in RIS countries and/or comparison with other countries; focus on size and experience of food industry in RIS countries; focus on specific stage of NPD and the use of sensory evaluation.

Acknowledgments

The research presented in the paper has been conducted as a part of the project ID 20228 that has received funding from EIT Food, the European Knowledge and Innovation Community (KIC) on Food, as part of Horizon 2020.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design, K.Ś., M.M.; methodology, K.Ś., M.M.; performed research, K.Ś., M.M.; analyzed the data, K.Ś., M.M.; interpreted the data, K.Ś., M.M.; writing, K.Ś., M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding from the Rector of WULS-SGGW as part of the system of financial support for scientists and teams.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, new food product development: strategies for success.

British Food Journal

ISSN : 0007-070X

Article publication date: 1 October 2001

This paper seeks to evaluate the ideas of six new product development (NPD) theorists and their associates. These include those who have developed their theories with particular reference to the food industry and the development of new food products. Their ideas are contrasted with non‐food specific theorists; these include those interested in the management of new products and those involved in marketing who have recognised the important role that NPD plays in any business. A further viewpoint is taken from theorists who are interested in NPD per se and who use food, on occasions, to illustrate their ideas. This research identifies different theories and recognises that there is very little consensus as to the right and wrong way to manage the process of product development. Indeed theorists name and number their various stages or phases differently with some advocating five while others believe eight steps to be more appropriate. This research concludes that an organisation should not be tied to one particular model but should take on board the basic fundamentals of a food‐based model (theory) and adapt and amend it to their particular situations as and when they develop new food products.

  • New product development
  • Food industry

Rudder, A. , Ainsworth, P. and Holgate, D. (2001), "New food product development: strategies for success?", British Food Journal , Vol. 103 No. 9, pp. 657-671. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700110407012

Copyright © 2001, MCB UP Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

Logo for Iowa State University Digital Press

1 Introduction to Food Product Development

To start, let’s think about what product development is:.

  • How new things show up in the grocery store or in foodservice
  • The process of creating, processing, and commercializing a new food product
  • The process generally takes a group of people from different disciplines working together to develop (or improve) a product.

Product Development Key Stages

Formulation, commercialization.

At each stage, or even within the stages, there are checkpoints to decide to continue or stop the project. This can be done through a Stage and Gate System like the example shown here or it can be done in a modified system. The principle is the same, though, to develop new products strategically and use time and resources wisely.

Stages include Ideation, Formulation, Processing and Communication. Gates include New Product Concept Check, Market Check, Feasibility Check, and Competitive Product Check and Decision to Launch. From there the product is launched and the results are evaluated

Typically this Stage and Gate process works like a funnel. You may start with 12 to 15 ideas and then research and evaluate those ideas. Some ideas will get discarded because you will find the product concept already exists. Others will get discarded because the ingredients or processing will cost more than what consumers are willing to pay (based on products in the relevant category). Some ideas will seem great, but will be too niche and will not have a large enough target audience to be successful. Once the ideas have been narrowed down, the best 3 to 5 ideas may be moved to the Formulation stage. In this stage, the product will be made on a small scale and consumer testing will be done to confirm interest. Then products will go through the second gate to determine which products have enough consumer interest to continue. During the Processing stage, 2 to 3 products are scaled up on larger equipment. This helps determine production costs and efficiency. Food safety and quality testing also are done to determine how to produce a safe and consistent product. Shelf-life testing is conducted at the end of the Processing stage to make sure the product will remain at an acceptable and safe quality long enough for the product to made, shipped, purchased, and consumed. The third gate evaluates production, food safety, quality, and shelf life to decide which products can actually be made efficiently and consistently. The Commercialization stage includes work to get the product ready to sell on the grocery store shelves. Typically this includes the final costing, additional consumer sensory testing, and package design. The final gate makes sure that no errors or significant drawbacks have been missed before the product is launched. Through the Stage and Gate process, 12 to 15 ideas may get narrowed down to 1 or 2 products. The Stage and Gate process allows many ideas to be considered efficiently. The more viable the idea, the more time and work is needed. When an obstacle is found at a gate, no more time or resources are committed to that idea.

Each company may work through the stages of product development a bit differently depending on resources, timelines, and product types being developed. In a product development course, a product is likely developed from start to finish, so more market, consumer, and product research will need to be done during the ideation stage to catch significant drawbacks.

