logo

  • assignments basic law

Assignments: The Basic Law

The assignment of a right or obligation is a common contractual event under the law and the right to assign (or prohibition against assignments) is found in the majority of agreements, leases and business structural documents created in the United States.

As with many terms commonly used, people are familiar with the term but often are not aware or fully aware of what the terms entail. The concept of assignment of rights and obligations is one of those simple concepts with wide ranging ramifications in the contractual and business context and the law imposes severe restrictions on the validity and effect of assignment in many instances. Clear contractual provisions concerning assignments and rights should be in every document and structure created and this article will outline why such drafting is essential for the creation of appropriate and effective contracts and structures.

The reader should first read the article on Limited Liability Entities in the United States and Contracts since the information in those articles will be assumed in this article.

Basic Definitions and Concepts:

An assignment is the transfer of rights held by one party called the “assignor” to another party called the “assignee.” The legal nature of the assignment and the contractual terms of the agreement between the parties determines some additional rights and liabilities that accompany the assignment. The assignment of rights under a contract usually completely transfers the rights to the assignee to receive the benefits accruing under the contract. Ordinarily, the term assignment is limited to the transfer of rights that are intangible, like contractual rights and rights connected with property. Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court , 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950).

An assignment will generally be permitted under the law unless there is an express prohibition against assignment in the underlying contract or lease. Where assignments are permitted, the assignor need not consult the other party to the contract but may merely assign the rights at that time. However, an assignment cannot have any adverse effect on the duties of the other party to the contract, nor can it diminish the chance of the other party receiving complete performance. The assignor normally remains liable unless there is an agreement to the contrary by the other party to the contract.

The effect of a valid assignment is to remove privity between the assignor and the obligor and create privity between the obligor and the assignee. Privity is usually defined as a direct and immediate contractual relationship. See Merchants case above.

Further, for the assignment to be effective in most jurisdictions, it must occur in the present. One does not normally assign a future right; the assignment vests immediate rights and obligations.

No specific language is required to create an assignment so long as the assignor makes clear his/her intent to assign identified contractual rights to the assignee. Since expensive litigation can erupt from ambiguous or vague language, obtaining the correct verbiage is vital. An agreement must manifest the intent to transfer rights and can either be oral or in writing and the rights assigned must be certain.

Note that an assignment of an interest is the transfer of some identifiable property, claim, or right from the assignor to the assignee. The assignment operates to transfer to the assignee all of the rights, title, or interest of the assignor in the thing assigned. A transfer of all rights, title, and interests conveys everything that the assignor owned in the thing assigned and the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor. Knott v. McDonald’s Corp ., 985 F. Supp. 1222 (N.D. Cal. 1997)

The parties must intend to effectuate an assignment at the time of the transfer, although no particular language or procedure is necessary. As long ago as the case of National Reserve Co. v. Metropolitan Trust Co ., 17 Cal. 2d 827 (Cal. 1941), the court held that in determining what rights or interests pass under an assignment, the intention of the parties as manifested in the instrument is controlling.

The intent of the parties to an assignment is a question of fact to be derived not only from the instrument executed by the parties but also from the surrounding circumstances. When there is no writing to evidence the intention to transfer some identifiable property, claim, or right, it is necessary to scrutinize the surrounding circumstances and parties’ acts to ascertain their intentions. Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998)

The general rule applicable to assignments of choses in action is that an assignment, unless there is a contract to the contrary, carries with it all securities held by the assignor as collateral to the claim and all rights incidental thereto and vests in the assignee the equitable title to such collateral securities and incidental rights. An unqualified assignment of a contract or chose in action, however, with no indication of the intent of the parties, vests in the assignee the assigned contract or chose and all rights and remedies incidental thereto.

More examples: In Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs ., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998), the court held that the assignee of a party to a subordination agreement is entitled to the benefits and is subject to the burdens of the agreement. In Florida E. C. R. Co. v. Eno , 99 Fla. 887 (Fla. 1930), the court held that the mere assignment of all sums due in and of itself creates no different or other liability of the owner to the assignee than that which existed from the owner to the assignor.

And note that even though an assignment vests in the assignee all rights, remedies, and contingent benefits which are incidental to the thing assigned, those which are personal to the assignor and for his sole benefit are not assigned. Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc ., 519 N.E.2d 153, 158 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988). Thus, if the underlying agreement provides that a service can only be provided to X, X cannot assign that right to Y.

Novation Compared to Assignment:

Although the difference between a novation and an assignment may appear narrow, it is an essential one. “Novation is a act whereby one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party.” In a novation, a third party successfully substitutes the original party as a party to the contract. “When a contract is novated, the other contracting party must be left in the same position he was in prior to the novation being made.”

A sublease is the transfer when a tenant retains some right of reentry onto the leased premises. However, if the tenant transfers the entire leasehold estate, retaining no right of reentry or other reversionary interest, then the transfer is an assignment. The assignor is normally also removed from liability to the landlord only if the landlord consents or allowed that right in the lease. In a sublease, the original tenant is not released from the obligations of the original lease.

Equitable Assignments:

An equitable assignment is one in which one has a future interest and is not valid at law but valid in a court of equity. In National Bank of Republic v. United Sec. Life Ins. & Trust Co. , 17 App. D.C. 112 (D.C. Cir. 1900), the court held that to constitute an equitable assignment of a chose in action, the following has to occur generally: anything said written or done, in pursuance of an agreement and for valuable consideration, or in consideration of an antecedent debt, to place a chose in action or fund out of the control of the owner, and appropriate it to or in favor of another person, amounts to an equitable assignment. Thus, an agreement, between a debtor and a creditor, that the debt shall be paid out of a specific fund going to the debtor may operate as an equitable assignment.

In Egyptian Navigation Co. v. Baker Invs. Corp. , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30804 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2008), the court stated that an equitable assignment occurs under English law when an assignor, with an intent to transfer his/her right to a chose in action, informs the assignee about the right so transferred.

An executory agreement or a declaration of trust are also equitable assignments if unenforceable as assignments by a court of law but enforceable by a court of equity exercising sound discretion according to the circumstances of the case. Since California combines courts of equity and courts of law, the same court would hear arguments as to whether an equitable assignment had occurred. Quite often, such relief is granted to avoid fraud or unjust enrichment.

Note that obtaining an assignment through fraudulent means invalidates the assignment. Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. It vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments. Walker v. Rich , 79 Cal. App. 139 (Cal. App. 1926). If an assignment is made with the fraudulent intent to delay, hinder, and defraud creditors, then it is void as fraudulent in fact. See our article on Transfers to Defraud Creditors .

But note that the motives that prompted an assignor to make the transfer will be considered as immaterial and will constitute no defense to an action by the assignee, if an assignment is considered as valid in all other respects.

Enforceability of Assignments:

Whether a right under a contract is capable of being transferred is determined by the law of the place where the contract was entered into. The validity and effect of an assignment is determined by the law of the place of assignment. The validity of an assignment of a contractual right is governed by the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the assignment and the parties.

In some jurisdictions, the traditional conflict of laws rules governing assignments has been rejected and the law of the place having the most significant contacts with the assignment applies. In Downs v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co ., 14 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. 1964), a wife and her husband separated and the wife obtained a judgment of separation from the husband in New York. The judgment required the husband to pay a certain yearly sum to the wife. The husband assigned 50 percent of his future salary, wages, and earnings to the wife. The agreement authorized the employer to make such payments to the wife.

After the husband moved from New York, the wife learned that he was employed by an employer in Massachusetts. She sent the proper notice and demanded payment under the agreement. The employer refused and the wife brought an action for enforcement. The court observed that Massachusetts did not prohibit assignment of the husband’s wages. Moreover, Massachusetts law was not controlling because New York had the most significant relationship with the assignment. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the wife.

