15 U.S. Code § 1060 - Assignment

Act Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 592, § 10, 33 Stat. 727 .

2002—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 107–273 amended subsecs. (a) and (b) generally, in subsec. (a) substituting pars. (1) to (5) for substantially identical undesignated provisions, and in subsec. (b) adding provisions relating to service on Director if assignee does not designate name and address of a person resident in the United States on whom may be served notices or process.

1999— Pub. L. 106–43, § 6(a)(2) , (3), which directed the amendment of this section by substituting “mark.” for “mark,” in the first sentence and striking out a second period at the end of the third sentence, could not be executed because “mark,” and the second period did not appear subsequent to amendment by Pub. L. 105–330 . See 1998 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–113, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(b)(1)(B)] , substituted “Director” for “Commissioner” in last sentence.

Pub. L. 106–43, § 6(a)(1) , which directed the amendment of the penultimate sentence of this section by substituting “assignment” for “subsequent purchase”, was executed by making the substitution for “subsequent purchase” in two places in the penultimate sentence of subsec. (a), after “date of the” and “prior to the”, to reflect the probable intent of Congress .

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 106–113, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(b)(1)(B)] , substituted “Director” for “Commissioner” in last sentence.

1998— Pub. L. 105–330 amended section catchline and text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

“A registered mark or a mark for which application to register has been filed shall be assignable with the goodwill of the business in which the mark is used, or with that part of the goodwill of the business connected with the use of and symbolized by the mark,. However, no application to register a mark under section 1051(b) of this title shall be assignable prior to the filing of the verified statement of use under section 1051(d) of this title , except to a successor to the business of the applicant, or portion thereof, to which the mark pertains, if that business is ongoing and existing. In any assignment authorized by this section it shall not be necessary to include the goodwill of the business connected with the use of and symbolized by any other mark used in the business or by the name or style under which the business is conducted. Assignments shall be by instruments in writing duly executed. Acknowledgment shall be prima facie evidence of the execution of an assignment and when recorded in the Patent and Trademark Office the record shall be prima facie evidence of execution. An assignment shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser for a valuable consideration without notice, unless it is recorded in the Patent and Trademark Office within three months after the date thereof or prior to such subsequent purchase. A separate record of assignments submitted for recording hereunder shall be maintained in the Patent and Trademark Office.

“An assignee not domiciled in the United States shall be subject to and comply with the provisions of section 1051(e) of this title .”

1988— Pub. L. 100–667 substituted “. However, no application to register a mark under section 1051(b) of this title shall be assignable prior to the filing of the verified statement of use under section 1051(d) of this title , except to a successor to the business of the applicant, or portion thereof, to which the mark pertains, if that business is ongoing and existing. In any assignment authorized by this section” for “and in any such assignment” in first par., and “1051(e)” for “1051(d)” in last par.

1975— Pub. L. 93–596 substituted “Patent and Trademark Office” for “Patent Office”.

1962— Pub. L. 87–772 substituted provisions which require a separate record of assignments to be kept in the Patent Office, for provisions which required the Commissioner to keep such record, and eliminated provisions permitting the cancellation of any assigned registration at any time if the registered mark is being used by, or with the permission of, the assignee so as to misrepresent the source of the goods or services in connection with which the mark is used.

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999 , see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731] of Pub. L. 106–113 , set out as a note under section 1 of Title 35 , Patents.

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–330 effective on the date that is 1 year after Oct. 30, 1998 , see section 110 of Pub. L. 105–330 , set out as a note under section 1051 of this title .

For provisions relating to applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 105–330 to applications for registration of trademarks, see section 109(b) of Pub. L. 105–330 , set out as a note under section 1051 of this title .

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–667 effective one year after Nov. 16, 1988 , see section 136 of Pub. L. 100–667 , set out as a note under section 1051 of this title .

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975 , see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596 , set out as a note under section 1111 of this title .

Repeal of inconsistent provisions, effect of this chapter on pending proceedings and existing registrations and rights under prior acts, see notes set out under section 1051 of this title .

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Commerce , with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Commerce , with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 5 of 1950, §§ 1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950 , 15 F.R. 3174 , 64 Stat. 1263 , set out in the Appendix to Title 5 , Government Organization and Employees.

