Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Financial stress and depression in adults: A systematic review

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

ORCID logo

Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Roles Validation, Writing – review & editing

  • Naijie Guan, 
  • Alessandra Guariglia, 
  • Patrick Moore, 
  • Fangzhou Xu, 
  • Hareth Al-Janabi

PLOS

  • Published: February 22, 2022
  • https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041
  • Reader Comments

Table 1

Financial stress has been proposed as an economic determinant of depression. However, there is little systematic analysis of different dimensions of financial stress and their association with depression. This paper reports a systematic review of 40 observational studies quantifying the relationship between various measures of financial stress and depression outcomes in adults. Most of the reviewed studies show that financial stress is positively associated with depression. A positive association between financial stress and depression is found in both high-income and low-and middle-income countries, but is generally stronger among populations with low income or wealth. In addition to the “social causation” pathway, other pathways such as “psychological stress” and “social selection” can also explain the effects of financial stress on depression. More longitudinal research would be useful to investigate the causal relationship and mechanisms linking different dimensions of financial stress and depression. Furthermore, exploration of effects in subgroups could help target interventions to break the cycle of financial stress and depression.

Citation: Guan N, Guariglia A, Moore P, Xu F, Al-Janabi H (2022) Financial stress and depression in adults: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 17(2): e0264041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041

Editor: Pedro Vieira da Silva Magalhaes, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, BRAZIL

Received: October 26, 2021; Accepted: January 31, 2022; Published: February 22, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Guan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Depression is one of the most common mental health problems and is marked by sadness, loss of interest or pleasure, feelings of guilt or low self-worth, disturbed sleep or appetite, feelings of tiredness, and poor concentration [ 1 ]. Depression is a leading cause of disability and poor health worldwide [ 1 ] and is expected to rank first worldwide by 2030 [ 2 ]. According to a survey from the World Health Organization, more than 322 million people, which accounted for approximately 4.4% of the world population, suffered from depressive disorders in 2015 [ 3 ]. The lifetime risk of developing depression was estimated to be 15%-18% [ 4 ]. Mental health problems including depression have imposed a heavy economic burden on individuals and households who are suffering from mental disorders and even on society [ 5 – 7 ]. Specifically, the global costs of mental health problems are increasing each year in every country. Those costs are estimated to reach approximately 16 trillion dollars by 2030 [ 8 , 9 ]. There is a considerable need to explore the risk factors of mental disorders or the determinants of mental health, which will inform preventive strategies and actions aimed at reducing the risk of getting mental disorders and thereby promoting public mental health.

Many social and economic determinants of depression have been identified. These include proximal factors like unemployment, low socioeconomic status, low education, low income and not being in a relationship and distal factors such as income inequality, structural characteristics of the neighbourhood and so on [ 10 – 12 ]. Research has emerged in the past two decades focusing on the association between the individual or household financial stressors and common mental disorders such as depression and anxiety. However, findings regarding the relationship between different indicators of financial stress and depression are inconclusive in the previous literature. Studies have shown positive associations between depression and various indicators of financial stress such as debt or debt stress, financial hardship, or difficulties [ 13 – 15 ]. Some other studies find no relationships when financial stress was indicated by low income. For example, Zimmerman and Katon [ 16 ] found that when other socioeconomic confounders were considered, no relationship between low income and depression was observed. Besides, there is evidence showing a negative association between low income and major depressive disorder in South Korea [ 17 ]. A 2010 review on poverty and mental disorders also finds that the association between income and mental disorders (including depression) was still unclear [ 18 ].

The social causation theory is one of the theories that has been proposed to explain possible mechanisms underlying the effect of poverty on mental disorders [ 18 , 19 ]. It states that stressful financial circumstances might lead to the occurrence of new depressive symptoms or maintain previous depression. This might be due to exposure to worse living conditions, malnutrition, unhealthy lifestyle, lower social capital, social isolation, or decreased coping ability with negative life events. Individuals or households with limited financial resources are more vulnerable to stressful life events (e.g., economic crises, public-health crises), which might increase the risk of mental health problems [ 18 – 20 ]. However, practically, social causation might not be applicable to situations where individuals are not in poverty or deprivation but still can experience depression due to financial stress.

Reviews to date have examined the relationship between debt specifically and broader mental health outcomes with depression being one of them. For example, two reviews published in 2013 and 2014 reviewed the literature on the relationship between debt and both mental health and physical health [ 21 , 22 ]. They concluded that there was a significant relationship between personal unsecured debt or unpaid debt obligations and the increased risk of common mental disorders, suicidal ideation and so on [ 21 , 22 ]. In terms of depression, they found that there was a strong and consistent positive relationship between debt and depression. Another focus of the literature is on the relationship between poverty and mental health problems including depression in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC). In those reviews, indicators of poverty include low socioeconomic status, low income, unemployment, low levels of education, food insecurity and low social class [ 18 , 23 ]. Both reviews find a positive relationship between poverty and common mental disorders, which exists in many LMIC societies regardless of their levels of development. Being related to low income, factors such as insecurity, low levels of education, unemployment, and poor housing were found to be strongly associated with mental disorders, while the association between income and mental disorders was unclear.

The reviews discussed above focus mainly on the relationship between debt or poverty and mental health outcomes. As sources of financial stress are complex and multidimensional, indicators such as low income or debt are not the only economic risk factor of mental health problems. Other sources of financial stress such as lack of assets, economic hardship or financial difficulties (e.g., whether an individual finds it difficult to meet standard living needs like buying food, clothes, paying bills and so on) might also relate to depression. In addition, various sources of financial stress might be related to mental health problems in different ways. Based on the existing reviews, it is still unknown which domains of financial stress have clearer associations with depression and whether there is heterogeneity in the relationship between financial stress and depression for different populations and contexts. Moreover, the existing reviews do not discuss the possible mechanisms underpinning the association between financial stress and depression. To better understand the association between financial stress and depression and the possible mechanisms underlying it, a systematic review was conducted bringing together a wide range of indicators of financial stress. The eligible economic indicators of financial stress in this review include objective financial variables like income, assets, wealth, indebtedness; as well as measures that capture subjective perceptions of financial stress, such as perceived financial hardship (e.g., subjective feelings of sufficiency regarding food, clothes, medical care, and housing), subjective financial situation (e.g., individuals’ feelings about their overall financial situation), subjective financial stress, subjective financial position, and financial dissatisfaction.

This study aims at providing a comprehensive review of the association between different financial stressors and depression considering the characteristics of the associations of interest and discussing the proposed mechanisms underlying the associations. An understanding of the relationship between financial stress and depression would not only advance our understanding and knowledge of the economic risk factors of mood disorders but also provide policymakers with more understanding of additional public mental health benefits of intervention aimed at alleviating poverty and/or at improving people’s financial conditions.

Search strategies

A systematic review of published literature was conducted using online searches on bibliographic databases. At the first stage, six bibliographic databases including CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, EconLit, AMED, and Business Source Premier were searched for related peer-reviewed journal articles to April 2019. The search terms are listed in Table 1 . The broad strategy was to combine terms related to finances, with terms related to depression, and terms related to the unit of analysis (individual, household etc). Several key studies that were eligible for inclusion criteria were pre-identified. Before the formal search, pilot searches were performed to make sure the pre-identified key studies can be found by the search. More details of search strategies are displayed in S1 Appendix . All the search results were limited to the English language. No time restriction was added to the search. The reference lists of the eligible studies and several relevant review papers were checked manually to supplement the main electronic searching.

thumbnail

  • PPT PowerPoint slide
  • PNG larger image
  • TIFF original image

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041.t001

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion and exclusion criteria for study selection were designed to ensure a focus on primary studies and secondary studies conducted on adults, using measures of financial stress (exposure) and depression (outcome). The eligibility criteria were tested on a selection of papers by multiple members of the study team to ensure that studies were categorised accurately. Based on the piloting process, the eligibility criteria were further modified. The following is the list of the final inclusion and exclusion criteria applied in this study.

Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) observational and experimental studies on the relationship between the individual or household financial stress and depression or depressive symptoms; (2) original research in peer-reviewed journals; (3) conducted on general population samples aged 18 and over; (4) used indicators which capture different dimensions of an individual or household financial stress, such as income, assets, debt, wealth, economic hardship, financial strain, financial stress, and financial satisfaction; (5) studies that measure depression through both non-clinical and clinical techniques (e.g., Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), were eligible for this review.

Studies were excluded if they were: (1) systematic reviews, dissertations, conference abstracts, or study protocols; (2) studies focusing on a specific population including female-only, male-only, people with a special occupation (e.g., soldiers), migrants, or people with specific illnesses; (3) studies relating to societal (as opposed individual) economic circumstances (e.g., income inequality measured at the community level or the country level) or shocks to the macroeconomy (e.g., stock market crashes, hyperinflation, banking crises, economic depressions, and financial crisis); (4) studies that only reported the joint association between several socioeconomic determinants and depression. These were included only if the association related to individual or household finances were reported and explained individually; (5) studies based on overall mental health, or other types of mental disorders (e.g., anxiety, suicide, self-harm, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, dementia) where the association between household financial stress and depression was not reported and explained independently.

Study selection

Search strategies were applied to six databases (i.e., CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, EconLit, AMED, and Business Source Premier EBSCO) to generate a long list of candidate studies. All the search results were exported into Mendeley. Search results, after the removal of duplicates, were screened for relevance using the title and abstract information. The full texts of relevant articles were then checked for eligibility based on the selection criteria. Screening and selection were undertaken by two reviewers independently. All authors were consulted when a disagreement arose. The study selection process and reasons for study exclusions were recorded in a flow chart shown in Fig 1 .

thumbnail

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041.g001

Data analysis

A pre-designed data collection form (listed in S2 Appendix ) was used for the data extraction process. The data extracted from the eligible studies covered the following categories: (1) characteristics of studies: year, author, journal, aim of study, countries, study type, data sources, responsible rate, level of study, eligibility of ethical approval; (2) characteristics of the population: sample size, age group, mean age of the participants, gender; (3) depression measures, definition of depression, validity of the measures; (4) measures of financial stress (exposures) used, measures of the exposure, definition of the exposure, validity of the measures; (5) statistical analysis: econometric methodologies, covariates, whether reverse causality was taken into account, whether there are subgroup analyses and methods (6) main results. The key information being extracted is presented in S1 and S3 Tables, which is a simplified version of the extracted data.

This review focused on the association between each dimension of financial stress and depression and analysed the heterogeneity of the association in different contexts. The eligible studies were reviewed narratively, and the results were stratified by different indicators of financial stress (e.g., low income, low assets, low wealth, debt, financial difficulties and so on). Causal inferences and proposed mechanisms underlying the association between financial stress and depression based on the reviewed evidence were discussed in the discussion section. No meta-analysis was conducted to pool the reviewed evidence due to the substantial heterogeneity in the measurements and definitions of the exposure and outcome variables, study context, and methodologies.

Quality assessment

The quality of the included studies was assessed using an adapted version of the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies used in Glonti et al. [ 24 ] (see S3 Appendix ). The original version of this tool is developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) [ 25 ]. Seven key domains relating to study design, selection bias, withdrawals, confounders, data collection, data analysis and reporting were considered. Studies can have between six and seven component ratings. The score of each domain equals 1 if the quality is high, 2 if the quality is moderate and 3 if the quality is low. An overall rating for each study was determined based on the ratings for all domains. The overall rating of studies’ quality was classified as high, moderate, or low. Full details of the design and usage of the quality assessment tool can be found in Glonti et al. [ 24 ]. The quality assessment of the included studies was conducted by two reviewers independently. The results of the quality assessment were based on consensus between the two reviewers.

5,134 papers were identified after searching online databases including CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, EconLit, AMED, and Business Source Premier. The flow chart for the study selection process is displayed in Fig 1 . The total number of papers after removing duplicates was 4,035. Both titles and abstracts of the identified 4,035 papers were screened. 3,763 papers were removed since they did not satisfy the eligibility criteria. The full texts of the remaining 272 papers were accessed and further screened separately by the two reviewers based on the eligible criteria. 235 papers were further excluded leading to 37 studies for consideration. The main reasons for exclusion were that the exposure, the outcome variables of interest, or the targeted population of those studies did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three additional articles were further added after checking the reference lists of all the eligible papers and those of the past relevant review papers [e.g., 18 , 21 ]. 40 articles were finally identified for the data extraction.

Study characteristics

Regarding the number of reviewed studies by years of publication, most of the reviewed studies were published in the past two decades, with a noticeable spike in the last five years. The majority of studies (32 out of 40) reported evidence from high-income European countries and the USA, Australia, Japan, and South Korea. Eight studies were based on low- and middle-countries including China, Chile, and South Africa. In terms of study design, 17 studies were cross-sectional, and 23 studies were longitudinal. The age groups considered in the 40 studies vary: 17 studies focused on the general adult population including young adults, middle-aged adults, and older adults, while 23 studies focused specifically on working-age, young adults, middle-aged, or older adults. Data of study characteristics were displayed in the data extraction form in S1 Table .

Measures of depression

The most commonly used measure for depression was the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) [e.g., 26 – 28 ]. Various versions of the CES-D were used in the reviewed studies: six studies used the full version, that is, the 20-item CES-D; 19 studies used the shortened version of the CES-D scale. Other measures were also used to assess the individual’s depressive symptoms such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [ 29 ], the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) [ 30 , 31 ], a subsection of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ depression) [ 31 – 33 ], the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV) [ 34 ], the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [ 35 ] and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) [ 15 , 36 , 37 ]. Two studies used self-reported depression by asking participants whether or not they had any experience of depression [ 13 , 38 ].