Therefore, the validity of an assignment is determined by looking to the law of the forum with the most significant relationship to the assignment itself. To determine the applicable law of assignments, the court must look to the law of the state which is most significantly related to the principal issue before it.

Assignment of Contractual Rights:

Generally, the law allows the assignment of a contractual right unless the substitution of rights would materially change the duty of the obligor, materially increase the burden or risk imposed on the obligor by the contract, materially impair the chance of obtaining return performance, or materially reduce the value of the performance to the obligor. Restat 2d of Contracts, § 317(2)(a). This presumes that the underlying agreement is silent on the right to assign.

If the contract specifically precludes assignment, the contractual right is not assignable. Whether a contract is assignable is a matter of contractual intent and one must look to the language used by the parties to discern that intent.

In the absence of an express provision to the contrary, the rights and duties under a bilateral executory contract that does not involve personal skill, trust, or confidence may be assigned without the consent of the other party. But note that an assignment is invalid if it would materially alter the other party’s duties and responsibilities. Once an assignment is effective, the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor and assumes all of assignor’s rights. Hence, after a valid assignment, the assignor’s right to performance is extinguished, transferred to assignee, and the assignee possesses the same rights, benefits, and remedies assignor once possessed. Robert Lamb Hart Planners & Architects v. Evergreen, Ltd. , 787 F. Supp. 753 (S.D. Ohio 1992).

On the other hand, an assignee’s right against the obligor is subject to “all of the limitations of the assignor’s right, all defenses thereto, and all set-offs and counterclaims which would have been available against the assignor had there been no assignment, provided that these defenses and set-offs are based on facts existing at the time of the assignment.” See Robert Lamb , case, above.

The power of the contract to restrict assignment is broad. Usually, contractual provisions that restrict assignment of the contract without the consent of the obligor are valid and enforceable, even when there is statutory authorization for the assignment. The restriction of the power to assign is often ineffective unless the restriction is expressly and precisely stated. Anti-assignment clauses are effective only if they contain clear, unambiguous language of prohibition. Anti-assignment clauses protect only the obligor and do not affect the transaction between the assignee and assignor.

Usually, a prohibition against the assignment of a contract does not prevent an assignment of the right to receive payments due, unless circumstances indicate the contrary. Moreover, the contracting parties cannot, by a mere non-assignment provision, prevent the effectual alienation of the right to money which becomes due under the contract.

A contract provision prohibiting or restricting an assignment may be waived, or a party may so act as to be estopped from objecting to the assignment, such as by effectively ratifying the assignment. The power to void an assignment made in violation of an anti-assignment clause may be waived either before or after the assignment. See our article on Contracts.

Noncompete Clauses and Assignments:

Of critical import to most buyers of businesses is the ability to ensure that key employees of the business being purchased cannot start a competing company. Some states strictly limit such clauses, some do allow them. California does restrict noncompete clauses, only allowing them under certain circumstances. A common question in those states that do allow them is whether such rights can be assigned to a new party, such as the buyer of the buyer.

A covenant not to compete, also called a non-competitive clause, is a formal agreement prohibiting one party from performing similar work or business within a designated area for a specified amount of time. This type of clause is generally included in contracts between employer and employee and contracts between buyer and seller of a business.

Many workers sign a covenant not to compete as part of the paperwork required for employment. It may be a separate document similar to a non-disclosure agreement, or buried within a number of other clauses in a contract. A covenant not to compete is generally legal and enforceable, although there are some exceptions and restrictions.

Whenever a company recruits skilled employees, it invests a significant amount of time and training. For example, it often takes years before a research chemist or a design engineer develops a workable knowledge of a company’s product line, including trade secrets and highly sensitive information. Once an employee gains this knowledge and experience, however, all sorts of things can happen. The employee could work for the company until retirement, accept a better offer from a competing company or start up his or her own business.

A covenant not to compete may cover a number of potential issues between employers and former employees. Many companies spend years developing a local base of customers or clients. It is important that this customer base not fall into the hands of local competitors. When an employee signs a covenant not to compete, he or she usually agrees not to use insider knowledge of the company’s customer base to disadvantage the company. The covenant not to compete often defines a broad geographical area considered off-limits to former employees, possibly tens or hundreds of miles.

Another area of concern covered by a covenant not to compete is a potential ‘brain drain’. Some high-level former employees may seek to recruit others from the same company to create new competition. Retention of employees, especially those with unique skills or proprietary knowledge, is vital for most companies, so a covenant not to compete may spell out definite restrictions on the hiring or recruiting of employees.

A covenant not to compete may also define a specific amount of time before a former employee can seek employment in a similar field. Many companies offer a substantial severance package to make sure former employees are financially solvent until the terms of the covenant not to compete have been met.

Because the use of a covenant not to compete can be controversial, a handful of states, including California, have largely banned this type of contractual language. The legal enforcement of these agreements falls on individual states, and many have sided with the employee during arbitration or litigation. A covenant not to compete must be reasonable and specific, with defined time periods and coverage areas. If the agreement gives the company too much power over former employees or is ambiguous, state courts may declare it to be overbroad and therefore unenforceable. In such case, the employee would be free to pursue any employment opportunity, including working for a direct competitor or starting up a new company of his or her own.

It has been held that an employee’s covenant not to compete is assignable where one business is transferred to another, that a merger does not constitute an assignment of a covenant not to compete, and that a covenant not to compete is enforceable by a successor to the employer where the assignment does not create an added burden of employment or other disadvantage to the employee. However, in some states such as Hawaii, it has also been held that a covenant not to compete is not assignable and under various statutes for various reasons that such covenants are not enforceable against an employee by a successor to the employer. Hawaii v. Gannett Pac. Corp. , 99 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Haw. 1999)

It is vital to obtain the relevant law of the applicable state before drafting or attempting to enforce assignment rights in this particular area.

Conclusion:

In the current business world of fast changing structures, agreements, employees and projects, the ability to assign rights and obligations is essential to allow flexibility and adjustment to new situations. Conversely, the ability to hold a contracting party into the deal may be essential for the future of a party. Thus, the law of assignments and the restriction on same is a critical aspect of every agreement and every structure. This basic provision is often glanced at by the contracting parties, or scribbled into the deal at the last minute but can easily become the most vital part of the transaction.

As an example, one client of ours came into the office outraged that his co venturer on a sizable exporting agreement, who had excellent connections in Brazil, had elected to pursue another venture instead and assigned the agreement to a party unknown to our client and without the business contacts our client considered vital. When we examined the handwritten agreement our client had drafted in a restaurant in Sao Paolo, we discovered there was no restriction on assignment whatsoever…our client had not even considered that right when drafting the agreement after a full day of work.

One choses who one does business with carefully…to ensure that one’s choice remains the party on the other side of the contract, one must master the ability to negotiate proper assignment provisions.

Founded in 1939, our law firm combines the ability to represent clients in domestic or international matters with the personal interaction with clients that is traditional to a long established law firm.

Read more about our firm

© 2024, Stimmel, Stimmel & Roeser, All rights reserved  | Terms of Use | Site by Bay Design

Assignment of Contract

Jump to section, what is an assignment of contract.

An assignment of contract is a legal term that describes the process that occurs when the original party (assignor) transfers their rights and obligations under their contract to a third party (assignee). When an assignment of contract happens, the original party is relieved of their contractual duties, and their role is replaced by the approved incoming party.

How Does Assignment of Contract Work?

An assignment of contract is simpler than you might think.