Often the most difficult part of product development is coming up with the initial idea. Many food products exist in the marketplace, so coming up with a new food product that does not exist and consumers are interested in buying can be a challenge. It is best to simply jump in and start generating ideas. From there, concepts can be refined and narrowed down. Ideas can come from a variety of sources. Some ideas are for a brand-new product and some are for a line extension of an existing product. Once ideas have been generated, it is important to identify the target customer. Trends are followed closely to determine what is new and upcoming. Trends often spark ideas for new products. Trends change over time, so it is difficult to list current examples, but convenience products, comfort foods, and plant-based foods have been trending over the last few years. 

Some issues with ideation include regional vs. global preferences and market size vs. target market. Flavors that are commonly known and liked in the Midwest may not sell well in other parts of the country. Consumers outside of the Midwest may not like those flavors or may simply be unfamiliar with the flavors. If your target market is a small part of a product category and the product category itself is small, there may not be a large enough market share for your product. It also can be a challenge to realize that just because you like something, many others may not. We tend to develop products we like, but sometimes you may have to develop a product for a target audience that does not include you.

  • Procure ingredients and make them into a product on a small laboratory scale
  • Produce a “gold standard” of the new product
  • Sourcing ingredients and ingredient costs
  • Product shelf life (often not tested in formulation, but needs to be considered early in the process)
  • Can the product really be made on a large scale?
  • Avoid Patent and Copyright infringement
  • The formulated product process is “scaled up” to produce greater volumes
  • Pilot plant testing
  • Plant testing
  • There are always product changes with scale-up.
  • Quality & Proximate Analysis testing done to set specifications, determine food safety concerns, and estimate shelf life
  • Processing experiments and runs allow a more accurate product cost to be determined (include processing efficiency, rework used, etc.).

Processing Key Questions:

  • Sensory Attributes
  • Nutritional Profile
  • Product Specifications
  • Overall Functionality
  • Once the new product has been made successfully, it is sent to commercialization to launch the new product into the store for sale.
  • determining packaging
  • creating a label (logo, nutrition facts, etc.)
  • finalizing costs
  • developing advertising and/or literature for the product

Commercialization Key Questions:

  • How should the product be positioned for the best sales?
  • What attributes do you highlight?
  • Where does it go in the grocery store (should consider this throughout the development process)?
  • What effect will the distribution system have on product quality?

After the launch of a new product:

  • Determine if the new product was successful.
  • Growing interest, increase in sales
  • Market share
  • Company sales revenue

Key Team Members

It takes many roles to develop a new food product. A product development team can be very successful with all members contributing an expertise. The challenge is communicating effectively to make sure everyone is on the same page with the status and goals of the project. Key team members include product development, engineering, production, purchasing, quality, regulatory, marketing, sales, and upper management. Their typical roles are laid out below.

Product Developers

  • In charge of developing new products, especially in terms of the hands-on testing and managing the development process
  • May be the Team Leader
  • Formulate Product
  • Determine Sensory Attributes
  • Run Shelf Life Testing
  • Know Food Safety Concerns
  • Test the Process
  • Consider Nutrition
  • Calculate Costs (may need input from others)

Engineering and Production

  • Equipment Design and Maintenance
  • Process Controls
  • Production Costs (line speeds, overhead cost)
  • Employee Training
  • Consumer Safety
  • Consumer Handling
  • Ensures consumer expectations are met
  • Sensory and Quality attributes are tested to make sure the product meets specifications
  • HACCP and Preventative Controls plus Prerequisite Programs
  • Microbiology Testing
  • Foreign Material Testing
  • Process Checks
  • Incoming ingredient and packaging safety checks
  • Makes sure the new product is legal and safe
  • Coordinates a Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) dossier if necessary (typically for ingredient development)
  • Product Name
  • Standard of Identity
  • Nutrition Labeling
  • Product Codes

Marketing & Sales

  • Defines product market and positioning
  • Confirms consumer need for a new product through surveys and consumer data
  • Develops advertising strategy
  • Monitors competitor’s sales and new product introductions
  • Helps design product packaging, especially tied to attracting the target audience
  • Has input on the product name