Measures of financial stress

A wide variety of concepts and measures of financial stress were used across the reviewed studies. The financial exposure in the reviewed studies can be divided roughly into two categories. First, personal or household finances, which include income, assets or wealth, debt or hardship were investigated. These economic indicators were measured in different ways. Some studies measured the total amount of assets while other studies measured assets by counting the number of durable items owned by an individual (such as motor vehicles, bicycles, computers, or cameras) or a household (such as fridges, microwaves, TV, cameras). The measures of debt were more diversified: the onset of debt, the amount of debt in general and of different types of debt, the debt-to-asset ratio, debt problems like over-indebtedness, debt arrears, and debt stress. Financial hardship was defined as difficulties in meeting the basic requirements of daily life due to a lack of financial resources. For example, not having enough money for food, clothes, shelter and medical expenses; being unable to pay bills on time or heat the home; having to sell assets; going without meals; or asking for financial help from others were used by these studies as proxies for financial hardship [ 30 , 39 ]. Second, some studies examined the associations between depression and subjective perceptions of financial stress such as perceived financial hardship (e.g., subjective feelings of insufficiency regarding food, clothes, medical care, etc.), subjective financial situation (e.g., individual’s feelings of their overall financial situation), subjective financial stress, subjective financial position, financial dissatisfaction and so on.

Quality of reviewed studies

Full details of the quality assessment of the 40 included studies are displayed in S2 Table and S1 Fig . An observational study design was utilised in all of the included papers. 29 (72.5%), and 11 (27.5%) studies were rated as methodologically strong [ 6 , 13 – 16 , 20 , 26 – 28 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 37 – 53 ] and moderate [ 29 , 31 , 32 , 35 , 36 , 54 – 59 ], respectively. Among the 40 included studies, 34 (85%) had a low risk of selection bias, five (12.5%) had a moderate risk and one had a high risk of selection bias. Eight studies were able to be rated on withdrawals and drop-outs: two of them were rated as “strong”, four achieved a “moderate” rating and one received a “weak” rating. We found that 15 studies (37.5%) had a low risk while 25 (62.5%) had a moderate risk of confounding bias. Regarding the data collection, two studies were rated as ‘strong’, 37 received a ‘strong’ score, and one study was rated as ‘weak’. All the studies received a ‘strong’ rating for data analysis except for one study that was rated as ‘weak’. 35 (87.5%) studies received a ‘strong’ rating for reporting, while five studies had a ‘moderate’ quality of reporting.

Association between income and depression

Eleven studies were identified examining the relationship between individual or household income levels and depression. All controlled for other socioeconomic confounders or/and health status. Seven studies found a statistically significant association between low income and a higher risk of depressive symptoms after adjustment. The positive association between low income and depression was reported in both high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries and found in different age groups (i.e., younger adults, middle-aged adults, and older adults).

The intertemporal relationship between individual or household income and depression was investigated in three longitudinal studies [ 20 , 34 , 58 ]. Osafo et al. found that in the UK, an increase in household relative income (i.e., income rank) was statistically related to a decreased risk of depression at a given time point [ 58 ]. The effect of household income at baseline on the risk of showing depressive symptoms in the following time point was weakened but still statistically significant, controlling for the baseline depression level. Lund and Cois reported similar results: they found that lower household income at baseline could predict a worse depression status during the follow-up period in South Africa [ 20 ]. Based on evidence from the US, Sareen et al. found that individuals with lower levels of household income faced an increased risk of depression compared to those with higher levels of household income [ 34 ]. Furthermore, a reduction in income was also related to an increased risk of depression [ 34 ].

Focusing on pension income, which is one of the main sources of household income for the retired population, Chen et al. found that pension enrolment and pension income were significantly associated with a reduction in CESD scores among Chinese older adults, controlling for other socioeconomic factors and health status [ 43 ].

The strength of the relationship between income and depression varies and can be affected by how income is measured. For example, compared to absolute income, a household’s relative income level within a reference group was found to be a more consistent household financial predictor of depression [ 58 ]. Osafo et al. compared the effect of relative income with that of the absolute value of household income [ 58 ]. They found that a deterioration in the rank of household income was associated with a higher possibility of showing depression at a given time point, as well as the subsequent time point [ 58 ].

The relationship between income and depression holds for all income groups but is more pronounced among lower-income groups. According to Zimmerman and Katon, the association between depression and income is stronger among people with income levels below the median [ 16 ]. Based on a quasi-natural experiment, Reeves et al. also found that the reduction in housing benefits significantly increased the prevalence of depression for low-income UK households [ 38 ]. Additionally, the association between pension income and depressive symptoms in older adults were more pronounced among lower-income groups [ 43 ]. More broadly, the income-depression relationship might be influenced by the economic status of the regions where households live. For example, Jo et al. found that the association between income and depression was significant among participants from low-economic-status regions, while it was insignificant among participants from high-economic-status regions [ 55 ].

Association between material assets and depression

Two studies on the relationship between assets and depression were identified: one cross-sectional study [ 29 ] and one longitudinal study [ 20 ]. Those studies showed that assets were a significant predictor of depression after controlling for demographic and other socioeconomic confounders. Furthermore, the household assets-depression association was found to be stronger for individuals with lower levels of assets at baseline [ 20 , 29 ]. The directions of the assets-depression relationship were investigated in one study. Lund and Cois simultaneously examined both directions of the relationships using a nationally representative survey on South Africa [ 20 ]. They found that low levels of individual and household material assets were significantly related to depression in the follow-up period after controlling for age, gender, race and education. Conversely, having more depression symptoms at baseline was significantly associated with lower levels of individual assets in the follow-up period [ 20 ].

Association between wealth and depression

Three studies explored the relationship between wealth and depression in adults. All of them were based on high-income country contexts including the UK and the US and suggested a positive relationship between individual or household low wealth and depression among middle-aged and older adults. Two longitudinal studies examined the association between wealth and depression. Specifically, Pool et al. found that an increase in household wealth was statistically related to a decrease in the risk of depressive symptoms [ 50 ]. Osafo et al. compared the effect of relative wealth (i.e., wealth rank) and absolute wealth on depressive symptoms [ 58 ]. Their results showed that, instead of the absolute wealth, the wealth rank within a social comparison group was the primary driver of the association between wealth and depressive symptoms [ 58 ]. The strength of the relationship between wealth and depression varies according to the level of wealth at baseline [ 58 ]. For example, Martikainen et al. found the association between household wealth and depression was most pronounced among the lowest wealth group [ 33 ].

Association between debt and depression

Fourteen studies investigated the association between debt and depression and provided empirical evidence based on high-income countries (Europe and the US) and Chile. Three studies were cross-sectional and all of them reported a positive association between debt (assessed by student debt, the occurrence of any debt, or unsecured debt) and depressive symptoms after controlling for demographic and other socioeconomic factors [ 6 , 27 , 53 ]. Eleven longitudinal studies identified by this review investigated the association between debt and depression over time. The definitions and measures of debt vary across studies. Associations between the occurrence and/or amount of financial debt, the occurrence and/or amount of housing debt, excessive mortgage debt, the occurrence of any debt, the debt-to-asset ratio, and the debt-to-income ratio, on the one hand, and depression, on the other, were investigated in the reviewed studies.

The association between changes in debt status and changes in depressive symptoms was investigated in six studies. Specifically, using five waves of data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Hiilamo and Grundy found that both men and women switched from having no financial debt to having substantial financial debt suffered from a deterioration in depressive symptoms [ 28 ]. Also, switching from no mortgage debt to having substantial mortgage debt was positively associated with the deterioration in depressive symptoms among women [ 28 ]. Using a large nationally representative dataset from the Chilean Social Protection Survey (SPS), Hojman et al. also found that individuals who were always over-indebted or switch from having moderate levels of debt to over-indebtedness had more depressive symptoms than those who were never over-indebted [ 46 ]. Additionally, they found that those who were not over-indebted, regardless of the previous debt status, did not experience a worsening in depression, showing that the effect of over-indebtedness on depressive symptoms faded away as the debt levels decreased [ 46 ].

Various measures of debt were used in the reviewed studies such as the occurrence of debt [ 26 , 27 , 53 ], the amount of debt [ 6 , 14 , 26 , 28 , 53 ], and the debt-to-income ratio or debt-to-asset ratio [ 14 , 46 , 48 ]. The debt-depression relationship varies with different operationalisations of debt with the debt to asset ratio being a more reliable predictor of depression than the total debt. Both Sweet et al. and Hojman et al. found that only the debt-to-assets ratio or debt-to-income ratio (rather than the absolute amount of debt) were consistently and positively associated with higher depression scores before and after adjustment (see S1 and S3 Tables for details of the covariates used) [ 14 , 46 ].

Different types of debt such as secured debt (e.g., mortgage debt) and unsecured debt (e.g., consumer debt) might be related to the depression in different ways. The reviewed studies reported a positive association between high levels of mortgage debt and high unsecured consumer debt (regardless of the amount) and depression [ 14 , 48 , 53 ]. For example, Leung and Lau examined the causal relationship between mortgage debt and depressive symptoms and found that a high level of mortgage indebtedness (defined as a mortgage loan to home value ratio over 80%) was associated with more depressive symptoms among mortgagors [ 48 ]. Both Zurlo et al. and Sweet et al. found that unsecured debt (e.g., consumer debt) was a significant predictor of more depressive symptoms [ 14 , 53 ]. Three studies compared the effect of different types of household debts on depression [ 26 , 28 , 46 ]. The results of those three studies suggested that the association between household debt and depressive symptoms was predominantly driven by short-term debt. Specifically, unsecured debt (e.g., financial debt), or short-term debt were associated with a higher risk of experiencing depression, while secured debt itself (e.g., mortgage debt) or long-term debt were not related to depressive symptoms. For example, using longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Hiilamo and Grundy found that household financial debt was positively and significantly associated with more depressive symptoms, while the effect of household housing debt on depression was weak or even insignificant [ 28 ]. Berger et al. found a similar result using longitudinal data from the US. Their results (controlling for baseline characteristics and socioeconomic factors) showed that only short-term debt (i.e., unsecured debt) was positively and statistically significantly associated with depressive symptoms, while the effects of mid-term and long-term debt (e.g., mortgage loan) on depressive symptoms were not significant [ 26 ].

However, it is not always the case that the association between debt and depressive symptoms is only driven by consumer debt. As reported in two longitudinal studies by Hiilamo and Grundy and by Gathergood, a secured debt like mortgage might be associated with depression when the secured debt becomes a problem debt [ 28 , 32 ]. Hojman et al. found that mortgage debt had no association with depressive symptoms, while consumer debt was positively and significantly related to more depressive symptoms [ 28 ]. Nevertheless, both Hojman et al. and Alley et al. found that mortgage arrears had a significant effect on more severe depression, even when the effect of consumer debt on depression was controlled [ 40 , 46 ]. In line with their study, Gathergood also found that housing payment problems were strongly associated with a higher depression score [ 32 ].

Association between financial hardship and depression

The association between financial hardship and depression was reported in four studies, all of which were based on high-income countries such as the US and Australia [ 15 , 30 , 39 , 52 ]. They all observed a cross-sectionally positive relationship between financial hardship and depression, which holds after adjustments (see S1 and S3 Tables for details of the covariates used). The intertemporal association between financial hardship and depressive symptoms was reported in two longitudinal studies [ 15 , 39 ]. However, the consistency of the findings is sensitive to the statistical methods applied. Mirowsky and Ross found that current financial hardship was associated with a subsequent increase in depression in the US [ 39 ]. The other study only observed an association between financial hardship at baseline and baseline depression, as well as a weak or even no association between prior financial hardship and current depression [ 15 ]. When the same statistical strategy was applied, the findings from Butterworth et al. were consistent with those were observed in Mirowsky and Ross’s study [ 15 , 39 ].

Furthermore, the reviewed studies showed that the effect of past financial hardship on depressive symptoms decayed with time. In other words, current financial hardship mattered the most for current depressive symptoms. Following Mirowsky and Ross, changes in financial hardship were stratified into four types [ 39 ]. An individual experiencing (not experiencing) current financial hardship and hardship in the past belongs to the always hardship group (no hardship group). An individual experiencing only current (past) financial hardship belongs to the new hardship group (resolved hardship group). Mirowsky and Ross found that the effects of consistent hardship and new financial hardship (3 years later) on depressive symptoms were positive and significant [ 39 ]. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the follow-up depressive symptoms between the consistent hardship group and the new hardship group [ 39 ]. Furthermore, the association between both resolved hardship and no hardship on depressive symptoms was not significant [ 39 ]. Consistent with this, Butterworth et al. also found that the individuals who currently experienced financial hardship were more likely to have depression than those who only experienced financial hardship in the past or never experienced it [ 15 ].

Age was the most analysed moderator of the association between financial hardship and depressive symptoms among the reviewed studies. This review found that there is no consistency in terms of the association between financial hardship and depression across different age groups. Butterworth et al. reported that the effect of financial hardship on depressive symptoms increased with age among Australian adults [ 30 ]. However, Butterworth et al. and Mirowsky and Ross reported different results [ 15 , 39 ]. Specifically, they found that the positive association between financial hardship and depressive symptoms decreased with age in the US. In contrast to the two studies listed above, Butterworth et al. did not find any statistically significant differences regarding this association among different age cohorts in Australia [ 15 ].