29 Jan 2024

Patent Assignment: How to Transfer Ownership of a Patent

By Michael K. Henry, Ph.D.

Patent Assignment: How to Transfer Ownership of a Patent

  • Intellectual Property
  • Patent Prosecution

This is the second in a two-part blog series on owning and transferring the rights to a patent. ( Read part one here. )

As we discussed in the first post in this series, patent owners enjoy important legal and commercial benefits: They have the right to exclude others from making, selling, using or importing the claimed invention, and to claim damages from anyone who infringes their patent.

However, a business entity can own a patent only if the inventors have assigned the patent rights to the business entity. So if your employees are creating valuable IP on behalf of your company, it’s important to get the patent assignment right, to ensure that your business is the patent owner.

In this post, we’ll take a closer look at what a patent assignment even is — and the best practices for approaching the process. But remember, assignment (or transfer of ownership) is a function of state law, so there might be some variation by state in how all this gets treated.

What Is a Patent Assignment and Why Does it Matter?

A patent assignment is an agreement where one entity (the “assignor”) transfers all or part of their right, title and interest in a patent or application to another entity (the “assignee”). 

In simpler terms, the assignee receives the original owner’s interest and gains the exclusive rights to pursue patent protection (through filing and prosecuting patent applications), and also to license and enforce the patent. 

Ideally, your business should own its patents if it wants to enjoy the benefits of the patent rights. But  under U.S. law , only an inventor or an assignee can own a patent — and businesses cannot be listed as an inventor. Accordingly, patent assignment is the legal mechanism that transfers ownership from the inventor to your business.

Patent Assignment vs. Licensing

Keep in mind that an assignment is different from a license. The difference is analogous to selling versus renting a house.

In a license agreement, the patent owner (the “licensor”) gives another entity (the “licensee”) permission to use the patented technology, while the patent owner retains ownership. Like a property rental, a patent license contemplates an ongoing relationship between the licensor and licensee.

In a patent assignment, the original owner permanently transfers its ownership to another entity. Like a property sale, a patent assignment is a permanent transfer of legal rights.

U sing Employment Agreements to Transfer Patent Ownership

Before your employees begin developing IP,  implement strong hiring policies  that ensure your IP rights will be legally enforceable in future.

If you’re bringing on a new employee, have them sign an  employment agreement  that establishes up front what IP the company owns — typically, anything the employee invents while under your employment. This part of an employment agreement is often presented as a self-contained document, and referred to as a “Pre-Invention Assignment Agreement” (PIAA).

The employment agreement should include the following provisions:

  • Advance assignment of any IP created while employed by your company, or using your company’s resources
  • An obligation to disclose any IP created while employed by your company, or using your company’s resources
  • An ongoing obligation to provide necessary information and execute documents related to the IP they created while employed, even after their employment ends
  • An obligation not to disclose confidential information to third parties, including when the employee moves on to a new employer

To track the IP your employees create, encourage your employees to document their contributions by completing  invention disclosure records .

But the paperwork can be quite involved, which is why your employment policies should also include  incentives to create and disclose valuable IP .

Drafting Agreements for Non-Employees

Some of the innovators working for your business might not have a formal employer-employee relationship with the business. If you don’t make the appropriate arrangements beforehand, this could complicate patent assignments. Keep an eye out for the following staffing arrangements:

  • Independent contractors:  Some inventors may be self-employed, or they may be employed by one of your service providers.
  • Joint collaborators:  Some inventors may be employed by, say, a subsidiary or service company instead of your company.
  • Anyone who did work through an educational institution : For example, Ph.D. candidates may not be employees of either their sponsoring institution or your company.

In these cases, you can still draft contractor or collaborator agreements using the same terms outlined above. Make sure the individual innovator signs it before beginning any work on behalf of your company.

uspto assignment rules

O btaining Written Assignments for New Patent Applications

In addition to getting signed employment agreements, you should  also  get a written assignments for each new patent application when it’s filed, in order to memorialize ownership of the specific patent property.