Challenges of Product Development

  • Just because you think it is a good idea, does not mean everyone else does.
  • Sometimes things just do not work like they are supposed to (scale-up changes product characteristics, shelf life is not long enough, low consumer acceptance, etc.)
  • Ingredient sourcing and costs
  • Processing and equipment limitations
  • Area of Expertise
  • Goals and Objectives
  • Ability to understand other disciplines
  • Can be overlap or gaps in functions depending on company structure

Timeline for new product development

  • A line extension for an already existing product
  • Example: A new flavor of a popular soda
  • A new product, but still can be made on existing equipment
  • Example: A new type of cereal
  • A brand new product – could be hard to make or new equipment may need to be designed/purchased.
  • Examples: co-extruded snacks and plant-based meat alternatives
  • Developing a new ingredient often takes longer than developing a finished food product because there are more regulatory and sales hurdles involved. 

Recap on the Product Development Process

  • Product Development is the process of creating, processing, and commercializing a new product.
  • New products need to be of interest to a target market.
  • The timeline can range from 3 months to 3 years.
  • Product development teams are made up of members with a variety of backgrounds.

Product Development Scope

It is important to be able to ideate openly & creatively.  However, ask yourself, “Does the product already exist?” and “What are our company’s new idea limitations?”. Below are common limitations for product development courses:

  • Avoid mixes, line extensions, and assembly products.
  • Avoid expensive ingredients or be ready to discuss how to pay for them.
  • Typically a course does not have an alcohol license.
  • CBD oil is not yet legal in food items in some states.
  • Processing equipment availability needs to be considered for your new product idea.

Food Product Development Lab Manual Copyright © 2021 by Kate Gilbert and Ken Prusa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

research paper on new food product development

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

  •  We're Hiring!
  •  Help Center

Food New Product Development

  • Most Cited Papers
  • Most Downloaded Papers
  • Newest Papers
  • Save to Library
  • Detection of Adulteration Follow Following
  • Analytical Techniques Follow Following
  • Functional Food Follow Following
  • Functional Foods Follow Following
  • Food Science Follow Following
  • Food Science and Technology Follow Following
  • Casein Follow Following
  • Nutrition Follow Following
  • Instrumentation Follow Following
  • Food and Nutrition Follow Following

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • Academia.edu Publishing
  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

Book cover

National Congress of Commodity Science

AISME 2022: Innovation, Quality and Sustainability for a Resilient Circular Economy pp 129–136 Cite as

The ILCIDAF Project for the Development of an Italian Database of Life Cycle Inventory of Agri-food Products: The Wheat Milling Phase

  • Bruno Notarnicola 12 ,
  • Giuseppe Tassielli 12 ,
  • Pietro A. Renzulli 12 ,
  • Rosa Di Capua 12 &
  • Francesco Astuto 12  
  • Conference paper
  • First Online: 24 February 2024

Part of the Circular Economy and Sustainability book series (CES)

The project “Italian Life Cycle Inventory Database of Agri-Food Products” (ILCIDAF), funded by the Ministry of University and Research, aims to promote the sustainability of the agri-food sector through the development of an Italian database for some important food chains in our country (bread and pasta, wine, olive oil, and citrus fruits). The research project is being developed by four scientific units: the University of Bari, Chieti-Pescara, Messina, and Reggio Calabria. The database is constructed considering the entire supply chain of the indicated foodstuffs. In particular, in this work, the milling activities of durum and soft wheat are analysed, and the construction of datasets related to the production phase of durum and soft wheat flour is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Bevilacqua M, Braglia M, Carmignani G et al (2007) Life cycle assessment of pasta production in Italy. J Food Qual 30(6):932–952

Article   Google Scholar  

Camara-Salim I, Almeida-Garcia F, Gonzalez-Garcia S et al (2020) Life cycle assessment of autochthonous varieties of wheat and artisanal bread production in Galicia, Spain. Sci Total Environ 713:136720

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Chiriaco MV, Grossi G, Castaldi S et al (2017) The contribution to climate change of the organic versus conventional wheat farming: a case study on the carbon footprint of wholemeal bread production in Italy. J Clean Prod 153:309–319

Comino E, Dominici L, Perozzi D (2021) Do-it-yourself approach applied to the valorization of a wheat milling industry’s byproduct for producing biobased material. J Clean Prod 318:128267