Association between subjective financial strain and depression

Eleven studies examined the association between subjective financial indicators (i.e., subjective financial strain, financial dissatisfaction or financial stress) and depression, providing empirical evidence based on high-income countries (Europe, the US, the UK, Japan and Korea) and on China. All of them (including four cross-sectional and seven longitudinal studies) reported a positive relationship between subjective financial strain and depression, holding after adjustments (see S1 and S3 Tables for details of the covariates used)). The intertemporal association between subjective financial strain and depression was reported in two studies [ 44 , 59 ]. For example, Richardson et al. found that increased subjective stress at baseline was associated with greater depression over time [ 59 ]. Similarly, Chi and Chou also found that higher levels of subjective financial strain measured at baseline were associated with more depressive symptoms after three years among Chinese older people [ 44 ]. The association between changes in subjective financial strain and depression was found in one longitudinal study [ 49 ]. Using data from the annual Belgian Household Panel Survey, Lorant et al. found that the worsening subjective financial strain was significantly associated with the increased risk of depressive symptoms and that of caseness of depression [ 49 ].

The positive and significant association between perceived financial strain in childhood and depression in adults was found in both a cross-sectional study and a longitudinal study [ 42 , 47 ]. Using cross-sectional data from 19 European countries in 2014, Boe et al. found that younger adults (25–40) who had experienced financial difficulties as children had higher depression scores in adulthood, while older adults (over 40) did not [ 42 ]. A similar association between adverse childhood financial situation and adults’ depression was also found in a longitudinal study [ 47 ]. Based on a national representative sample of 9,645 South Korean adults without depressive symptoms at baseline, Kim, et al. found that experiencing financial difficulties in childhood was associated with the increased chance of depression in adulthood [ 47 ]. Furthermore, the effect of experiencing financial difficulties in childhood on depression was weaker than that of current financial difficulties [ 47 ].

The gender difference of the association between perceived financial strain and depression was examined in two studies and no statistical difference between females and males was observed, though women tended to report worse depression [ 36 , 44 ].

Summary and discussion of the findings

This systematic review is the most comprehensive synthesis of observational studies quantifying the association between indicators of financial stress and depression in both high- and low- and middle-income countries to date. Findings regarding the relationship between financial stress and depression vary across different indicators of financial stress. Economic indicators such as material assets, unsecured debt, financial hardship, and subjective measures of financial stress are relatively strong and persistent predictors of depressive symptoms, while absolute income and wealth levels have an inconclusive association with depression. The only longitudinal evidence on relative income and relative wealth suggests a stronger relationship between relative income or relative wealth and depressive symptoms than that between absolute income or wealth and depression. Additionally, this review finds that the association between indicators such as income, material assets or wealth and depression is more pronounced in lower socioeconomic groups (i.e., low income or low wealth group). This review is unable to make a conclusion regarding the association between debt and depression across different socioeconomic subgroups. The only evidence is provided in one study showing that there is no difference in the association between debt and depression by assets level. Additionally, there is insufficient evidence to conclude a common pattern regarding the association between financial stressors and depression by gender or age groups, though differences of this relationship across age or gender groups are observed in some of the reviewed studies.

The income-depression association is inconclusive, although income is one of the most commonly used indicators of the individual or household’s economic situation. The reviewed studies consistently reported a positive association between low income and depressive symptoms in univariable analyses. However, this association was largely reduced or even became insignificant when other social and economic factors (such as educational level, employment status and so on) and health status were controlled for [ 31 , 33 ]. The findings are consistent with the results from the previous reviews and empirical research where different mental disorders were considered including depression [ 18 , 23 , 60 ]. It is likely that income has a close correlation with other dimensions of the socioeconomic condition such as educational levels and employment status that affect an individual’s mental health independently from income per se [ 23 ].

Furthermore, this review finds that compared to absolute income (or wealth), relative income (or wealth) in a reference group is a more important risk factor of depression. There is evidence showing a positive association between low-income ranks and current depression scores as well as follow-up depression scores, while no association is found between absolute low income and depression [ 58 ]. The findings here are in line with the previous review, which mainly focused on the association between income inequality and depression [ 61 ]. Patel et al.’s review concluded that a higher level of income inequality at the neighbourhood level was strongly associated with a higher risk of depression [ 61 ]. This review only identified one study investigating the association between relative income or relative wealth and depression. The insufficient evidence on this topic suggests the need for more research to investigate the mental health effects of relative income (or wealth).

Some of the reviewed studies have suggested a positive association between debt and depression despite the substantial heterogeneity in definitions and measurements of debt, study methods, study contexts, and targeted population. The association between debt and depressive symptoms is mainly driven by unsecured debt (e.g., credit card) or late mortgage payments. Secured debt (e.g., mortgage debt) per se is not associated with depressive symptoms. However, depression may still be more likely when individuals or households are no longer able to manage their debt or perform debt obligations. For example, the reviewed evidence shows that mortgage arrears have a significant effect on more severe depression, even when the effect of consumer debt and mortgage debt on depressive symptoms are considered within the same model [ 46 , 48 ]. The findings regarding the relationship between debt and depression are consistent with the findings from the previous reviews on the association between debt and health where depression was one of the outcomes [ 22 , 62 ].

An important consideration regarding the debt-depression relationship is that having personal or household debt does not always lead to depression, as debt is not always a sign of financial problems. Some personal and household loans are taken to finance housing purchases, business, and investments, which are granted based on the borrower’s financial situation and payback abilities. Additionally, except for stress, debt might also bring benefits to mental well-being by generating consumption, feelings of attainment or satisfaction or making investments [ 63 , 64 ]. As a result, the financial stress derived from debt could be partially offset by such positive mental well-being effects. The review suggests that future longitudinal research on the impact of debt on depression should consider mediators to understand the nature of the causal association between debt and mental health.

It should be noted that nearly a half of the reviewed studies are cross-sectional, limiting the ability to draw a conclusion on the directions and the causality of the associations between some indicators of financial stress and depression. A few of the longitudinal studies considered the reverse relationship and/or the unobserved bias using econometric methods. The majority of these longitudinal studies mainly focused on the relationship between debt or subjective measures of financial stress and depression. They provide supportive evidence that, debt and subjective financial stress might lead to subsequent depressive symptoms. Longitudinal evidence remains limited as to the understanding of both directions and causality of the relationships between other indicators of financial stress and depression. For example, only three longitudinal studies provided an exploration of the association between income and depression. The casual relationship between some indicators of financial stress (such as low income, material assets, wealth, financial hardship) and depression should therefore be interpreted with caution.

This review includes a number of studies focusing on the older-aged population. The signs of the relationship between financial stress and depression in different age subgroups do not show a significant difference. Despite this, it should be noted that there might be heterogeneity in the magnitude of the relationship between financial stress and depression across different age subgroups. However, it is difficult to identify if including the studies based on adults aged 50 and over would make the generalisability of the findings towards this population. Because a cross-study comparison is almost impossible as there is a substantial heterogeneity in different studies regarding country contexts, measurements of exposures and outcome variables, study methods and so on.

Based on the reviewed evidence, three possible mechanisms may be behind the relationship between financial stress and depression.

Social causation.

Firstly, as highlighted in the introduction, the effects of financial stress on depression can be explained by social causation theory. The reviewed evidence supports the social causation pathway according to which individuals or households who have low income or low wealth are more likely to be exposed to economic uncertainty, unhealthy lifestyle, worse living environment, deprivation, malnutrition, decreased social capital and so on [ 20 , 47 , 65 ]. Those factors might lead to a higher risk of developing depressive symptoms. Individuals or households with limited financial resources are more vulnerable to stressful financial events, which might increase the risk of experiencing depression. This mechanism is applicable to the studies where financial stress is measured by economic indicators related to poverty, such as income poverty, deprivation, and financial hardship.

Psychological stress.

The reviewed studies also show that subjective measures of financial stress have adverse effects on depression. Indeed, some studies state that subjective financial stress is more important than objective measures such as the amount of debt [ 13 , 41 , 66 ]. Objective indicators of financial stress might have an indirect effect on depression, which is mediated by the individual’s perception of those objective indicators as resulting in financial stress. Experiencing a similar objective financial situation, people may report different perceptions of the objective financial situation due to the heterogeneity of personal experiences, abilities to manage financial resources, aspirations, and perceived sufficiency of financial resources [ 67 ]. For example, individuals with limited financial resources are more likely to be concerned about the uncertainty of the future financial situation. The expectation of financial stress, not just their occurrence, may also cause depression. Furthermore, people living in poverty face substantial uncertainty and income volatility. The long-run exposure to stress from coping with this volatility may also threaten mental health [ 68 ]. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that both the respondent’s perception of financial stress and objective measures of financial stress lie at the heart of the relationship between financial stress and depression.

Social selection.

Other studies suggest that depression might negatively impact the finances of individuals [ 20 , 69 ]. Social selection theory states that individuals who have mental disorders are more likely to drift into or maintain a worse financial situation [ 20 ]. Evidence shows that mental problems might increase expenditure on healthcare, reduce productivity, and lead to unemployment, as well as be associated with social stigma, all of which are related to lower levels of income [ 18 , 65 , 70 ]. However, some scholars argue that the relative importance of social causation and social selection varies by diagnosis [ 71 ]. Social causation theory is more important to the relationship between financial stress and depression or substance use; while social selection theory is more important in relation to severe mental disorders such as schizophrenia [ 70 , 72 ].

Limitations of the review

This systematic review is the first to comprehensively pool observational studies on the association between individual or household finances and depression or depressive symptoms. However, this review is subject to several limitations. First, since there is substantial heterogeneity in the measurements and definitions of exposure (financial stress) and the outcome variable (depression), targeted populations, and methodologies between studies, a meta-analysis combining the data from the reviewed studies is neither appropriate nor practical. As such, only a narrative approach is used in this review without quantitatively synthesising the data from the studies, which are difficult to compare. Second, the majority of studies reported evidence on high-income countries like the US, the UK, European countries. Therefore, the conclusions of this review are more immediately generalisable to these contexts as opposed to low-and middle-income country contexts. Third, this review undertakes the search on six databases for any related peer-reviewed journal articles without searching for other resources to find grey or unpublished literature and conference abstracts. Excluding the unpublished studies might limit the findings of this review since studies with significant results are more likely to get published [ 73 ]. The published studies may lead this review to overestimate the associations between any financial exposures and depressive symptoms. Fourth, the included exposures in this review are the most direct indicators (i.e., proximal indicators) of financial stress. The findings in this review might not be generalisable to the relationship between a distal factor (e.g., job loss) and depression. Evidence has suggested that a significant life event or experience, for example, job loss, is associated with financial stress and thereby can predict subsequent major depression [ 74 ]. Future review on financial stress and mental health outcomes might benefit from further including the effect of distal factors (such as job loss, changes in working hours, changes in marital status, and so on) on mental health.

Implications

This review has a number of implications for public policy around financial circumstances and depression. Firstly, it highlights the role that measures aimed at alleviating financial poverty and inequality could have in improving public mental health. Secondly, it suggests attention needs to be focused on unsecured debt as a public health measure. For example, providing financial counselling services and financial education to those who have debt stress and depression may help them to effectively deal with individual debt problems and associated depression. Meanwhile, the regulation of unsecured debt markets is crucial to the sustainable development of unsecured lending markets, and thereby supports both financial health and mental health. Thirdly, this review highlights the importance of targeted interventions to break the cycle of financial stress and depression. For example, instead of a one-for-all intervention focusing on the general population, interventions targeted at lower socioeconomic groups might be more effective since the association between financial stress and depression is more pronounced in these groups.

In terms of practical support, the interdisciplinary collaboration of psychologists and financial professionals in the development of interventions aiming to break the vicious cycle of depression and financial stress could be useful. For example, interventions such as poverty alleviation programs, the provision of financial advice or financial education might have a beneficial influence on mental health. The collaboration of policymakers in both mental health areas and financial areas might create win-win situations, having mutual benefits for both areas and saving costs to society in the long run.

Finally, this review highlights the need for further research in certain areas. First, this review suggests that more longitudinal research or randomised control trials (where feasible) are needed to further clarify the directions of the causal relationships and possible mechanisms between different financial stressors and depression or other mental disorders. A better understanding of this can help to design more effective interventions either aimed at alleviating financial stress or at improving mental health. For example, anti-poverty programs such as direct cash transfers might be more helpful for families in poverty or deprivation, where social causation plays the main role in the effect of financial stress on depression. However, if financial stress is due to social comparison, rather than absolute poverty, challenging social attitudes may be more beneficial. This review also calls for more future research to investigate the heterogeneity of the relationship and the difference in the direction of the relationship between financial stress and depression or other mental disorders across different populations. This would provide more precise and solid evidence for developing targeted interventions as noted above.

Second, this review finds that the majority of the existing studies on the financial stress-depression relationship are based on high-income countries. However, low-and middle-income countries have higher levels of poverty and economic inequality, as well as a high economic burden caused by mental disorders and low levels of investment in mental health [ 69 , 75 ]. Therefore, more future research that is based on low-and middle-income country contexts would be important.

In conclusion, this systematic review of the link between financial stress and depression in adults found that financial stress is positively associated with depression, in particular among low socioeconomic groups. The findings suggest directions for policymakers and the need for greater collaboration between psychology and financial professionals, which will be beneficial to developing targeted interventions either to mitigate depression or alleviate financial stress. Further longitudinal research would be useful to investigate the causality and mechanisms of the relationship between different dimensions of financial stress and depression.

Supporting information

S1 checklist. prisma checklist..

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041.s001

S1 Fig. Quality assessment of the reviewed studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041.s002

S1 Table. Basic characteristics data extraction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041.s003

S2 Table. Quality assessment form.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041.s004

S3 Table. Methods and findings extraction form.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041.s005

S1 Appendix. Sample search in PsycINFO.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041.s006

S2 Appendix. Data extraction form.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041.s007

S3 Appendix. Quality assessment tool following Glonti et al. (2015) [ 24 ].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041.s008

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped to improve and clarify the manuscript.

