How Gender Reassignment Surgery Works (Infographic)

Infographics: How surgery can change the sex of an individual.

Bradley Manning, the U.S. Army private who was sentenced Aug. 21 to 35 years in a military prison for releasing highly sensitive U.S. military secrets, is seeking gender reassignment. Here’s how gender reassignment works:

Converting male anatomy to female anatomy requires removing the penis, reshaping genital tissue to appear more female and constructing a vagina.

An incision is made into the scrotum, and the flap of skin is pulled back. The testes are removed.

A shorter urethra is cut. The penis is removed, and the excess skin is used to create the labia and vagina.

People who have male-to-female gender-reassignment surgery retain a prostate. Following surgery, estrogen (a female hormone) will stimulate breast development, widen the hips, inhibit the growth of facial hair and slightly increase voice pitch.

Female-to-male surgery has achieved lesser success due to the difficulty of creating a functioning penis from the much smaller clitoral tissue available in the female genitals.

The uterus and the ovaries are removed. Genital reconstructive procedures (GRT) use either the clitoris, which is enlarged by hormones, or rely on free tissue grafts from the arm, the thigh or belly and an erectile prosthetic (phalloplasty).

Breasts need to be surgically altered if they are to look less feminine. This process involves removing breast tissue and excess skin, and reducing and properly positioning the nipples and areolae. Androgens (male hormones) will stimulate the development of facial and chest hair, and cause the voice to deepen.

Reliable statistics are extremely difficult to obtain. Many sexual-reassignment procedures are conducted in private facilities that are not subject to reporting requirements.

The cost for female-to-male reassignment can be more than $50,000. The cost for male-to-female reassignment can be $7,000 to $24,000.

Between 100 to 500 gender-reassignment procedures are conducted in the United States each year.

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

Ross Toro

Viagra alternatives? Study of mouse erections hints at new ways to treat erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction risk may rise on lengthy space missions, rat study reveals

5,000-pound European satellite burns up over Pacific Ocean after 30 years in orbit

Most Popular

By Anna Gora December 27, 2023

By Anna Gora December 26, 2023

By Anna Gora December 25, 2023

By Emily Cooke December 23, 2023

By Victoria Atkinson December 22, 2023

By Anna Gora December 16, 2023

By Anna Gora December 15, 2023

By Anna Gora November 09, 2023

By Donavyn Coffey November 06, 2023

By Anna Gora October 31, 2023

By Anna Gora October 26, 2023

  • 2 There's an asteroid out there worth $100,000 quadrillion. Why haven't we mined it?
  • 3 There may be a 'dark mirror' universe within ours where atoms failed to form, new study suggests
  • 4 Giant, invasive Joro spiders with 6-foot webs could be poised to take over US cities, scientists warn
  • 5 Why are blueberries blue?
  • 2 April 8 total solar eclipse: Why this eclipse repeats itself every 54 years
  • 3 Stunning rock art site reveals that humans settled the Colombian Amazon 13,000 years ago
  • 4 There's an asteroid out there worth $100,000 quadrillion. Why haven't we mined it?
  • 5 1,800-year-old Roman tombs in Bulgaria included medallion featuring an emperor and glass bottles for collecting mourners' tears
  • Type 2 Diabetes
  • Heart Disease
  • Digestive Health
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Healthy Aging
  • Health Insurance
  • Public Health
  • Patient Rights
  • Caregivers & Loved Ones
  • End of Life Concerns
  • Health News
  • Thyroid Test Analyzer
  • Doctor Discussion Guides
  • Hemoglobin A1c Test Analyzer
  • Lipid Test Analyzer
  • Complete Blood Count (CBC) Analyzer
  • What to Buy
  • Editorial Process
  • Meet Our Medical Expert Board

Preparation and Procedures Involved in Gender Affirmation Surgeries

If you or a loved one are considering gender affirmation surgery , you are probably wondering what steps you must go through before the surgery can be done. Let's look at what is required to be a candidate for these surgeries, the potential positive effects and side effects of hormonal therapy, and the types of surgeries that are available.

Gender affirmation surgery, also known as gender confirmation surgery, is performed to align or transition individuals with gender dysphoria to their true gender.

A transgender woman, man, or non-binary person may choose to undergo gender affirmation surgery.

The term "transexual" was previously used by the medical community to describe people who undergo gender affirmation surgery. The term is no longer accepted by many members of the trans community as it is often weaponized as a slur. While some trans people do identify as "transexual", it is best to use the term "transgender" to describe members of this community.

Transitioning

Transitioning may involve:

  • Social transitioning : going by different pronouns, changing one’s style, adopting a new name, etc., to affirm one’s gender
  • Medical transitioning : taking hormones and/or surgically removing or modifying genitals and reproductive organs

Transgender individuals do not need to undergo medical intervention to have valid identities.  

Reasons for Undergoing Surgery

Many transgender people experience a marked incongruence between their gender and their assigned sex at birth.   The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has identified this as gender dysphoria.

Gender dysphoria is the distress some trans people feel when their appearance does not reflect their gender. Dysphoria can be the cause of poor mental health or trigger mental illness in transgender people.

For these individuals, social transitioning, hormone therapy, and gender confirmation surgery permit their outside appearance to match their true gender.  

Steps Required Before Surgery

In addition to a comprehensive understanding of the procedures, hormones, and other risks involved in gender-affirming surgery, there are other steps that must be accomplished before surgery is performed. These steps are one way the medical community and insurance companies limit access to gender affirmative procedures.

Steps may include:

  • Mental health evaluation : A mental health evaluation is required to look for any mental health concerns that could influence an individual’s mental state, and to assess a person’s readiness to undergo the physical and emotional stresses of the transition.  
  • Clear and consistent documentation of gender dysphoria
  • A "real life" test :   The individual must take on the role of their gender in everyday activities, both socially and professionally (known as “real-life experience” or “real-life test”).

Firstly, not all transgender experience physical body dysphoria. The “real life” test is also very dangerous to execute, as trans people have to make themselves vulnerable in public to be considered for affirmative procedures. When a trans person does not pass (easily identified as their gender), they can be clocked (found out to be transgender), putting them at risk for violence and discrimination.

Requiring trans people to conduct a “real-life” test despite the ongoing violence out transgender people face is extremely dangerous, especially because some transgender people only want surgery to lower their risk of experiencing transphobic violence.

Hormone Therapy & Transitioning

Hormone therapy involves taking progesterone, estrogen, or testosterone. An individual has to have undergone hormone therapy for a year before having gender affirmation surgery.  

The purpose of hormone therapy is to change the physical appearance to reflect gender identity.

Effects of Testosterone

When a trans person begins taking testosterone , changes include both a reduction in assigned female sexual characteristics and an increase in assigned male sexual characteristics.

Bodily changes can include:

  • Beard and mustache growth  
  • Deepening of the voice
  • Enlargement of the clitoris  
  • Increased growth of body hair
  • Increased muscle mass and strength  
  • Increase in the number of red blood cells
  • Redistribution of fat from the breasts, hips, and thighs to the abdominal area  
  • Development of acne, similar to male puberty
  • Baldness or localized hair loss, especially at the temples and crown of the head  
  • Atrophy of the uterus and ovaries, resulting in an inability to have children

Behavioral changes include:

  • Aggression  
  • Increased sex drive

Effects of Estrogen

When a trans person begins taking estrogen , changes include both a reduction in assigned male sexual characteristics and an increase in assigned female characteristics.

Changes to the body can include:

  • Breast development  
  • Loss of erection
  • Shrinkage of testicles  
  • Decreased acne
  • Decreased facial and body hair
  • Decreased muscle mass and strength  
  • Softer and smoother skin
  • Slowing of balding
  • Redistribution of fat from abdomen to the hips, thighs, and buttocks  
  • Decreased sex drive
  • Mood swings  

When Are the Hormonal Therapy Effects Noticed?

The feminizing effects of estrogen and the masculinizing effects of testosterone may appear after the first couple of doses, although it may be several years before a person is satisfied with their transition.   This is especially true for breast development.

Timeline of Surgical Process

Surgery is delayed until at least one year after the start of hormone therapy and at least two years after a mental health evaluation. Once the surgical procedures begin, the amount of time until completion is variable depending on the number of procedures desired, recovery time, and more.

Transfeminine Surgeries

Transfeminine is an umbrella term inclusive of trans women and non-binary trans people who were assigned male at birth.

Most often, surgeries involved in gender affirmation surgery are broken down into those that occur above the belt (top surgery) and those below the belt (bottom surgery). Not everyone undergoes all of these surgeries, but procedures that may be considered for transfeminine individuals are listed below.

Top surgery includes:

  • Breast augmentation  
  • Facial feminization
  • Nose surgery: Rhinoplasty may be done to narrow the nose and refine the tip.
  • Eyebrows: A brow lift may be done to feminize the curvature and position of the eyebrows.  
  • Jaw surgery: The jaw bone may be shaved down.
  • Chin reduction: Chin reduction may be performed to soften the chin's angles.
  • Cheekbones: Cheekbones may be enhanced, often via collagen injections as well as other plastic surgery techniques.  
  • Lips: A lip lift may be done.
  • Alteration to hairline  
  • Male pattern hair removal
  • Reduction of Adam’s apple  
  • Voice change surgery

Bottom surgery includes:

  • Removal of the penis (penectomy) and scrotum (orchiectomy)  
  • Creation of a vagina and labia

Transmasculine Surgeries

Transmasculine is an umbrella term inclusive of trans men and non-binary trans people who were assigned female at birth.

Surgery for this group involves top surgery and bottom surgery as well.

Top surgery includes :

  • Subcutaneous mastectomy/breast reduction surgery.
  • Removal of the uterus and ovaries
  • Creation of a penis and scrotum either through metoidioplasty and/or phalloplasty

Complications and Side Effects

Surgery is not without potential risks and complications. Estrogen therapy has been associated with an elevated risk of blood clots ( deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli ) for transfeminine people.   There is also the potential of increased risk of breast cancer (even without hormones, breast cancer may develop).

Testosterone use in transmasculine people has been associated with an increase in blood pressure, insulin resistance, and lipid abnormalities, though it's not certain exactly what role these changes play in the development of heart disease.  

With surgery, there are surgical risks such as bleeding and infection, as well as side effects of anesthesia . Those who are considering these treatments should have a careful discussion with their doctor about potential risks related to hormone therapy as well as the surgeries.  

Cost of Gender Confirmation Surgery

Surgery can be prohibitively expensive for many transgender individuals. Costs including counseling, hormones, electrolysis, and operations can amount to well over $100,000. Transfeminine procedures tend to be more expensive than transmasculine ones. Health insurance sometimes covers a portion of the expenses.

Quality of Life After Surgery

Quality of life appears to improve after gender-affirming surgery for all trans people who medically transition. One 2017 study found that surgical satisfaction ranged from 94% to 100%.  

Since there are many steps and sometimes uncomfortable surgeries involved, this number supports the benefits of surgery for those who feel it is their best choice.

A Word From Verywell

Gender affirmation surgery is a lengthy process that begins with counseling and a mental health evaluation to determine if a person can be diagnosed with gender dysphoria.

After this is complete, hormonal treatment is begun with testosterone for transmasculine individuals and estrogen for transfeminine people. Some of the physical and behavioral changes associated with hormonal treatment are listed above.

After hormone therapy has been continued for at least one year, a number of surgical procedures may be considered. These are broken down into "top" procedures and "bottom" procedures.

Surgery is costly, but precise estimates are difficult due to many variables. Finding a surgeon who focuses solely on gender confirmation surgery and has performed many of these procedures is a plus.   Speaking to a surgeon's past patients can be a helpful way to gain insight on the physician's practices as well.

For those who follow through with these preparation steps, hormone treatment, and surgeries, studies show quality of life appears to improve. Many people who undergo these procedures express satisfaction with their results.

Bizic MR, Jeftovic M, Pusica S, et al. Gender dysphoria: Bioethical aspects of medical treatment . Biomed Res Int . 2018;2018:9652305. doi:10.1155/2018/9652305

American Psychiatric Association. What is gender dysphoria? . 2016.

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health. Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people . 2012.

Tomlins L. Prescribing for transgender patients . Aust Prescr . 2019;42(1): 10–13.  doi:10.18773/austprescr.2019.003

T'sjoen G, Arcelus J, Gooren L, Klink DT, Tangpricha V. Endocrinology of transgender medicine . Endocr Rev . 2019;40(1):97-117. doi:10.1210/er.2018-00011

Unger CA. Hormone therapy for transgender patients . Transl Androl Urol . 2016;5(6):877-884.  doi:10.21037/tau.2016.09.04

Seal LJ. A review of the physical and metabolic effects of cross-sex hormonal therapy in the treatment of gender dysphoria . Ann Clin Biochem . 2016;53(Pt 1):10-20.  doi:10.1177/0004563215587763

Schechter LS. Gender confirmation surgery: An update for the primary care provider . Transgend Health . 2016;1(1):32-40. doi:10.1089/trgh.2015.0006

Altman K. Facial feminization surgery: current state of the art . Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 2012;41(8):885-94.  doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2012.04.024

Therattil PJ, Hazim NY, Cohen WA, Keith JD. Esthetic reduction of the thyroid cartilage: A systematic review of chondrolaryngoplasty . JPRAS Open. 2019;22:27-32. doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2019.07.002

Top H, Balta S. Transsexual mastectomy: Selection of appropriate technique according to breast characteristics . Balkan Med J . 2017;34(2):147-155. doi:10.4274/balkanmedj.2016.0093

Chan W, Drummond A, Kelly M. Deep vein thrombosis in a transgender woman . CMAJ . 2017;189(13):E502-E504.  doi:10.1503/cmaj.160408

Streed CG, Harfouch O, Marvel F, Blumenthal RS, Martin SS, Mukherjee M. Cardiovascular disease among transgender adults receiving hormone therapy: A narrative review . Ann Intern Med . 2017;167(4):256-267. doi:10.7326/M17-0577

Hashemi L, Weinreb J, Weimer AK, Weiss RL. Transgender care in the primary care setting: A review of guidelines and literature . Fed Pract . 2018;35(7):30-37.

Van de grift TC, Elaut E, Cerwenka SC, Cohen-kettenis PT, Kreukels BPC. Surgical satisfaction, quality of life, and their association after gender-affirming aurgery: A follow-up atudy . J Sex Marital Ther . 2018;44(2):138-148. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2017.1326190

American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Gender confirmation surgeries .

American Psychological Association. Transgender people, gender identity, and gender expression .

Colebunders B, Brondeel S, D'Arpa S, Hoebeke P, Monstrey S. An update on the surgical treatment for transgender patients . Sex Med Rev . 2017 Jan;5(1):103-109. doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.08.001

  • Search Close Search submit

Register for 'Leading Wellness' L.I.F.T. Webinar, March 2nd

Accommodation bookings for the World Congress 2024 are offered only through direct bookings on our website. Beware of scams!