The process starts with an existing contract party who wishes to transfer their contractual obligations to a new party.

When this occurs, the existing contract party must first confirm that an assignment of contract is permissible under the legally binding agreement . Some contracts prohibit assignments of contract altogether, and some require the other parties of the agreement to agree to the transfer. However, the general rule is that contracts are freely assignable unless there is an explicit provision that says otherwise.

In other cases, some contracts allow an assignment of contract without any formal notification to other contract parties. If this is the case, once the existing contract party decides to reassign his duties, he must create a “Letter of Assignment ” to notify any other contract signers of the change.

The Letter of Assignment must include details about who is to take over the contractual obligations of the exiting party and when the transfer will take place. If the assignment is valid, the assignor is not required to obtain the consent or signature of the other parties to the original contract for the valid assignment to take place.

Check out this article to learn more about how assigning a contract works.

Contract Assignment Examples

Contract assignments are great tools for contract parties to use when they wish to transfer their commitments to a third party. Here are some examples of contract assignments to help you better understand them:

Anna signs a contract with a local trash company that entitles her to have her trash picked up twice a week. A year later, the trash company transferred her contract to a new trash service provider. This contract assignment effectively makes Anna’s contract now with the new service provider.

Hasina enters a contract with a national phone company for cell phone service. The company goes into bankruptcy and needs to close its doors but decides to transfer all current contracts to another provider who agrees to honor the same rates and level of service. The contract assignment is completed, and Hasina now has a contract with the new phone company as a result.

Here is an article where you can find out more about contract assignments.

can you assign a contract in part

Assignment of Contract in Real Estate

Assignment of contract is also used in real estate to make money without going the well-known routes of buying and flipping houses. When real estate LLC investors use an assignment of contract, they can make money off properties without ever actually buying them by instead opting to transfer real estate contracts .

This process is called real estate wholesaling.

Real Estate Wholesaling

Real estate wholesaling consists of locating deals on houses that you don’t plan to buy but instead plan to enter a contract to reassign the house to another buyer and pocket the profit.

The process is simple: real estate wholesalers negotiate purchase contracts with sellers. Then, they present these contracts to buyers who pay them an assignment fee for transferring the contract.

This process works because a real estate purchase agreement does not come with the obligation to buy a property. Instead, it sets forth certain purchasing parameters that must be fulfilled by the buyer of the property. In a nutshell, whoever signs the purchase contract has the right to buy the property, but those rights can usually be transferred by means of an assignment of contract.

This means that as long as the buyer who’s involved in the assignment of contract agrees with the purchasing terms, they can legally take over the contract.

But how do real estate wholesalers find these properties?

It is easier than you might think. Here are a few examples of ways that wholesalers find cheap houses to turn a profit on:

  • Direct mailers
  • Place newspaper ads
  • Make posts in online forums
  • Social media posts

The key to finding the perfect home for an assignment of contract is to locate sellers that are looking to get rid of their properties quickly. This might be a family who is looking to relocate for a job opportunity or someone who needs to make repairs on a home but can’t afford it. Either way, the quicker the wholesaler can close the deal, the better.

Once a property is located, wholesalers immediately go to work getting the details ironed out about how the sale will work. Transparency is key when it comes to wholesaling. This means that when a wholesaler intends to use an assignment of contract to transfer the rights to another person, they are always upfront about during the preliminary phases of the sale.

In addition to this practice just being good business, it makes sure the process goes as smoothly as possible later down the line. Wholesalers are clear in their intent and make sure buyers know that the contract could be transferred to another buyer before the closing date arrives.

After their offer is accepted and warranties are determined, wholesalers move to complete a title search . Title searches ensure that sellers have the right to enter into a purchase agreement on the property. They do this by searching for any outstanding tax payments, liens , or other roadblocks that could prevent the sale from going through.

Wholesalers also often work with experienced real estate lawyers who ensure that all of the legal paperwork is forthcoming and will stand up in court. Lawyers can also assist in the contract negotiation process if needed but often don’t come in until the final stages.

If the title search comes back clear and the real estate lawyer gives the green light, the wholesaler will immediately move to locate an entity to transfer the rights to buy.

One of the most attractive advantages of real estate wholesaling is that very little money is needed to get started. The process of finding a seller, negotiating a price, and performing a title search is an extremely cheap process that almost anyone can do.

On the other hand, it is not always a positive experience. It can be hard for wholesalers to find sellers who will agree to sell their homes for less than the market value. Even when they do, there is always a chance that the transferred buyer will back out of the sale, which leaves wholesalers obligated to either purchase the property themselves or scramble to find a new person to complete an assignment of contract with.

Learn more about assignment of contract in real estate by checking out this article .

Who Handles Assignment of Contract?

The best person to handle an assignment of contract is an attorney. Since these are detailed legal documents that deal with thousands of dollars, it is never a bad idea to have a professional on your side. If you need help with an assignment of contract or signing a business contract , post a project on ContractsCounsel. There, you can connect with attorneys who know everything there is to know about assignment of contract amendment and can walk you through the whole process.

Meet some of our Lawyers

Nicholas M. on ContractsCounsel

Nicholas M.

Nicholas Matlach is a cybersecurity expert (CISSP) and an attorney who is dedicated to helping small businesses succeed. He is a client-focused professional who has a deep understanding of the challenges that small businesses face in the digital age. He also provides legal counsel to small businesses on a variety of issues, including formation, intellectual property, contracts, and employment law.

Andrew A. on ContractsCounsel

I am the Managing Partner of Adams Global Immigration, a Business Immigration Law firm focusing on nonimmigrant visa processing (H-1B, L-1, E-2, E-3, O-1, TN, etc.) and immigrant visa processing (EB-1, EB-2, EB-3, PERM, NIW, etc.). I have many years of business immigration experience, including legal work at Jackson and Hertogs, Fragomen, E&M Mayock, and as a Freelance Immigration Specialist. My specialization includes complicated Request for Evidence responses and high-volume nonimmigrant visa preparation. I can provide legal advice regarding employment visa preparation, unique international travel issues, and various other complex immigration matters. Prior to joining Jackson & Hertogs in 2018, I served as a Certified Law Clerk with the San Diego Public Defender office through Thomas Jefferson School of Law (TJSL). In this role, I argued over 40 hearings in state court for criminal juvenile matters, adult misdemeanors, and adult felonies. I subsequently joined the TJSL Removal Defense clinic, wherein I argued and won a full asylum trial in Federal Court for a Moroccan refugee fleeing severe LGBTQ persecution.

Jocelyne U. on ContractsCounsel

Jocelyne U.

Jocelyne Uy graduated from law school in 2002 where she began her career in insurance defense where she practiced a wide range of issues relating to insurance policies and claims. Identifying a need for representation for those working cross border, Jocelyne understood the unique interplay of the laws of Canada and the U.S. and started her first firm in Michigan focusing on Canadian American immigration and tax law. Jocelyne and her partner realize that Nevada residents continuously face challenges in finding affordable and accessible representation to assist with their debt issues. Because of these challenges and continuous shifting economy, they are committed to assisting anyone who finds themselves struggling to handle the debt and credit cycle that often feels hopeless and endless. Jocelyne's firm has assisted clients in post-COVID financial crisis ranging from credit card debt, student loan debt, and COVID unemployment repayment hearings.