  • 1. World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. World Health Organization; 2017.
  • View Article
  • PubMed/NCBI
  • Google Scholar
  • 5. World Health Organization. Investing in mental health. Genève, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
  • 8. Bloom DE, Cafiero ET, Jané-Llopis E. The global economic burden of noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2011.
  • 69. Ridley M, Rao G, Schilbach F, Patel V. Poverty, depression, and anxiety: Causal evidence and mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2020.
  • 71. Dohrenwend BP, Levav I, Shrout P, Schwartz S, Neveh G, Link BG, et al. Ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and psychiatric disorders: A test of the social causation-social selection issue. In: Dohrenwend BP, editor. Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 285–318.

The impact of ESG disclosure on mitigating financial distress: exploring the moderating role of firm life cycle

  • Original Article
  • Published: 16 February 2024

Cite this article

  • K. R. Suprabha 1 ,
  • J. Sreepriya   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-4909 3 &
  • Krishna Prasad 2  

19 Accesses

Explore all metrics

Globally, businesses are increasingly gaining recognition for their non-financial performance due to heightened stakeholder demands about ethical and environmental responsibilities. This noteworthy shift in perspective has catalyzed the inception of this research, which seeks to scrutinize the influence of environmental, social, and governance disclosure (ESGD) on financial distress. To investigate the potential capacity of ESGD in mitigating financial distress, the researchers have employed the Generalized Method of Moments. Additionally, the study takes into account the moderating role played by the firm’s life cycle in this relationship. The findings underscore that the adoption of ESGD is associated with a decreased likelihood of default, thus highlighting its effectiveness as a risk management strategy. Moreover, this investigation emphasizes the impact of the firm’s life cycle on the link between ESGD and corporate financial distress. Rooted in signalling theory as the theoretical framework, the research posits that a wide spectrum of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives not only enhances the consistency of signals but also amplifies the associated signal costs. Consequently, in alignment with this theoretical perspective and substantiated by empirical evidence, our study confirms a multifaceted influence of ESGD on financial distress, contingent upon the distinctive phases of a firm's life cycle. In consequence, this study offers valuable insights for managerial decision-making, guiding the development of tailored disclosure policies that align with the specific characteristics of a firm’s life cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Alam, A., M. Uddin, and H. Yazdifar. 2019. Institutional determinants of R&D investment: Evidence from emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 138: 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.007 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Al-Hadi, A., B. Chatterjee, A. Yaftian, G. Taylor, and M. Monzur Hasan. 2019. Corporate social responsibility performance, financial distress, and firm life cycle: Evidence from Australia. Accounting and Finance 59(2): 961–989. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12277 .

Al-Shaer, H., and M. Zaman. 2018. Credibility of sustainability reports: The contribution of audit committees. Business Strategy and the Environment 27(7): 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2046 .

Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58(2): 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968 .

Atif, M., and S. Ali. 2021. Environmental, social, and governance disclosure and default risk. Business Strategy and the Environment 30(8): 3937–3959. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2850 .

Atif, M., B. Liu, and S. Nadarajah. 2022. The effect of corporate environmental, social and governance disclosure on cash holdings: Life-cycle perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment . https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3016 .

Baiman, S., and R.E. Verrecchia. 1996. The relation among capital markets, financial disclosure, production efficiency, and insider trading. Journal of Accounting Research 34(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491329 .

Barnea, A., and A. Rubin. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97(1): 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z .

Behl, A., P.S.R. Kumari, H. Makhija, and D. Sharma. 2022. Exploring the relationship of ESG score and firm value using cross-lagged panel analyses: Case of the Indian energy sector. Annals of Operations Research 313(1): 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04189-8 .

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87(1): 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8 .

Bouslah, K., L. Kryzanowski, and B. M’Zali. 2013. The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. Journal of Banking & Finance 37(4): 1258–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.004 .

Cerqueti, R., R. Ciciretti, A. Dalò, and M. Nicolosi. 2021. ESG investing: A chance to reduce systemic risk. Journal of Financial Stability . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100887 .

Chatterjee, C., and T. Nag. 2023. Do women on boards enhance firm performance? Evidence from top Indian companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 20(2): 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-022-00153-5 .

Chiaramonte, L., A. Dreassi, C. Girardone, and S. Piserà. 2021. Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe. European Journal of Finance . https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1964556 .

Connelly, B.L., S.T. Certo, R.D. Ireland, and C.R. Reutzel. 2011. Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management 37(1): 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419 .

Cornell, B., and A. Damodaran. 2020. Valuing ESG: Doing good or sounding good? The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing 1(1): 76–93. https://doi.org/10.3905/jesg.2020.1.1.076 .

Deangelo, H., L. Deangelo, and R. Stulz. 2006. Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: A test of the life-cycle theory☆. Journal of Financial Economics 81(2): 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.07.005 .

Dickinson, V. 2011. Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. SSRN Electronic Journal . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1268509 .

El Ghoul, S., O. Guedhami, C.C.Y. Kwok, and D.R. Mishra. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance 35(9): 2388–2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007 .

Fatemi, A., M. Glaum, and S. Kaiser. 2018. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal 38: 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 .

Fu, L., D.M. Boehe, and M.O. Orlitzky. 2022. Broad or narrow stakeholder management? A signaling theory perspective. Business & Society 61(7): 1838–1880. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211053018 .

Godfrey, P.C. 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review 30(4): 777–798. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.18378878 .

Godfrey, P.C., C.B. Merrill, and J.M. Hansen. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30(4): 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.750 .

Gray, B., and S.S. Ariss. 1985. Politics and strategic change across organizational life cycles. The Academy of Management Review 10(4): 707. https://doi.org/10.2307/258040 .

Harymawan, I., F.K.G. Putra, B.A. Fianto, and W.A. Wan Ismail. 2021. Financially distressed firms: Environmental, social, and governance reporting in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(18): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810156 .

Hasan, M.M., M. Hossain, A. Wai-K. Cheung, and A. Habib. 2015. Corporate life cycle and cost of equity capital. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 11(1): 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2014.12.002 .

Helfat, C.E., and M.A. Peteraf. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332 .

Hou, T. C. T. 2019. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: Firm‐level evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26(1): 19–28.

Javaid, S., and H.A.N. Al-Malkawi. 2018. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Saudi Arabia: Evidence from Zakat contribution. Managerial Finance 44(6): 648. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-12-2016-0366 .

Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review 76(2): 323–329.

Kirmani, A., and A.R. Rao. 2000. No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing 64(2): 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.2.66.18000 .

KPMG. (2020). The time has come . https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2020/11/the-time-has-come-survey-of-sustainability-reporting.html .

Lee, D.D., and R.W. Faff. 2009. Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. Financial Review 44(2): 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2009.00216.x .

Luo, X., and C.B. Bhattacharya. 2009. The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing 73(6): 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198 .

Maddala, G.S., and K. Lahiri. 2009. Introduction to econometrics . Wiley.

Google Scholar  

Oduoza, C.F. 2020. Framework for sustainable risk management in the manufacturing sector. Procedia Manufacturing 51: 1290–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.180 .

Orazalin, N., M. Mahmood, and T. Narbaev. 2019. The impact of sustainability performance indicators on financial stability: Evidence from the Russian oil and gas industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(8): 8157–8168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04325-9 .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Roberts, P.W., and G.R. Dowling. 2002. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance: Reputation and persistent profitability. Strategic Management Journal 23(12): 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.274 .

Roodman, D. 2009. How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata 9(1): 86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106 .

Ross, S. A., R. Westerfield, J. F. Jaffe and J. Helmuth. 2002. Solutions manual for use with corporate finance . McGraw- Hill/Irwin.

Ryan, T.P. 2008. Modern regression methods . Wiley.

Book   Google Scholar  

Santamaria, R., F. Paolone, N. Cucari, and L. Dezi. 2021. Non-financial strategy disclosure and environmental, social and governance score: Insight from a configurational approach. Business Strategy and the Environment 30(4): 1993–2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2728 .

Shabana, K.M., A.K. Buchholtz, and A.B. Carroll. 2017. The institutionalization of corporate social responsibility reporting. Business and Society 56(8): 1107–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316628177 .

Sharma, P., P. Panday, and R.C. Dangwal. 2020. Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: A study of Indian companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 17(4): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00085-y .

Simoni, L., L. Bini, and M. Bellucci. 2020. Effects of social, environmental, and institutional factors on sustainability report assurance: Evidence from European countries. Meditari Accountancy Research 28(6): 1059–1087. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2019-0462 .

Soytas, M.A., M. Denizel, and D. Durak Usar. 2019. Addressing endogeneity in the causal relationship between sustainability and financial performance. International Journal of Production Economics 210(March2014): 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.016 .

Spence, M. 1978. Job market signaling. In Uncertainty in economics , 281–306. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50025-5 .

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Suazo, M.M., P.G. Martínez, and R. Sandoval. 2011. Creating psychological and legal contracts through HRM practices: A strength of signals perspective. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 23(3): 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-011-9169-z .

Turban, D.B., and D.W. Greening. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40(3): 658–672. https://doi.org/10.2307/257057 .

Ullah, S., P. Akhtar, and G. Zaefarian. 2018. Dealing with endogeneity bias: The generalized method of moments (GMM) for panel data. Industrial Marketing Management 71: 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.11.010 .

Wong, W.C., J.A. Batten, A.H. Ahmad, S.B. Mohamed-Arshad, S. Nordin, and A.A. Adzis. 2021. Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters 39: 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101593 .

Zahid, M., H.U. Rahman, M. Khan, W. Ali, and F. Shad. 2020. Addressing endogeneity by proposing novel instrumental variables in the nexus of sustainability reporting and firm financial performance: A step-by-step procedure for non-experts. Business Strategy and the Environment 29(8): 3086–3103. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2559 .

Zerbini, F. 2017. CSR Initiatives as market signals: A Review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 146(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2922-8 .

Zhao, T., and X. Xiao. 2019. The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial constraints: Does the life cycle stage of a firm matter? International Review of Economics & Finance 63: 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.08.010 .

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, India

K. R. Suprabha

T A Pai Management Institute, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India

Krishna Prasad

Govt Arts and Science college Mankada, Kolathur, Malappuram, India

J. Sreepriya

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Sreepriya .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Suprabha, K.R., Sreepriya, J. & Prasad, K. The impact of ESG disclosure on mitigating financial distress: exploring the moderating role of firm life cycle. Int J Discl Gov (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00225-8

Download citation

Received : 05 June 2023

Accepted : 12 January 2024

Published : 16 February 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00225-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Environmental social and governance disclosure (ESGD)
  • Financial distress
  • Firm life cycle
  • Signalling theory
  • Indian manufacturing sector
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Publication: From Health Crisis to Financial Distress

Thumbnail Image

Files in English

Link to data set, report series, other publications in this report series.

  • Publication Urban Informality in Sub-Saharan Africa ( World Bank , 2024-02-14 ) Cunningham, Wendy ; Newhouse, David Locke ; Ricaldi, Federica ; Tchuisseu Seuyong, Feraud ; Viollaz, Mariana ; Edochie, Ifeanyi Nzegwu Show more This paper describes the state of informal sector work in urban Sub-Saharan Africa, using household surveys from 26 countries representing 61 percent of the population of Sub-Saharan Africa and firm surveys from three countries. Five main conclusions emerge. First, the urban informal sector is large and persistent in Sub-Saharan Africa. Approximately 56 to 65 percent of urban workers are informal, half of whom are self-employed. Data from five countries suggest little systematic reduction in the prevalence of informality during the 2010s. Second, heterogeneity in the African informal sector cuts along demographic lines. Women are overrepresented in informal self-employment, men in informal wage work, and youth in unpaid employment. Third, while the urban informal workers are, on average, poorer and in less-skilled occupations than formal sector workers, the majority are not extremely poor and are in mid-skilled occupations. Fourth, informal enterprises are small and are challenged to survive and grow into job-creating firms. Few find much benefit from registration given the costs, both monetary (taxes) and transactional (information about the registration process). Fifth, access to urban public services (utilities) is weakly associated with the probability of working in an informal job, although access to mobile phones is high across all job types. If thriving urban jobs are to contribute to economic and social development in Africa, it will be crucial for policies and programs to take into consideration the heterogeneity in jobs, the profile of workers, and the urban context. Show more
  • Publication What Lies Behind “Good” Analytical Work on Development ? Four Years of Knowledge Products at the World Bank ( World Bank , 2024-02-14 ) Rama, Martin ; Singh, Rucheta ; Aslam, Aiza Show more The World Bank’s analytical work has a strong reputation, but its knowledge products are also perceived to be of varying quality and relevance, and the drivers of this heterogeneity are only partially understood. Building on previous evaluations, this paper adopts a production function approach to assess how budget resources, time to completion, technical skills, and institutional responsibilities affect the internal ratings and external visibility of different types of analytical tasks at the World Bank. To this effect, the paper first matches records from three unconnected electronic platforms — for internal documents, budget codes, and external publications — to assemble a comprehensive database of knowledge products and their key characteristics. With analytical documents as its unit of observation, the exercise shows that: (1) devoting more resources to analytical tasks leads to both better ratings and greater visibility; (2) both outcomes are systematically worse when a greater share of resources comes from trust funds; (3) they are also consistently worse for tasks that take longer to complete; (4) more academically oriented team leaders underperform on ratings and overperform on visibility, whereas technically solid but less stellar team leaders overperform on ratings; and (5) everything else equal, performance varies systematically with the nature of the unit in charge. The findings of the paper can be read as a cautionary note against knowledge management that is based on the counting of analytical tasks. Instead, the findings call for much stronger information systems on knowledge products, a better alignment of incentives for the units in charge, and regular evaluations in the spirit of this paper. Show more
  • Publication Beyond the Usual ( Washington, DC: World Bank , 2024-02-13 ) Canavire Bacarreza, Gustavo Javier ; Cueva, Ronald A. ; Davalos, Maria Eugenia Show more Job quality can impact workers’ productivity and contribute to societal well-being. To analyze the evolution of job quality in Bolivia, this paper employs Bolivian household survey data spanning 2007 to 2021 to construct a synthetic job quality index. The index incorporates a broad definition of a good job, encompassing six dimensions: adherence to regulations, working conditions, establishment of an appropriate wage-job linkage, productive usage and adaptability of skills, availability of career opportunities, and employment resilience. The findings indicate that job quality in Bolivia has mostly remained incessant, exhibiting limited change even during periods of high growth in economic output. However, this result masks heterogeneities, with significant variation in job quality associated with workers’ demographic and job-specific characteristics and across regions. Show more
  • Publication Indigenous peoples, land and conflict in Mindanao, Philippines ( Washington, DC: World Bank , 2024-02-12 ) Madrigal Correa, Alma Lucia ; Cuesta Leiva, Jose Antonio ; Somerville, Sergio Patrick Show more This article explores the links between conflict, land and indigenous peoples in several regions of Mindano, the Philippines, notorious for their levels of poverty and conflict. The analysis takes advantage of the unprecedented concurrence of data from the most recent, 2020, census; an independent conflict data monitor for Mindanao; and administrative sources on ancestral land titling for indigenous peoples in the Philippines. While evidence elsewhere compellingly links land titling with conflict reduction, a more nuanced story emerges in the Philippines. Conflicts, including land- and resource-related conflicts, are generally less likely in districts (barangays) with higher shares of indigenous peoples. Ancestral domain areas also have a lower likelihood for general conflict but a higher likelihood for land-related conflict. Ancestral domains titling does not automatically solve land-related conflicts. When administrative delays take place (from cumbersome bureaucratic processes, insufficient resources and weak institutional capacity), titling processes may lead to sustained, rather than decreased, conflict. Show more
  • Publication Gender-Specific Transportation Costs and Female Time Use ( Washington, DC: World Bank , 2024-02-12 ) Chen, Yutong ; Cosar, Kerem ; Ghose, Devaki ; Mahendru, Shirish ; Sekhri, Sheetal Show more This paper estimates a synthetic difference-in-differences specification on the roll-out of a program providing free bus transit for women in several Indian states, to examine the impact on women’s time allocation and labor supply. Household expenditures on buses fall and women save time on travel. However, there is substantial heterogeneity. Skilled employed women increase labor supply and reduce time on household chores. Low-skilled married women increase time on household activities and reduce labor supply. Unemployed women increase job search with no effect on employment. The findings show that gender roles within households undermine the effect of gender-specific travel subsidies on female labor supply. Show more