Female to Male Gender Reassignment Surgery (FTM GRS)

Female-to-male gender reassignment surgery (FTM GRS) is a complex and irreversible genital surgery for female transsexual who is diagnosed with gender identity disorder and has a strong desire to live as male. The procedure is to remove all female genital organs including the uterus, ovaries, and vagina with the construction of male genitalia composed of the penis and scrotum.  

The patient who is fit for this surgery must strictly follow the standard of care set by the World Professional Association of Transgender Healthcare (WPATH) or equivalent criteria; Express desire or live in another gender role (Female gender) long enough, under hormonal replacement therapy, evaluated and approved by a psychiatrist or other qualified professional gender therapist.  

Apart from genital surgery, the patient would seek other procedures to allow them to live as males smoothly such as breast amputation, facial surgery, body surgery, etc.  

Interested in having this procedure?

Useful Information

Ensure you consider all aspects of a procedure. You can speak to your surgeon about these areas of the surgery in more detail during a consultation.

The surgery is very complicated and only a handful of surgeons are able to perform this procedure. It is a multi-staged procedure, the first stage is the removal of the uterus, ovary, and vagina. The duration of the procedure is 2-3 hours. The second and later stages are penis and scrotum reconstruction which is at least 6 months later. There are several techniques for penile reconstruction depending on the type of tissue such as skin/fat of the forearm, skin/fat of the thigh, or adjacent tissue around the clitoris. This second stage of surgical time is between 3-5 hours. A penile prosthesis can be incorporated simultaneously or at a later stage. The scrotal prosthesis is also implanted later.  

The procedure is done under general anesthesia and might be combined with spinal anesthesia for faster recovery by reducing the usage of anesthetic gas.  

Inpatient/Outpatient

The patient will be hospitalized as an in-patient for between 5-7 days for each stage depending on the technique and surgeon. The patient will have a urinary catheter at all times in the hospital.  

Additional Information

What are the risks.

The most frequent complication of FTM GRS is bleeding, wound infection, skin flap or graft necrosis, urinary stenosis and fistula, unsightly scar, etc. The revision procedure is scar revision, hair transplant, or tattooing to camouflage unsightly scars.   

What is the recovery process?

During hospitalization, the patient must be restricted in bed continuously or intermittently for several days between 3-5 days. After release from the hospital, the patients return to their normal lives but not having to do physical exercise during the first 2 months after surgery. The patient will have a urinary catheter continuously for several weeks to avoid a urinary fistula. If the patient has a penile prosthesis, it would need at least 6 months before sexual intimacy.  

What are the results?

With good surgical technique, the result is very satisfying with an improved quality of life. The patient is able to live in a male role completely and happily either on their own or with their female or male partners.  

  • Patient Information
  • Global Statistics
  • Media Centre
  • Global Sponsors
  • Privacy Policy

19 Mantua Road, Mount Royal, NJ 08061 United States

Registration number: 0330131

US Office: +1-603-643-2325

UK Office: +44 20 7038 7812

© 2022 International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. All Rights Reserved.

  • Create an account

Log into My ISAPS

Forgot your password? Reset it here

Join the ISAPS Community

All members will continue to receive information relevant to their membership and ISAPS events.

I confirm by clicking below I would like to receive information about:

Welcome to the ISAPS community

By creating an account, you can:.

  • Register for events
  • Update your personal details
  • Gain access to ISAPS publications and video library
  • Become a member (explore our memberships here)

ISAPS Members can also:

  • Access your member benefits
  • Secure discounted member rates for events
  • Read the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Journal
  • Gain full access to the video library
  • View the Members Directory
  • Update your 'Find a Surgeon' profile details
  • Renew/Upgrade your Membership 

The first step to becoming a part of the community is creating an account, so join us!

  • Patient Care & Health Information
  • Tests & Procedures
  • Feminizing surgery

Feminizing surgery, also called gender-affirming surgery or gender-confirmation surgery, involves procedures that help better align the body with a person's gender identity. Feminizing surgery includes several options, such as top surgery to increase the size of the breasts. That procedure also is called breast augmentation. Bottom surgery can involve removal of the testicles, or removal of the testicles and penis and the creation of a vagina, labia and clitoris. Facial procedures or body-contouring procedures can be used as well.

Not everybody chooses to have feminizing surgery. These surgeries can be expensive, carry risks and complications, and involve follow-up medical care and procedures. Certain surgeries change fertility and sexual sensations. They also may change how you feel about your body.

Your health care team can talk with you about your options and help you weigh the risks and benefits.

Products & Services

  • A Book: Mayo Clinic Family Health Book, 5th Edition
  • Available Sexual Health Solutions at Mayo Clinic Store
  • Newsletter: Mayo Clinic Health Letter — Digital Edition

Why it's done

Many people seek feminizing surgery as a step in the process of treating discomfort or distress because their gender identity differs from their sex assigned at birth. The medical term for this is gender dysphoria.

For some people, having feminizing surgery feels like a natural step. It's important to their sense of self. Others choose not to have surgery. All people relate to their bodies differently and should make individual choices that best suit their needs.

Feminizing surgery may include:

  • Removal of the testicles alone. This is called orchiectomy.
  • Removal of the penis, called penectomy.
  • Removal of the testicles.
  • Creation of a vagina, called vaginoplasty.
  • Creation of a clitoris, called clitoroplasty.
  • Creation of labia, called labioplasty.
  • Breast surgery. Surgery to increase breast size is called top surgery or breast augmentation. It can be done through implants, the placement of tissue expanders under breast tissue, or the transplantation of fat from other parts of the body into the breast.
  • Plastic surgery on the face. This is called facial feminization surgery. It involves plastic surgery techniques in which the jaw, chin, cheeks, forehead, nose, and areas surrounding the eyes, ears or lips are changed to create a more feminine appearance.
  • Tummy tuck, called abdominoplasty.
  • Buttock lift, called gluteal augmentation.
  • Liposuction, a surgical procedure that uses a suction technique to remove fat from specific areas of the body.
  • Voice feminizing therapy and surgery. These are techniques used to raise voice pitch.
  • Tracheal shave. This surgery reduces the thyroid cartilage, also called the Adam's apple.
  • Scalp hair transplant. This procedure removes hair follicles from the back and side of the head and transplants them to balding areas.
  • Hair removal. A laser can be used to remove unwanted hair. Another option is electrolysis, a procedure that involves inserting a tiny needle into each hair follicle. The needle emits a pulse of electric current that damages and eventually destroys the follicle.

Your health care provider might advise against these surgeries if you have:

  • Significant medical conditions that haven't been addressed.
  • Behavioral health conditions that haven't been addressed.
  • Any condition that limits your ability to give your informed consent.

Like any other type of major surgery, many types of feminizing surgery pose a risk of bleeding, infection and a reaction to anesthesia. Other complications might include:

  • Delayed wound healing
  • Fluid buildup beneath the skin, called seroma
  • Bruising, also called hematoma
  • Changes in skin sensation such as pain that doesn't go away, tingling, reduced sensation or numbness
  • Damaged or dead body tissue — a condition known as tissue necrosis — such as in the vagina or labia
  • A blood clot in a deep vein, called deep vein thrombosis, or a blood clot in the lung, called pulmonary embolism
  • Development of an irregular connection between two body parts, called a fistula, such as between the bladder or bowel into the vagina
  • Urinary problems, such as incontinence
  • Pelvic floor problems
  • Permanent scarring
  • Loss of sexual pleasure or function
  • Worsening of a behavioral health problem

Certain types of feminizing surgery may limit or end fertility. If you want to have biological children and you're having surgery that involves your reproductive organs, talk to your health care provider before surgery. You may be able to freeze sperm with a technique called sperm cryopreservation.

How you prepare

Before surgery, you meet with your surgeon. Work with a surgeon who is board certified and experienced in the procedures you want. Your surgeon talks with you about your options and the potential results. The surgeon also may provide information on details such as the type of anesthesia that will be used during surgery and the kind of follow-up care that you may need.

Follow your health care team's directions on preparing for your procedures. This may include guidelines on eating and drinking. You may need to make changes in the medicine you take and stop using nicotine, including vaping, smoking and chewing tobacco.

Because feminizing surgery might cause physical changes that cannot be reversed, you must give informed consent after thoroughly discussing:

  • Risks and benefits
  • Alternatives to surgery
  • Expectations and goals
  • Social and legal implications
  • Potential complications
  • Impact on sexual function and fertility

Evaluation for surgery

Before surgery, a health care provider evaluates your health to address any medical conditions that might prevent you from having surgery or that could affect the procedure. This evaluation may be done by a provider with expertise in transgender medicine. The evaluation might include:

  • A review of your personal and family medical history
  • A physical exam
  • A review of your vaccinations
  • Screening tests for some conditions and diseases
  • Identification and management, if needed, of tobacco use, drug use, alcohol use disorder, HIV or other sexually transmitted infections
  • Discussion about birth control, fertility and sexual function

You also may have a behavioral health evaluation by a health care provider with expertise in transgender health. That evaluation might assess:

  • Gender identity
  • Gender dysphoria
  • Mental health concerns
  • Sexual health concerns
  • The impact of gender identity at work, at school, at home and in social settings
  • The role of social transitioning and hormone therapy before surgery
  • Risky behaviors, such as substance use or use of unapproved hormone therapy or supplements
  • Support from family, friends and caregivers
  • Your goals and expectations of treatment
  • Care planning and follow-up after surgery

Other considerations

Health insurance coverage for feminizing surgery varies widely. Before you have surgery, check with your insurance provider to see what will be covered.

Before surgery, you might consider talking to others who have had feminizing surgery. If you don't know someone, ask your health care provider about support groups in your area or online resources you can trust. People who have gone through the process may be able to help you set your expectations and offer a point of comparison for your own goals of the surgery.

What you can expect

Facial feminization surgery.

Facial feminization surgery may involve a range of procedures to change facial features, including:

  • Moving the hairline to create a smaller forehead
  • Enlarging the lips and cheekbones with implants
  • Reshaping the jaw and chin
  • Undergoing skin-tightening surgery after bone reduction

These surgeries are typically done on an outpatient basis, requiring no hospital stay. Recovery time for most of them is several weeks. Recovering from jaw procedures takes longer.

Tracheal shave

A tracheal shave minimizes the thyroid cartilage, also called the Adam's apple. During this procedure, a small cut is made under the chin, in the shadow of the neck or in a skin fold to conceal the scar. The surgeon then reduces and reshapes the cartilage. This is typically an outpatient procedure, requiring no hospital stay.

Top surgery

Breast incisions for breast augmentation

  • Breast augmentation incisions

As part of top surgery, the surgeon makes cuts around the areola, near the armpit or in the crease under the breast.

Placement of breast implants or tissue expanders

  • Placement of breast implants or tissue expanders

During top surgery, the surgeon places the implants under the breast tissue. If feminizing hormones haven't made the breasts large enough, an initial surgery might be needed to have devices called tissue expanders placed in front of the chest muscles.

Hormone therapy with estrogen stimulates breast growth, but many people aren't satisfied with that growth alone. Top surgery is a surgical procedure to increase breast size that may involve implants, fat grafting or both.

During this surgery, a surgeon makes cuts around the areola, near the armpit or in the crease under the breast. Next, silicone or saline implants are placed under the breast tissue. Another option is to transplant fat, muscles or tissue from other parts of the body into the breasts.

If feminizing hormones haven't made the breasts large enough for top surgery, an initial surgery may be needed to place devices called tissue expanders in front of the chest muscles. After that surgery, visits to a health care provider are needed every few weeks to have a small amount of saline injected into the tissue expanders. This slowly stretches the chest skin and other tissues to make room for the implants. When the skin has been stretched enough, another surgery is done to remove the expanders and place the implants.

Genital surgery

Anatomy before and after penile inversion

  • Anatomy before and after penile inversion

During penile inversion, the surgeon makes a cut in the area between the rectum and the urethra and prostate. This forms a tunnel that becomes the new vagina. The surgeon lines the inside of the tunnel with skin from the scrotum, the penis or both. If there's not enough penile or scrotal skin, the surgeon might take skin from another area of the body and use it for the new vagina as well.

Anatomy before and after bowel flap procedure

  • Anatomy before and after bowel flap procedure

A bowel flap procedure might be done if there's not enough tissue or skin in the penis or scrotum. The surgeon moves a segment of the colon or small bowel to form a new vagina. That segment is called a bowel flap or conduit. The surgeon reconnects the remaining parts of the colon.

Orchiectomy

Orchiectomy is a surgery to remove the testicles. Because testicles produce sperm and the hormone testosterone, an orchiectomy might eliminate the need to use testosterone blockers. It also may lower the amount of estrogen needed to achieve and maintain the appearance you want.

This type of surgery is typically done on an outpatient basis. A local anesthetic may be used, so only the testicular area is numbed. Or the surgery may be done using general anesthesia. This means you are in a sleep-like state during the procedure.

To remove the testicles, a surgeon makes a cut in the scrotum and removes the testicles through the opening. Orchiectomy is typically done as part of the surgery for vaginoplasty. But some people prefer to have it done alone without other genital surgery.

Vaginoplasty

Vaginoplasty is the surgical creation of a vagina. During vaginoplasty, skin from the shaft of the penis and the scrotum is used to create a vaginal canal. This surgical approach is called penile inversion. In some techniques, the skin also is used to create the labia. That procedure is called labiaplasty. To surgically create a clitoris, the tip of the penis and the nerves that supply it are used. This procedure is called a clitoroplasty. In some cases, skin can be taken from another area of the body or tissue from the colon may be used to create the vagina. This approach is called a bowel flap procedure. During vaginoplasty, the testicles are removed if that has not been done previously.

Some surgeons use a technique that requires laser hair removal in the area of the penis and scrotum to provide hair-free tissue for the procedure. That process can take several months. Other techniques don't require hair removal prior to surgery because the hair follicles are destroyed during the procedure.

After vaginoplasty, a tube called a catheter is placed in the urethra to collect urine for several days. You need to be closely watched for about a week after surgery. Recovery can take up to two months. Your health care provider gives you instructions about when you may begin sexual activity with your new vagina.

After surgery, you're given a set of vaginal dilators of increasing sizes. You insert the dilators in your vagina to maintain, lengthen and stretch it. Follow your health care provider's directions on how often to use the dilators. To keep the vagina open, dilation needs to continue long term.

Because the prostate gland isn't removed during surgery, you need to follow age-appropriate recommendations for prostate cancer screening. Following surgery, it is possible to develop urinary symptoms from enlargement of the prostate.

Dilation after gender-affirming surgery

This material is for your education and information only. This content does not replace medical advice, diagnosis and treatment. If you have questions about a medical condition, always talk with your health care provider.

Narrator: Vaginal dilation is important to your recovery and ongoing care. You have to dilate to maintain the size and shape of your vaginal canal and to keep it open.