Don’t rely exclusively on the employment agreement to prove ownership:

  • The employment agreement might contain confidential terms, so you don’t want to record them with the patent office
  • Because employment agreements are executed before beginning the process of developing the invention, they won’t clearly establish what specific patent applications are being assigned

While you  can  execute the formal assignment for each patent application after the application has been filed, an inventor or co-inventor who no longer works for the company might refuse to execute the assignment.

As such, we recommend executing the assignment before filing, to show ownership as of the filing date and avoid complications (like getting signatures from estranged inventors).

How to Execute a Written Patent Agreement

Well-executed invention assignments should:

  • Be in writing:  Oral agreements to assign patent rights are typically not enforceable in the United States
  • Clearly identify all parties:  Include the names, addresses, and relationship of the assignor(s) and assignee
  • Clearly identify the patent being assigned:  State the patent or patent application number, title, inventors, and filing date
  • Be signed by the assignors
  • Be notarized : If notarization isn’t possible, have one or two witnesses attest to the signatures

Recording a Patent Assignment With the USPTO

Without a recorded assignment with the U.S. patent office, someone else could claim ownership of the issued patent, and you could even lose your rights in the issued patent in some cases. 

So the patent owner (the Assignee) should should record the assignment through the  USPTO’s Assignment Recordation Branch . They can use the  Electronic Patent Assignment System (EPAS)  to file a  Recordation Cover Sheet  along with a copy of the actual patent assignment agreement.

They should submit this paperwork  within three months  of the assignment’s date. If it’s recorded electronically, the USPTO  won’t charge a recordation fee .

Need to check who owns a patent?  The USPTO website  publicly lists all information about a patent’s current and previous assignments.

When Would I Need to Execute a New Assignment for a Related Application?

You’ll need only one patent assignment per patent application, unless new matter is introduced in a new filing (e.g., in a  continuation-in-part , or in a non-provisional application that adds new matter to a  provisional application ). In that case, you’ll need an additional assignment to cover the new matter — even if it was developed by the same inventors.

What If an Investor Won’t Sign the Written Assignment?

If you can’t get an inventor to sign an invention assignment, you can still move forward with a patent application — but you’ll need to document your ownership. To document ownership, you can often rely on an   employee agreement ,  company policy ,  invention disclosure , or other employment-related documentation.

D o I Need to Record My Assignments in Foreign Countries?

Most assignments transfer all rights, title, and interest in all patent rights throughout the world.

But in some countries, the assignment might not be legally effective until the assignment has been recorded in that country — meaning that the assignee can’t enforce the patent rights, or claim damages for any infringement that takes place before the recordation. 

And there might be additional formal requirements that aren’t typically required in the United States. For example, some countries might require a transfer between companies to be signed by both parties, and must contain one or both parties’ addresses.

If you’re assigning patents issued by a foreign country, consult a patent attorney in that country to find out what’s required to properly document the transfer of ownership.

N eed Help With Your Patent Assignments?

Crafting robust assignment agreements is essential to ensuring the proper transfer of patent ownership. An  experienced patent professional  can help you to prepare legally enforceable documentation.

Henry Patent Law Firm has worked with tech businesses of all sizes to execute patent assignments —  contact us now  to learn more.

GOT A QUESTION? Whether you want to know more about the patent process or think we might be a good fit for your needs – we’d love to hear from you!

uspto assignment rules

Michael K. Henry, Ph.D.

Michael K. Henry, Ph.D., is a principal and the firm’s founding member. He specializes in creating comprehensive, growth-oriented IP strategies for early-stage tech companies.

10 Jan 2024

Geothermal Energy: An Overview of the Patent Landscape

By Michael Henry

Don't miss a new article. Henry Patent Law's Patent Law News + Insights blog is designed to help people like you build smart, scalable patent strategies that protect your intellectual property as your business grows. Subscribe to receive email updates every time we publish a new article — don't miss out on key tips to help your business be more successful.

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

The Federal Register

The daily journal of the united states government, request access.

Due to aggressive automated scraping of FederalRegister.gov and eCFR.gov, programmatic access to these sites is limited to access to our extensive developer APIs.