Journal Volume

Journal issue, collections, associated urls, associated content.

Financial Distress Prediction: Principle Component Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks

Ieee account.

  • Change Username/Password
  • Update Address

Purchase Details

  • Payment Options
  • Order History
  • View Purchased Documents

Profile Information

  • Communications Preferences
  • Profession and Education
  • Technical Interests
  • US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
  • Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
  • Contact & Support
  • About IEEE Xplore
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Nondiscrimination Policy
  • Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.

Economic Research - Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

The Persistence of Financial Distress

Working Paper 2017-038C by Kartik Athreya, José Mustre-del-Río, and Juan M. Sánchez

Using recently available proprietary panel data, we show that while many (35%) US consumers experience financial distress at some point in the life cycle, most of the events of financial distress are primarily concentrated in a much smaller proportion of consumers in persistent trouble. Roughly 10% of consumers are distressed for more than a quarter of the life cycle, and less than 10% of borrowers account for half of all distress events. These facts can be largely accounted for in a straightforward extension of a workhorse model of defaultable debt that accommodates a simple form of heterogeneity in time preference but not otherwise.

Read Full Text

https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2017.038

https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz009

  • Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Related Links

  • Economist Pages
  • JEL Classification System
  • Fed In Print

SUBSCRIBE TO THE RESEARCH DIVISION NEWSLETTER

Research division.

  • Legal and Privacy

research papers on financial distress

One Federal Reserve Bank Plaza St. Louis, MO 63102

Information for Visitors

follow @stlouisfed

  • Money Museum

Kansas City Fed Logo

  • Community Development
  • TEN Magazine

The Effects of Macroeconomic Shocks: Household Financial Distress Matters

Accounting for household financial distress helps explain large regional differences in spending responses during recessions.

  • Research Working Paper

RWP 20-13, September 2020; updated January 2024

This paper investigates how, and how much, household financial distress (FD), arising from allowing debts to go unpaid, matters for the aggregate and cross-sectional consumption responses to macroeconomic risk. Through a battery of structural models, we show that FD can affect consumption responses through three channels: (1) as another margin of adjustment to shocks (direct channel); (2) because its persistence implies a significant degree of preference heterogeneity (indirect channel); and (3) because it can exacerbate macroeconomic risks whenever it is more severe in the hardest-hit regions, as evinced by the last two recessions (correlation channel). We find that all channels shape cross-sectional differences in the response of consumption to shocks. However, only the direct and indirect channels matter in the aggregate.

JEL Classification: D31, D58, E21, E44, G11, G12, G21

Article Citation

Athreya, Kartik, Ryan Mather, José Mustre-del-Río, and Juan M. Sánchez. 2024. “The Effects of Macroeconomic Shocks: Household Financial Distress Matters.” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Research Working Paper no. 20-13, January. Available at External Link https://doi.org/10.18651/RWP2020-13

Note: Previous versions of this RWP from September 2020 and October 2021 were titled "Household Financial Distress and the Burden of "Aggregate" Shocks" and "Financial Distress and Macroeconomic Risks".

Related Research

Athreya, Kartik, Ryan A. Mather, José Mustre-del-Río, and Juan M. Sánchez. 2019. “Consumption in the Great Recession: The Financial Distress Channel.” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Research Working Paper no. 19-06, October. Available at  External Link https://doi.org/10.18651/RWP2019-06

Athreya, Kartik, José Mustre-del-Río, and Juan M. Sánchez. 2019. “The Persistence of Financial Distress.” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 3851–3883. Available at  External Link https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz009

Mian, Atif, Kamalesh Rao, and Amir Sufi. 2013. “Household Balance Sheets, Consumption, and the Economic Slump.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 1687–1726. Available at  External Link https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt020

Share Article:

José mustre-del-río, research and policy officer.

José Mustre-del-Río is a Research and Policy Officer at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. He joined the Economic Research Department in August 2011. Prior to joining the d…

Additional Resources

Uninsurable income risk and the welfare effects of reducing global imbalances.

Encouraging savings in debtor economies can help balance their current accounts while raising wages globally.

Explaining the Life Cycle of Bank-Sponsored Money Market Funds: An Application of the Regulatory Dialectic

How banks and regulators react to each other helps explain how the money market fund industry has evolved.

Shocks, Frictions, and Policy Regimes: Understanding Inflation after the COVID-19 Pandemic

Fiscal and monetary policies likely contributed to the persistent rise in inflation during the post-pandemic period.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List

Logo of plosone

Financial stress and depression in adults: A systematic review

Naijie guan.

1 Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Alessandra Guariglia

2 Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Patrick Moore

Fangzhou xu, hareth al-janabi, associated data.

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Financial stress has been proposed as an economic determinant of depression. However, there is little systematic analysis of different dimensions of financial stress and their association with depression. This paper reports a systematic review of 40 observational studies quantifying the relationship between various measures of financial stress and depression outcomes in adults. Most of the reviewed studies show that financial stress is positively associated with depression. A positive association between financial stress and depression is found in both high-income and low-and middle-income countries, but is generally stronger among populations with low income or wealth. In addition to the “social causation” pathway, other pathways such as “psychological stress” and “social selection” can also explain the effects of financial stress on depression. More longitudinal research would be useful to investigate the causal relationship and mechanisms linking different dimensions of financial stress and depression. Furthermore, exploration of effects in subgroups could help target interventions to break the cycle of financial stress and depression.

Introduction

Depression is one of the most common mental health problems and is marked by sadness, loss of interest or pleasure, feelings of guilt or low self-worth, disturbed sleep or appetite, feelings of tiredness, and poor concentration [ 1 ]. Depression is a leading cause of disability and poor health worldwide [ 1 ] and is expected to rank first worldwide by 2030 [ 2 ]. According to a survey from the World Health Organization, more than 322 million people, which accounted for approximately 4.4% of the world population, suffered from depressive disorders in 2015 [ 3 ]. The lifetime risk of developing depression was estimated to be 15%-18% [ 4 ]. Mental health problems including depression have imposed a heavy economic burden on individuals and households who are suffering from mental disorders and even on society [ 5 – 7 ]. Specifically, the global costs of mental health problems are increasing each year in every country. Those costs are estimated to reach approximately 16 trillion dollars by 2030 [ 8 , 9 ]. There is a considerable need to explore the risk factors of mental disorders or the determinants of mental health, which will inform preventive strategies and actions aimed at reducing the risk of getting mental disorders and thereby promoting public mental health.

Many social and economic determinants of depression have been identified. These include proximal factors like unemployment, low socioeconomic status, low education, low income and not being in a relationship and distal factors such as income inequality, structural characteristics of the neighbourhood and so on [ 10 – 12 ]. Research has emerged in the past two decades focusing on the association between the individual or household financial stressors and common mental disorders such as depression and anxiety. However, findings regarding the relationship between different indicators of financial stress and depression are inconclusive in the previous literature. Studies have shown positive associations between depression and various indicators of financial stress such as debt or debt stress, financial hardship, or difficulties [ 13 – 15 ]. Some other studies find no relationships when financial stress was indicated by low income. For example, Zimmerman and Katon [ 16 ] found that when other socioeconomic confounders were considered, no relationship between low income and depression was observed. Besides, there is evidence showing a negative association between low income and major depressive disorder in South Korea [ 17 ]. A 2010 review on poverty and mental disorders also finds that the association between income and mental disorders (including depression) was still unclear [ 18 ].

The social causation theory is one of the theories that has been proposed to explain possible mechanisms underlying the effect of poverty on mental disorders [ 18 , 19 ]. It states that stressful financial circumstances might lead to the occurrence of new depressive symptoms or maintain previous depression. This might be due to exposure to worse living conditions, malnutrition, unhealthy lifestyle, lower social capital, social isolation, or decreased coping ability with negative life events. Individuals or households with limited financial resources are more vulnerable to stressful life events (e.g., economic crises, public-health crises), which might increase the risk of mental health problems [ 18 – 20 ]. However, practically, social causation might not be applicable to situations where individuals are not in poverty or deprivation but still can experience depression due to financial stress.

Reviews to date have examined the relationship between debt specifically and broader mental health outcomes with depression being one of them. For example, two reviews published in 2013 and 2014 reviewed the literature on the relationship between debt and both mental health and physical health [ 21 , 22 ]. They concluded that there was a significant relationship between personal unsecured debt or unpaid debt obligations and the increased risk of common mental disorders, suicidal ideation and so on [ 21 , 22 ]. In terms of depression, they found that there was a strong and consistent positive relationship between debt and depression. Another focus of the literature is on the relationship between poverty and mental health problems including depression in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC). In those reviews, indicators of poverty include low socioeconomic status, low income, unemployment, low levels of education, food insecurity and low social class [ 18 , 23 ]. Both reviews find a positive relationship between poverty and common mental disorders, which exists in many LMIC societies regardless of their levels of development. Being related to low income, factors such as insecurity, low levels of education, unemployment, and poor housing were found to be strongly associated with mental disorders, while the association between income and mental disorders was unclear.

The reviews discussed above focus mainly on the relationship between debt or poverty and mental health outcomes. As sources of financial stress are complex and multidimensional, indicators such as low income or debt are not the only economic risk factor of mental health problems. Other sources of financial stress such as lack of assets, economic hardship or financial difficulties (e.g., whether an individual finds it difficult to meet standard living needs like buying food, clothes, paying bills and so on) might also relate to depression. In addition, various sources of financial stress might be related to mental health problems in different ways. Based on the existing reviews, it is still unknown which domains of financial stress have clearer associations with depression and whether there is heterogeneity in the relationship between financial stress and depression for different populations and contexts. Moreover, the existing reviews do not discuss the possible mechanisms underpinning the association between financial stress and depression. To better understand the association between financial stress and depression and the possible mechanisms underlying it, a systematic review was conducted bringing together a wide range of indicators of financial stress. The eligible economic indicators of financial stress in this review include objective financial variables like income, assets, wealth, indebtedness; as well as measures that capture subjective perceptions of financial stress, such as perceived financial hardship (e.g., subjective feelings of sufficiency regarding food, clothes, medical care, and housing), subjective financial situation (e.g., individuals’ feelings about their overall financial situation), subjective financial stress, subjective financial position, and financial dissatisfaction.

This study aims at providing a comprehensive review of the association between different financial stressors and depression considering the characteristics of the associations of interest and discussing the proposed mechanisms underlying the associations. An understanding of the relationship between financial stress and depression would not only advance our understanding and knowledge of the economic risk factors of mood disorders but also provide policymakers with more understanding of additional public mental health benefits of intervention aimed at alleviating poverty and/or at improving people’s financial conditions.

Search strategies

A systematic review of published literature was conducted using online searches on bibliographic databases. At the first stage, six bibliographic databases including CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, EconLit, AMED, and Business Source Premier were searched for related peer-reviewed journal articles to April 2019. The search terms are listed in Table 1 . The broad strategy was to combine terms related to finances, with terms related to depression, and terms related to the unit of analysis (individual, household etc). Several key studies that were eligible for inclusion criteria were pre-identified. Before the formal search, pilot searches were performed to make sure the pre-identified key studies can be found by the search. More details of search strategies are displayed in S1 Appendix . All the search results were limited to the English language. No time restriction was added to the search. The reference lists of the eligible studies and several relevant review papers were checked manually to supplement the main electronic searching.