Ingrao C, Licciardello F, Pecorino B et al (2018) Energy and environmental assessment of a traditional durum-wheat bread. J Clean Prod 171:1494–1509

Kulak M, Nemecek T, Frossard E et al (2015) Life cycle assessment of bread from several alternative food networks in Europe. J Clean Prod 90:104–113

Lo Guidice AL, Clasadonte MT, Matarazzo A (2011) LCI preliminary results in the Sicilian durum wheat pasta chain production. J Commod Sci Technol Qual 50(1):65–79

Google Scholar  

Notarnicola B, Nicoletti GM (2001) Life cycle assessment of pasta and couscous. Tecnica Molitoria (Italy)

Notarnicola B, Nicoletti GM, Tassielli G et al (2004) Environmental input–output analysis and hybrid approaches to improve the setup of the pasta life cycle inventory. J Commodity Sci 43:1000–1028

Notarnicola B, Tassielli G, Renzulli PA et al (2022) Life cycle inventory data for the italian agri-food sector: background, sources and methodological aspects. Int J Life Cycle Assess:1–16

Parenti O, Guerrini L, Zanoni B (2020) Techniques and technologies for the breadmaking process with unrefined wheat flours. Trends Food Sci Technol 99:152–166

Seget S, Costa M, Barilli E et al (2020) Substituting wheat with chickpea flour in pasta production delivers more nutrition at a lower environmental cost. Sustain Prod Consum 24:26–38

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Ionian Department of Law, Economics and Environmen, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Taranto, Italy

Bruno Notarnicola, Giuseppe Tassielli, Pietro A. Renzulli, Rosa Di Capua & Francesco Astuto

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Notarnicola .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Economics, Management and Business Law, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy

Giovanni Lagioia

Annarita Paiano

Vera Amicarelli

Teodoro Gallucci

Carlo Ingrao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., Renzulli, P.A., Di Capua, R., Astuto, F. (2024). The ILCIDAF Project for the Development of an Italian Database of Life Cycle Inventory of Agri-food Products: The Wheat Milling Phase. In: Lagioia, G., Paiano, A., Amicarelli, V., Gallucci, T., Ingrao, C. (eds) Innovation, Quality and Sustainability for a Resilient Circular Economy. AISME 2022. Circular Economy and Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28292-8_17

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28292-8_17

Published : 24 February 2024

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-28291-1

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-28292-8

eBook Packages : Earth and Environmental Science Earth and Environmental Science (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Publish with us

Policies and ethics

  • Find a journal
  • Track your research
  • International edition
  • Australia edition
  • Europe edition

Person wearing backpack shops in supermarket

New study reveals diet link to PFAS ‘forever chemicals’ in human body

US research shows foods such as butter and processed meat likely to increase levels of toxic PFAS in blood over time

Diets rich in foods such as processed meat and butter likely increase levels of toxic PFAS “forever chemicals” in human blood over time, new peer-reviewed research has found.

The paper identified a range of foods to be among the drivers of high PFAS levels, including teas, pork, candy, sports drinks, processed meat, butter, chips and bottled water. The research also pointed to higher PFAS blood levels among those who consumed more carryout or food prepared at restaurants.

“The main takeaway is not to demonize certain foods or say, ‘Oh my gosh, this food is so unhealthy,” said Hailey Hampson, a University of Southern California doctoral student and the study’s lead author. “The point is to highlight that we need more testing of these foods, and this gives us an avenue to say, “OK, these foods may have higher levels of PFAS so we should do more targeted monitoring of them.’”

PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a class of about 15,000 chemicals often used to make products resistant to water, stains and heat. They are called “forever chemicals” because they do not naturally break down, and they are linked to cancer, liver problems, thyroid issues, birth defects, kidney disease, decreased immunity and other serious health problems.

Although exposure via water has drawn the most regulatory attention, there is scientific consensus that contaminated food largely represents the biggest threat to human health.

The US Food and Drug Administration tests food for PFAS annually and has reported very little contamination. But the agency has faced criticism from independent scientists who say its testing methodologies are flawed, and designed to make it appear as if food is less contaminated than it really is.

Among the main sources of food contamination are tainted water, greaseproof food wrappers , some plastics , pesticides, or farms where PFAS-tainted sewage sludge is spread as fertilizer.