If you are human user receiving this message, we can add your IP address to a set of IPs that can access FederalRegister.gov & eCFR.gov; complete the CAPTCHA (bot test) below and click "Request Access". This process will be necessary for each IP address you wish to access the site from, requests are valid for approximately one quarter (three months) after which the process may need to be repeated.

An official website of the United States government.

If you want to request a wider IP range, first request access for your current IP, and then use the "Site Feedback" button found in the lower left-hand side to make the request.

TMEP 501.01(a): Assignability of Intent-to-Use Applications

October 2017 Edition of the TMEP

TMEP Chapter Index Chapter 500: Change of Ownership 501 : Assignment of Marks 501.01 : Assignability of Marks in Applications and Registrations

Previous: §501.01 | Next: §501.01(b)

501.01(a)    Assignability of Intent-to-Use Applications

In an application under §1(b) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. §1051(b) , the applicant cannot assign the application before the applicant files an allegation of use (i.e., either an amendment to allege use under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c)    or a statement of use under 15 U.S.C. §1051(d) ), except to a successor to the applicant’s business, or portion of the business to which the mark pertains, if that business is ongoing and existing.  Section 10 of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. §1060 ; 37 C.F.R. §3.16 .

The primary purpose of this provision is to ensure that a mark may only be assigned along with some business or goodwill, and to prevent "trafficking" in marks.

As a general rule, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") does not investigate or evaluate the validity of assignments.  Therefore, the examining attorney must issue an inquiry concerning the compliance of an assignment with the cited provisions of §10 only if:

  • (1) The application itself includes a statement indicating that the assignee is not a successor to the original applicant’s business, or portion of the business to which the mark pertains, if that business is ongoing and existing; or
  • (a) The assignment is executed before the filing of an allegation of use;
  • (b) The applicant submits the assignment document for inclusion in the application record in the Trademark database, and not just to the Assignment Recordation Branch; and
  • (c) The assignment document fails to include the relevant language from §10 to the effect that the assignment includes the entire business of the applicant/assignor or the portion of the business to which the mark pertains.

The examining attorney should not require the submission of assignment documents to determine compliance.

If the examining attorney issues an inquiry, the applicant’s statement that the assignment was in compliance with the cited provision of §10 is sufficient to resolve the issue.  This statement may be entered through an examiner’s amendment.

The assignment of an intent-to-use application to someone who is not the successor to the applicant’s business before filing an allegation of use renders the application void, and any resulting registration must be cancelled. Cent. Garden & Pet Co. v. Doskocil Mfg. Co., 108 USPQ2d 1134, 1146 (TTAB 2013); Clorox Co. v. Chem. Bank, 40 USPQ2d 1098, 1105-06 (TTAB 1996); cf. Amazon Techs., Inc. v. Wax, 95 USPQ2d 1865, 1872 (TTAB 2010) (finding "the assignment from one joint applicant to another, where the assignee joint applicant was and remains an owner of the application is more in the nature of 'relinquishment' of ownership rights by one joint owner than a true 'assignment' to a different legal entity, and, thus, it is not prohibited under §10 of the Trademark Act").

uspto assignment rules

E-Signing Patent Documents Might Sometimes Be the Wrong Approach

By Joseph Hetz and Hervey Su

Joseph Hetz

Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the US Patent and Trademark Office’s electronic signature rules required inventors to type their signature between two slashes or use a graphically inserted replica of a previously created wet—or ink—signature.

During the pandemic’s early days, the USPTO revised its e-signature guidance to allow e-signatures created with a commercial platform, such as DocuSign.

With many inventors working from home, the platform became a popular tool for obtaining inventor signatures on declarations and assignments.

Although many employees are returning to the office, the work-from-home-era practice of using DocuSign is here to stay, especially since people are accustomed to using the tool in various aspects of their lives. However, there are three misconceptions about using DocuSign for patent documents.

Myth: The USPTO Accepts ‘DocuSign Signatures’

One misconception is that, because of its revised guidance, the USPTO now accepts “DocuSign signatures,” as if a “DocuSign signature” was monolithic. But there are many ways DocuSign can be used to create an e-signature, and only some comply with the guidance.