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion and exclusion criteria for study selection were designed to ensure a focus on primary studies and secondary studies conducted on adults, using measures of financial stress (exposure) and depression (outcome). The eligibility criteria were tested on a selection of papers by multiple members of the study team to ensure that studies were categorised accurately. Based on the piloting process, the eligibility criteria were further modified. The following is the list of the final inclusion and exclusion criteria applied in this study.

Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) observational and experimental studies on the relationship between the individual or household financial stress and depression or depressive symptoms; (2) original research in peer-reviewed journals; (3) conducted on general population samples aged 18 and over; (4) used indicators which capture different dimensions of an individual or household financial stress, such as income, assets, debt, wealth, economic hardship, financial strain, financial stress, and financial satisfaction; (5) studies that measure depression through both non-clinical and clinical techniques (e.g., Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), were eligible for this review.

Studies were excluded if they were: (1) systematic reviews, dissertations, conference abstracts, or study protocols; (2) studies focusing on a specific population including female-only, male-only, people with a special occupation (e.g., soldiers), migrants, or people with specific illnesses; (3) studies relating to societal (as opposed individual) economic circumstances (e.g., income inequality measured at the community level or the country level) or shocks to the macroeconomy (e.g., stock market crashes, hyperinflation, banking crises, economic depressions, and financial crisis); (4) studies that only reported the joint association between several socioeconomic determinants and depression. These were included only if the association related to individual or household finances were reported and explained individually; (5) studies based on overall mental health, or other types of mental disorders (e.g., anxiety, suicide, self-harm, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, dementia) where the association between household financial stress and depression was not reported and explained independently.

Study selection

Search strategies were applied to six databases (i.e., CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, EconLit, AMED, and Business Source Premier EBSCO) to generate a long list of candidate studies. All the search results were exported into Mendeley. Search results, after the removal of duplicates, were screened for relevance using the title and abstract information. The full texts of relevant articles were then checked for eligibility based on the selection criteria. Screening and selection were undertaken by two reviewers independently. All authors were consulted when a disagreement arose. The study selection process and reasons for study exclusions were recorded in a flow chart shown in Fig 1 .

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is pone.0264041.g001.jpg

Data analysis

A pre-designed data collection form (listed in S2 Appendix ) was used for the data extraction process. The data extracted from the eligible studies covered the following categories: (1) characteristics of studies: year, author, journal, aim of study, countries, study type, data sources, responsible rate, level of study, eligibility of ethical approval; (2) characteristics of the population: sample size, age group, mean age of the participants, gender; (3) depression measures, definition of depression, validity of the measures; (4) measures of financial stress (exposures) used, measures of the exposure, definition of the exposure, validity of the measures; (5) statistical analysis: econometric methodologies, covariates, whether reverse causality was taken into account, whether there are subgroup analyses and methods (6) main results. The key information being extracted is presented in S1 and S3 Tables, which is a simplified version of the extracted data.

This review focused on the association between each dimension of financial stress and depression and analysed the heterogeneity of the association in different contexts. The eligible studies were reviewed narratively, and the results were stratified by different indicators of financial stress (e.g., low income, low assets, low wealth, debt, financial difficulties and so on). Causal inferences and proposed mechanisms underlying the association between financial stress and depression based on the reviewed evidence were discussed in the discussion section. No meta-analysis was conducted to pool the reviewed evidence due to the substantial heterogeneity in the measurements and definitions of the exposure and outcome variables, study context, and methodologies.

Quality assessment

The quality of the included studies was assessed using an adapted version of the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies used in Glonti et al. [ 24 ] (see S3 Appendix ). The original version of this tool is developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) [ 25 ]. Seven key domains relating to study design, selection bias, withdrawals, confounders, data collection, data analysis and reporting were considered. Studies can have between six and seven component ratings. The score of each domain equals 1 if the quality is high, 2 if the quality is moderate and 3 if the quality is low. An overall rating for each study was determined based on the ratings for all domains. The overall rating of studies’ quality was classified as high, moderate, or low. Full details of the design and usage of the quality assessment tool can be found in Glonti et al. [ 24 ]. The quality assessment of the included studies was conducted by two reviewers independently. The results of the quality assessment were based on consensus between the two reviewers.

5,134 papers were identified after searching online databases including CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, EconLit, AMED, and Business Source Premier. The flow chart for the study selection process is displayed in Fig 1 . The total number of papers after removing duplicates was 4,035. Both titles and abstracts of the identified 4,035 papers were screened. 3,763 papers were removed since they did not satisfy the eligibility criteria. The full texts of the remaining 272 papers were accessed and further screened separately by the two reviewers based on the eligible criteria. 235 papers were further excluded leading to 37 studies for consideration. The main reasons for exclusion were that the exposure, the outcome variables of interest, or the targeted population of those studies did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three additional articles were further added after checking the reference lists of all the eligible papers and those of the past relevant review papers [e.g., 18 , 21 ]. 40 articles were finally identified for the data extraction.

Study characteristics

Regarding the number of reviewed studies by years of publication, most of the reviewed studies were published in the past two decades, with a noticeable spike in the last five years. The majority of studies (32 out of 40) reported evidence from high-income European countries and the USA, Australia, Japan, and South Korea. Eight studies were based on low- and middle-countries including China, Chile, and South Africa. In terms of study design, 17 studies were cross-sectional, and 23 studies were longitudinal. The age groups considered in the 40 studies vary: 17 studies focused on the general adult population including young adults, middle-aged adults, and older adults, while 23 studies focused specifically on working-age, young adults, middle-aged, or older adults. Data of study characteristics were displayed in the data extraction form in S1 Table .

Measures of depression

The most commonly used measure for depression was the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) [e.g., 26 – 28 ]. Various versions of the CES-D were used in the reviewed studies: six studies used the full version, that is, the 20-item CES-D; 19 studies used the shortened version of the CES-D scale. Other measures were also used to assess the individual’s depressive symptoms such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [ 29 ], the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) [ 30 , 31 ], a subsection of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ depression) [ 31 – 33 ], the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV) [ 34 ], the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [ 35 ] and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) [ 15 , 36 , 37 ]. Two studies used self-reported depression by asking participants whether or not they had any experience of depression [ 13 , 38 ].

Measures of financial stress

A wide variety of concepts and measures of financial stress were used across the reviewed studies. The financial exposure in the reviewed studies can be divided roughly into two categories. First, personal or household finances, which include income, assets or wealth, debt or hardship were investigated. These economic indicators were measured in different ways. Some studies measured the total amount of assets while other studies measured assets by counting the number of durable items owned by an individual (such as motor vehicles, bicycles, computers, or cameras) or a household (such as fridges, microwaves, TV, cameras). The measures of debt were more diversified: the onset of debt, the amount of debt in general and of different types of debt, the debt-to-asset ratio, debt problems like over-indebtedness, debt arrears, and debt stress. Financial hardship was defined as difficulties in meeting the basic requirements of daily life due to a lack of financial resources. For example, not having enough money for food, clothes, shelter and medical expenses; being unable to pay bills on time or heat the home; having to sell assets; going without meals; or asking for financial help from others were used by these studies as proxies for financial hardship [ 30 , 39 ]. Second, some studies examined the associations between depression and subjective perceptions of financial stress such as perceived financial hardship (e.g., subjective feelings of insufficiency regarding food, clothes, medical care, etc.), subjective financial situation (e.g., individual’s feelings of their overall financial situation), subjective financial stress, subjective financial position, financial dissatisfaction and so on.

Quality of reviewed studies

Full details of the quality assessment of the 40 included studies are displayed in S2 Table and S1 Fig . An observational study design was utilised in all of the included papers. 29 (72.5%), and 11 (27.5%) studies were rated as methodologically strong [ 6 , 13 – 16 , 20 , 26 – 28 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 37 – 53 ] and moderate [ 29 , 31 , 32 , 35 , 36 , 54 – 59 ], respectively. Among the 40 included studies, 34 (85%) had a low risk of selection bias, five (12.5%) had a moderate risk and one had a high risk of selection bias. Eight studies were able to be rated on withdrawals and drop-outs: two of them were rated as “strong”, four achieved a “moderate” rating and one received a “weak” rating. We found that 15 studies (37.5%) had a low risk while 25 (62.5%) had a moderate risk of confounding bias. Regarding the data collection, two studies were rated as ‘strong’, 37 received a ‘strong’ score, and one study was rated as ‘weak’. All the studies received a ‘strong’ rating for data analysis except for one study that was rated as ‘weak’. 35 (87.5%) studies received a ‘strong’ rating for reporting, while five studies had a ‘moderate’ quality of reporting.

Association between income and depression

Eleven studies were identified examining the relationship between individual or household income levels and depression. All controlled for other socioeconomic confounders or/and health status. Seven studies found a statistically significant association between low income and a higher risk of depressive symptoms after adjustment. The positive association between low income and depression was reported in both high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries and found in different age groups (i.e., younger adults, middle-aged adults, and older adults).

The intertemporal relationship between individual or household income and depression was investigated in three longitudinal studies [ 20 , 34 , 58 ]. Osafo et al. found that in the UK, an increase in household relative income (i.e., income rank) was statistically related to a decreased risk of depression at a given time point [ 58 ]. The effect of household income at baseline on the risk of showing depressive symptoms in the following time point was weakened but still statistically significant, controlling for the baseline depression level. Lund and Cois reported similar results: they found that lower household income at baseline could predict a worse depression status during the follow-up period in South Africa [ 20 ]. Based on evidence from the US, Sareen et al. found that individuals with lower levels of household income faced an increased risk of depression compared to those with higher levels of household income [ 34 ]. Furthermore, a reduction in income was also related to an increased risk of depression [ 34 ].

Focusing on pension income, which is one of the main sources of household income for the retired population, Chen et al. found that pension enrolment and pension income were significantly associated with a reduction in CESD scores among Chinese older adults, controlling for other socioeconomic factors and health status [ 43 ].

The strength of the relationship between income and depression varies and can be affected by how income is measured. For example, compared to absolute income, a household’s relative income level within a reference group was found to be a more consistent household financial predictor of depression [ 58 ]. Osafo et al. compared the effect of relative income with that of the absolute value of household income [ 58 ]. They found that a deterioration in the rank of household income was associated with a higher possibility of showing depression at a given time point, as well as the subsequent time point [ 58 ].

The relationship between income and depression holds for all income groups but is more pronounced among lower-income groups. According to Zimmerman and Katon, the association between depression and income is stronger among people with income levels below the median [ 16 ]. Based on a quasi-natural experiment, Reeves et al. also found that the reduction in housing benefits significantly increased the prevalence of depression for low-income UK households [ 38 ]. Additionally, the association between pension income and depressive symptoms in older adults were more pronounced among lower-income groups [ 43 ]. More broadly, the income-depression relationship might be influenced by the economic status of the regions where households live. For example, Jo et al. found that the association between income and depression was significant among participants from low-economic-status regions, while it was insignificant among participants from high-economic-status regions [ 55 ].

Association between material assets and depression

Two studies on the relationship between assets and depression were identified: one cross-sectional study [ 29 ] and one longitudinal study [ 20 ]. Those studies showed that assets were a significant predictor of depression after controlling for demographic and other socioeconomic confounders. Furthermore, the household assets-depression association was found to be stronger for individuals with lower levels of assets at baseline [ 20 , 29 ]. The directions of the assets-depression relationship were investigated in one study. Lund and Cois simultaneously examined both directions of the relationships using a nationally representative survey on South Africa [ 20 ]. They found that low levels of individual and household material assets were significantly related to depression in the follow-up period after controlling for age, gender, race and education. Conversely, having more depression symptoms at baseline was significantly associated with lower levels of individual assets in the follow-up period [ 20 ].

Association between wealth and depression

Three studies explored the relationship between wealth and depression in adults. All of them were based on high-income country contexts including the UK and the US and suggested a positive relationship between individual or household low wealth and depression among middle-aged and older adults. Two longitudinal studies examined the association between wealth and depression. Specifically, Pool et al. found that an increase in household wealth was statistically related to a decrease in the risk of depressive symptoms [ 50 ]. Osafo et al. compared the effect of relative wealth (i.e., wealth rank) and absolute wealth on depressive symptoms [ 58 ]. Their results showed that, instead of the absolute wealth, the wealth rank within a social comparison group was the primary driver of the association between wealth and depressive symptoms [ 58 ]. The strength of the relationship between wealth and depression varies according to the level of wealth at baseline [ 58 ]. For example, Martikainen et al. found the association between household wealth and depression was most pronounced among the lowest wealth group [ 33 ].

Association between debt and depression

Fourteen studies investigated the association between debt and depression and provided empirical evidence based on high-income countries (Europe and the US) and Chile. Three studies were cross-sectional and all of them reported a positive association between debt (assessed by student debt, the occurrence of any debt, or unsecured debt) and depressive symptoms after controlling for demographic and other socioeconomic factors [ 6 , 27 , 53 ]. Eleven longitudinal studies identified by this review investigated the association between debt and depression over time. The definitions and measures of debt vary across studies. Associations between the occurrence and/or amount of financial debt, the occurrence and/or amount of housing debt, excessive mortgage debt, the occurrence of any debt, the debt-to-asset ratio, and the debt-to-income ratio, on the one hand, and depression, on the other, were investigated in the reviewed studies.