Steven W. on ContractsCounsel

Attorney Steven Wax is ardent about helping his clients. Whether creating personalized estate plans, drafting and negotiating contracts or other legal matters. Steven’s goal is to assist and counsel his clients to protect them and their loved ones. Steven grew up on Long Island, New York. He attended the University of Massachusetts in Amherst earning a BS in Sport Management. He earned his paralegal certificate at Duke University and earned his Juris Doctorate from North Carolina Central University School of Law in Durham, NC. Steven has an extensive legal career in the life science sector, working for some of the world’s largest Contract Research Organizations since 2013. Steven has negotiated a broad range of contracts for both businesses and individuals. Steven participated in the NCCU Elder Law Project, where he prepared wills, durable powers of attorney, living wills, and health care powers of attorneys for low/fixed income clients in Durham and surrounding counties. Steven finds meaningful ways to share his skills and passion with his community. Steven volunteers his time to Wills for Heroes, which provides no-cost estate planning documents to first responders and their families, through the NC Bar Foundation.

William W. on ContractsCounsel

My name is Will, and I'm the Principal Attorney at Accelerate Law STL, a startup attorney who helps entrepreneurs and small businesses with everything from formation to IPO. Whether your small to mid-sized business needs help drafting or reviewing contracts, securing intellectual property, complying with government regulations, or even streamlining your business' internal policies, I'm prepared to help.

 on ContractsCounsel

I specialize in reviewing, drafting and negotiating commercial real estate contracts. I have over 10 years of experience in the areas of cell tower leases and retail shopping center leases.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Need help with a contract agreement.

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

CONTRACT LAWYERS BY TOP CITIES

  • Austin Contracts Lawyers
  • Boston Contracts Lawyers
  • Chicago Contracts Lawyers
  • Dallas Contracts Lawyers
  • Denver Contracts Lawyers
  • Houston Contracts Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Contracts Lawyers
  • New York Contracts Lawyers
  • Phoenix Contracts Lawyers
  • San Diego Contracts Lawyers
  • Tampa Contracts Lawyers

ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT LAWYERS BY CITY

  • Austin Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
  • Boston Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
  • Chicago Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
  • Dallas Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
  • Denver Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
  • Houston Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
  • New York Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
  • Phoenix Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
  • San Diego Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
  • Tampa Assignment Of Contract Lawyers

other helpful articles

  • How much does it cost to draft a contract?
  • Do Contract Lawyers Use Templates?
  • How do Contract Lawyers charge?
  • Business Contract Lawyers: How Can They Help?
  • What to look for when hiring a lawyer

can you assign a contract in part

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

How It Works

Want to speak to someone.

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

  • Search Search Please fill out this field.
  • Building Your Business
  • Operations & Success

What Is an Assignment of Contract?

Assignment of Contract Explained

Hero Images / Getty Images

Assignment of contract allows one person to assign, or transfer, their rights, obligations, or property to another. An assignment of contract clause is often included in contracts to give either party the opportunity to transfer their part of the contract to someone else in the future. Many assignment clauses require that both parties agree to the assignment.

Learn more about assignment of contract and how it works.

What Is Assignment of Contract?

Assignment of contract means the contract and the property, rights, or obligations within it can be assigned to another party. An assignment of contract clause can typically be found in a business contract. This type of clause is common in contracts with suppliers or vendors and in intellectual property (patent, trademark , and copyright) agreements.

How Does Assignment of Contract Work?

An assignment may be made to anyone, but it is typically made to a subsidiary or a successor. A subsidiary is a business owned by another business, while a successor is the business that follows a sale, acquisition, or merger.

Let’s suppose Ken owns a lawn mowing service and he has a contract with a real estate firm to mow at each of their offices every week in the summer. The contract includes an assignment clause, so when Ken goes out of business, he assigns the contract to his sister-in-law Karrie, who also owns a lawn mowing service.

Before you try to assign something in a contract, check the contract to make sure it's allowed, and notify the other party in the contract.

Assignment usually is included in a specific clause in a contract. It typically includes transfer of both accountability and responsibility to another party, but liability usually remains with the assignor (the person doing the assigning) unless there is language to the contrary.

What Does Assignment of Contract Cover?

Generally, just about anything of value in a contract can be assigned, unless there is a specific law or public policy disallowing the assignment.

Rights and obligations of specific people can’t be assigned because special skills and abilities can’t be transferred. This is called specific performance.   For example, Billy Joel wouldn't be able to transfer or assign a contract to perform at Madison Square Garden to someone else—they wouldn't have his special abilities.

Assignments won’t stand up in court if the assignment significantly changes the terms of the contract. For example, if Karrie’s business is tree trimming, not lawn mowing, the contract can’t be assigned to her.

Assigning Intellectual Property

Intellectual property (such as copyrights, patents, and trademarks) has value, and these assets are often assigned. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) says patents are personal property and that patent rights can be assigned. Trademarks, too, can be assigned. The assignment must be registered with the USPTO's Electronic Trademark Assignment System (ETAS) .  

The U.S. Copyright Office doesn't keep a database of copyright assignments, but they will record the document if you follow their procedure.

Alternatives to Assignment of Contract

There are other types of transfers that may be functional alternatives to assignment.

Licensing is an agreement whereby one party leases the rights to use a piece of property (for example, intellectual property) from another. For instance, a business that owns a patent may license another company to make products using that patent.  

Delegation permits someone else to act on your behalf. For example, Ken’s lawn service might delegate Karrie to do mowing for him without assigning the entire contract to her. Ken would still receive the payment and control the work.

Do I Need an Assignment of Contract?

Assignment of contract can be a useful clause to include in a business agreement. The most common cases of assignment of contract in a business situation are:

  • Assignment of a trademark, copyright, or patent
  • Assignments to a successor company in the case of the sale of the business
  • Assignment in a contract with a supplier or customer
  • Assignment in an employment contract or work for hire agreement

Before you sign a contract, look to see if there is an assignment clause, and get the advice of an attorney if you want to assign something in a contract.

Key Takeaways

  • Assignment of contract is the ability to transfer rights, property, or obligations to another.
  • Assignment of contract is a clause often found in business contracts.
  • A party may assign a contract to another party if the contract permits it and no law forbids it.

Legal Information Institute. " Assignment ." Accessed Jan. 2, 2021.

Legal Information Institute. " Specific Performance ." Accessed Jan. 2, 2021.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. " 301 Ownership/Assignability of Patents and Applications [R-10.2019] ." Accessed Jan. 2, 2021.

Licensing International. " What is Licensing ." Accessed Jan. 2, 2021.

  • EXPLORE Random Article

How to Draft an Assignment of Contract

Last Updated: January 23, 2022

This article was co-authored by Clinton M. Sandvick, JD, PhD . Clinton M. Sandvick worked as a civil litigator in California for over 7 years. He received his JD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998 and his PhD in American History from the University of Oregon in 2013. This article has been viewed 5,316 times.

A contract is an agreement between at least two parties—A and B. However, one party might want to transfer the contract to someone else. For example, B might want to assign its rights and obligations to C. Sometimes, a contract prohibits assignment, in which case B can’t assign the contract to anyone. In other contracts, the other party to the original contract (here Party A) must also agree to the assignment from B to C. If the contract allows assignment, then an assignment can take place once a proper assignment agreement has been created.

Starting the Assignment Agreement

Step 1 Format your document.

  • If you are printing the agreement on letterhead, make sure to leave enough room at the top.

Step 3 Identify the parties.

  • Sample language could read, “This Assignment (‘Assignment’), dated as of [insert date] (‘Effective Date’), is made between [insert your name] (‘Assignor’) and [insert the name of the assignee] (‘Assignee’).” [1] X Research source

Step 4 Include your recitals.

  • Sample recitals could read, “Whereas, Assignor entered into the following Contract with [the name of the party you contracted with, called the ‘obligor’] on [insert date of the contract] (‘Contract’); and whereas Assignor wishes to assign all of its rights and obligations under the Contract to Assignee. Now, therefore, Assignor and Assignee agree as follows.”