The study looked at two cohorts with a combined total of over 700 people. For one group, the authors checked dietary consumption and PFAS levels over a four-year period.

Among evidence of food packaging contamination was the finding that burritos, fajitas, tacos, French fries and pizza made at home were associated with lower PFAS concentrations. But those who ate the same dishes prepared at restaurants typically showed increased PFAS concentrations in their blood.

“It’s really interesting to find that these foods that are maybe not so healthy, when they’re cooked at home were a lower source of PFAS, and that definitely points to food packaging,” Hampson said.

The research also found butter likely increased PFAS levels. Though consumption of nuts was associated with lower levels of the chemicals in blood, nut butter showed higher levels. Butter is often wrapped in greaseproof paper, Hampson noted, though the contamination could also stem from cows or processing.

Higher PFAS levels in blood associated with higher bottled water consumption also may point to contaminated packaging, or contamination of the water source. And the authors suspect the link between tea and high PFAS levels may largely stem from tea bags treated with the chemicals, though more research is needed.

Processed meats across the board seemed to boost PFAS blood levels. Hampson said the finding was unsurprising because processing opens numerous entry points for the chemicals, though non-processed cuts of pork also showed a strong association. That suggests the pigs are likely contaminated.

Those who consumed higher levels of sugar, fruit drinks and soda typically showed lower levels of PFAS, which the authors said caught them by surprise. They hypothesize that young adults who made up one of their cohorts drink higher levels of soda and fruit drinks, which may generally be less contaminated with PFAS than tap or bottled water.

The association was one of several in which unhealthy foods appeared to protect people from PFAS contamination, while some healthy foods seemed to drive up PFAS levels.

“We need more public health monitoring, especially of healthy foods, to make sure we don’t have unintended chemical exposures in what we know are foods that are healthy in a lot of other ways,” said Jesse Goodrich, a USC researcher and study co-author.

Most viewed

  • Newsletters

OpenAI teases an amazing new generative video model called Sora

The firm is sharing Sora with a small group of safety testers but the rest of us will have to wait to learn more.

  • Will Douglas Heaven archive page

OpenAI has built a striking new generative video model called Sora that can take a short text description and turn it into a detailed, high-definition film clip up to a minute long.

Based on four sample videos that OpenAI shared with MIT Technology Review ahead of today’s announcement, the San Francisco–based firm has pushed the envelope of what’s possible with text-to-video generation (a hot new research direction that we flagged as a trend to watch in 2024 ).

“We think building models that can understand video, and understand all these very complex interactions of our world, is an important step for all future AI systems,” says Tim Brooks, a scientist at OpenAI.

But there’s a disclaimer. OpenAI gave us a preview of Sora (which means sky in Japanese) under conditions of strict secrecy. In an unusual move, the firm would only share information about Sora if we agreed to wait until after news of the model was made public to seek the opinions of outside experts. [Editor’s note: We’ve updated this story with outside comment below.] OpenAI has not yet released a technical report or demonstrated the model actually working. And it says it won’t be releasing Sora anytime soon. [ Update: OpenAI has now shared more technical details on its website.]

The first generative models that could produce video from snippets of text appeared in late 2022. But early examples from Meta , Google, and a startup called Runway were glitchy and grainy. Since then, the tech has been getting better fast. Runway’s gen-2 model, released last year, can produce short clips that come close to matching big-studio animation in their quality. But most of these examples are still only a few seconds long.  

The sample videos from OpenAI’s Sora are high-definition and full of detail. OpenAI also says it can generate videos up to a minute long. One video of a Tokyo street scene shows that Sora has learned how objects fit together in 3D: the camera swoops into the scene to follow a couple as they walk past a row of shops.

OpenAI also claims that Sora handles occlusion well. One problem with existing models is that they can fail to keep track of objects when they drop out of view. For example, if a truck passes in front of a street sign, the sign might not reappear afterward.  

In a video of a papercraft underwater scene, Sora has added what look like cuts between different pieces of footage, and the model has maintained a consistent style between them.

It’s not perfect. In the Tokyo video, cars to the left look smaller than the people walking beside them. They also pop in and out between the tree branches. “There’s definitely some work to be done in terms of long-term coherence,” says Brooks. “For example, if someone goes out of view for a long time, they won’t come back. The model kind of forgets that they were supposed to be there.”