The association between changes in debt status and changes in depressive symptoms was investigated in six studies. Specifically, using five waves of data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Hiilamo and Grundy found that both men and women switched from having no financial debt to having substantial financial debt suffered from a deterioration in depressive symptoms [ 28 ]. Also, switching from no mortgage debt to having substantial mortgage debt was positively associated with the deterioration in depressive symptoms among women [ 28 ]. Using a large nationally representative dataset from the Chilean Social Protection Survey (SPS), Hojman et al. also found that individuals who were always over-indebted or switch from having moderate levels of debt to over-indebtedness had more depressive symptoms than those who were never over-indebted [ 46 ]. Additionally, they found that those who were not over-indebted, regardless of the previous debt status, did not experience a worsening in depression, showing that the effect of over-indebtedness on depressive symptoms faded away as the debt levels decreased [ 46 ].

Various measures of debt were used in the reviewed studies such as the occurrence of debt [ 26 , 27 , 53 ], the amount of debt [ 6 , 14 , 26 , 28 , 53 ], and the debt-to-income ratio or debt-to-asset ratio [ 14 , 46 , 48 ]. The debt-depression relationship varies with different operationalisations of debt with the debt to asset ratio being a more reliable predictor of depression than the total debt. Both Sweet et al. and Hojman et al. found that only the debt-to-assets ratio or debt-to-income ratio (rather than the absolute amount of debt) were consistently and positively associated with higher depression scores before and after adjustment (see S1 and S3 Tables for details of the covariates used) [ 14 , 46 ].

Different types of debt such as secured debt (e.g., mortgage debt) and unsecured debt (e.g., consumer debt) might be related to the depression in different ways. The reviewed studies reported a positive association between high levels of mortgage debt and high unsecured consumer debt (regardless of the amount) and depression [ 14 , 48 , 53 ]. For example, Leung and Lau examined the causal relationship between mortgage debt and depressive symptoms and found that a high level of mortgage indebtedness (defined as a mortgage loan to home value ratio over 80%) was associated with more depressive symptoms among mortgagors [ 48 ]. Both Zurlo et al. and Sweet et al. found that unsecured debt (e.g., consumer debt) was a significant predictor of more depressive symptoms [ 14 , 53 ]. Three studies compared the effect of different types of household debts on depression [ 26 , 28 , 46 ]. The results of those three studies suggested that the association between household debt and depressive symptoms was predominantly driven by short-term debt. Specifically, unsecured debt (e.g., financial debt), or short-term debt were associated with a higher risk of experiencing depression, while secured debt itself (e.g., mortgage debt) or long-term debt were not related to depressive symptoms. For example, using longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Hiilamo and Grundy found that household financial debt was positively and significantly associated with more depressive symptoms, while the effect of household housing debt on depression was weak or even insignificant [ 28 ]. Berger et al. found a similar result using longitudinal data from the US. Their results (controlling for baseline characteristics and socioeconomic factors) showed that only short-term debt (i.e., unsecured debt) was positively and statistically significantly associated with depressive symptoms, while the effects of mid-term and long-term debt (e.g., mortgage loan) on depressive symptoms were not significant [ 26 ].

However, it is not always the case that the association between debt and depressive symptoms is only driven by consumer debt. As reported in two longitudinal studies by Hiilamo and Grundy and by Gathergood, a secured debt like mortgage might be associated with depression when the secured debt becomes a problem debt [ 28 , 32 ]. Hojman et al. found that mortgage debt had no association with depressive symptoms, while consumer debt was positively and significantly related to more depressive symptoms [ 28 ]. Nevertheless, both Hojman et al. and Alley et al. found that mortgage arrears had a significant effect on more severe depression, even when the effect of consumer debt on depression was controlled [ 40 , 46 ]. In line with their study, Gathergood also found that housing payment problems were strongly associated with a higher depression score [ 32 ].

Association between financial hardship and depression

The association between financial hardship and depression was reported in four studies, all of which were based on high-income countries such as the US and Australia [ 15 , 30 , 39 , 52 ]. They all observed a cross-sectionally positive relationship between financial hardship and depression, which holds after adjustments (see S1 and S3 Tables for details of the covariates used). The intertemporal association between financial hardship and depressive symptoms was reported in two longitudinal studies [ 15 , 39 ]. However, the consistency of the findings is sensitive to the statistical methods applied. Mirowsky and Ross found that current financial hardship was associated with a subsequent increase in depression in the US [ 39 ]. The other study only observed an association between financial hardship at baseline and baseline depression, as well as a weak or even no association between prior financial hardship and current depression [ 15 ]. When the same statistical strategy was applied, the findings from Butterworth et al. were consistent with those were observed in Mirowsky and Ross’s study [ 15 , 39 ].

Furthermore, the reviewed studies showed that the effect of past financial hardship on depressive symptoms decayed with time. In other words, current financial hardship mattered the most for current depressive symptoms. Following Mirowsky and Ross, changes in financial hardship were stratified into four types [ 39 ]. An individual experiencing (not experiencing) current financial hardship and hardship in the past belongs to the always hardship group (no hardship group). An individual experiencing only current (past) financial hardship belongs to the new hardship group (resolved hardship group). Mirowsky and Ross found that the effects of consistent hardship and new financial hardship (3 years later) on depressive symptoms were positive and significant [ 39 ]. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the follow-up depressive symptoms between the consistent hardship group and the new hardship group [ 39 ]. Furthermore, the association between both resolved hardship and no hardship on depressive symptoms was not significant [ 39 ]. Consistent with this, Butterworth et al. also found that the individuals who currently experienced financial hardship were more likely to have depression than those who only experienced financial hardship in the past or never experienced it [ 15 ].

Age was the most analysed moderator of the association between financial hardship and depressive symptoms among the reviewed studies. This review found that there is no consistency in terms of the association between financial hardship and depression across different age groups. Butterworth et al. reported that the effect of financial hardship on depressive symptoms increased with age among Australian adults [ 30 ]. However, Butterworth et al. and Mirowsky and Ross reported different results [ 15 , 39 ]. Specifically, they found that the positive association between financial hardship and depressive symptoms decreased with age in the US. In contrast to the two studies listed above, Butterworth et al. did not find any statistically significant differences regarding this association among different age cohorts in Australia [ 15 ].

Association between subjective financial strain and depression

Eleven studies examined the association between subjective financial indicators (i.e., subjective financial strain, financial dissatisfaction or financial stress) and depression, providing empirical evidence based on high-income countries (Europe, the US, the UK, Japan and Korea) and on China. All of them (including four cross-sectional and seven longitudinal studies) reported a positive relationship between subjective financial strain and depression, holding after adjustments (see S1 and S3 Tables for details of the covariates used)). The intertemporal association between subjective financial strain and depression was reported in two studies [ 44 , 59 ]. For example, Richardson et al. found that increased subjective stress at baseline was associated with greater depression over time [ 59 ]. Similarly, Chi and Chou also found that higher levels of subjective financial strain measured at baseline were associated with more depressive symptoms after three years among Chinese older people [ 44 ]. The association between changes in subjective financial strain and depression was found in one longitudinal study [ 49 ]. Using data from the annual Belgian Household Panel Survey, Lorant et al. found that the worsening subjective financial strain was significantly associated with the increased risk of depressive symptoms and that of caseness of depression [ 49 ].

The positive and significant association between perceived financial strain in childhood and depression in adults was found in both a cross-sectional study and a longitudinal study [ 42 , 47 ]. Using cross-sectional data from 19 European countries in 2014, Boe et al. found that younger adults (25–40) who had experienced financial difficulties as children had higher depression scores in adulthood, while older adults (over 40) did not [ 42 ]. A similar association between adverse childhood financial situation and adults’ depression was also found in a longitudinal study [ 47 ]. Based on a national representative sample of 9,645 South Korean adults without depressive symptoms at baseline, Kim, et al. found that experiencing financial difficulties in childhood was associated with the increased chance of depression in adulthood [ 47 ]. Furthermore, the effect of experiencing financial difficulties in childhood on depression was weaker than that of current financial difficulties [ 47 ].

The gender difference of the association between perceived financial strain and depression was examined in two studies and no statistical difference between females and males was observed, though women tended to report worse depression [ 36 , 44 ].

Summary and discussion of the findings

This systematic review is the most comprehensive synthesis of observational studies quantifying the association between indicators of financial stress and depression in both high- and low- and middle-income countries to date. Findings regarding the relationship between financial stress and depression vary across different indicators of financial stress. Economic indicators such as material assets, unsecured debt, financial hardship, and subjective measures of financial stress are relatively strong and persistent predictors of depressive symptoms, while absolute income and wealth levels have an inconclusive association with depression. The only longitudinal evidence on relative income and relative wealth suggests a stronger relationship between relative income or relative wealth and depressive symptoms than that between absolute income or wealth and depression. Additionally, this review finds that the association between indicators such as income, material assets or wealth and depression is more pronounced in lower socioeconomic groups (i.e., low income or low wealth group). This review is unable to make a conclusion regarding the association between debt and depression across different socioeconomic subgroups. The only evidence is provided in one study showing that there is no difference in the association between debt and depression by assets level. Additionally, there is insufficient evidence to conclude a common pattern regarding the association between financial stressors and depression by gender or age groups, though differences of this relationship across age or gender groups are observed in some of the reviewed studies.

The income-depression association is inconclusive, although income is one of the most commonly used indicators of the individual or household’s economic situation. The reviewed studies consistently reported a positive association between low income and depressive symptoms in univariable analyses. However, this association was largely reduced or even became insignificant when other social and economic factors (such as educational level, employment status and so on) and health status were controlled for [ 31 , 33 ]. The findings are consistent with the results from the previous reviews and empirical research where different mental disorders were considered including depression [ 18 , 23 , 60 ]. It is likely that income has a close correlation with other dimensions of the socioeconomic condition such as educational levels and employment status that affect an individual’s mental health independently from income per se [ 23 ].

Furthermore, this review finds that compared to absolute income (or wealth), relative income (or wealth) in a reference group is a more important risk factor of depression. There is evidence showing a positive association between low-income ranks and current depression scores as well as follow-up depression scores, while no association is found between absolute low income and depression [ 58 ]. The findings here are in line with the previous review, which mainly focused on the association between income inequality and depression [ 61 ]. Patel et al.’s review concluded that a higher level of income inequality at the neighbourhood level was strongly associated with a higher risk of depression [ 61 ]. This review only identified one study investigating the association between relative income or relative wealth and depression. The insufficient evidence on this topic suggests the need for more research to investigate the mental health effects of relative income (or wealth).

Some of the reviewed studies have suggested a positive association between debt and depression despite the substantial heterogeneity in definitions and measurements of debt, study methods, study contexts, and targeted population. The association between debt and depressive symptoms is mainly driven by unsecured debt (e.g., credit card) or late mortgage payments. Secured debt (e.g., mortgage debt) per se is not associated with depressive symptoms. However, depression may still be more likely when individuals or households are no longer able to manage their debt or perform debt obligations. For example, the reviewed evidence shows that mortgage arrears have a significant effect on more severe depression, even when the effect of consumer debt and mortgage debt on depressive symptoms are considered within the same model [ 46 , 48 ]. The findings regarding the relationship between debt and depression are consistent with the findings from the previous reviews on the association between debt and health where depression was one of the outcomes [ 22 , 62 ].

An important consideration regarding the debt-depression relationship is that having personal or household debt does not always lead to depression, as debt is not always a sign of financial problems. Some personal and household loans are taken to finance housing purchases, business, and investments, which are granted based on the borrower’s financial situation and payback abilities. Additionally, except for stress, debt might also bring benefits to mental well-being by generating consumption, feelings of attainment or satisfaction or making investments [ 63 , 64 ]. As a result, the financial stress derived from debt could be partially offset by such positive mental well-being effects. The review suggests that future longitudinal research on the impact of debt on depression should consider mediators to understand the nature of the causal association between debt and mental health.

It should be noted that nearly a half of the reviewed studies are cross-sectional, limiting the ability to draw a conclusion on the directions and the causality of the associations between some indicators of financial stress and depression. A few of the longitudinal studies considered the reverse relationship and/or the unobserved bias using econometric methods. The majority of these longitudinal studies mainly focused on the relationship between debt or subjective measures of financial stress and depression. They provide supportive evidence that, debt and subjective financial stress might lead to subsequent depressive symptoms. Longitudinal evidence remains limited as to the understanding of both directions and causality of the relationships between other indicators of financial stress and depression. For example, only three longitudinal studies provided an exploration of the association between income and depression. The casual relationship between some indicators of financial stress (such as low income, material assets, wealth, financial hardship) and depression should therefore be interpreted with caution.

This review includes a number of studies focusing on the older-aged population. The signs of the relationship between financial stress and depression in different age subgroups do not show a significant difference. Despite this, it should be noted that there might be heterogeneity in the magnitude of the relationship between financial stress and depression across different age subgroups. However, it is difficult to identify if including the studies based on adults aged 50 and over would make the generalisability of the findings towards this population. Because a cross-study comparison is almost impossible as there is a substantial heterogeneity in different studies regarding country contexts, measurements of exposures and outcome variables, study methods and so on.

Based on the reviewed evidence, three possible mechanisms may be behind the relationship between financial stress and depression.

Social causation

Firstly, as highlighted in the introduction, the effects of financial stress on depression can be explained by social causation theory. The reviewed evidence supports the social causation pathway according to which individuals or households who have low income or low wealth are more likely to be exposed to economic uncertainty, unhealthy lifestyle, worse living environment, deprivation, malnutrition, decreased social capital and so on [ 20 , 47 , 65 ]. Those factors might lead to a higher risk of developing depressive symptoms. Individuals or households with limited financial resources are more vulnerable to stressful financial events, which might increase the risk of experiencing depression. This mechanism is applicable to the studies where financial stress is measured by economic indicators related to poverty, such as income poverty, deprivation, and financial hardship.