Jessi: I think for many trans women, including myself, but especially myself, I looked forward to one day having surgery for a long time. So that meant looking up on the internet what the routines would be, what the surgery entailed. So I knew going into it that dilation was going to be a very big part of my routine post-op, but just going forward, permanently.

Narrator: Vaginal dilation is part of your self-care. You will need to do vaginal dilation for the rest of your life.

Alissa (nurse): If you do not do dilation, your vagina may shrink or close. If that happens, these changes might not be able to be reversed.

Narrator: For the first year after surgery, you will dilate many times a day. After the first year, you may only need to dilate once a week. Most people dilate for the rest of their life.

Jessi: The dilation became easier mostly because I healed the scars, the stitches held up a little bit better, and I knew how to do it better. Each transgender woman's vagina is going to be a little bit different based on anatomy, and I grew to learn mine. I understand, you know, what position I needed to put the dilator in, how much force I needed to use, and once I learned how far I needed to put it in and I didn't force it and I didn't worry so much on oh, did I put it in too far, am I not putting it in far enough, and I have all these worries and then I stress out and then my body tenses up. Once I stopped having those thoughts, I relaxed more and it was a lot easier.

Narrator: You will have dilators of different sizes. Your health care provider will determine which sizes are best for you. Dilation will most likely be painful at first. It's important to dilate even if you have pain.

Alissa (nurse): Learning how to relax the muscles and breathe as you dilate will help. If you wish, you can take the pain medication recommended by your health care team before you dilate.

Narrator: Dilation requires time and privacy. Plan ahead so you have a private area at home or at work. Be sure to have your dilators, a mirror, water-based lubricant and towels available. Wash your hands and the dilators with warm soapy water, rinse well and dry on a clean towel. Use a water-based lubricant to moisten the rounded end of the dilators. Water-based lubricants are available over-the-counter. Do not use oil-based lubricants, such as petroleum jelly or baby oil. These can irritate the vagina. Find a comfortable position in bed or elsewhere. Use pillows to support your back and thighs as you lean back to a 45-degree angle. Start your dilation session with the smallest dilator. Hold a mirror in one hand. Use the other hand to find the opening of your vagina. Separate the skin. Relax through your hips, abdomen and pelvic floor. Take slow, deep breaths. Position the rounded end of the dilator with the lubricant at the opening to your vaginal canal. The rounded end should point toward your back. Insert the dilator. Go slowly and gently. Think of its path as a gentle curving swoop. The dilator doesn't go straight in. It follows the natural curve of the vaginal canal. Keep gentle down and inward pressure on the dilator as you insert it. Stop when the dilator's rounded end reaches the end of your vaginal canal. The dilators have dots or markers that measure depth. Hold the dilator in place in your vaginal canal. Use gentle but constant inward pressure for the correct amount of time at the right depth for you. If you're feeling pain, breathe and relax the muscles. When time is up, slowly remove the dilator, then repeat with the other dilators you need to use. Wash the dilators and your hands. If you have increased discharge following dilation, you may want to wear a pad to protect your clothing.

Jessi: I mean, it's such a strange, unfamiliar feeling to dilate and to have a dilator, you know to insert a dilator into your own vagina. Because it's not a pleasurable experience, and it's quite painful at first when you start to dilate. It feels much like a foreign body entering and it doesn't feel familiar and your body kind of wants to get it out of there. It's really tough at the beginning, but if you can get through the first month, couple months, it's going to be a lot easier and it's not going to be so much of an emotional and uncomfortable experience.

Narrator: You need to stay on schedule even when traveling. Bring your dilators with you. If your schedule at work creates challenges, ask your health care team if some of your dilation sessions can be done overnight.

Alissa (nurse): You can't skip days now and do more dilation later. You must do dilation on schedule to keep vaginal depth and width. It is important to dilate even if you have pain. Dilation should cause less pain over time.

Jessi: I hear that from a lot of other women that it's an overwhelming experience. There's lots of emotions that are coming through all at once. But at the end of the day for me, it was a very happy experience. I was glad to have the opportunity because that meant that while I have a vagina now, at the end of the day I had a vagina. Yes, it hurts, and it's not pleasant to dilate, but I have the vagina and it's worth it. It's a long process and it's not going to be easy. But you can do it.

Narrator: If you feel dilation may not be working or you have any questions about dilation, please talk with a member of your health care team.

Research has found that that gender-affirming surgery can have a positive impact on well-being and sexual function. It's important to follow your health care provider's advice for long-term care and follow-up after surgery. Continued care after surgery is associated with good outcomes for long-term health.

Before you have surgery, talk to members of your health care team about what to expect after surgery and the ongoing care you may need.

Clinical trials

Explore Mayo Clinic studies of tests and procedures to help prevent, detect, treat or manage conditions.

Feminizing surgery care at Mayo Clinic

  • Tangpricha V, et al. Transgender women: Evaluation and management. https://www.uptodate.com/ contents/search. Accessed Aug. 16, 2022.
  • Erickson-Schroth L, ed. Surgical transition. In: Trans Bodies, Trans Selves: A Resource by and for Transgender Communities. 2nd ed. Kindle edition. Oxford University Press; 2022. Accessed Aug. 17, 2022.
  • Coleman E, et al. Standards of care for the health of transgender and gender diverse people, version 8. International Journal of Transgender Health. 2022; doi:10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644.
  • AskMayoExpert. Gender-affirming procedures (adult). Mayo Clinic; 2022.
  • Nahabedian, M. Implant-based breast reconstruction and augmentation. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/search. Accessed Aug. 17, 2022.
  • Erickson-Schroth L, ed. Medical transition. In: Trans Bodies, Trans Selves: A Resource by and for Transgender Communities. 2nd ed. Kindle edition. Oxford University Press; 2022. Accessed Aug. 17, 2022.
  • Ferrando C, et al. Gender-affirming surgery: Male to female. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/search. Accessed Aug. 17, 2022.
  • Doctors & Departments
  • Care at Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic does not endorse companies or products. Advertising revenue supports our not-for-profit mission.

  • Opportunities

Mayo Clinic Press

Check out these best-sellers and special offers on books and newsletters from Mayo Clinic Press .

  • Mayo Clinic on Incontinence - Mayo Clinic Press Mayo Clinic on Incontinence
  • The Essential Diabetes Book - Mayo Clinic Press The Essential Diabetes Book
  • Mayo Clinic on Hearing and Balance - Mayo Clinic Press Mayo Clinic on Hearing and Balance
  • FREE Mayo Clinic Diet Assessment - Mayo Clinic Press FREE Mayo Clinic Diet Assessment
  • Mayo Clinic Health Letter - FREE book - Mayo Clinic Press Mayo Clinic Health Letter - FREE book

Show the heart some love!

Help us advance cardiovascular medicine.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Front Psychiatry

Readiness assessments for gender-affirming surgical treatments: A systematic scoping review of historical practices and changing ethical considerations

Travis amengual.

1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States

Kaitlyn Kunstman

R. brett lloyd, aron janssen.

2 The Pritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States

Annie B. Wescott

3 Galter Health Science Library, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States

Associated Data

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/ Supplementary material , further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) are terms that refer to individuals whose gender identity differs from sex assigned at birth. TGD individuals may choose any variety of modifications to their gender expression including, but not limited to changing their name, clothing, or hairstyle, starting hormones, or undergoing surgery. Starting in the 1950s, surgeons and endocrinologists began treating what was then known as transsexualism with cross sex hormones and a variety of surgical procedures collectively known as sex reassignment surgery (SRS). Soon after, Harry Benjamin began work to develop standards of care that could be applied to these patients with some uniformity. These guidelines, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), are in their 8th iteration. Through each iteration there has been a requirement that patients requesting gender-affirming hormones (GAH) or gender-affirming surgery (GAS) undergo one or more detailed evaluations by a mental health provider through which they must obtain a “letter of readiness,” placing mental health providers in the role of gatekeeper. WPATH specifies eligibility criteria for gender-affirming treatments and general guidelines for the content of letters, but does not include specific details about what must be included, leading to a lack of uniformity in how mental health providers approach performing evaluations and writing letters. This manuscript aims to review practices related to evaluations and letters of readiness for GAS in adults over time as the standards of care have evolved via a scoping review of the literature. We will place a particular emphasis on changing ethical considerations over time and the evolution of the model of care from gatekeeping to informed consent. To this end, we did an extensive review of the literature. We identified a trend across successive iterations of the guidelines in both reducing stigma against TGD individuals and shift in ethical considerations from “do no harm” to the core principle of patient autonomy. This has helped reduce barriers to care and connect more people who desire it to gender affirming care (GAC), but in these authors’ opinions does not go far enough in reducing barriers.

Introduction

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) are terms that refer to any individual whose gender identity is different from their sex assigned at birth. Gender identity can be expressed through any combination of name, pronouns, hairstyle, clothing, and social role. Some TGD individuals wish to transition medically by taking gender-affirming hormones (GAH) and/or pursuing gender-affirming surgery (GAS) ( 1 ). 1 The medical community’s comfort level with TGD individuals and, consequently, their willingness to provide a broad range of gender affirming care (GAC) 2 has changed significantly over time alongside an increasing understanding of what it means to be TGD and increasing cultural acceptance of LGBTQI people.

Historically physicians have placed significant barriers in the way of TGD people accessing the care that we now know to be lifesaving. Even today, patients wishing to receive GAC must navigate a system that sometimes requires multiple mental health evaluations for procedures, that is not required of cisgender individuals.

The medical and psychiatric communities have used a variety of terms over time to refer to TGD individuals. The first and second editions of DSM described TGD individuals using terms such as transvestism (TV) and transsexualism (TS), and often conflated gender identity with sexuality, by including them alongside diagnoses such as homosexuality and paraphilias. Both the DSM and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) have continuously changed diagnostic terminology and criteria involving TGD individuals over time, from Gender Identity Disorder in DSM-IV to Gender Dysphoria in DSM-5 to Gender Incongruence in ICD-11.

In 1979, the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association 3 , renamed the World Profession Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) in 2006, was the first to publish international guidelines for providing GAC to TGD individuals. The WPATH Standards of Care (SOC) are used by many insurance companies and surgeons to determine an individual’s eligibility for GAC. Throughout each iteration, mental health providers are placed in the role of gatekeeper and tasked with conducting mental health evaluations and providing required letters of readiness for TGD individuals who request GAC ( 1 ). As part of this review, we will summarize the available literature examining the practical and ethical changes in conducting mental health readiness assessments and writing the associated letters.

While the WPATH guidelines specify eligibility criteria for GAC and a general guide for what information to include in a letter of readiness, there are no widely agreed upon standardized letter templates or semi-structured interviews, leading to a variety of practices in evaluation and letter writing for GAC ( 2 ). To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review to summarize the available research to date regarding the evolution of the mental health evaluation and process of writing letters of readiness for GAS. By summarizing trends in these evaluations over time, we aim to identify best practices and help further guide mental health professionals working in this field.

The review authors conducted a comprehensive search of the literature in collaboration with a research librarian (ABW) according to PRISMA guidelines. The search was comprised of database-specific controlled vocabulary and keyword terms for (1) mental health and (2) TGD-related surgeries. Searches were conducted on December 2, 2020 in MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library Databases (Wiley), PsychINFO (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus (Elsevier), and Dissertations and Theses Global (ProQuest). All databases were searched from inception to present without the use of limits or filters. In total, 8,197 results underwent multi-pass deduplication in a citation management system (EndNote), and 4,411 unique entries were uploaded to an online screening software (Rayyan) for title/abstract screening by two independent reviewers. In total, 303 articles were included for full text screening ( Figure 1 ), however, 69 of those articles were excluded as they were unable to be obtained online or through interlibrary loan. Both review authors conducted a full text screen of the remaining 234 articles. Articles were included in the final review if they specified criteria used for mental health screening/evaluation and/or letter writing for GAS, focused on TGD adults, were written in English, and were peer-reviewed publications. Any discrepancies were discussed between the two review authors TA and KK and a consensus was reached. A total of 86 articles met full inclusion criteria. Full documentation of all searches can be found in the Supplementary material .

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is fpsyt-13-1006024-g001.jpg

PRISMA flow diagram demonstrating article review process.

In total, 86 articles were included for review. Eleven articles were focused on ethical considerations while the remaining 75 articles focused on the mental health evaluation and process of writing letters of readiness for GAS. Version 8 of the SOC was published in September of 2022 during the review process of this manuscript and is also included as a reference and point of discussion.

Prior to the publication of the standards of care

Fourteen articles were identified in the literature search as published prior to the development of the WPATH SOC version 1 in 1979. Prominent themes included classification, categorization, and diagnosis of TS. Few publications described the components of a mental health evaluation, and inclusion and exclusion criteria, for GAS. Many publications focused exclusively on transgender females, with a paucity of literature examining the experiences of transgender males during this timeframe.

Authors emphasized accurate diagnosis of TS, highlighting elements of the psychosocial history including early life cross-dressing, preference for play with the opposite gender toys and friends, and social estrangement around puberty ( 3 ). One author proposed the term gender dysphoria syndrome, which included the following criteria: a sense of inappropriateness in one’s anatomically congruent sex role, that role reversal would lead to improvement in discomfort, homoerotic interest and heterosexual inhibition, an active desire for surgical intervention, and the patient taking on an active role in exploring their interest in sex reassignment ( 4 ). Many authors attempted to differentiate between the “true transsexual” and other diagnoses, including idiopathic TS; idiopathic, essential, or obligatory homosexuality; neuroticism; TV; schizophrenia; and intersex individuals ( 5 , 6 ).

Money argued that the selection criteria for patients requesting GAS include a psychiatric evaluation to obtain collateral information to confirm the accuracy of the interview, work with the family to foster support of the individual, and proper management of any psychiatric comorbidities ( 5 ). Authors began to assemble a list of possible exclusion criteria for receiving GAS such as psychosis, unstable mental health, ambivalence, and secondary gain (e.g., getting out of the military), lack of triggering major life events or crises, lack of sufficient distress in therapy, presence of marital bonds (given the illegality of same-sex marriage during this period), and if natal genitals were used for pleasure ( 3 – 5 , 7 – 13 ).

Others focused the role of the psychiatric evaluation on the social lives and roles of the patient. They believed the evaluation should include exploring the patient’s motivation for change for at least 6–12 months ( 8 ), facilitating realistic expectations of treatment, managing family issues, providing support during social transition and post-operatively ( 13 ), and encouraging GAH and the “real-life test” (RLT). The RLT is a period in which a person must fully live in their affirmed gender identity, “testing” if it is right for them. In 1970, Green recommended that a primary goal of treatment was that, “the male patient must be able to pass in society as a socially acceptable woman in appearance and to conduct the normal affairs of the day without arousing undue suspicion” ( 14 ). Benjamin also noted concern that “too masculine” features may be a contraindication to surgery so as to not make an “acceptable woman” ( 7 ). Some publications recommended at least 1–2 years of a RLT ( 3 , 7 , 11 , 15 ), while others recommended at least 5 years of RLT prior to considering GAS ( 12 ). Emphasis was placed on verifying the accuracy of reported information from family or friends to ensure “authentic” motivation for GAS and rule out ambivalence or secondary gain (e.g., getting out of the military) ( 10 ).