Impressive as they are, the sample videos shown here were no doubt cherry-picked to show Sora at its best. Without more information, it is hard to know how representative they are of the model’s typical output.   

It may be some time before we find out. OpenAI’s announcement of Sora today is a tech tease, and the company says it has no current plans to release it to the public. Instead, OpenAI will today begin sharing the model with third-party safety testers for the first time.

In particular, the firm is worried about the potential misuses of fake but photorealistic video . “We’re being careful about deployment here and making sure we have all our bases covered before we put this in the hands of the general public,” says Aditya Ramesh, a scientist at OpenAI, who created the firm’s text-to-image model DALL-E .

But OpenAI is eyeing a product launch sometime in the future. As well as safety testers, the company is also sharing the model with a select group of video makers and artists to get feedback on how to make Sora as useful as possible to creative professionals. “The other goal is to show everyone what is on the horizon, to give a preview of what these models will be capable of,” says Ramesh.

To build Sora, the team adapted the tech behind DALL-E 3, the latest version of OpenAI’s flagship text-to-image model. Like most text-to-image models, DALL-E 3 uses what’s known as a diffusion model. These are trained to turn a fuzz of random pixels into a picture.

Sora takes this approach and applies it to videos rather than still images. But the researchers also added another technique to the mix. Unlike DALL-E or most other generative video models, Sora combines its diffusion model with a type of neural network called a transformer.

Transformers are great at processing long sequences of data, like words. That has made them the special sauce inside large language models like OpenAI’s GPT-4 and Google DeepMind’s Gemini . But videos are not made of words. Instead, the researchers had to find a way to cut videos into chunks that could be treated as if they were. The approach they came up with was to dice videos up across both space and time. “It’s like if you were to have a stack of all the video frames and you cut little cubes from it,” says Brooks.

The transformer inside Sora can then process these chunks of video data in much the same way that the transformer inside a large language model processes words in a block of text. The researchers say that this let them train Sora on many more types of video than other text-to-video models, varied in terms of resolution, duration, aspect ratio, and orientation. “It really helps the model,” says Brooks. “That is something that we’re not aware of any existing work on.”

“From a technical perspective it seems like a very significant leap forward,” says Sam Gregory, executive director at Witness, a human rights organization that specializes in the use and misuse of video technology. “But there are two sides to the coin,” he says. “The expressive capabilities offer the potential for many more people to be storytellers using video. And there are also real potential avenues for misuse.” 

OpenAI is well aware of the risks that come with a generative video model. We are already seeing the large-scale misuse of deepfake images . Photorealistic video takes this to another level.

Gregory notes that you could use technology like this to misinform people about conflict zones or protests. The range of styles is also interesting, he says. If you could generate shaky footage that looked like something shot with a phone, it would come across as more authentic.

The tech is not there yet, but generative video has gone from zero to Sora in just 18 months. “We’re going to be entering a universe where there will be fully synthetic content, human-generated content and a mix of the two,” says Gregory.

The OpenAI team plans to draw on the safety testing it did last year for DALL-E 3. Sora already includes a filter that runs on all prompts sent to the model that will block requests for violent, sexual, or hateful images, as well as images of known people. Another filter will look at frames of generated videos and block material that violates OpenAI’s safety policies.

OpenAI says it is also adapting a fake-image detector developed for DALL-E 3 to use with Sora. And the company will embed industry-standard C2PA tags , metadata that states how an image was generated, into all of Sora’s output. But these steps are far from foolproof. Fake-image detectors are hit-or-miss. Metadata is easy to remove, and most social media sites strip it from uploaded images by default.  

“We’ll definitely need to get more feedback and learn more about the types of risks that need to be addressed with video before it would make sense for us to release this,” says Ramesh.

Brooks agrees. “Part of the reason that we’re talking about this research now is so that we can start getting the input that we need to do the work necessary to figure out how it could be safely deployed,” he says.

Update 2/15: Comments from Sam Gregory were added .

Artificial intelligence

Ai for everything: 10 breakthrough technologies 2024.

Generative AI tools like ChatGPT reached mass adoption in record time, and reset the course of an entire industry.