Granting the Assignment

Step 1 Assign all rights and obligations.

  • A sample grant could read: “Assignor and Assignee hereby agree that the Assignor shall assign all its title, right, and interest, and delegate all its obligations, responsibilities, and duties, in and to the Contract to Assignee.”

Step 2 Include an acceptance by the assignee.

  • “Assignee hereby accepts the assignment of all of Assignor’s obligations, responsibilities, and duties under the Contract and all of Assignor’s right, title, and interest in and to the Contract.”

Step 3 Explain how to modify the assignment.

  • A sample modification provision could read: “This Agreement may only be modified if the modification is made in writing and executed by both Assignor and Assignee. No verbal agreement is allowed.”

Step 4 Allocate indemnification.

  • The assignor could agree to indemnify the obligor: “Assignor agrees to defend and indemnify [insert name of the obligor] from any and all claims, judgments, actions, proceedings, liabilities, and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and other costs of defense and damages, resulting from Assignor’s performance prior to the assignment of the Contract and resulting from Assignee’s performance after the assignment of the Contract. However, after the assignment of the Contract, [insert name of the obligor] shall first look to Assignee to satisfy all claims, actions, judgments, proceedings, liabilities, and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and other costs of defense and damages resulting from Assignee’s performance.”
  • The assignee should also agree to indemnify the obligor: “Assignee agrees to indemnify the [insert name of obligor] from any and all claims, judgments, actions, proceedings, liabilities, and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and other costs of defense and damages, resulting from Assignee’s performance after the assignment of the Contract.”

Finalizing the Agreement

Step 1 Identify the governing law.

  • You could write, “This Assignment shall be construed and interpreted, and the rights of the parties determined by, the laws of the State of Maine (without regard to the conflicts of law principles thereof or any other jurisdiction).” [2] X Research source

Step 2 Include a severability clause.

  • A sample clause could read, “If any part of this Agreement is declared invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the Agreement shall continue to be valid and enforceable.” [3] X Research source

Step 3 Add a signature block.

  • Just above the signature line, insert: “In witness whereof, the parties have caused this Assignment to be duly executed as of the date first written above.” [4] X Research source

Step 4 Show the agreement to an attorney.

  • If you don’t have an attorney, then you should contact your local or state bar association and ask for a referral.
  • When scheduling the consultation, ask how much the attorney charges.

Expert Q&A

You might also like.

Determine if an Estate Must File an Income Tax Return

  • ↑ http://contracts.onecle.com/annies/baking-assignment-2014-03-20.shtml
  • ↑ http://www.contractstandards.com/clauses/severability

About this article

Clinton M. Sandvick, JD, PhD

Reader Success Stories

Luciana Alencar

Luciana Alencar

Dec 20, 2017

Did this article help you?

Luciana Alencar

  • About wikiHow
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Info
  • Not Selling Info

 - Progressive Legal Counsel

FAQ About Assignments of Agreements of Purchase and Sale

Assignments of Agreements of Purchase and Sale

What is an assignment?

An assignment simply refers to the transfer of one’s contractual rights and obligations from one person (the “ assignor ”) to another (the “ assignee ”). The specific features and terms of an assignment are usually set out in a separate assignment contract, which refers to the rights and obligations in an original contract. As a result, assignments generally involve at least two related contracts: the Original Contract and the Assignment Contract. Often, assignments are seen in the context of long-term obligations, such as commercial leases or agreements to purchase pre-construction properties.

  • Are Assignments Permitted?
  • Why Would An Assignor Assign Their Interest?
  • Why Would An Assignee Prefer An Assignment?
  • How Can Assignors And Assignees Protect Themselves?

Are assignments permitted?

Speaking generally, either party to a contract may assign their rights and obligations unless the terms of the said contract suggest otherwise. For instance, in most agreements of purchase and sale for pre-construction property, builders will place strict limits on the purchaser’s rights to assign by requiring the purchaser to obtain the builder’s consent to do so. Going one step further, builders commonly prohibit purchasers from advertising an assignment on any platform.

Even when a builder consents to an assignment, they may impose additional terms and conditions which can be costly and burdensome for a purchaser looking to assign. For example, the builder can refuse to release the original purchaser from their obligations notwithstanding the assignment.

FAQ About Assignments of Agreements of Purchase and Sale

Why would an assignor assign their interest?

Assignments by assignors generally occur for one of two reasons: (1) the assignor intends to make a quick(er) profit by “realizing” or selling their contractual rights before closing with the builder, or (2) the assignor cannot or no longer wishes to meet their obligations under the Original Contract. Assignors who wish to see early returns on their investment hope to take advantage of a seller’s market by assigning their contractual rights to an assignee – for a profit, of course. On the other hand, assignors who cannot or no longer wish to meet their obligations with the builder have usually experienced a change in their circumstances or plans which would make meeting their obligations infeasible.

Why would an assignee prefer an assignment?

Assignments may be attractive to assignees looking to buy into a specific development which has already been completely sold but not closed. Those looking to invest may yet make substantial gains (on final closing with the builder) if the market is on the rise – even if the assignee ends up paying the assignor’s fee in addition to the builder’s sale price. Also, because of the builder’s restrictions on advertising assignments and perhaps because of a general unfamiliarity with assignments among the public, it may be less likely that assignments are the subject of bidding wars.

Real Estate Lawyers in Toronto

How can assignors and assignees protect themselves?

The concerns of assignors and assignees vary greatly from situation to situation, so seeking the advice of an experienced real estate lawyer is crucial throughout the assignment process. At Hummingbird Lawyers LLP, our experienced team of Real Estate lawyers can help you:

  • Draft or review assignment contracts to protect your interests;
  • Identify and even minimize potential costs and risks;
  • Review and explain the builder’s terms of assignment;
  • Guide you through the assignment process; and
  • Ensure that you have the right paperwork needed to finalize the assignment.

For more information, please get in touch with our firm. There is always a Toronto real estate lawyer or a Vaughan real estate lawyer available to help.

Related Articles

  • Title Transfer
  • Why You Need a Lawyer for Buying a House
  • Insights & events

Assigning debts and other contractual claims - not as easy as first thought

Updates to UK Money laundering rules - key changes

Harking back to law school, we had a thirst for new black letter law. Section 136 of the Law of the Property Act 1925 kindly obliged. This lays down the conditions which need to be satisfied for an effective legal assignment of a chose in action (such as a debt). We won’t bore you with the detail, but suffice to say that what’s important is that a legal assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor, must be absolute (i.e. no conditions attached) and crucially that written notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

When assigning debts, it’s worth remembering that you can’t legally assign part of a debt – any attempt to do so will take effect as an equitable assignment. The main practical difference between a legal and an equitable assignment is that the assignor will need to be joined in any legal proceedings in relation to the assigned debt (e.g. an attempt to recover that part of the debt).