Psychological stress

The reviewed studies also show that subjective measures of financial stress have adverse effects on depression. Indeed, some studies state that subjective financial stress is more important than objective measures such as the amount of debt [ 13 , 41 , 66 ]. Objective indicators of financial stress might have an indirect effect on depression, which is mediated by the individual’s perception of those objective indicators as resulting in financial stress. Experiencing a similar objective financial situation, people may report different perceptions of the objective financial situation due to the heterogeneity of personal experiences, abilities to manage financial resources, aspirations, and perceived sufficiency of financial resources [ 67 ]. For example, individuals with limited financial resources are more likely to be concerned about the uncertainty of the future financial situation. The expectation of financial stress, not just their occurrence, may also cause depression. Furthermore, people living in poverty face substantial uncertainty and income volatility. The long-run exposure to stress from coping with this volatility may also threaten mental health [ 68 ]. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that both the respondent’s perception of financial stress and objective measures of financial stress lie at the heart of the relationship between financial stress and depression.

Social selection

Other studies suggest that depression might negatively impact the finances of individuals [ 20 , 69 ]. Social selection theory states that individuals who have mental disorders are more likely to drift into or maintain a worse financial situation [ 20 ]. Evidence shows that mental problems might increase expenditure on healthcare, reduce productivity, and lead to unemployment, as well as be associated with social stigma, all of which are related to lower levels of income [ 18 , 65 , 70 ]. However, some scholars argue that the relative importance of social causation and social selection varies by diagnosis [ 71 ]. Social causation theory is more important to the relationship between financial stress and depression or substance use; while social selection theory is more important in relation to severe mental disorders such as schizophrenia [ 70 , 72 ].

Limitations of the review

This systematic review is the first to comprehensively pool observational studies on the association between individual or household finances and depression or depressive symptoms. However, this review is subject to several limitations. First, since there is substantial heterogeneity in the measurements and definitions of exposure (financial stress) and the outcome variable (depression), targeted populations, and methodologies between studies, a meta-analysis combining the data from the reviewed studies is neither appropriate nor practical. As such, only a narrative approach is used in this review without quantitatively synthesising the data from the studies, which are difficult to compare. Second, the majority of studies reported evidence on high-income countries like the US, the UK, European countries. Therefore, the conclusions of this review are more immediately generalisable to these contexts as opposed to low-and middle-income country contexts. Third, this review undertakes the search on six databases for any related peer-reviewed journal articles without searching for other resources to find grey or unpublished literature and conference abstracts. Excluding the unpublished studies might limit the findings of this review since studies with significant results are more likely to get published [ 73 ]. The published studies may lead this review to overestimate the associations between any financial exposures and depressive symptoms. Fourth, the included exposures in this review are the most direct indicators (i.e., proximal indicators) of financial stress. The findings in this review might not be generalisable to the relationship between a distal factor (e.g., job loss) and depression. Evidence has suggested that a significant life event or experience, for example, job loss, is associated with financial stress and thereby can predict subsequent major depression [ 74 ]. Future review on financial stress and mental health outcomes might benefit from further including the effect of distal factors (such as job loss, changes in working hours, changes in marital status, and so on) on mental health.

Implications

This review has a number of implications for public policy around financial circumstances and depression. Firstly, it highlights the role that measures aimed at alleviating financial poverty and inequality could have in improving public mental health. Secondly, it suggests attention needs to be focused on unsecured debt as a public health measure. For example, providing financial counselling services and financial education to those who have debt stress and depression may help them to effectively deal with individual debt problems and associated depression. Meanwhile, the regulation of unsecured debt markets is crucial to the sustainable development of unsecured lending markets, and thereby supports both financial health and mental health. Thirdly, this review highlights the importance of targeted interventions to break the cycle of financial stress and depression. For example, instead of a one-for-all intervention focusing on the general population, interventions targeted at lower socioeconomic groups might be more effective since the association between financial stress and depression is more pronounced in these groups.

In terms of practical support, the interdisciplinary collaboration of psychologists and financial professionals in the development of interventions aiming to break the vicious cycle of depression and financial stress could be useful. For example, interventions such as poverty alleviation programs, the provision of financial advice or financial education might have a beneficial influence on mental health. The collaboration of policymakers in both mental health areas and financial areas might create win-win situations, having mutual benefits for both areas and saving costs to society in the long run.

Finally, this review highlights the need for further research in certain areas. First, this review suggests that more longitudinal research or randomised control trials (where feasible) are needed to further clarify the directions of the causal relationships and possible mechanisms between different financial stressors and depression or other mental disorders. A better understanding of this can help to design more effective interventions either aimed at alleviating financial stress or at improving mental health. For example, anti-poverty programs such as direct cash transfers might be more helpful for families in poverty or deprivation, where social causation plays the main role in the effect of financial stress on depression. However, if financial stress is due to social comparison, rather than absolute poverty, challenging social attitudes may be more beneficial. This review also calls for more future research to investigate the heterogeneity of the relationship and the difference in the direction of the relationship between financial stress and depression or other mental disorders across different populations. This would provide more precise and solid evidence for developing targeted interventions as noted above.

Second, this review finds that the majority of the existing studies on the financial stress-depression relationship are based on high-income countries. However, low-and middle-income countries have higher levels of poverty and economic inequality, as well as a high economic burden caused by mental disorders and low levels of investment in mental health [ 69 , 75 ]. Therefore, more future research that is based on low-and middle-income country contexts would be important.

In conclusion, this systematic review of the link between financial stress and depression in adults found that financial stress is positively associated with depression, in particular among low socioeconomic groups. The findings suggest directions for policymakers and the need for greater collaboration between psychology and financial professionals, which will be beneficial to developing targeted interventions either to mitigate depression or alleviate financial stress. Further longitudinal research would be useful to investigate the causality and mechanisms of the relationship between different dimensions of financial stress and depression.

Supporting information

S1 checklist, s1 appendix, s2 appendix, s3 appendix, acknowledgments.

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped to improve and clarify the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Data Availability

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) Impacts of financial distress on real and accrual earnings management

    research papers on financial distress

  2. (PDF) Risk-Taking, Financial Distress and Innovation

    research papers on financial distress

  3. (PDF) Earnings Management to Avoid Financial Distress and Improve

    research papers on financial distress

  4. (PDF) A Study of Financial Distress based on MDA

    research papers on financial distress

  5. (PDF) A Statistical Analysis to Predict Financial Distress

    research papers on financial distress

  6. (PDF) EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF FINANCIAL DISTRESS IN INDONESIA

    research papers on financial distress

VIDEO

  1. ||Financial Reporting Theory suggestion ||

  2. ||Financial Reporting Theory||

  3. Write Your Investment Thesis Down #stockmarket #investing

  4. Financial Freedom

  5. Contribution in research paper

  6. Create your own junk journal ephemera using Tim Holtz products: falling stars and colorized cactus

COMMENTS

  1. Financial Distress, Prediction, and Strategies by Firms: A Systematic Review of Literature

    The paper is systematic scrutiny of studies on financial distress, prediction, and strategies firms adapt to deal with the difficulty. To this end, the paper offers a dissection and...

  2. Full article: Systematic Review of Financial Distress Identification

    7 CrossRef citations to date 0 Altmetric Listen Review Systematic Review of Financial Distress Identification using Artificial Intelligence Methods Dovilė Kuizinienė , Tomas Krilavičius , Robertas Damaševičius & Rytis Maskeliūnas Article: 2138124 | Received 23 May 2022, Accepted 13 Oct 2022, Published online: 18 Nov 2022 Cite this article

  3. Financial stress and depression in adults: A systematic review

    Financial stress has been proposed as an economic determinant of depression. However, there is little systematic analysis of different dimensions of financial stress and their association with depression.

  4. Corporate Financial Distress: A Roadmap of the Academic ...

    2.1 Financial Distress: Definition and Main Features Since first devoting its attention to the subject, academic literature has emphasized the difficulties in defining corporate financial distress because of the incomplete and arbitrary nature of any criteria by which to classify it (Keasey and Watson 1991 ).

  5. Determinants and consequences of financial distress: review of the

    We synthesise the empirical literature on the determinants and consequences of financial distress, critique the findings and offer suggestions for future research. We categorise these indicators into (i) firm-level fundamental determinants, (ii) macroeconomic determinants and (iii) firm-level corporate governance determinants.

  6. Full article: Reporting matters: the real effects of financial

    Financial distress costs are estimated to be between 10 and 23% of market value of the firm (Andrade and Kaplan Citation 1998). The costs of financial distress include direct costs, such as legal costs, renegotiation costs etc., and indirect costs, such as loss of customers and employees, fire sale of assets, etc.

  7. Full article: Financial distress in the banking industry: A

    Financial distress in the banking industry: A bibliometric synthesis and exploration Saib Fakhar , Fateh Mohd Khan , Mosab I. Tabash , Gayas Ahmad , Javaid Akhter & Mujeeb Saif Mohsen Al-Absy Article: 2253076 | Received 06 May 2023, Accepted 24 Aug 2023, Published online: 03 Sep 2023 Cite this article https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2253076

  8. Financial Distress, the Severity of Financial Distress and Direction of

    Bravo F., , & Moreno E. (2020). Does compliance with corporate governance codes help to mitigate financial distress? Research in International Business and Finance, 55. Crossref. Google Scholar. Bystrom H. N. (2006). ... Earnings management strategies during financial distress [Working paper]. Indian Institute of Management. Google Scholar. Qin ...

  9. An explainable artificial intelligence approach for financial distress

    It is obvious that listed companies marked as ST have experienced financial distress. As the definition of financial distress has hysteresis, the data used for FDP are the financial indicators of sample companies in the fiscal year (T-3). They are collected from China's stock market and accounting research database (CSMAR).

  10. The impact of ESG disclosure on mitigating financial distress

    Globally, businesses are increasingly gaining recognition for their non-financial performance due to heightened stakeholder demands about ethical and environmental responsibilities. This noteworthy shift in perspective has catalyzed the inception of this research, which seeks to scrutinize the influence of environmental, social, and governance disclosure (ESGD) on financial distress. To ...

  11. From Health Crisis to Financial Distress

    Policy Research Working Papers From Health Crisis to Financial Distress I discuss the multifaceted economic and financial vulnerabilities that have been created or exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic on a foundation of already weak economic fundamentals in many countries. Crises often do not travel alone.

  12. Financial Distress Prediction: Principle Component Analysis and

    Abstract: Financial distress prediction is vital in financial decision-making for industry practitioners, financial system users and policymakers. Most of the research work on bankruptcy prediction and credit scoring compare the prediction accuracy of a model on a specific dataset to other models applied on a different dataset.

  13. Financial distress and tax avoidance: the moderating effect of the

    pdf (148 KB) Abstract Introduction Literature review and hypothesis development Research methodology Results Conclusion Abstract Purpose This paper examines whether financial distress is associated with tax avoidance and whether the COVID-19 pandemic moderates such association. Design/methodology/approach

  14. PDF Predicting Financial Distress of Companies: Revisiting the Z -score and

    paper is adapted an d updated from E. Altman, "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the ... Predicting Financial Distress of Companies: ... It should be pointed out that the basic research for much of the material in this paper was performed in 1967 and that several subsequent studies have commented upon the Z -Score model

  15. The Persistence of Financial Distress

    While many US consumers experience financial distress at some point in the life cycle, most of the events of financial distress are primarily concentrated in a much smaller proportion of consumers in persistent trouble. ... "The Persistence of Financial Distress." Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Research Working Paper no. 17-15 ...

  16. The Relationship Between Financial Worries and Psychological Distress

    A Pew Research Center ( 2021) report shows that worries about personal health and financial security are related to higher levels of psychological distress.

  17. The Persistence of Financial Distress- Working Papers

    Using recently available proprietary panel data, we show that while many (35%) US consumers experience financial distress at some point in the life cycle, most of the events of financial distress are primarily concentrated in a much smaller proportion of consumers in persistent trouble.

  18. The influence of ESG performance on credit risk and financial distress

    The findings suggest that, with the exception of carbon emissions and water consumption, enhancements in the majority of ESG performance indicators can mitigate credit risk and financial instability. Furthermore, companies exhibiting strong ESG performance tend to receive favourable credit risk ratings and avoid financial instability.

  19. Families' Financial Stress & Well-Being: The Importance of the Economy

    Families experience financial-related psychological stress or distress when they do not have adequate income, wealth, or debt to afford economic hardship (Lai 2011; Park and Kim 2018; Thorne 2010; Sweet et al. 2013).

  20. The Effects of Macroeconomic Shocks: Household Financial Distress

    Download Article. RWP 20-13, September 2020; updated January 2024. This paper investigates how, and how much, household financial distress (FD), arising from allowing debts to go unpaid, matters for the aggregate and cross-sectional consumption responses to macroeconomic risk.

  21. Financial distress and its determinants: Evidence from insurance

    This research is aimed to investigate the determinants of financial distress of insurance companies in Ethiopia using balanced panel data from eleven insurance companies for the period covering from 2008 to 2019. A quantitative approach and explanatory design were employed to realize the stated objectives.

  22. Financial stress and depression in adults: A systematic review

    This paper reports a systematic review of 40 observational studies quantifying the relationship between various measures of financial stress and depression outcomes in adults. Most of the reviewed studies show that financial stress is positively associated with depression.

  23. PDF Financial Distress Prediction: A Literature Review Approach

    Many researchers have conducted research into the signs and symptoms of financial distress, and forecasting of future financial distress based on variety of variables. There are various models to predict the corporate financial distress is also available, probably the predetermined contributors of research. This paper contains a number of ...