Ell recommended evaluation to ensure the patient has “adequate intelligence” to understand realistic expectations of surgery and attempted to highlight the patient’s autonomy in the decision to undergo GAS. He wrote, “That is your decision [to undergo surgery]. It’s up to you to prove that you are a suitable candidate for surgery. It’s not for me to offer it to you. If you decide to go ahead with your plans to pass in the opposite gender role, you do it on your own responsibility” ( 8 ). Notably, many authors conceptualized gender transition along a binary, with individuals transitioning from one end to the other.

In these earliest publications, one can start to see the beginning framework of modern-day requirements for accessing GAS, including ensuring an accurate diagnosis of gender incongruence; ruling out other possible causes of presentation such as psychosis; ensuring general mental stability; making sure that the patient has undergone at least some time of living in their affirmed gender; and that they are able to understand the consequences of the procedure.

Standards of care version 1 and 2

Changes to the standards of care.

The first two versions of the WPATH SOC were written in 1979 and 1980, respectively and are substantially similar to one another. SOC version three was the first to be published in an academic journal in 1985 and changes from the first two versions were documented within this publication. The first two versions required that all recommendations for GAC be completed by licensed psychologists or psychiatrists. The first version recommended that patients requesting GAH and non-genital GAS, spend 3 and 6 months, respectively, living full time in their affirmed gender. These recommendations were rescinded in subsequent versions ( 16 ). Figure 2 reviews changes to the recommendations for GAC within the WPATH SOC over time.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is fpsyt-13-1006024-g002.jpg

Changes to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) standards of care around gender affirming medical and surgical treatments over time.

Results review

Five articles published between 1979 and 1980 were included in this review. Again, emphasis was placed on proper diagnosis, classification and consistency of gender identity over time ( 17 , 18 ).

Wise and Meyer explored the concept of a continuum between TV and TS, describing that those who experienced gender dysphoria often requested GAS, displayed evidence of strong cross-dressing desires with arousal, history of cross-gender roles, and absence of manic-depressive or psychotic illnesses ( 19 ). Requirements for GAS at the Johns Hopkins Gender Clinic included at least 2 years of cross-dressing, working in the opposite gender role, and undergoing treatment with GAH and psychotherapy ( 19 ). Bernstein identified factors correlated with negative GAS outcomes including presence of psychosis, drug abuse, frequent suicide attempts, criminality, unstable relationships, and low intelligence level ( 18 ). Lothstein stressed the importance of correct diagnosis, “since life stressors may lead some transvestites to clinically present as transsexuals desiring SRS” ( 20 ). Levine reviewed the diagnostic process employed by Case Western Reserve University Gender Identity Clinic which involved initial interview by a social worker to collect psychometric testing, followed by two independent psychiatric interviews to obtain the developmental gender history, understand treatment goals, and evaluate for underlying co-morbid mental health diagnoses, with a final multidisciplinary conference to integrate the various evaluations and develop a treatment plan ( 21 ).

Standards of care version 3

Version 3 broadened the definition of the clinician thereby broadening the scope of providers who could write recommendation letters for GAC. Whereas prior SOC required letters from licensed psychologists or psychiatrists, version 3 allowed initial evaluations from providers with at least a Master’s degree in behavioral science, and when required, a second evaluation from any licensed provider with at least a doctoral degree. Version 3 recommended that all evaluators demonstrate competence in “gender identity matters” and must know the patient, “in a psychotherapeutic relationship,” for at least 6 months ( 16 ). Version 3 relied on the definition of TS in DSM-III, which specified the sense of discomfort with one’s anatomic sex be “continuous (not limited to a period of stress) for at least 2 years” and be independently verified by a source other than the patient through collateral or through a longitudinal relationship with the mental health provider ( 16 ). Recommendation of GAS specifically required at least 6–12 months of RLT, for non-genital and genital GAS, respectively ( 16 ).”

Nine articles were published during the timeframe that the SOC version 3 were active (1981–1990). Themes in these publications included increasing focus on selection criteria for GAS and emphasis on the RLT, which was used to ensure proper diagnosis of gender dysphoria. Recommendations for the duration of the RLT ranged anywhere between 1 and 3 years ( 22 , 23 ).

Proposed components of the mental health evaluation for GAS included a detailed assessment of the duration, intensity, and stability of the gender dysphoria, identification of underlying psychiatric diagnoses and suicidal ideation, a mental status examination to rule out psychosis, and an assessment of intelligence (e.g., IQ) to comment on the individual’s “capacity and competence” to consent to GAC. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), and Lindgren-Pauly Body Image Scale were also used during assessments ( 24 ).

Authors developed more specific inclusion and exclusion criteria for undergoing GAS with inclusion criteria including age 21 or older, not legally married, no pending litigation, evidence of gender dysphoria, completion of 1 year of psychotherapy, between 1 and 2 years RLT with ability to “pass convincingly” and “perform successfully” in the opposite gender role, at least 6 months on GAH (if medically tolerable), reasonably stable mental health (including absence of psychosis, depression, alcoholism and intellectual disability), good financial standing with psychotherapy fees ( 25 ), and a prediction that GAS would improve personal and social functioning ( 26 – 29 ). A 1987 survey of European psychiatrists identified their most common requirements as completion of a RLT of 1–2 years, psychiatric observation, mental stability, no psychosis, and 1 year of GAH ( 27 ).

Standards of care version 4

World Professional Association for Transgender Health SOC version four was published in 1990. Between version three and version four, DSM-III-R was published in 1987. Version four relied on the DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for TS as opposed to the DSM-III criteria in version three. The DSM-III-R criteria for TS included a “persistent discomfort and sense of inappropriateness about one’s assigned sex,” “persistent preoccupation for at least 2 years with getting rid of one’s primary and secondary sex characteristics and acquiring the sex characteristics of the other sex,” and that the individual had reached puberty ( 30 ). Notable changes from the DSM-III criteria include specifying a time duration for the discomfort (2 years) and designating that individuals must have reached puberty.

Six articles were published between 1990 and 1998 while version four was active. Earlier trends continued including emphasizing proper diagnosis of gender dysphoria ( 31 , 32 ), however, a new trend emerged toward implementing more comprehensive evaluations, with an emphasis on decision making, a key element of informed consent.

Bockting and Coleman, in a move representative of other publications of this era, advocated for a more comprehensive approach to the mental health evaluation and treatment of gender dysphoria. Their treatment model was comprised of five main components: a mental health assessment consisting of psychological testing and clinical interviews with the individual, couple, and/or family; a physical examination; management of comorbid disorders with pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy; facilitation of identity formation and sexual identity management through individual and group therapy; and aftercare consisting of individual, couple, and/or family therapy with the option of a gender identity consolidation support group. Psychoeducation was a main thread throughout the treatment model and a variety of treatment “subtasks” such as understanding decision making, sexual functioning and sexual identity exploration, social support, and family of origin intimacy were identified as important. The authors advocated for “a clear separation of gender identity, social sex role, and sexual orientation which allows a wide spectrum of sexual identities and prevents limiting access to GAS to those who conform to a heterosexist paradigm of mental health” ( 33 ).

This process can be compared with the Italian SOC for GAS which recommend a multidisciplinary assessment consisting of a psychosocial evaluation and informed consent discussion around treatment options, procedures, and risks. Requirements included 6 months of psychotherapy prior to initiating GAH, 1 year of a RLT prior to GAS, and provision of a court order approving GAS, which could not be granted any sooner than 2 years after starting the process of gender transition. Follow-up was recommended at 6, 12, and 24 months post-GAS to ensure psychosocial adjustment to the affirmed gender role ( 34 ).

Other authors continued to refine inclusion and exclusion criteria for GAS by surveying the actual practices of health centers. Inclusion criteria included those who had life-long cross gender identification with inability to live in their sex assigned at birth; a 1–2 years RLT (a nearly universal requirement in the survey); and ability to pass “effortlessly and convincingly in society”; completed 1 year of GAH; maintained a stable job; were unmarried or divorced; demonstrated good coping skills and social-emotional stability; had a good support system; and were able to maintain a relationship with a psychotherapist. Exclusion criteria included age under 21 years old, recent death of a parent ( 35 ), unstable gender identity, unstable psychosocial circumstances, unstable psychiatric illness (such as schizophrenia, suicide attempts, substance abuse, intellectual disability, organic brain disorder, AIDS), incompatible marital status, criminal history/activity or physical/medical disability ( 36 ).

The survey indicated some programs were more lenient around considering individuals with bipolar affective disorder, the ability to pass successfully, and issues around family support. Only three clinics used sexual orientation as a factor in decision for GAS, marking a significant change in the literature from prior decades. Overall, the authors found that 74% of the clinics surveyed did not adhere to WPATH SOC, instead adopting more conservative policies ( 36 ).

Standards of care version 5

Published in 1998, version five defined the responsibilities of the mental health professional which included diagnosing the gender disorder, diagnosing and treating co-morbid psychiatric conditions, counseling around GAC, providing psychotherapy, evaluating eligibility and readiness criteria for GAC, and collaborating with medical and surgical colleagues by writing letters of recommendation for GAC ( Figure 3 ). Eligibility and readiness criteria were more explicitly described in this version to refer to the specific objective and subjective criteria, respectively, that the patient must meet before proceeding to the next step of their gender transition. The seven elements to include in a letter of readiness were more explicitly listed within this version as well including: the patient’s identifying characteristics, gender, sexual orientation, any other psychological diagnoses, duration and nature of the treatment with the letter writer, whether the author is part of a gender team, whether eligibility criteria have been met, the patient’s ability to follow the SOC and an offer of collaboration. Version five removes the requirement that patients undertake psychotherapy to be eligible for GAC ( 37 ).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is fpsyt-13-1006024-g003.jpg

Changes to the ten tasks of the mental health provider within the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) standards of care over time.

Five articles were published between 1998 and 2001 while version five was active. Two of these articles were summaries of the SOC ( 37 , 38 ). Themes in these publications included continued attempts to develop comprehensive treatment models for GAS.

Ma reviewed the role of the social worker in a multidisciplinary gender clinic in Hong Kong. Psychosocial assessment for GAS included evaluation of performance in affirmed social roles, adaptation to the affirmed gender role during the 1-year RLT and understanding the patient’s identified gender role and the response to the new gender role culturally and interpersonally within the individual’s support network and family unit. She noted five contraindications to GAS: a history of psychosis, sociopathy, severe depression, organic brain dysfunction or “defective intelligence,” success in parental or marital roles, “successful functioning in heterosexual intercourse,” ability to function in the pretransition gender role, and homosexual or TV history with genital pleasure. She proposed a social work practice model for patients who apply for GAS with categorization of TGD individuals into “better-adjusted” and “poorly-adjusted” with different intervention goals and methods for each. For those who were “better-adjusted,” treatment focused on psychoeducation, building coping tools, and mobilization into a peer counselor role, while treatment goals for those who were “poorly-adjusted” focused on building support and resources ( 39 ).

Damodaran and Kennedy reviewed the assessment and treatment model used by the Monash gender dysphoria clinic in Melbourne, Australia for patients requesting GAS. All referrals for GAS were assessed independently by two psychiatrists to determine proper diagnosis of gender dysphoria, followed by endocrinology and psychology consultation to develop a comprehensive treatment plan. Requirements included RLT of minimum 18 months and GAH ( 40 ).

Miach reviewed the utility of using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2), a revision of the MMPI which was standardized using a more heterogeneous population, in a gender clinic to assess stability of psychopathology prior to GAS, which was only performed on patients aged 21–55 years old. The authors concluded that while the TGD group had a significantly lower level of psychopathology than the control group, they believed that the MMPI-2 was a useful test in assessing readiness for GAC ( 41 ).

Standards of care version 6

Published in 2001, version six of the WPATH SOC did not include significant changes to the 10 tasks of the mental health professional ( Figure 3 ) or in the general recommendations for content of the letters of readiness. An important change in the eligibility criteria for GAH allowed providers to prescribe hormones even if patients had not undergone RLT or psychotherapy if it was for harm reduction purposes (i.e., to prevent patient from buying black market hormones). A notable change in version six separated the eligibility and readiness criteria for top (breast augmentation or mastectomy) and bottom (any gender-affirming surgical alteration of genitalia or reproductive organs) surgery allowing some patients, particularly individuals assigned female at birth (AFAB), to receive a mastectomy without having been on GAH or completing a 12 month RLT ( 42 , 43 ).

Thirteen articles were published between 2001 and 2012. One is a systematic review of evidence for factors that are associated with regret and suicide, and predictive factors of a good psychological and social functioning outcome after GAC. De Cuypere and Vercruysse note that less than one percent of patients regret having GAS or commit suicide, making detection of negative predictive factors in a study nearly impossible. They identified a wide array of positive predictive factors including age at time of request, sex of partner, premorbid social or psychiatric functioning, adequacy of social support system, level of satisfaction with secondary sexual characteristics, and surgical outcomes. Many of these predictive factors were later disproved. They also noted that there were not enough studies to determine whether following the WPATH guidelines was a positive predictive factor. In the end they noted that the evidence for all established evaluation regimens (i.e., RLT, age cut-off, psychotherapy, etc.) was at best indeterminate. They recommended that changes to WPATH criteria should redirect focus from gender identity to psychopathology, differential diagnosis, and psychotherapy for severe personality disorders ( 44 ).

The literature at this time supports two opposing approaches to requests for GAC, those advocating for a set of strictly enforced eligibility and readiness criteria associated with very thorough evaluations and those who advocate for a more flexible approach. Common approaches to the evaluation for GAC include: taking a detailed social history including current relationships, support systems, income, and social functioning; a sexual development history meant to understand when and how the patient began to identify as TGD and how their transition has affected their life; an evaluation of their coping skills, “psychic functions” and general mental well-being; and a focus on assessing the “correct diagnosis” of gender identity disorder ( 44 – 56 ). The use of a multidisciplinary team was also commonly recommended ( 44 , 47 , 48 , 51 , 54 – 56 ).

Those that advocated for a stricter interpretation of the eligibility and readiness criteria emphasized the importance of the RLT ( 45 , 49 , 51 , 53 , 55 , 56 ). One clinic in the UK required a RLT lasting 2 years prior to starting GAH, twice as long as recommended by the SOC ( 49 ). The prevailing view continued to approach gender as a binary phenomenon, rather than as a spectrum of experiences. As a result, treatment recommendations emphasized helping the patient to “pass” in their chosen gender role and did not endorse patients receiving less than the full spectrum of treatment to transition fully from one sex to the other. Several authors indicated that they required some amount of psychotherapy before recommending GAC ( 46 , 47 , 51 , 52 , 55 , 56 ). One author described requirements in Turkey, which unlike the US has the requirements enshrined in law and defines an important role for the courts in granting permission for GAC ( 51 ). In general, these authors supported the gatekeeping role of the mental health provider as a mechanism to prevent cases of regret.