Recent cases which tell another story

Why bother telling you the above?  Aside from our delight in remembering the joys of debating the merits of legal and equitable assignments (ehem), it’s worth revisiting our textbooks in the context of three recent cases. Although at first blush the statutory conditions for a legal assignment seem quite straightforward, attempts to assign contractual claims such as debts continue to throw up legal disputes:

  • In  Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp Europe Ltd v Euler Hermes Europe SA (NV) [2019] EWHC 2250 (Comm),  the High Court held that a performance bond issued under a construction contract was not effectively assigned despite the surety acknowledging a notice of assignment of the bond. Sadly, the notice of assignment failed to meet the requirements under the bond instrument that the assignee confirm its acceptance of a provision in the bond that required the employer to repay the surety in the event of an overpayment. This case highlights the importance of ensuring any purported assignment meets any conditions stipulated in the underlying documents.
  • In  Promontoria (Henrico) Ltd v Melton [2019] EWHC 2243 (Ch) (26 June 2019) , the High Court held that an assignment of a facility agreement and legal charges was valid, even though the debt assigned had to be identified by considering external evidence. The deed of assignment in question listed the assets subject to assignment, but was illegible to the extent that the debtor’s name could not be deciphered. The court got comfortable that there had been an effective assignment, given the following factors: (i) the lender had notified the borrower of its intention to assign the loan to the assignee; (ii) following the assignment, the lender had made no demand for repayment; (iii) a manager of the assignee had given a statement that the loan had been assigned and the borrower had accepted in evidence that he was aware of the assignment. Fortunately for the assignee, a second notice of assignment - which was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment - did not invalidate the earlier assignment, which was found to be effective. The court took a practical and commercial view of the circumstances, although we recommend ensuring that your assignment documents clearly reflect what the parties intend!
  • Finally, in Nicoll v Promontoria (Ram 2) Ltd [2019] EWHC 2410 (Ch),  the High Court held that a notice of assignment of a debt given to a debtor was valid, even though the effective date of assignment stated in the notice could not be verified by the debtor. The case concerned a debt assigned by the Co-op Bank to Promontoria and a joint notice given by assignor and assignee to the debtor that the debt had been assigned “on and with effect from 29 July 2016”. A subsequent statutory demand served by Promontoria on the debtor for the outstanding sums was disputed on the basis that the notice of assignment was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment. Whilst accepting that the documentation was incapable of verifying with certainty the date of assignment, the Court held that the joint notice clearly showed that both parties had agreed that an assignment had taken place and was valid. This decision suggests that mistakes as to the date of assignment in a notice of assignment may not necessarily be fatal, if it is otherwise clear that the debt has been assigned.

The conclusion from the above? Maybe it’s not quite as easy as first thought to get an assignment right. Make sure you follow all of the conditions for a legal assignment according to the underlying contract and ensure your assignment documentation is clear.

Contact our experts for further advice

View profile for Matthew Padian

Search our site

  • Practical Law

Is it possible to assign the benefit of part of a contract?

Practical law resource id a-022-9640  (approx. 3 pages).

  • Contracts and Transfers: Land and Buildings
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Legal Topics
  • Contract Law
  • When Can a Party Assign Contractual Rights to...

When Can a Party Assign Contractual Rights to Another Party?

(This may not be the same place you live)

  What is a Contract?

An agreement between two private parties creates mutual legal obligations. A contract can be either oral or written. However, oral contracts are more challenging to enforce and should be avoided, if possible.

A contract that involves a significant amount of money (over $500) must be written in order to be valid. Every aspect of life involves contracts. To ensure you have a valid contract, you must understand the rules governing them.

All valid contracts must include the following elements to be enforced:

  • An offer (I will pay you $1,000 for 1,000 cupcakes);
  • And acceptance of the offer presented with (Another person accepts $1,000 for 1,000 cupcakes);
  • A promise to perform (Other person says they will perform);
  • A valuable consideration ($1,000);
  • A time or an event when the performance must be made (1,000 cupcakes exactly two weeks from now);
  • Terms and conditions for the performance (The cupcakes must be chocolate and have vanilla frosting); and
  • Performance (The 1,000 cupcakes are delivered, and the person is paid $1,000).

On top of that, the courts will not enforce certain contracts unless they are in writing. These contracts fall under the Statute of Frauds and must be in writing. Examples include marriage contracts, contracts not to be performed within one year, interest on land contracts, and the decedent’s debt guarantees.

When dealing with a contract issue, it is important to consider the local laws since state statutes govern most contracts.

What are the Required Elements for a Contract?

What is considered a breach of a contract, what are there different types of contracts, what is a contract assignment, does a contract assignment need to be in writing, do i need a lawyer for help with contract assignments.

Any contract must contain five elements. A contract must have a legal purpose and cannot be used for illegal purposes. Contracting to commit a crime (such as hiring a hitman). In addition, there must be a mutual agreement between the parties. In order for this to occur, one party must have made an offer to another party for acceptance. The signing of a contract, for instance, indicates that the parties are in agreement and on the same page.

Some offers may not have an expiration period , so the offer remains open for a “reasonable” time. Offers can also be revoked until acceptance occurs. Acceptance usually means agreeing to the terms of the offer, and if there is any change to the terms in the acceptance, it would be considered a counteroffer. States differ on this, and it would be ideal to consider the regulations in your local jurisdiction.

Third, consideration is key in order for the contract to be valid. Both parties agree to provide something of value in exchange for a benefit. The consideration can take the form of a car, money, or even manual labor. It must be something of real value.

Gifts and promises differ as well. It is not considered a contract if someone gives you a handbag or if they promise to give you a handbag but don’t; there is still no contract. A contract exists, however, when a friend promises you a handbag in exchange for completing a task. I will buy you a handbag if you clean my gutters.

Fourth, the parties must be legally competent . Minors and the mentally impaired cannot validly contract. Additionally, the party must be of a sound mind while contracting and without the influence of drugs or alcohol. Lastly, all parties must agree based on their own will. Contracts will be void if there is a mistake, duress, or fraud by one or more parties.

The contract is breached if either party fails to fulfill its legal obligations. The other party will suffer economic losses if one party violates the contract. As an example, if you hired a construction company to complete a project on time and that company failed to meet the deadline, then you will most likely suffer financial losses.

There are several options available to compensate for those losses. You can either sue for damages, demand specific performance , or terminate the contract. In the end, the court will decide the outcome and the amount of compensation.

A unilateral contract involves a promise in exchange for specific performance. In a bilateral contract, one promise is exchanged for another promise.

Other types of contracts include:

  • Express contracts usually specify orally or in writing the exact terms of the contract;
  • Conditional contracts are based upon the completion of a condition;
  • Joint and several contracts have multiple parties involved;
  • Implied contracts where courts find that a contract exists based on the situation;
  • Unconscionable contracts put one party at a greater advantage than another one and are considered unjust;
  • Adhesion contracts are considered to give one party more bargaining power than another and therefore result in a “take it or leave it” situation;
  • Option contracts allow you to enter into another contract with another party at a later time; and
  • Fixed-price contracts involve a buyer and a seller that agree to pay a fixed price for a project.

Keeping in mind that contracts come in all shapes and sizes is something we deal with every day. Contact a local lawyer if you are unsure what type of contract to which you are a party.

A contract assignment occurs when one party in a contract transfers or “assigns” their contract rights to another party. For instance, suppose that party X contracts with party Y, stating that Y will build their house. X can then assign their rights to the building to another party (Z) if they choose to do so. Here, X is called the “assignor,” while Z is called the “assignee.”

Contractual rights may be assigned to another party at any time unless:

  • The contract prohibits the assignment of contractual rights
  • The assignment would fundamentally change certain duties or risks involved in the contract
  • The assignment has to do with future rights derived from a future, non-existent contract
  • The assignment is legally prohibited by law

Aside from these situations, contract assignments are allowed and frequently occur in many situations. This is especially common in contracts involving sub-contracts and building projects.

An oral agreement is usually sufficient for a contract assignment to be valid. The original party (the obligor) does not need to be informed of the assignment. In any contract situation, it’s best if the agreement is reduced to writing and signed by all parties. By doing this, everyone will be on the same page, and a record of interactions can be maintained in case of a lawsuit.

Contract rights often contain many terms, which can get more complex when other parties enter the picture. You may need to hire a contract lawyer for advice and guidance if you have any questions, concerns, or disputes involving contract assignments.