For example, the signor often chooses a signature to adopt—usually having a script font that has the appearance of a written signature. Such a signature wouldn’t comply with USPTO guidance because it is missing slashes before and after the signature.

Fortunately, DocuSign allows the slashes to be prepopulated, eliminating the risk of forgetting to include them. Also, the USPTO allows “hand-drawn” signatures—e.g., using a mouse or a fingertip—that don’t require slashes, and DocuSign can be configured to force the inventor to create such a signature.

Myth: E-Signature Rules Apply to Assignments

Since declarations and assignments are often presented together to an inventor, USPTO rules on e-signatures often are assumed to apply to both declarations and assignments.

Unlike signatures on declarations, which are governed by USPTO rules, signatures on assignments are only governed by federal and state law, such as the E-signatures in Global and National Commerce Act and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act .

Still, since the documents are typically signed together, it’s good practice to configure DocuSign to use the same signature rules on both the declaration and the assignment.

Also, since evidence of the signor’s intent is typically examined when determining the validity of an e-signed document, it’s good practice to include language in the assignment that the assignor agrees to using e-signatures.

Myth: Wet Signatures Needed for Foreign Filings

Another misconception is that foreign countries don’t accept e-signatures. But Canada’s Intellectual Property Office honors a variety of e-signatures, such as /s/ signatures and DocuSign.

Second, the US declaration and assignment don’t need to be submitted in many foreign countries—such as Australia, Canada, and Germany—so it shouldn’t matter if those are e-signed.

E-signatures aren’t accepted in China, Japan, and Mexico, however, and DocuSign contracts may not meet the strict requirements in Brazil for e-signatures.

Inventor-signed formal papers don’t need to be filed when nationalizing into those countries from a Patent Cooperation Treaty application, so it usually shouldn’t matter if the US declaration and assignment are e-signed.

However, if an error in the inventor or applicant information needs to be corrected during the national stage, it might need a copy of the US assignment and, if e-signed, it may be rejected.

The rules aren’t clear for some countries. India requires inventor-signed documents, for example, and its Information Technology Act allows for e-signatures. Nevertheless, the Indian Patent Office has been known to reject e-signatures.

But there’s a workaround. In nationalizing into India from a PCT application, an e-signed declaration under PCT Rule 4 would be accepted, so it’s good practice to include one as part of the DocuSign package if and inventor may file in India.

A wet signature is the gold standard and safest option, especially if foreign filing is contemplated. But if using DocuSign, it’s important to configure its setting to only accept a USPTO-approved signature and add language in the assignment that the assignor agrees to the use of e-signatures.

This article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc., the publisher of Bloomberg Law and Bloomberg Tax, or its owners.

Write for Us: Author Guidelines

Author Information

Joseph F. Hetz is a partner at Crowell & Moring and co-chair of the firm’s patent prosecution practice group.

Hefeng (Hervey) Su is an associate at Crowell & Moring and splits time between the patent and ITC litigation and patent prosecution groups.

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn about bloomberg law.

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.

Home

Trending News

Mintz Law Firm

Related Practices & Jurisdictions

  • Administrative & Regulatory
  • Corporate & Business Organizations
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation / Trial Practice
  • All Federal

uspto assignment rules

Increased employee mobility, health challenges, and the economic downturn due to the COVID-19 pandemic may result in more inventors than usual being unavailable to assign patent rights.  Fortunately, applicants may procure a U.S. patent even if an assignment document cannot be obtained for the application to be filed.  This article summarizes the requirements for filing and prosecuting a U.S. patent application filed post-America Invents Act (AIA) without a patent assignment and identifies pitfalls when establishing ownership of patent rights for patent prosecution.  Inventors being unavailable may also complicate obtaining the declarations required for U.S. patent prosecution, but solutions are available as we previously discussed  here .