Among groups supporting a flexible interpretation of the SOC, there was a much stronger emphasis on the supportive role of the mental health provider in the gender transition process ( 44 – 46 , 48 , 52 , 53 ). This role included creating a supportive environment for the patient, asking and using the correct pronouns, and helping to guide them through what may be a difficult transition both socially and physically. They emphasized the importance of the psychosocial evaluation including the patient’s connections to others in the TGD community, their social functioning, substance use, and psychiatric history/psychological functioning. While informed consent was mentioned as part of the evaluation, the process was not thoroughly explored and largely focused on patients’ awareness that GAS is an irreversible procedure which removes healthy tissue ( 53 ). One author suggested that a “consumer handbook outlining such rights and responsibilities” related to GAS be made available, but they made no further comment on the informed consent process ( 44 ). There was no further guidance as to the contents of letters of readiness for GAC.

The lack of emphasis on informed consent by both groups of authors mirrors the discussion of informed consent within the SOC, which up through version six, had a relatively narrow definition and role specifically related to risks and benefits of surgery. As far back as version one, the SOC states “hormonal and surgical sex reassignment are procedures which must be requested by, and performed only with the agreement of, the patient having informed consent…[these procedures] may be conducted or administered only after the patient applicant has received full and complete explanations, preferably in writing, in words understood by the patient applicant, of all risks inherent in the requested procedures ( 16 ). “This reflects the dominant concerns of surgeons at the time that they were removing or damaging healthy tissue, which was unethical, and as such wanted to make sure that patients understood the irreversibility of the procedures. It was not until version 7 that there is a change in the discussion of informed consent.

Standards of care version 7

Standards of care version seven was published in 2013. Publication of version seven coincided with the publication of DSM-5, in which the diagnosis required to receive GAC shifted from Gender Identity Disorder to Gender Dysphoria, in an effort to de-pathologize TGD patients. Version seven highlights that these are guidelines meant to be flexible to account for different practices in different places. Compared to version six, a significantly expanded section on the “Tasks of the Mental Health Provider” was added, offering some instructions on what to include in the assessment of the patient for GAS. For the first time the SOC expand on what it means to obtain informed consent and describe a process where the mental health provider is expected to guide a conversation around gender identity and how different treatments and procedures might affect TGD individuals psychologically, socially, and physically. Other recommendations include “at a minimum, assessment of gender identity and gender dysphoria, history and development of gender dysphoric feelings, the impact of stigma attached to gender non-conformity on mental health, and the availability of support from family, friends, and peers.” There is also a change to the recommended content of the letters: switching from “The initial and evolving gender, sexual, and other psychiatric diagnoses” to “Results of the client’s psychosocial assessment, including any diagnoses”, indicating a shift in the focus away from diagnosis toward the psychosocial assessment. Version 7 also adds two new tasks for the mental health provider including “Educate and advocate on behalf of clients within their community (schools, workplaces, other organizations) and assist clients with making changes in identity documents” and “Provide information and referral for peer support”( 2 ).

There were also significant changes to eligibility criteria for GAC. For GAH, version seven eliminates entirely the requirement for a RLT and psychotherapy and adds requirements for “persistent well documented gender dysphoria” and “reasonably well controlled” medical or mental health concerns. Notably, the SOC do not define the meaning of “reasonably well controlled,” leaving providers to interpret this on their own. Version seven delineates separate requirements for top and bottom surgeries. The criteria for both feminizing and masculinizing top surgeries are identical to each other and identical to those laid out for GAH. Version seven explicitly states that GAH is not required prior to top surgery, although GAH is still recommended prior to gender-affirming breast augmentation. Criteria for bottom surgery are more explicitly defined, namely internal (i.e., hysterectomy, orchiectomy) vs. external (i.e., metoidioplasty, phalloplasty, and vaginoplasty). For internal surgeries, criteria are the same as for top surgery with the addition of a required 12 months of GAH. For external surgeries the criteria are the same as for internal, with the addition of required 12 months of living in the patient’s affirmed gender identity ( 2 , 42 ).

Twenty-three articles were published while version 7 of the SOC have been active. Themes include identifying the role of psychometric testing in GAC evaluations, expanding the discussion around informed consent for GAC, and revising the requirements for letter writers.

A systematic review evaluated the accuracy of psychometric tests in those requesting GAC, identifying only two published manuscripts that met their inclusion criteria, both of which were of poor quality; this led them to question the utility of psychometric tests in in TGD patients ( 57 ). Keo-Meir and Fitzgerald provided a detailed narrative review of psychometric and neurocognitive exams in the TGD population and concluded that psychometric testing should not be done unless there is a question about the capacity of the patient to provide informed consent ( 58 ). The only other manuscripts that include a mention of psychological testing describe processes in Iran and China, both of which require extensive psychological testing prior to approval for GAC ( 59 , 60 ). These two manuscripts, in addition to an ethnographic study of the evaluation process in Turkey ( 61 ), are also the only ones that indicate a requirement for psychotherapy prior to approval for treatment. The three international manuscripts described above plus three manuscripts from the US ( 62 – 64 ) are the only ones to include consideration of a RLT, with authors outside the US preferring a long RLT and US authors considering RLT as part of the informed consent process for GAS, and not required at all prior to the initiation of GAH.

Many authors describe the process of informed consent for GAC ( 1 , 58 , 60 , 62 – 76 ). In China, a signature indicating informed consent from the patient’s family is required in addition to that of the patient ( 60 ). Many authors emphasize evaluating for and addressing social determinants of health including housing status, income, transportation, trauma history, etc. ( 1 , 58 , 60 , 67 , 69 – 71 , 75 – 77 ). Deutsch advocated for the psychosocial evaluation being the most important aspect of the evaluation and suggests that one of the letters required for bottom surgery be replaced by a functional assessment (i.e., ADLs/iADLs), which could be repeated as needed or removed entirely for high functioning patients ( 69 ).

Practice patterns and opinions on who should write letters of readiness and how many letters should be required vary widely. Many letters that surgeons receive are cursory, and short and non-personal letters correlate with poor surgical outcomes ( 1 ). Several authors advocate for eliminating the second letter entirely, for at least some procedures, as it is a barrier to care ( 68 , 69 , 74 ). Some support removing the requirement that both letter writers be therapists or psychiatrists, and even suggesting the second letter be written by a urologist ( 72 ) or a social worker who has performed a detailed social assessment ( 69 , 75 ). The evaluation in Turkey requires a report written by an extensive multidisciplinary team and submitted to a court for approval ( 61 ). Surveys of providers indicate that the SOC are not uniformly implemented leading to huge disparities based on the providers knowledge level and personal beliefs ( 77 , 78 ). Additional recommendations include that providers spend significant time discussing the SOC and diagnosis of gender dysphoria with the patients prior to providing a letter to prepare them for the stigma such a diagnosis may confer ( 65 , 66 ), and dropping gender dysphoria entirely in favor the ICD-11 diagnosis of gender incongruence, as it may be less stigmatizing ( 71 ).

The Mount Sinai Gender Clinic describes an integrated multidisciplinary model where a patient will see a primary care doctor, endocrinologist, social worker, psychiatrist, and obtain any necessary lab work in a single visit, significantly reducing barriers to care. The criteria in this model focus on informed consent, the social determinants of health, being physically ready for surgery, and putting measurable goals on psychiatric stability, while deemphasizing the gender dysphoria diagnosis. Their study showed that people who received their evaluation over a 2-year period were more likely to meet their in-house criteria than they were to meet criteria as set forth in WPATH SOC. The Mount Sinai criteria allowed for significantly decreased barriers to care, allowing more people to progress through desired GAC in a timely fashion ( 75 ).

Standards of care version 8

Standards of care version 8, published in September 2022, includes major updates to the guidelines around GAS. This version explicitly highlights the importance of informed decision making, patient autonomy, and harm reduction models of care, as well as emphasizing the flexibility of the guidelines which the authors note can be modified by the healthcare provider in consultation with the TGD individual.

Version 8 lays out the roles of the assessor which are to identify the presence of gender incongruence and any co-existing mental health concerns, provide information on GAC, support the TGD individual in their decision-making, and to assess for capacity to consent to GAC. The authors emphasize the collaborative nature of this decision-making process between the assessor and the TGD individual, as well as recommending TGD care occur in a multidisciplinary team model when possible.

Version 8 recommends that providers who assess TGD individuals for GAC hold at least a Master’s level degree and have sufficient knowledge in diagnosing gender incongruence and distinguishing it from other diagnoses which may present similarly. These changes allow for non-mental health providers to be the main assessors for GAC.

Version 8 recommends reducing the number of evaluations prior to GAS to a single evaluation in an effort to reduce barriers to care for the TGD population. Notably, the authors have removed the recommendations around content of the letter of readiness for GAC. The guidelines note that the complexity of the assessment process may differ from patient to patient, based on the type of GAC requested and the specific characteristics of the patient. Version eight directly states that psychometric testing and psychotherapy are not requirements to pursue GAC. While evaluations should continue to identify co-existing mental health diagnoses, version 8 highlights that the presence of a mental health diagnosis should not prevent access to GAC unless the mental health symptoms directly interfere with capacity to provide informed consent for treatment or interfere with receiving treatment. Version 8 recommends that perioperative matters, such as travel requirements, presence of stable, safe housing, hygiene/healthy living, any activity restrictions, and aftercare optimization, be discussed by the surgeon prior to GAS. In terms of eligibility criteria, the authors recommend a reduced duration of GAH from 12 months (from version 7) to 6 months (in version 8) prior to pursuing GAS involving reproductive organs ( 79 ).

Ethical discussions

A total of eleven articles explored ethical considerations of conducting mental health evaluations and writing letters of readiness for GAS, including a comparison of the ethical principles prioritized within the “gatekeeping” model vs. the informed consent model for GAC and the differential treatment of TGD individuals compared to cisgender individuals seeking similar surgical procedures.

Many authors compare the informed consent model of care for TGD individuals to the WPATH SOC model. In the informed consent model, the role of the health practitioner is to provide TGD patients with information about risks, side effects, benefits, and possible consequences of undergoing GAC, and to obtain informed consent from the patient ( 80 ). Cavanaugh et al. argue that the informed consent model is more patient-centered and elevates the ethical principle of autonomy above non-maleficence, the principle often prioritized in the “gatekeeping” model ( 81 ). They write, “Through a discussion of risks and benefits of possible treatment options with the patient…clinicians work to assist patients in making decisions. This approach recognizes that patients are the only ones who are best positioned, in the context of their lived experience, to assess and judge beneficence (i.e., the potential improvement in their welfare that might be achieved), and it also affords prescribing clinicians a better and fuller sense of how a particular patient balances principles of non-maleficence and beneficence.” Authors note that mental health providers can be particularly helpful in situations where an individual desires additional mental health treatment, which some argue should remain optional, or when an individual’s capacity is in question ( 81 ). Additional ethical considerations include balancing the respect for the dignity of persons, responsible caring, integrity in relationships, and responsibility to society ( 82 ). Other authors argue for a more systematic approach to ethical issues, including consulting the literature and/or experts in the field of TGD mental health for support in making decisions around GAC ( 74 ).

Hale criticizes the WPATH SOC noting that these guidelines create a barrier between patient and mental health provider in establishing trust and a therapeutic relationship, overly pathologize TGD individuals, and unnecessarily impose financial costs to the TGD individual. As a “gatekeeper,” the mental health provider is placed in the position of either granting or denying GAC and must weigh the competing ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, and autonomy. He argues that mental health providers are not surrogate decision makers and that framing requests for GAS as a “phenomenon of incapacity” is “reflective of the overall incapacitating effects of society at large toward the TGD community” ( 83 ). This reflects the broader approach to determining capacity utilized in other medical contexts, namely that patients have capacity until proven otherwise ( 84 ). Additionally, due to the gatekeeping dynamic between patient and clinician, many TGD patients may not mention concerns or fears surrounding GAS out of concern they will be denied services, thereby limiting the quality and utility of the informed consent discussion. Ashley proposes changes to the informed consent model, specifically that the informed consent process should include not only information about whether to go through with a procedure, but how to go through the procedure including relevant information about timeline, side effects, need for perioperative support, and treatment plan ( 85 ). Gruenweld argues for a bottom-up, TGD-led provision of GAC instead of focusing solely on alleviating gender dysphoria through a top-down, medical expert approach via such systems like the WPATH SOC ( 86 ).

MacKinnon et al. conducted an institutional ethnographic study of both TGD individuals undergoing mental health evaluations for GAC and mental health providers to better understand the process of conducting such evaluations ( 87 ). They found that providers cited three concerns with the evaluation: determining the authenticity of an individual’s TGD identity, determining if the individual has the capacity to consent to treatment, and determining the readiness of the individual to undergo treatment. TGD individuals cited concerns around presenting enough distress to be diagnosed with gender dysphoria (a SOC requirement) versus too much distress, and risk being diagnosed with an uncontrolled mental health condition therefore being ineligible for GAC. The authors conclude, “although they are designed to optimize and universalize care… psychosocial readiness assessments actually create a medically risky and arguably unethical situation in which trans people experiencing mental health issues have to decide what is more important – transitioning at the potential expense of care for their mental health or disclosing significant mental health issues at the expense of being rendered not ready to transition (which in turn may produce or exacerbate mental distress)” ( 87 ).

With regards to writing letters of readiness for GAS, authors comment on the differential treatment of TGD compared to cisgender individuals. Bouman argues that requiring two letters for gender-affirming orchiectomy or hysterectomy is unethical given that orchiectomy and hysterectomy for chronic scrotal pain and dysfunctional uterine bleeding, respectively, do not require any mental health evaluation. Requiring a second letter may cause delays in treatment, increase financial costs, and may be invasive to the patient who must undergo two detailed evaluations, while allowing for diffusion of responsibility for the mental health provider ( 88 ).