A qualified lawyer can assist with drafting documents, reviewing agreements, and other tasks. Furthermore, your lawyer can represent you in court if you need to file a legal claim. An issue that involves a large amount of money or evidence that the contract is invalid can easily get out of hand.

Need a Contract Lawyer in your Area?

  • Connecticut
  • Massachusetts
  • Mississippi
  • New Hampshire
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • South Carolina
  • South Dakota
  • West Virginia

Photo of page author Ty McDuffey

Ty McDuffey

LegalMatch Legal Writer

Updating Author

Ty began working at LegalMatch in November 2021. Ty holds a Professional Writing Degree from Missouri State University with a minor in Economics. Ty received his Juris Doctorate from the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law in May of 2021. Before joining LegalMatch, Ty worked as a law clerk and freelance writer. Ty is a native of Lake of the Ozarks, Missouri, and currently resides in Kansas City. Read More

Photo of page author Jose Rivera

Jose Rivera

Managing Editor

Original Author

Related Articles

  • What Are Contractual Rights?
  • When a Party to a Contract Makes a Unilateral Mistake
  • Unilateral Mistake Examples
  • Retainer Fee Contracts
  • What is a Non-disclosure Agreement
  • Breach of a Confidentiality Agreement
  • Non-Disclosure Agreement Violation
  • Lawyers for Contracts: Contract Dispute Attorney Near Me
  • Contract Mistake Lawyers
  • Contract Error Lawsuits
  • Breach of Real Estate Contract
  • Fraud in Contract Law
  • Contract Coercion
  • Legally Binding Contracts
  • Contract Violation Lawyers
  • Binding Agreement
  • Duty to Read a Contract
  • What are Employment Contracts?
  • Resolving Contract Conflicts
  • State Employment Contracts
  • Land Contract Agreements
  • What is an Installment Contract?
  • What is a Land Contract?
  • What is a Service Contract?
  • Service-Level Agreement Disputes
  • Contract Obligations
  • Legal Contracts
  • Indemnity Clause Law
  • Indemnification
  • Warranty Contract Lawyers

Discover the Trustworthy LegalMatch Advantage

  • No fee to present your case
  • Choose from lawyers in your area
  • A 100% confidential service

How does LegalMatch work?

Law Library Disclaimer

star-badge.png

16 people have successfully posted their cases

Can You Assign Part of a Contract? Legal Insights and Advice

Can you assign part of a contract – top 10 legal questions answered, the fascinating world of contract assignment.

Contracts a aspect of and dealings. They the and between and as the of many transactions. What when want to only of a to party? It possible? Dive this topic and the possibilities.

Understanding Contract Assignment

Before delving into the specifics of assigning part of a contract, it`s important to have a clear understanding of contract assignment in general. When assign a contract, are your and under that to party. This involve the contract or just portion of it, on the circumstances.

Can You Assign Part of a Contract?

Whether not can assign part a largely on the of the itself. Contracts clauses prohibit assignment, while may for assignment with conditions. Crucial carefully the terms of the to the of assigning part it.

Case Studies

Let`s at couple of case to the of assigning part a contract.

As by these case the of assigning part a contract based on the terms in the contract.

Legal Considerations

When the of part a contract, essential to the implications. Law be and to legal to with all laws and regulations.

The to assign part a can a in and dealings. Imperative to the in and any before with an assignment. Taking and approach, can the of assignment with confidence.

Legally Binding Contract Regarding Assignment of Contractual Rights

It to the parameters the of rights in to the of all involved. Contract to the and regarding the of rights.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this contract as of the date first above written.

Recent Posts

  • Standard Virginia Rental Agreement: Essential Terms and Conditions
  • Legal Alcohol Limit for Driving in India: Know the Law
  • Law Silence Big Mom: Understanding the Legal Implications
  • Huron Law Firm San Antonio – Expert Legal Representation
  • Qué es el encaje legal: Concepto y explicación

Recent Comments

  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • No categories

Consent to Assignment: Everything You Need to Know

Consent to assignment refers to allowing a party of a contract (the assignor) to assign a contract and move the obligations to another party (the assignee). 3 min read updated on February 01, 2023

Consent to assignment refers to allowing a party of a contract to assign a contract and move the obligations to another party. The party of the existing contract, known as the assignor, will pass on the contract to another party, known as the assignee. The goal is for the assignee to take over the rights and obligations of the contract. For a contract to be assigned, the other party must be aware of what is happening.

Contract Assignments

The assignment of a contract differs depending on the type of contract and the language in the original agreement. Some contracts contain a clause that doesn't allow assignment at all, while other contracts have clauses that require the other party to consent before assignment can be finalized.

Consider the following scenario. A business owner contracts with a computer company to have a processor delivered every time a new model is released. The computer company assigns the business owner's contract to another provider. As long as the business owner is aware of the changes and still receives the processors as scheduled, his contract is now with the new computer company.

However, assigning a contract doesn't always exempt the assignor from their duties and responsibilities. Some contracts include a clause that states that even if the agreement is assigned to another party, the original parties guarantee that the terms of the contract will be fulfilled.

Unenforceable Assignments

There are a number of situations where a contract assignment won't be enforced , including:

  • The contract has an anti-assignment clause that can stop or invalidate any assignments.
  • The assignment changes the nature of the contract. An assignment that changes what is expected or impacts the performance of the contract isn't allowed. This also applies if the assignment lowers the value one party will receive or adds risk to the deal that the other party didn't originally agree to.
  • The assignment is against the law. In some cases, laws or public policies don't allow assignment. Many states forbid employees to assign future wages. The federal government doesn't allow the assignment of particular claims against the government. Some assignments violate public policy. For example, a personal injury claim cannot be assigned because it could lead to litigation against a party who was not responsible for the injury.

Delegation vs. Assignment

It is common for a party to sign a contract and have someone else actually fulfill his duties and do the work required by the contract. However, some contracts can't be delegated, such as when a party agrees to service done by a particular person or company. If a company contracted with Oprah Winfrey to be a keynote speaker, Oprah wouldn't be permitted to delegate her performance duties to anyone else.

If both parties agree that the work can't be delegated, they should include specific language in the original contract. This can be as simple as a clause that states, “Neither party shall delegate or assign its rights.” Both parties should agree to this clause.

How to Assign a Contract

Assigning a contract is a three-step process. First, check to see if the contract has an anti-assignment clause or if there are limitations around assignments. Sometimes clauses are straightforward with language like, “This agreement may not be assigned,” and while other times, the language is less obvious and hidden in another clause. If there is language in the contract that states it can't be assigned, the other party must consent to an assignment before you can proceed.

Second, the parties must execute an assignment . Create an agreement that transfers the rights and obligations of one party to the assignee.

Third, notify the other party of the contract. Once the contract rights have been assigned to the new party, you should notify the other party of the original contract. Providing written notice removes you from being responsible for any part of the contract unless there is language in the contract that says differently or the assignment is illegal.

Anti-Assignment Clause

As you are negotiating and writing a contract, consider whether you want the contract to be able to be assigned. If you don't want assignment to be a legally viable option, that needs to be clearly stated in the contract.