Need for an Assignment

For a patent to issue to an assignee, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) must be made formally aware of the assignment so that the assignee is recognized as the patent applicant.  Filing an Application Data Sheet (ADS) for a patent application identifying the assignee as the applicant provides informal notice to the USPTO.   MPEP § 301  discusses ownership/assignability of patents and applications, including formal assignment recordation at the USPTO.  Recording an assignment may be necessary to permit the assignee to “take action” in the patent application during prosecution and for the patent to issue in the name of the assignee.   37 CFR 1.46 ; MPEP §§  301 ,  302 ,  605 .  In other words, assignees may face obstacles prosecuting a patent without an executed assignment.  The assignment(s) must transfer the entirety of patent rights from each of the inventors to the assignee, e.g., corporation, partnership, university, government entity, etc.  There can be multiple assignees if different inventors assign their rights to different assignees, a situation that results in two or more partial assignees that must each be identified to the USPTO as an applicant.   MPEP § 301 .

As only one patent assignment is required per inventor per patent application, subsequent applications claiming priority may often rely on an earlier assignment (depending on the assignment’s particular language).  If new subject matter is introduced in the application being filed, such as in a continuation-in-part application, another assignment may be required.

Persons who may file a Patent Application without an Assignment

Fortunately, applicants may procure a patent even if an inventor is not available to sign an assignment before application filing or during prosecution before payment of the issue fee. 

A person to whom the inventor is under the obligation to assign the invention may file a patent application and be identified as the applicant.  An assignment can then be subsequently executed and the USPTO notified as discussed above.  Alternatively, other documentary evidence of ownership, such as an employment agreement, invention disclosure form, or other documentation, can be recorded with the USPTO in lieu of a signed assignment document.   37 CFR 1.46 .  Employment agreements may contain language stating that the inventor assigns all rights, title, and interests in any invention developed while employed by the employer.  In some instances, the employment agreement may affirmatively state that the employee is under an obligation to assign the invention to the employer.  An invention disclosure form may contain language stating that the inventor’s signature on the form acknowledges the inventor’s assignment of and/or obligation to assign any rights, title, and interest in the invention disclosure to the employer.  If the invention disclosure form includes the inventor’s signature, this may be sufficient evidence that the employer is an obligated assignee.   37 C.F.R. 1.46(b)(1) .  It is important to examine any documentary evidence of ownership before recordation to identify any information (e.g., industry trend language, discussion of prior art, personal information of an employee, etc.) that may require redaction before recordation and/or may make public recording of the documentary evidence an undesirable option for the applicant.

Also, a person who shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter may file a patent application and be identified as the applicant upon showing that such an action is appropriate, with the resulting patent being issuable in the applicant’s name.   37 CFR 1.46 .  If filing a national stage application, the applicant must have been identified in the international stage of the international application or as the applicant in the publication of the international registration. 

Showing Sufficient Proprietary Interest or Obligation to Assign

As provided in  37 CFR 1.46(b)(2) , “[i]f the applicant is a person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter, such applicant must submit a petition including: (i) The fee set forth in § 1.17(g); (ii) A showing that such person has sufficient proprietary interest in the matter; and (iii) A statement that making the application for patent by a person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter on behalf of and as agent for the inventor is appropriate to preserve the rights of the parties.”  Additionally, as stated in  MPEP § 409.05 , “[t]he ability for a person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter to make an application for patent is not limited to situations in which all of the inventors refuse to execute the application, or cannot be found or reached after diligent effort.”

Showing sufficient proprietary interest requires “proof of the pertinent facts and a showing that such action is appropriate to preserve the rights of the parties.”   37 CFR 1.46(a) ;  37 CFR 1.424 .  Showing sufficient proprietary interest is discussed in  MPEP § 409.05  and may be established in various ways depending on the circumstances.  MPEP § 409.05 states that

A proprietary interest obtained other than by assignment or agreement to assign may be demonstrated by an appropriate legal memorandum to the effect that a court of competent jurisdiction (federal, state, or foreign) would by the weight of authority in that jurisdiction award title of the invention to the 37 CFR 1.46 applicant.  The facts in support of any conclusion that a court would award title to the 37 CFR 1.46 applicant should be made of record by way of an affidavit or declaration of the person having firsthand knowledge of same.  The legal memorandum should be prepared and signed by an attorney at law familiar with the law of the jurisdiction involved.  A copy (in the English language) of a statute (if other than the United States statute) or a court decision (if other than a reported decision of a federal court or a decision reported in the United States Patents Quarterly) relied on to demonstrate a proprietary interest should be made of record.