Changing standards

Starting in the 1950’s with the first successful gender affirming procedure in the US on Christine Jorgenson, TGD people in the US started seeking surgical treatment of what was then called TS. The medical community’s understanding of TGD people, their mental health, and the role of the mental health provider in their medical and surgical transition has progressed and evolved since this time. Prior to the first iteration of what would later be known as WPATH’s SOC, patients were mostly evaluated within a system that viewed gender and sexual minorities as deviants and thereby largely limited access to GAC. We can also see this reflected in the changes to DSM and ICD diagnostic criteria between 1980 and today which demonstrates a trend from pathologizing identity and conflating sexual and gender identity toward pathologizing the distress experienced due to the discordant identity, and finally removing the relevant diagnosis from the chapter of Mental and Behavioral Disorders altogether in the ICD and instead into a new chapter titled “conditions related to sexual health ( 89 ).” These changes have clearly yielded positive benefits for TGD individuals by reducing stigma and improving access to care, but significant problems remain. Requiring TGD people to have a diagnosis at all to obtain care, no matter the terminology used, is pathologizing. The practice of requiring a diagnosis continues to put mental health and other medical providers in the position of gatekeeping, continuing the vestigial historical focus on “confirming” a person’s gender identity, rather than trusting that TGD people understand their identities better than providers do. Version 8 of the SOC put a much heavier emphasis on shared decision making and informed consent, but continue to maintain the requirement of a diagnosis ( 79 ). Many insurance companies and other health care payers require the diagnosis to justify paying for GAC, but providers should continue to advocate for removing such labels as a gatekeeping mechanism for GAC.

With each version of the SOC, guidelines for GAC become more specific, with more explanation of the reasoning behind each recommendation; more flexible requirements, a broadening of the definition of mental health provider, and elimination of the requirement that at least one letter be written by a doctoral level provider. There has been a notable shift in the conceptualization of gender identity, away from a strict gender binary, with individuals transitioning fully from one end to the other, to gender identity and transition as a spectrum of experiences. Over time the SOC became more flexible by removing requirements for psychotherapy, narrowing requirement for the RLT to only those pursuing bottom surgery, eliminating requirements for a mental health evaluation prior to initiating GAH, and eliminating requirements for GAH prior to top surgery. Version 8 of the SOC was even more explicit about removing requirements for psychotherapy and psychometric testing prior to receiving GAC ( 79 ).

Despite these positive changes, those wishing to access GAC still face significant challenges. Access to providers knowledgeable about GAC remains limited, especially in more rural areas, therefore requiring evaluations and letters of readiness for GAC continues to significantly limit access to treatment. By requiring letters of readiness for GAC, adult TGD individuals are not afforded the same level of autonomy present in almost any other medical context, where capacity to provide informed consent is automatically established ( 84 ). The WPATH SOC continue to perpetuate differential treatment of TGD individuals by requiring extensive, and often invasive, evaluations for procedures that their cisgender peers are able to access without such evaluations ( 88 ). The WPATH guidelines apply a one-size-fits-all approach to an extremely heterogeneous community who have varying levels of needs based on a variety of factors including but not limited to age, socioeconomic status, race, natal sex, and geographic location ( 90 ). It should be noted, however, that the version 8 of the SOC does acknowledge that different patients may require evaluations of varying complexity based on the procedure they are requesting as well as a variety of psychosocial factors, although it remains vague about exactly what those different evaluations should entail ( 79 ). We propose that future work be directed toward three primary goals: conducting research to determine the utility of letters of readiness; to better understand factors that impact GAS outcomes; and to develop easily accessible and understandable guides to conducting readiness evaluations and writing letters. These aims will help to further our goals of advocating for this vastly underserved population by further removing barriers to life-saving GAC.

Changing ethics

Early iterations of the SOC were strict, placing the mental health provider within a gatekeeper role, tasked with distinguishing the “true transsexual” that would benefit from GAS from those who would not, which in effect elevated the ethical principal of non-maleficence above autonomy. This created a barrier to forming a therapeutic alliance between the patient and mental health provider as there was little motivation for patients to give any information outside of the expected gender narrative ( 50 , 65 ). Mistrust flowed both ways leading to longer and more involved evaluations then than what is required today, with many providers requiring patients to undergo extensive psychological testing and psychotherapy, provide extensive collateral, and undergo lengthy RLTs, with some focusing on a patient’s ability to “pass” within the desire gender role, before agreeing to write a letter ( 11 , 15 , 19 , 49 , 57 , 58 ).

As understanding around the experiences of TGD individuals has evolved over time, the emphasis has shifted from the reliance on non-maleficence toward elevating patient autonomy as the guiding principle of care. Evaluations within this informed consent model focus much more on the patient’s ability to understand the treatment, its aftercare, and its potential effect on their lives. Informed consent evaluations also shift focus toward other psychosocial factors that will contribute to successful surgical outcomes, for example, housing, transportation, a support system, and treatment of any underlying mental health symptoms. While there is still a lack of consistency in current evaluations and the SOC are enforced unevenly ( 77 ), the use of the informed consent model by some providers has reduced barriers for some patients. Many authors now agree that psychological or neuropsychological testing should not be used when evaluating for surgical readiness unless there is a concern about the patient’s ability to provide informed consent such as in the case of a neurocognitive or developmental disorder ( 58 ). Also important to note here is that while there is a general shift in the focus of the literature from that of gatekeeping toward one of informed consent, neither the informed consent model nor the WPATH SOC more broadly are evenly applied by providers, leading to continued barriers for many patients ( 77 , 78 ).

Within the literature, there is support for further reducing barriers to care by widening the definition of who can conduct evaluations, write letters, or facilitate the informed consent discussion for GAC. Recommending that the physician providing the GAC be the one to conduct the informed consent evaluation would bring GAC practices more in line with practices in place within the broader medical community. It is very rare for mental health providers to be the gatekeepers for medical or surgical procedures, except for transplant surgery, where mental health providers may have a clearer role given the prominence of substance use disorders and the very limited resource of organs. However, even within transplant psychiatry, a negative psychiatric evaluation would not necessarily preclude the patient from receiving the transplant, but instead may be used to guide a treatment plan to improve chances of a successful recovery post-operatively. We then should consider what it means to embrace patient autonomy as our guiding principle, especially with more than 40 years of evidence of the positive effects around GAC behind us. Future guidelines should focus on making sure that TGD individuals are good surgical candidates, not based on their gender identity, but instead on a more holistic understanding of the factors that lead to good and bad gender-affirming surgical outcomes, along the lines of those proposed by Mt. Sinai’s gender clinic for vaginoplasty ( 75 ). Additionally, the physicians providing the GAC should in most cases be the ones to obtain informed consent, while retaining the ability to request a mental health evaluation if specific concerns related to mental health arise. This would both allow mental health providers to adopt a supportive consultant role rather than that of gatekeeper, as well as provide more individualized rather than one-size-fits-all care to patients.

Version 8 of the SOC go a long way toward changing the ethical focus of evaluations toward one of shared decision making and informed consent by removing the requirement of a second letter and the requirement that the letter be written by a mental health provider. This will, in theory, lower barriers to care by allowing other providers (as long as they have at least a master’s degree) to write letters for surgery ( 79 ). In practice, however, this change is likely to only affect a small portion of the patient population. This is because, as noted in the section below in more detail, insurance companies already do not adhere closely to the SOC ( 91 ) and are unlikely to quickly adopt the new guidelines if at all. Further, it is possible that many surgeons will require that the letter of readiness be written by a mental health provider, especially if the patient has any previous mental health problems. While changes to SOC 8 are a step in the direction we propose in this manuscript, it is important to remember that the primary decision makers of who can access GAC in the US are insurance companies with surgeons, primary care providers, and mental health providers as secondary decision makers; this leaves patients with much less real-world autonomy than the SOC state they should have in the process. While insurance companies hold this effective decision-making power in all of US healthcare, it could be at least partially addressed by developing clear, evidence based guidelines for which patients might require a more in-depth evaluation in the first place. Screening out patients that have little or no mental health or social barriers to care would directly reduce those patients’ barriers to receiving GAC, while freeing up mental health and other providers to provide evaluation, resources, and support to those patients who will actually benefit from these services.

Letter writing

There are few published guides for writing letters of readiness for GAC. The WPATH SOC provide vague guidelines as to the information to include within the letter itself, which, in addition to a lack of consistency in implementation of the SOC, lead to a huge variety in current practices around letter writing and limit their usefulness to surgical providers ( 1 ). There is much debate within the literature about how many letters should be required and who should be able to write them. Guidelines from China, Turkey, and Iran recommend much stricter processes requiring input from a wider variety of specialists to comment on a patient’s readiness ( 59 – 61 ). Within the US, the few recent recommendations include having a frank discussion with patients about the gender dysphoria diagnosis and allowing them to have input into the content of the letter itself ( 65 , 66 , 70 , 71 , 75 ). The heterogeneity of current practices around letter writing demonstrates a reality in which many providers do not uniformly operate within the informed consent model, and do not even uniformly adhere to the SOC as written. This heterogeneity in practice by providers also extends to requirements by insurance companies in the US. The lack of clear guidelines about what should go into a letter, especially across different insurance providers, can lead to increased barriers to care due to insurance denials for incorrectly written letters. While direct data examining insurance denials for incorrectly written letters is not available, we can see this indirect effects in the fact that while 90% of insurance providers in the US provide coverage for GAC, only 5–10% of TGD patients had received bottom surgery even though about 50% of TGD patients have reported wanting it ( 91 ). Version 8 of the SOC reduce some of the letter writing requirements as discussed above, but they still do not give clear instructions on exactly how to write a letter of readiness or perform an evaluation ( 79 ). Given the lack of uniformity and limited benefit of such letters to surgical providers, these authors propose that future research be conducted into the need for letters of readiness for GAC, ways to ensure the content of such letters are evidence-based to improve outcomes of GAC, and improve education to providers by creating an easily accessible and free semi-structured interview with letter template.

Limitations

The reviewed articles included opinion manuscripts, published SOC, and proposed models for how to design and operate GAC clinics, however, this narrative review is limited by a lack of peer reviewed clinical trials that assess the evidence for the GAC practices described here. As a result, it is challenging to comment on the effectiveness of various interventions over time.

The WPATH SOC have evolved significantly over time with regards to their treatment of TGD individuals. Review of the literature shows a clear progression of practices from paternalistic gatekeeping toward increasing emphasis on patient autonomy and informed consent. Mental health evaluations, still required by SOC version eight are almost entirely unique as a requirement for GAS, apart from some bariatric and transplant surgeries. Individuals who wish to pursue GAC are required to get approval for treatments that their cisgender peers may pursue without such evaluations. While there may be some benefits from these evaluations in helping to optimize a patient socially, emotionally, and psychologically for GAC, the increased stigma and burden placed on patients by having a blanket requirement for such evaluations leads us to seriously question the readiness evaluation requirements in SOC version 8, despite a reduction in the requirements compared to previous SOC. This burden is made worse by limited access to providers knowledgeable and competent in conducting GAC evaluations, writing letters of readiness, and a lack of consistency in the application and interpretations of the SOC by both providers and insurance companies. Other barriers to care created by multiple letter requirements include the often-prohibitive cost of getting multiple evaluations and the delay in receiving their medical or surgical treatments due to extensive wait times to see a mental health provider. This barrier will in theory be ameliorated by updates to SOC in version 8, but multiple letters are likely to at least be required by insurance companies for some time. Overall, the shift from gate keeping to informed consent has been a net positive for patients by reducing barriers to care and improving patient autonomy, but the mental health evaluation is still an unnecessary barrier for many people. Further research is necessary to develop a standardized evaluation and letter template for providers to access, as well as further study into who can most benefit from an evaluation in the first place.

Data availability statement

Author contributions.

TA and KK contributed to the conception and design of the study under the guidance of RL and AJ, reviewed and analyzed the literature, and wrote the manuscript. AW organized the literature search and wrote the “Methods” section. RL and AJ assisted in review and revision of the completed manuscript. All authors approved of the submitted version.

Abbreviations

1 Gender affirming surgery has historically been referred to as sexual reassignment surgery (SRS).

2 Gender affirming care is an umbrella term referring to any medical care a TGD individual might pursue that affirms their gender identity, including primary care, mental health care, GAH or GAS.

3 The organization will be referred to as WPATH moving forward, even when referring to time periods before the name change.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1006024/full#supplementary-material

Healthdirect Free Australian health advice you can count on.

Medical problem? Call 1800 022 222. If you need urgent medical help, call triple zero immediately

healthdirect Australia is a free service where you can talk to a nurse or doctor who can help you know what to do.

Gender affirming surgery

7-minute read

Share via email

There is a total of 5 error s on this form, details are below.

  • Please enter your name
  • Please enter your email
  • Your email is invalid. Please check and try again
  • Please enter recipient's email
  • Recipient's email is invalid. Please check and try again
  • Agree to Terms required

Error: This is required

Error: Not a valid value

What is gender affirming surgery?

Gender affirming surgery refers to a variety of procedures that some trans or gender diverse people may use to affirm their gender.

Surgery is just one option for gender affirming care. All trans and gender diverse people are unique and will choose to affirm their gender in a way that feels right for them.

Gender affirming care might include:

  • Social affirmation, such as changing names, pronouns, hair or clothing.
  • Legal affirmation, such as changing legal name or gender.
  • Medical affirmation, with hormones or surgery.

Read more about gender incongruence, gender dysphoria , and gender affirming care here.

This article talks more about gender affirming surgery.

What happens during gender affirming surgery?

There are many different gender affirming surgeries and procedures. They may include making changes to your face, chest, genitals, or other body parts.

For people assumed male at birth, feminising surgeries may include:

  • Breast augmentation with insertion of breast implants.
  • Facial feminisation — changing the shape of any or all facial features.
  • Vocal surgery — shortening the vocal cords for a higher, more feminine voice.
  • Tracheal shave — reducing the size of the ‘Adam’s apple’.
  • Fillers or liposuction, to achieve a more typically feminine shape.
  • Orchiectomy, or removal of testicles.
  • Bottom surgery or ‘genital reconfiguration surgery’, involving changes to the genitals.

Bottom surgery is called ‘genital reconfiguration surgery’. This was previously known as ‘sex reassignment surgery’ or ‘gender confirmation surgery’. The name change shows that your genitals don’t define your sex or gender.

Feminising bottom surgery may involve a combination of the following procedures:

  • Removing the testicles (orchiectomy).
  • Removing and reshaping tissue from the penis to make a vulva. This includes external labia or lips, and a clitoris. This is known as vulvoplasty.
  • Shortening the urethra (tube that you urinate — wee — from).
  • Creation of a vaginal canal (vaginoplasty). This is a complicated step which some people choose to skip. After surgery, vaginal dilators will need to be used to maintain the shape of the vaginal canal.

For people assumed female at birth, masculinising surgeries may include:

  • Top surgery, with reduction or removal of breast tissue (mastectomy). This creates a flatter or more neutral chest. There are many different techniques used to achieve this.
  • Liposuction to achieve a more typically masculine shape.
  • Hysterectomy , or removal of the uterus (womb) and ovaries.
  • Bottom surgery or genital reconfiguration surgery. This involves changes to the genitals.