What’s next for AI in 2024

Our writers look at the four hot trends to watch out for this year

  • Melissa Heikkilä archive page

Google’s Gemini is now in everything. Here’s how you can try it out.

Gmail, Docs, and more will now come with Gemini baked in. But Europeans will have to wait before they can download the app.

Deploying high-performance, energy-efficient AI

Investments into downsized infrastructure can help enterprises reap the benefits of AI while mitigating energy consumption, says corporate VP and GM of data center platform engineering and architecture at Intel, Zane Ball.

  • MIT Technology Review Insights archive page

Stay connected

Get the latest updates from mit technology review.

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at [email protected] with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) An Integrated Approach to New Food Product Development

    research paper on new food product development

  2. Food Product Development Lab Manual

    research paper on new food product development

  3. Food Product Development PowerPoint and Google Slides Template

    research paper on new food product development

  4. Preview Our FREE Webinar on Practical Food Product Development Basics

    research paper on new food product development

  5. (PDF) An Overview of Current Challenges in New Food Product Development

    research paper on new food product development

  6. (PDF) Sensory optimisation in new food product development: A case

    research paper on new food product development

VIDEO

  1. New Lajawab Guess Paper

  2. From Concept to Successful Commercialisation of Products and Projects :An Engineer’s Journal

  3. Food Science & Technology CDE

  4. POTATO LASAGNA FOOD PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (ZAS ENTERPRISE)

  5. Project file on Improvement in food resources #project #science #study 📚✏#school

  6. Ethical Consideration in Food Product Development

COMMENTS

  1. (PDF) New Food Product Development

    Food product development is a continuous process that is of great concern to producers, because of the fact that tomorrow's consumers needs are changing with time and they may not want the...

  2. (Pdf) New Foods, New Consumers: Innovation in Food Product Development

    The topics investigated were: aspects related to innovation in food development (such as the transfer of innovation, open innovation, collaborative innovation and consumer perception and its...

  3. 1190 PDFs

    Irina Romanova Explore the latest full-text research PDFs, articles, conference papers, preprints and more on FOOD PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. Find methods information, sources, references or...

  4. Accelerating New Food Product Design and Development

    Accelerating New Food Product Design and Development The IFT Press series reflects the mission of the Institute of Food Technologists—advancing the science and technology of food through the exchange of knowledge.

  5. The Link between the Consumer and the Innovations in Food Product

    1. Introduction Today's manufacturing companies rely much on the success of new products, and this has become critical for a healthy business performance, having in mind the present competitive and fast shifting markets [ 1, 2 ].

  6. Embedding sustainability analysis in new food product development

    1. Introduction. The food sector is crucial in modern societies because it produces food products (FPs) and makes them available to consumers. The food sector is also key to achieving several of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) established in 2015 by the United Nations, principally Zero Hunger (SDG 2), Good Health and Well-Being (SDG 3), Responsible Production and Consumption (SDG 12 ...

  7. An Overview of Current Challenges in New Food Product Development

    New product development (NPD) is essential for business success and growth. High- to medium-technology manufacturing sectors have introduced standard models.

  8. PDF An overview of current challenges in new food product development

    New product development (NPD) is the process of designing a new product, producing it and bringing it to market. Most new food products, particularly those produced by small- and medium-sized enterprises, are developed based on company-specific NPD procedures or models adapted from other sectors [2-4].

  9. Innovation in Healthy and Sustainable Food Product Development for

    Innovation in Healthy and Sustainable Food Product Development for Health and Aged Care: A Scoping Review by Judi Porter 1,*, Nathan Cook 1, Ranil Coorey 2, Don Gunasekera 3, Martin Hensher 4, Deborah A. Kerr 5, Christina M. Pollard 5, Serene Yoong 6, Gary Dykes 7 and Mark Lawrence 1 1

  10. New Foods, New Consumers: Innovation in Food Product Development

    The topics investigated were: aspects related to innovation in food development (such as the transfer of innovation, open innovation, collaborative innovation and consumer perception and its role in the developing process); the innovation in the food industry (particularly regarding the processing technologies and packaging, which are two promi...

  11. Development of food products

    This review summarises studies performed within the last 3 years, focusing on possibilities of various sources, such as fruits, vegetables, dairy, meat, fish, coffee production, as well as new alternative ingredients insects, algae, grass and microorganisms. Finally, consumer perception and legal status are shortly addressed.