Remember that an applicant as a person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter must submit the required petition, fee, and information prior to paying the issue fee as set forth in  37 CFR 1.46 .

Final Considerations

Patent applicants can gain control over patent prosecution and assert patent rights even without execution of a signed assignment by an inventor.  Before doing so, however, applicants should coordinate with patent counsel regarding their particular circumstances and should consult current USPTO rules.

Current Legal Analysis

More from mintz, upcoming legal education events.

Epstein Becker and Green, P.C. Law Firm

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know keyboard_arrow_down

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Jump to main content

United States Patent and Trademark Office - An Agency of the Department of Commerce

USPTO publishes updated guidance for determining obviousness

Published on: 02/26/2024 15:03 PM

Additional information about this page

IMAGES

  1. SKGF_Advisory_Strategies for Life Under the New USPTO Rules on Contin…

    uspto assignment rules

  2. SKGF_Advisory_Strategies for Life Under the New USPTO Rules on Contin…

    uspto assignment rules

  3. PPT

    uspto assignment rules

  4. SKGF_Advisory_Strategies for Life Under the New USPTO Rules on Contin…

    uspto assignment rules

  5. Instructor Assignment Rules for Class Scheduling

    uspto assignment rules

  6. Handling Assignment Rules in ServiceNow

    uspto assignment rules

VIDEO

  1. USPTO Community College Fall 2023 Patent eligibility duration of protection

  2. USPTO Community College Fall 2023 PATENT SYSTEM OVERVIEW

  3. USPTO Community College Fall 2023 UNDERSTANDING THE BASICS OF IP

  4. USPTO Community College Fall 2023 BENEFITS OF FEDERAL REGISTRATION Trademarks

  5. USPTO Community College Fall 2023 TRADEMARK BASICS LIKLIHOOD OF CONFUSION

  6. Lead Assignment Rules (Lead Part-3)

COMMENTS

  1. 300

    302.10-Electronic Submission of Assignment Documents; 303-Assignment Documents Not Endorsed on Pending Applications; 304‑305-[Reserved] 306-Assignment of Division, Continuation, Substitute, and Continuation-in-Part in Relation to Parent Application. 306.01-Assignment of an Application Claiming the Benefits of a Provisional Application

  2. Patents Assignments: Change & search ownership

    Assignment Center makes it easier to transfer ownership or change the name on your patent or trademark registration. See our how-to guides on using Assignment Center for patents and trademarks. If you have questions, email [email protected] or call customer service at 800-972-6382.

  3. 301-Ownership/Assignability of Patents and Applications

    A patent or patent application is assignable by an instrument in writing, and the assignment of the patent, or patent application, transfers to the assignee (s) an alienable (transferable) ownership interest in the patent or application. 35 U.S.C. 261 . II. ASSIGNMENT. "Assignment," in general, is the act of transferring to another the ...

  4. Assignment Center

    EPAS is the Electronic Patent Assignment System that allows users to submit patent reassignment requests online. EPAS is being replaced by the new Assignment Center, which will offer more features and functionality for patent and trademark assignments. Users can access EPAS until February 5, 2021, when the transition to Assignment Center will be completed.

  5. PDF What you Need to Know…..

    Multiple Assignment - the chain of title is kept by the execution date. If the execution dates are the same, you must use the sequence options. This function allows you to dictate the order in which the assignment will be recorded. Customers who desire to have an assignment application stopped, prior to recordation, should

  6. USPTO modernizes patent, trademark assignment request process

    The collection of assignment information is required by 15 U.S.C. § 1057 and 1060 and is used by the public to submit (and by the USPTO to process) patent and trademark assignment recordation requests using the EPAS and ETAS. For more information, contact the Assignments Recordation Branch customer service personnel at [email protected] or (571 ...