Masculinising bottom surgery may involve a combination of the following procedures:

  • Hysterectomy, if not already performed.
  • Vaginectomy, or removal of the vagina.
  • Creation of a penis, which may include metoidioplasty or phalloplasty.
  • Metoidioplasty involves making a penis shape wrapping tissue around the clitoris after it is enlarged by testosterone hormone therapy.
  • Phalloplasty involves making a larger penis with tissue from the arm, thigh, back, or abdomen. This involves lengthening the urethra to be able to urinate from the tip of the new penis. An inflatable penile implant may be inserted inside the penis to allow an erection.

Is gender affirming surgery right for me?

Choosing to undergo any surgery is a big decision. Everyone affirms their gender in different ways, and that may or may not include surgery.

Surgery is permanent so you need to make sure it’s the right choice for you. Surgery doesn’t make you more or less trans.

Before being able to access gender affirming surgery, you need to meet the criteria below:

  • A history of gender incongruence (for 6 months or more).
  • The ability to make a fully informed decision.
  • Be over the age of 16 for top surgery, or 18 for bottom surgery. Some surgeons will provide surgery to younger people in very specific situations.
  • Ensure that any physical or mental health conditions are well managed.

You will need letters of support from a mental health professional before having gender affirming surgery.

For top surgery, one letter is required. For bottom surgery two letters are required. For bottom surgery, you are also required to have ‘lived as your current gender’ for 12 months, meaning you have socially transitioned. The letter needs to state that surgery is appropriate for you and is likely to help affirm your gender and reduce any gender dysphoria that may be present.

If you are taking gender affirming hormones, or want to take hormones in the future, you should do this for 12 months before having surgery. This is to allow any significant body changes to occur before surgery.

Most people who have surgery are happy with their results and feel more comfortable in their bodies. But some people are disappointed with the results, or find that any gender dysphoria that was present is not fully resolved. Make sure you discuss any difficult feelings with your doctor or psychologist.

What questions should I ask before surgery?

It’s important to talk about the pros and cons of surgery in detail with your doctor. It’s a good idea to ask to see pictures of how other people look after surgery.

Questions to ask your surgeon include:

  • What different surgical techniques are there?
  • What are the pros and cons of each technique for me?
  • What results can I expect?
  • What are the possible risks and complications?

For help in having the discussion, visit healthdirect’s Question Builder .

What should I expect after surgery?

Surgical recovery can be long and uncomfortable. Your surgeon will be able to give you more information on what can be expected before, during, and after surgery. This might include spending time in hospital afterwards, any special dressings, surgical garments, or follow up care.

Make sure you do everything your doctor tells you and go to all follow-up appointments. This will help you get the best results from your surgery.

Having surgery is a big deal. Even if you’ve been looking forward to it and are happy with the result, it can still be quite confronting. It might take some time to get used to your new body.

Talk to your doctor if you are feeling any distress following surgery.

How much will gender affirming surgery cost me?

Gender affirming surgery can be very expensive. It can cost between $20,000 to more than $100,000, depending on which procedures you need.

Your surgeon will be able to tell you how much surgery will cost. The cost may include specialist visits before and after surgery, surgeon and anaesthetist fees, hospital and theatre costs, and any other products or services necessary.

Some costs may be covered by Medicare, such as specialist consults if you have a referral from your doctor. Unfortunately, most gender affirming surgery in Australia is done privately, meaning there will be large out-of-pocket costs.

You should ask your surgeon what Medicare item numbers they use. You can check the Medicare rebate at MBS Online .

Some private health insurance will also help with gender affirming surgery. If you have health insurance, it’s important to check with your health fund first about your level of cover. There is a range of health insurance comparison sites available online, such as privatehealth.gov.au .

Legal matters

Changing your gender on your passport, licence, Medicare card or birth certificate all require separate processes. These vary between states and territories. In some states and territories, you must have undergone specific types of gender affirmation surgery to change the gender marker on your birth certificate.

You can find out more about the specific processes at TransHub .

You are legally protected by the Sex Discrimination Act from discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status. Visit the Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department for more details.

Where can I get more information on gender affirming surgery?

  • TransHub has information about gender affirming surgery.
  • The Gender Centre (NSW) provides resources and support.
  • Transgender Victoria has resources and links to other services.
  • The Australian Professional Association for Trans Health (AusPATH) lists some providers.

Learn more here about the development and quality assurance of healthdirect content .

Last reviewed: June 2022

Search our site for

  • Transgender
  • Gender Dysphoria

Need more information?

These trusted information partners have more on this topic.

Top results

Everything you need to know about gender identity | Gender Identity

If you’ve ever wondered ‘what does gender mean?’, you’re not alone. Gender and identity exists on a diverse spectrum. Learn more about gender in this guide.

Read more on ReachOut.com website

ReachOut.com

What Is Gender Identity | headspace

Gender identify and mental health is an issue that affects many young people. Learn more about the affects of gender identify and how you can get help from headspace.

Read more on headspace website

headspace

Understanding gender identity - for families | headspace

understanding sexuality and sexual identity - for family and friends The term sexuality refers to a person's sexual attractions, experiences of the attraction and sexual preferences

Gender Identity Examples, Meaning & Definition | Kids Helpline

Gender identity is more than being male or female. Kids Helpline can help you understand what it is and how you can understand your own identity.

Read more on Kids Helpline website

Kids Helpline

Gender dysphoria & identity: kids & teens | Raising Children Network

Gender identity is feeling male, female, both or neither. Gender dysphoria is when your child is distressed by feeling different from their birth gender.

Read more on raisingchildren.net.au website

raisingchildren.net.au

Gender dysphoria & diversity: support | Raising Children Network

If your child is gender diverse or experiencing gender dysphoria, support means embracing their gender identity. Your support boosts your child’s wellbeing.

How Emma learnt to accept herself and her gender identity | ReachOut Australia

Emma, a young transgender woman, shares how reaching out for support helped her to accept her gender identity.

Supporting a transgender teenager - ReachOut Parents

Learn how best to support your teen as they embrace their gender identity, with ReachOut Australia and Ross Jacobs from QLife.

Your child’s gender diversity: your family | Raising Children Network

If your child is gender diverse, it’s OK if you and your child’s siblings have mixed feelings about your child’s gender identity. It’s good to seek support.

Gender diversity - a QLife guide for health professionals

Many people assume that gender is binary; that all people are women or men. However, gender can more accurately be thought of as a colour palette, with many possible shades of identity and subtle expressions of gender far beyond only woman or man.

Read more on QLife website

QLife

RACGP - LGBTIQA+ Family abuse and violence

Reproduced with permission from The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

Read more on RACGP - The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners website

RACGP - The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

RACGP - Care of older LGBTI people

Reproduced with permission from The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. The historical pathologising of older lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people’s bodies and relationships continue to adversely affect their health and wellbeing

Bisexuality - a QLife guide for health professionals

Bisexual people are attracted to people of multiple genders and these attractions may be fluid over time.

Young people - QLife guide tip sheet

Social conditions for the acceptance of LGBTI (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex) people have improved dramatically in Australia in recent years.

Coming out, inviting in and disclosure

‘Coming out’ typically refers to acknowledging one’s sexuality or samegender attractions to oneself and disclosing this to others.

Antidepressants in adolescence - Australian Prescriber

Antidepressant drugs are not the first-line treatment for adolescents with mild symptoms of depression.

Read more on Australian Prescriber website

Australian Prescriber

Clinical guidelines – Intersex Human Rights Australia

Are clinical guidelines enough to eliminate human rights violations against intersex people in medical settings? Reviewing the evidence, we believe they are inadequate, and their prerequisites do not exist.

Read more on Intersex Human Rights Australia website

Intersex Human Rights Australia

For Health Professionals | Cancer in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People - Our mob and cancer

Culturally appropriate, optimal cancer care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people Cancer is the third leading cause of burden of disease for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

Read more on Cancer Australia - Our Mob and Cancer website

Cancer Australia - Our Mob and Cancer

The Health and Care of First Nations Australians | Ausmed

First Nations Australians are diverse peoples with a variety of histories, cultures, languages and experiences. In order to deliver appropriate and culturally competent care, it is essential to understand the care needs and health of First Nations peoples.

Read more on Ausmed Education website

Ausmed Education

Healthdirect Australia is not responsible for the content and advertising on the external website you are now entering.

Healthdirect 24hr 7 days a week hotline

24 hour health advice you can count on

1800 022 222

Government Accredited with over 140 information partners

We are a government-funded service, providing quality, approved health information and advice

Australian Government, health department logo

Healthdirect Australia acknowledges the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to land, sea and community. We pay our respects to the Traditional Owners and to Elders both past and present.

© 2024 Healthdirect Australia Limited

Support for this browser is being discontinued

Support for this browser is being discontinued for this site

  • Internet Explorer 11 and lower

We currently support Microsoft Edge, Chrome, Firefox and Safari. For more information, please visit the links below:

  • Chrome by Google
  • Firefox by Mozilla
  • Microsoft Edge
  • Safari by Apple

You are welcome to continue browsing this site with this browser. Some features, tools or interaction may not work correctly.

This is the beneficial effect of sex-reassignment surgery early on in a transition

A participant lies on a giant Transgender Pride Flag during the Equality March, organized by the LGBT community in Kiev, Ukraine June 23, 2019.  REUTERS/Gleb Garanich TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY - RC1D8925C170

Surgery "is often the last and the most considered step in the treatment process for gender dysphoria". Image:  REUTERS/Gleb Garanich

.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo{-webkit-transition:all 0.15s ease-out;transition:all 0.15s ease-out;cursor:pointer;-webkit-text-decoration:none;text-decoration:none;outline:none;color:inherit;}.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo:hover,.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo[data-hover]{-webkit-text-decoration:underline;text-decoration:underline;}.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo:focus,.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo[data-focus]{box-shadow:0 0 0 3px rgba(168,203,251,0.5);} Reuters Staff

re assignment surgery

.chakra .wef-9dduvl{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;font-size:1.25rem;}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-9dduvl{font-size:1.125rem;}} Explore and monitor how .chakra .wef-15eoq1r{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;font-size:1.25rem;color:#F7DB5E;}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-15eoq1r{font-size:1.125rem;}} Mental Health is affecting economies, industries and global issues

A hand holding a looking glass by a lake

.chakra .wef-1nk5u5d{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;color:#2846F8;font-size:1.25rem;}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-1nk5u5d{font-size:1.125rem;}} Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale

Stay up to date:, mental health.

When transgender people undergo sex-reassignment surgery, the beneficial effect on their mental health is still evident - and increasing - years later, a Swedish study suggests.

Overall, people in the study with gender incongruence - that is, their biological gender doesn’t match the gender with which they identify - were six times more likely than people in the general population to visit a doctor for mood and anxiety disorders. They were also three times more likely to be prescribed antidepressants, and six times more likely to be hospitalized after a suicide attempt, researchers found.

But among trans people who had undergone gender-affirming surgery, the longer ago their surgery, the less likely they were to suffer anxiety, depression or suicidal behavior during the study period, researchers reported in The American Journal of Psychiatry.

Surgery to modify a person’s sex characteristics “is often the last and the most considered step in the treatment process for gender dysphoria,” according to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health.

Many transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming individuals "find comfort with their gender identity, role, and expression without surgery," but for others, "surgery is essential and medically necessary to alleviate their gender dysphoria," according to the organization. (bit.ly/2WEn9Lg)

Have you read?

This is the state of lgbti rights around the world in 2018.

While the new study confirms that transgender individuals are more likely to use mental health treatments, it also shows that gender-affirming therapy might reduce this risk, coauthor Richard Branstrom of the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm told Reuters Health by email.

Branstrom and colleague John Pachankis of the Yale School of Public Health in New Haven, Connecticut found that as of 2015, 2,679 people in Sweden had a diagnosis of gender incongruence, out of the total population of 9.7 million.

That year, 9.3% of people with gender incongruence visited a doctor for mood disorders, 7.4% saw a doctor for anxiety disorders, and 29% were on antidepressants. In the general population, those percentages were 1%, 0.6% and 9.4%, respectively.

Just over 70% of people with gender incongruence were receiving feminizing or masculinizing hormones to modify outward sexual features such as breasts, body fat distribution, and facial hair, and 48% had undergone gender-affirming surgery. Nearly all of those who had surgery also received hormone therapy.

The benefit of hormone treatment did not increase with time. But “increased time since last gender-affirming surgery was associated with fewer mental health treatments,” the authors report.

In fact, they note, “The likelihood of being treated for a mood or anxiety disorder was reduced by 8% for each year since the last gender-affirming surgery,” for up to 10 years.

Transgender individuals’ use of mental health care still exceeded that of the general Swedish population, which the research team suggests is due at least partly to stigma, economic inequality and victimization.

“We need greater visibility and knowledge about challenges people are confronted with while breaking gender and identity norms,” Branstrom said.

Dr. Joshua Safer, executive director at Mount Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery in New York City, told Reuters Health by email, “If anything, the study likely under-reports mental health benefits of medical and surgical care for transgender individuals.”

Safer, who was not involved in the study, said the fact that mental health continued to improve for years after surgery “suggests (surgery provides) extended and ongoing benefit to patients living according to gender identity.”

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:

The agenda .chakra .wef-n7bacu{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;font-weight:400;} weekly.

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

.chakra .wef-1dtnjt5{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;} More on Mental Health .chakra .wef-17xejub{-webkit-flex:1;-ms-flex:1;flex:1;justify-self:stretch;-webkit-align-self:stretch;-ms-flex-item-align:stretch;align-self:stretch;} .chakra .wef-nr1rr4{display:-webkit-inline-box;display:-webkit-inline-flex;display:-ms-inline-flexbox;display:inline-flex;white-space:normal;vertical-align:middle;text-transform:uppercase;font-size:0.75rem;border-radius:0.25rem;font-weight:700;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;line-height:1.2;-webkit-letter-spacing:1.25px;-moz-letter-spacing:1.25px;-ms-letter-spacing:1.25px;letter-spacing:1.25px;background:none;padding:0px;color:#B3B3B3;-webkit-box-decoration-break:clone;box-decoration-break:clone;-webkit-box-decoration-break:clone;}@media screen and (min-width:37.5rem){.chakra .wef-nr1rr4{font-size:0.875rem;}}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-nr1rr4{font-size:1rem;}} See all

re assignment surgery

'Striking inequities' as global cancer burden grows, and other health stories you need to know this week

Shyam Bishen

February 14, 2024

re assignment surgery

Is your organization ignoring workplace bullying? Here's why it matters

Jason Walker and Deborah Circo

February 12, 2024

re assignment surgery

What is ‘generous listening’ and how can it help communities heal after a disaster?