If you need help with consent to assignment, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

  • Assignment Law
  • Legal Assignment
  • Assignment Contract Law
  • Assignment of Rights and Obligations Under a Contract
  • Assignment of Contract Rights
  • Assignability Of Contracts
  • Assignment of Rights Example
  • Assignment Legal Definition
  • What Is the Definition of Assigns
  • Assignment Of Contracts

IMAGES

  1. Contract in PDF

    can you assign a contract in part

  2. Assignment Agreement Template

    can you assign a contract in part

  3. Free Assignment Of Contract Form

    can you assign a contract in part

  4. FREE 6+ Sample Assignment of Contract Templates in PDF

    can you assign a contract in part

  5. How Tos of Assigning a Contract in Wholesaling

    can you assign a contract in part

  6. Assignment of a purchase agreement: Real Estate Legal Contracts

    can you assign a contract in part

VIDEO

  1. How Do You Assign A Contract?

  2. Assign 2 part 2 Excel واجب

COMMENTS

  1. Assignments: The Basic Law

    An assignment will generally be permitted under the law unless there is an express prohibition against assignment in the underlying contract or lease. Where assignments are permitted, the assignor need not consult the other party to the contract but may merely assign the rights at that time.

  2. Assignability Of Contracts: Everything You Need to Know

    The assignability of contracts is when one side of a contract agreement transfers the contract to another entity, so that the new entity fulfills the terms of the contract. Being able to assign contracts depends on a variety of factors, mainly the language contained in the contract. How Contract Assignments Work

  3. Assignment Clause: Meaning & Samples (2022)

    Assignment clauses are legally binding provisions in contracts that give a party the chance to engage in a transfer of ownership or assign their contractual obligations and rights to a different contracting party. In other words, an assignment clause can reassign contracts to another party. They can commonly be seen in contracts related to ...

  4. The Process of Assigning a Contract

    As a general rule, yes, contracts can be assigned. But here are some exceptions and limitations to the rule. Contracts Can Prohibit or Limit Assignment Many contracts contain an "assignment clause" that specifically allows, forbids, or limits assignment. Here are some example assignment clauses: "This Agreement may not be assigned by either party."

  5. What Is an Assignment of Contract?

    An assignment of contract occurs when one party to an existing contract (the "assignor") hands off the contract's obligations and benefits to another party (the "assignee"). Ideally, the assignor wants the assignee to step into his shoes and assume all of his contractual obligations and rights.

  6. Assignment of Contract: What Is It? How It Works

    An assignment of contract is a legal term that describes the process that occurs when the original party (assignor) transfers their rights and obligations under their contract to a third party (assignee).

  7. What Is an Assignment of Contract?

    Assignment of contract allows one person to assign, or transfer, their rights, obligations, or property to another. An assignment of contract clause is often included in contracts to give either party the opportunity to transfer their part of the contract to someone else in the future.

  8. How to Draft an Assignment of Contract: 12 Steps (with Pictures)

    Sometimes, a contract prohibits assignment, in which case B can't assign the contract to anyone. In other contracts, the other party to the original contract (here Party A) must also agree to the assignment from B to C. If the contract allows assignment, then an assignment can take place once a proper assignment agreement has been created. Part 1

  9. Assignment of Contract Rights: Everything You Need to Know

    Assignment is prohibited in the contract language, which is called an anti-assignment clause. Assignment of rights changes the foundational terms of the agreement. The assignment is illegal in some way. If assignment of contract takes place, but the contract actually prohibits it, the assignment will automatically be voided.

  10. Can you assign part of a contract?

    Can you assign part of a contract? | Practical Law Practical Law may have moderated questions and answers before publication. No answer to a question is legal advice and no lawyer-client relationship is created between the person asking the question and the person answering it. Where appropriate, you should consult your own lawyer for legal advice.

  11. Assignment Of Contracts

    The assignment agreement may also be called the contract assignment, assignment contract, or assignment of contract. While assignment contracts are typically only used for amounts of less than $5,000, you can assign a higher profit contract when both the buyer and seller agree. You cannot assign a contract if the original contract prohibits ...

  12. How Is a Contract Assigned?

    Step 1: Examine the contract for any limitations or prohibitions. Check for anti-assignment clauses. Sometimes the prohibition is not a separate clause but is included in another provision. Look for language that states, "This agreement may not be assigned."

  13. Assigning Contracts in the Context of M&A Transactions

    Conclusion. Although contracts are generally freely assignable, in the context of any M&A transaction or other proposed contract assignment, careful consideration should be given to: (1) whether the contract in question includes an anti-assignment provision and, if so, whether the provision is "comprehensive" ( i.e., applies to change of ...

  14. Can you assign part of a contract?

    Can you assign part of a contract? | Practical Law Practical Law may have moderated questions and answers before publication. No answer to a question is legal advice and no lawyer-client relationship is created between the person asking the question and the person answering it. Where appropriate, you should consult your own lawyer for legal advice.

  15. What is assignment in contract law?

    You cannot assign part of a contract if the benefit is a 'chose in action'. A 'chose in action' refers to the personal rights over property that can only be claimed or enforced via legal action.

  16. Assignment and novation

    Assignment in construction contracts. As noted above only the benefits of a contract can be assigned - not the burden. In the context of a building contract: the employer may assign its right to have the works constructed, and its right to sue the contractor in the event that the works are defective - but not its obligation to pay for the works;

  17. Assignments of Agreements of Purchase and Sale

    Speaking generally, either party to a contract may assign their rights and obligations unless the terms of the said contract suggest otherwise. For instance, in most agreements of purchase and sale for pre-construction property, builders will place strict limits on the purchaser's rights to assign by requiring the purchaser to obtain the ...

  18. Assignment of Rights and Obligations Under a Contract

    Updated October 29, 2020: An assignment of rights and obligations under a contract occurs when a party assigns their contractual rights to a third party. The benefit that the issuing party would have received from the contract is now assigned to the third party.

  19. Assigning debts and other contractual claims

    When assigning debts, it's worth remembering that you can't legally assign part of a debt - any attempt to do so will take effect as an equitable assignment. The main practical difference between a legal and an equitable assignment is that the assignor will need to be joined in any legal proceedings in relation to the assigned debt (e.g ...

  20. Is it possible to assign the benefit of part of a contract?

    I have a query having read Practice note, Contracts: assignment on whether part of the benefit of a contract can be assigned. Our client has exchanged contracts to purchase 15 flats in a new development. This transaction was set out in a single contract for all 15 properties. Our client now wants to sell 3 of the properties to a third party before completion.

  21. When Can a Party Assign Contractual Rights to Another Party?

    A contract assignment occurs when one party in a contract transfers or "assigns" their contract rights to another party. For instance, suppose that party X contracts with party Y, stating that Y will build their house. X can then assign their rights to the building to another party (Z) if they choose to do so.

  22. Can You Assign Part of a Contract? Legal Insights and Advice

    3. Can a party to a assignment? Yes, a party can object to a partial assignment if it violates the terms of the original contract or if it substantially alters the duties and obligations of the parties. It`s important to address any objections through negotiation or legal means. 4. What considered before assigning a contract?

  23. Consent to Assignment: Everything You Need to Know

    Table Of Contents Consent to Assignment: Everything You Need to Know Consent to assignment refers to allowing a party of a contract (the assignor) to assign a contract and move the obligations to another party (the assignee).3 min read updated on February 01, 2023

  24. PDF Appendix a Standard Clauses for New York State Contracts

    this contract to the Contractor or to anyone else beyond funds appropriated and available for this contract. 2. NON-ASSIGNMENT CLAUSE. In accordance with Section 138 of the State Finance Law, this contract may not be assigned by the Contractor or its right, title or interest therein assigned, transferred, conveyed, sublet or otherwise disposed of

  25. Auto Warranties and Auto Service Contracts

    Read the offered contract before you sign to learn if you have rights if the administrator declines to pay a claim. The length of coverage. If the service contract lasts longer than you expect to own the vehicle, find out if you're allowed to transfer it when you sell the vehicle, if there's a fee, or if you can get a shorter contract.