  7. Assignment Center

    Sample of a Patent Assignment (PDF) Sample of a Trademark Assignment (PDF) Resources. Upload a Document (PDF) Trademark Assignment Fees (Fee codes: 8521 and 8522) Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) Trademark Manual of Examining Procedures (TMEP) Assignment Search ; Tutorial. Assignment Center Patent Training Guide (PDF)

  8. 35 U.S. Code § 261

    35 U.S. Code § 261 - Ownership; assignment. Subject to the provisions of this title, patents shall have the attributes of personal property. The Patent and Trademark Office shall maintain a register of interests in patents and applications for patents and shall record any document related thereto upon request, and may require a fee therefor ...

  9. 15 U.S. Code § 1060

    15 U.S. Code § 1060 - Assignment. A registered mark or a mark for which an application to register has been filed shall be assignable with the good will of the business in which the mark is used, or with that part of the good will of the business connected with the use of and symbolized by the mark. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, no ...

  10. Laws & Regulations

    Prior compilations of the Trademark rules and statute. All attorneys and agents practicing before the USPTO in trademark or patent matters are subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19 (a).

  11. Patent Assignment: How to Transfer Ownership of a Patent

    A patent assignment is an agreement where one entity (the "assignor") transfers all or part of their right, title and interest in a patent or application to another entity (the "assignee"). In simpler terms, the assignee receives the original owner's interest and gains the exclusive rights to pursue patent protection (through filing ...

  12. United States Patent and Trademark Office

    This searchable database contains all recorded Patent Assignment information from August 1980 to the present. When the USPTO receives relevant information for its assignment database, the USPTO puts the information in the public record and does not verify the validity of the information. Recordation is a ministerial function--the USPTO neither ...

  13. PDF Assignment Center Training Guide Patents

    Steps; Account Creation. Center landing page (public facing). On top of page far right, click the link, 'Create an account'. page. Please provide information for all required input boxes, as indicated with an "*"; 4. Once all input boxes are populated, the "Next" button will become "active". 5.

  14. Federal Register :: Recording Assignments

    The USPTO administers these statutes through 37 CFR 2.146, 2.171, and 37 CFR part 3. These rules permit the public, corporations, other federal agencies, and Government-owned or Government-controlled corporations to submit patent and trademark assignment documents and other documents related to title transfers to the USPTO to be recorded.

  15. Due Diligence on Startups: Patent Assignments and Inventorship Issues

    The USPTO assignment rules are a race/notice policy. An assignee has three months to file an assignment, otherwise an earlier filed assignment will have priority.

  16. TMEP 501.01 (a): Assignability of Intent-to-Use Applications

    As a general rule, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") does not investigate or evaluate the validity of assignments. Therefore, the examining attorney must issue an inquiry concerning the compliance of an assignment with the cited provisions of §10 only if: (1) The application itself includes a statement indicating that the ...

  17. Assignment Center

    All assignments are processed through an image-based workflow management system called Assignment Center. Bibliographic data concerning the property (ies) and party (ies) involved in the transaction are transcribed from the manually scanned image by the USPTO or are entered by the requesting party at the time of submission through Assignment Center.

  18. E-Signing Patent Documents Might Sometimes Be the Wrong Approach

    Since declarations and assignments are often presented together to an inventor, USPTO rules on e-signatures often are assumed to apply to both declarations and assignments. Unlike signatures on declarations, which are governed by USPTO rules, signatures on assignments are only governed by federal and state law, such as the E-signatures in ...

  19. Assignment Center

    The site is secure. A lock ( lock) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  20. US Patents Without a Signed Assignment of Patent Rights

    Recording an assignment may be necessary to permit the assignee to "take action" in the patent application during prosecution and for the patent to issue in the name of the assignee. 37 CFR 1. ...

  21. Recording of Assignments

    2020-06-24. No Comments. The Office records assignments, grants, and similar instruments sent to it for recording, and the recording serves as notice. If an assignment, grant, or conveyance of a patent or an interest in a patent (or an application for patent) is not recorded in the Office within three months from its date, it is void against a ...

  22. USPTO publishes updated guidance for determining obviousness

    USPTO announces updated guidance for determining obviousness. Tomorrow, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is publishing updated guidance to underscore the flexible approach to determining obviousness that is required by the U.S. Supreme Court's KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc. decision. The updated guidance focuses on post-KSR precedential cases of the Federal Circuit.