  12. Sensory Analysis and Consumer Research in New Product Development

    Sensory Analysis and Consumer Research in New Product Development - PMC Journal List Foods PMC8001375 As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

  13. An Overview of Current Challenges in New Food Product Development

    Several research papers related to new product development (NPD) employed qualitative approaches [14] [15] [16]. However, most new product development (NPD) approaches have mainly...

  14. 2. Sensory Evaluation in New Product Development

    Sensory evaluation plays an important role in New Product Development (NPD) in food industry. In the present study, the current trends of using sensory evaluation in NPD in the food industry in countries that belong to EIT Regional Innovation Scheme (RIS) were identified. The research was conducted in the first quarter of 2020.

  15. New food product development: strategies for success?

    This paper seeks to evaluate the ideas of six new product development (NPD) theorists and their associates. ... These include those who have developed their theories with particular reference to the food industry and the development of new food products. Their ideas are contrasted with non‐food specific theorists; these include those ...

  16. The Link between the Consumer and the Innovations in Food Product

    New lifestyles, higher incomes and better consumer awareness are increasing the demand for a year-round supply of innovative food products. In past decades, important developments have been achieved in areas related to food and the food industry. This review shows that factors influencing performance in new product development (NPD) are dynamic and continuously guiding project development.

  17. Food Formulation and Product Development

    Food formulation strategies are key for the product development process. Food formulation is critical in developing new food products along with rising consumer demand for products with key health and nutritional properties.

  18. Introduction to Food Product Development

    1 Introduction to Food Product Development To start, let's think about what product development is: How new things show up in the grocery store or in foodservice The process of creating, processing, and commercializing a new food product

  19. Food New Product Development Research Papers

    •With over a million organized small scale bakeries and more than 2000 organized or semi-managed bakeries, they are facing many challenges in the Food product development in industries •Food research lab explains you the challenges in bakery products produced in this blog 1. New Age Demands 2. Cleanliness 3. Hygienic Maintenance 4.

  20. PDF Development of A Food Product Concept Formulation Framework for Low

    design parameters for the framework. The food industry (n = 17) indicated affordability, nutrient content, taste and product quality as the food product attributes of most importance during food product development, indicating a discrepancy.

  21. foods The Link between the Consumer and the Innovations in Food Product

    Foods 2020,9, 1317 5 of 22. At present, innovation practices in the food industry rely very strongly on the voice of the. consumer, recognized as vital for success. Hence, strategies to develop a ...

  22. New Concepts in Functional Food Product Development

    New Concepts in Functional Food Product Development share announcement New Concepts in Functional Food Product Development Abstract submission deadline closed (30 July 2023) Manuscript submission deadline closed (30 September 2023) Viewed by 5811 Topic Information Dear Colleagues,

  23. The role of food industries in sustainability transition: a review

    The global food industry is crucial in promoting sustainability, contributing to environmental degradation but also driving positive change. This review paper explores the significance, methodologies and recent research of food industries in promoting sustainability. The food industry faces sustainability challenges due to climate change, resource depletion, food security and health concerns ...

  24. The ILCIDAF Project for the Development of an Italian ...

    The Project of Relevant National Interest titled "Promoting Agri Food Sustainability: Development of an Italian Life Cycle Inventory Database of Agri-Food Products" (ILCIDAF) aims to build a database dedicated to the Italian agri-food sector (Notarnicola et al., ()).The database is structured in such a way as to describe all phases of a food production chain: the agricultural phase of ...

  25. New study reveals diet link to PFAS 'forever chemicals' in human body

    The paper identified a range of foods to be among the drivers of high PFAS levels, including teas, pork, candy, sports drinks, processed meat, butter, chips and bottled water. The research also ...

  26. (PDF) FOOD PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AS OPPORTUNITY FOR ...

    The aim of this paper was to give an overview of up-to-date papers covering sensory evaluation and consumer preference research that can form a basis for user-oriented food product...

  27. OpenAI teases an amazing new generative video model called Sora

    OpenAI has built a striking new generative video model called Sora that can take a short text description and turn it into a detailed, high-definition film clip up to a minute long.. Based on four ...