Vuslat Doğan Sabancı

re assignment surgery

Why we need 'right to disconnect' laws for workers

Chris F. Wright

February 9, 2024

re assignment surgery

How companies can support employees working with cancer to drive better business and health outcomes

Lynn Koble and Gina Jacobson

February 5, 2024

re assignment surgery

How to tackle the mounting crisis of workforce mental health

Aleksandra Agatowska and Shyam Bishen

December 21, 2023

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • View all journals
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • Review Article
  • Published: 02 June 2020

Urethral complications after gender reassignment surgery: a systematic review

  • N. Nassiri 1 ,
  • M. Maas   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9677-9917 1 ,
  • M. Basin 1 ,
  • G. E. Cacciamani 1 &
  • L. R. Doumanian 1  

International Journal of Impotence Research volume  33 ,  pages 793–800 ( 2021 ) Cite this article

1031 Accesses

17 Citations

51 Altmetric

Metrics details

  • Health care
  • Medical research

The aim of the present systematic review is to evaluate the impact of gender reassignment surgery on the development of urethral complication. A systematic search in accordance the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement for original articles published up until June 2019 was performed using the Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Pooled analyses were done when appropriate. The bibliographic search with the included terms ((“Transsexualism”[Mesh])) AND (“Sex Reassignment Surgery”[Mesh]) produced a literature of 879 articles altogether. After removing papers of not interest or articles in which the outcomes could not be deduced, 32 studies were examined for a total of 3463 patients screened. Thirty-two studies met our inclusion criteria and were evaluated, and references were manually reviewed in order to include additional relevant studies in this review. Female-to-male (FtM) surgery and male-to-female (MtF) surgery was discussed in 23 and 10 studies, respectively. One study discussed both. Varying patterns of complications were observed in FtM and MtF surgeries, with increased complications in the former because of the larger size of the neourethra. Meatal stenosis is a particular concern in MtF surgery, with complication rates ranging from 4 to 40%, and usually require meatotomy for repair. Stricture and fistulization are frequently reported complications following FtM surgery. In studies reporting on fistulae involving the urethra, 19–54% of fistulae resolved spontaneously without further surgical intervention. High rates of complications are reported in the current literature, which should be understood by patients and practitioners alike. Shared decision making with patients regarding incidence and management of urethral complications including stricture disease and fistulae, particularly after FtM surgery, is critical for setting expectations and managing postoperative outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 8 print issues and online access

251,40 € per year

only 31,43 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

re assignment surgery

Selvaggi G, Bellringer J. Gender reassignment surgery: an overview. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8:274–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.46 .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Santucci RA. Urethral complications after transgender phalloplasty: strategies to treat them and minimize their occurrence. Clin Anat 2018;31:187–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23021 .

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Oxford Center of Evidence-Based Medicine. Levels of Evidence. https://www.cebm.net/2016/05/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/ . Published 2011. Accessed September 22, 2019.

Hoebeke P, Selvaggi G, Ceulemans P, et al. Impact of sex reassignment surgery on lower urinary tract function. Eur Urol. 2005;47:398–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.10.008 .

Weyers S, Selvaggi G, Monstrey S, et al. Two-stage versus one-stage sex reassignment surgery in female-to-male transsexual individuals. Gynecol Surg. 2006;3:190–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-006-0203-3 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Schaff J. Enlarged range of free flaps for phalloplasty in transsexual reassignment surgery. Int J Transgenderism. 2007;10:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J485v10n01_06 .

Takamatsu A, Harashina T. Labial ring flap: a new flap for metaidoioplasty in female-to-male transsexuals. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:318–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.11.038 .

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Kim S-K, Lee K-C, Kwon Y-S, Cha B-H. Phalloplasty using radial forearm osteocutaneous free flaps in female-to-male transsexuals. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:309–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.11.011 .

Zhang Y-F, Liu C-Y, Qu C-Y, et al. Is vaginal mucosal graft the excellent substitute material for urethral reconstruction in female-to-male transsexuals? World J Urol. 2015;33:2115–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1562-z .

Fang R-H, Kao Y-S, Ma S, Lin J-T. Phalloplasty in female-to-male transsexuals using free radial osteocutaneous flap: a series of 22 cases. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:217–22. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1998.3027 .

Dabernig J, Chan LKW, Schaff J. Phalloplasty with free (septocutaneous) fibular flap sine fibula. J Urol 2006;176:2085–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.036 .

Djordjevic ML, Stanojevic D, Bizic M, et al. Metoidioplasty as a single stage sex reassignment surgery in female transsexuals: Belgrade experience. J Sex Med. 2009;6:1306–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01065.x .

Garaffa G, Christopher NA, Ralph DJ. Total phallic construction in female to male transsexuals. Curr Urol 2009;3:146–55. https://doi.org/10.1159/000253373 .

Kim S-K, Moon J-B, Heo J, Kwon Y-S, Lee K-C. A new method of urethroplasty for prevention of fistula in female-to-male gender reassignment surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:759–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181a5b719 .

Wierckx K, Van Caenegem E, Elaut E, et al. Quality of life and sexual health after sex reassignment surgery in transsexual men. J Sex Med. 2011;8:3379–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02348.x .

Djordjevic ML, Bizic MR. Comparison of two different methods for urethral lengthening in female to male (metoidioplasty) surgery. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1431–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12108 .

van der Sluis WB, Smit JM, Pigot GLS, et al. Double flap phalloplasty in transgender men: Surgical technique and outcome of pedicled anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty combined with radial forearm free flap urethral reconstruction. Microsurgery 2017;37:917–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30190 .

Stojanovic B, Bizic M, Bencic M, et al. One-stage gender-confirmation surgery as a viable surgical procedure for female-to-male transsexuals. J Sex Med. 2017;14:741–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.03.256 .

Al-Tamimi M, Pigot GL, van der Sluis WB, et al. Colpectomy significantly reduces the risk of urethral fistula formation after urethral lengthening in transgender men undergoing genital gender affirming surgery. J Urol 2018;200:1315–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.037 .

Ascha M, Massie JP, Morrison SD, Crane CN, Chen ML. Outcomes of single stage phalloplasty by pedicled anterolateral thigh flap versus radial forearm free flap in gender confirming surgery. J Urol 2018;199:206–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.084 .

Wirthmann AE, Majenka P, Kaufmann MC, et al. Phalloplasty in female-to-male transsexuals by Gottlieb and Levine’s free radial forearm flap technique-A long-term single-center experience over more than two decades. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018;34:235–41. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1608656 .

Namba Y, Watanabe T, Kimata Y. Flap combination phalloplasty in female-to-male transsexuals. J Sex Med. 2019;16:934–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.02.010 .

D’Arpa S, Claes K, Lumen N, et al. Urethral reconstruction in anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty: a 93-case experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143:382e–392e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005278 .

Nikkels C, van Trotsenburg M, Huirne J, et al. Vaginal colpectomy in transgender men: a retrospective cohort study on surgical procedure and outcomes. J Sex Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.263 .

Rohrmann D, Jakse G. Urethroplasty in female-to-male transsexuals. Eur Urol. 2003;44:611–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00356-7 .

Garaffa G, Christopher NA, Ralph DJ. Total phallic reconstruction in female-to-male transsexuals. Eur Urol 2010;57:715–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.018 .

Lawrence AA. Patient-reported complications and functional outcomes of male-to-female sex reassignment surgery. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35:717–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9104-9 .

Rossi Neto R, Hintz F, Krege S, Rübben H, vom Dorp F. Gender reassignment surgery - a 13 year review of surgical outcomes. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382012000100014 .

Amend B, Seibold J, Toomey P, Stenzl A, Sievert K-D. Surgical reconstruction for male-to-female sex reassignment. Eur Urol 2013;64:141–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.12.030 .

Raigosa M, Avvedimento S, Yoon TS, Cruz-Gimeno J, Rodriguez G, Fontdevila J. Male-to-female genital reassignment surgery: a retrospective review of surgical technique and complications in 60 patients. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1837–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12936 .

van der Sluis WB, Bouman M-B, de Boer NKH, et al. Long-term follow-up of transgender women after secondary intestinal vaginoplasty. J Sex Med. 2016;13:702–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.008 .

Kuzon WMJ, Gast KM, Buncamper ME, et al. Surgical outcome after penile inversion vaginoplasty: a retrospective study of 475 transgender women. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002684 .

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Ives GC, Fein LA, Finch L, et al. Evaluation of BMI as a risk factor for complications following gender-affirming penile inversion vaginoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7:e2097 https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002097 .

Goddard JC, Vickery RM, Qureshi A, Summerton DJ, Khoosal D, Terry TR. Feminizing genitoplasty in adult transsexuals: early and long-term surgical results. BJU Int. 2007;100:607–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07017.x .

Krege S, Bex A, Lümmen G, Rübben H. Male-to-female transsexualism: a technique, results and long-term follow-up in 66 patients. BJU Int. 2001;88:396–402. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.02323.x .

World Professional Association for Transgender Health. Standards of Care—WPATH. https://www.wpath.org/publications/soc . Accessed September 25, 2019.

Morrison SD, Chen ML, Crane CN. An overview of female-to-male gender-confirming surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14:486–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.64 .

Jun MS, Santucci RA. Urethral stricture after phalloplasty. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8:266–72. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.05.08 .

Massie JP, Morrison SD, Wilson SC, Crane CN, Chen ML. Phalloplasty with urethral lengthening: addition of a vascularized bulbospongiosus flap from vaginectomy reduces postoperative urethral complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:551e–558e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003697 .

Salgado CJ, Nugent AG, Moody AM, Chim H, Paz AM, Chen H-C. Immediate pedicled gracilis flap in radial forearm flap phalloplasty for transgender male patients to reduce urinary fistula. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:1551–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2016.05.011 .

Cocci A, Frediani D, Cacciamani GE, et al. Systematic review of studies reporting perioperative and functional outcomes following male-to- female gender assignment surgery (MtoF GAS): a call for standardization in data reporting. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03407-6 .

Download references

There was no funding source for this study. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA

N. Nassiri, M. Maas, M. Basin, G. E. Cacciamani & L. R. Doumanian

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. R. Doumanian .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Prisma 2009 checklist, rights and permissions.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Nassiri, N., Maas, M., Basin, M. et al. Urethral complications after gender reassignment surgery: a systematic review. Int J Impot Res 33 , 793–800 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0304-y

Download citation

Received : 15 February 2020

Revised : 20 April 2020

Accepted : 05 May 2020

Published : 02 June 2020

Issue Date : December 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0304-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Phalloplasty and metoidioplasty: a systematic review of sensation, orgasm, and penetrative intercourse.

  • Elad Fraiman
  • Kelly Chambers
  • Shubham Gupta

Current Sexual Health Reports (2023)

Imaging in Gender Affirmation Surgery

  • Omar Hassan
  • Priyanka Jha

Current Urology Reports (2021)

Geschlechtsangleichung von Frau zu Mann

  • S. Morgenstern

Der Urologe (2020)

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

re assignment surgery

Why the largest transgender survey ever could be a powerful rebuke to myths, misinformation

re assignment surgery

When Ashton Holmes saw the results of the largest-ever transgender survey in the U.S ., the data elicited ripples of joy: “It made my heart happy.”

The survey by the National Center for Transgender Equality of over 92,000 binary and nonbinary transgender people offers a window into a world often clouded by misconceptions. Nearly all respondents – 94% − said they were satisfied with their lives after transitioning.  

Holmes, 39, a Black transgender man who navigates life with a “let’s love on each other” philosophy, says the statistics give powerful proof “that people are satisfied when they are seen, when they are affirmed.”

Transgender advocates are hoping the data not only shows that validation − but also cuts through a tornado of misinformation about transgender people that has swirled in the past few years.

“This survey is tremendously significant for the quality, the quantity and frankly the timing,” says Cathy Renna, communications director for the National LGBTQ Task Force. “We could not need this more than we do right now.”

Rights of transgender people are in the crosshairs

The survey, released earlier this month. lands as the rights of transgender people continue to be in the crosshairs: About 130 bills targeting the community have been filed in 2024 in statehouses, according to the Human Rights Campaign. Last year saw 225 bills.

As the community, particularly youths, “face increased attacks on our ability to access health care, public facilities and other fundamental aspects of life, these findings serve as a critical resource,” said Rodrigo Heng-Lehtinen, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, which conducted the U.S. Trans Survey in partnership with other groups. The center is a national organization that advocates for the understanding and acceptance of transgender people.

The survey also showed that nearly all respondents, or 98%, reported that receiving hormone treatments for their transition resulted in greater satisfaction with their lives.

And nearly half – 47% − said they have considered moving to another state because their state passed or was weighing legislation that targeted transgender people for unequal treatment.    

Renna said the data is going to be a “101 for allies” – those who have transgender people in their lives and have questions. “Instead of having them find a sea of misinformation, myths and stereotypes, they are going to find the lived realities of trans people.”

Real-world data to help support families

Laura Hoge, a clinical social worker in New Jersey who works with transgender people and their families, said the survey results underscore what she sees in her daily practice: that lives improve when access to something as basic as gender-affirming care is not restricted.

“I see children who come here sometimes not able to go to school or are completely distanced from their friends,” she said. “And when they have access to care, they can go from not going to school to trying out for their school play.”

Every time misinformation about transgender people surfaces, Hoge says she is flooded with phone calls.

The survey now gives real-world data on the lived experiences of transgender people and how their lives are flourishing, she said. “I can tell you that when I talk to families I am able to say to them: This is what other people in your child’s situation or in your situation are saying.”

Gender-affirming care has been a target of state bills

Gender-affirming care , which can involve everything from talk sessions to hormone therapy, in many ways has been ground zero in recent legislative debates over the rights of transgender people.  

A poll by the Trevor Project, which provides crisis and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ people under 25, found that 85% of trans and nonbinary youths say even the debates about these laws have negatively impacted their mental health.

In January, the Ohio Senate overrode the governor’s veto of legislation that restricted medical care for transgender young people.

The bill prohibits doctors from prescribing hormones, puberty blockers, or gender reassignment surgery before patients turn 18 and requires mental health providers to get parental permission to diagnose and treat gender dysphoria.

Backers of the bill said it was needed to protect the state’s children. One lawmaker, state Sen. Kristina Roegner, disputed whether transgender people even exist : “There is no such thing as gender-affirming care. You can’t affirm something that doesn’t exist," she said. 

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, whose state restricts gender-affirming care , also has said “ a lot of the dysphoria resolves itself by the time” young people become adults.

Transgender advocates say not only are those kinds of statements false, but they also make the case for the urgency of the national survey.

“It is astounding that people can say things like that,” Renna said. ”That’s why you need this, why you need data − especially when what you are dealing with is not just ignorance: It is a concerted effort to erase transgender and nonbinary people.”

A 'coordinated campaign that is good at confusing people'

Heng-Lehtinen says many of the anti-transgender policies in states are based on “fearmongering” to “exploit the public’s relative unfamiliarity with transgender people.”

Some organizations use names that appear to be legitimate and can mislead the public, Hoge said, citing one such example: The American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds), which has a name similar to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

AAP, which was founded in 1930 and has about 67,000 members, is a major medical association and one that supports gender-affirming care .

ACPeds, which was founded in 2002 and says it has about 600 members, has been designated an anti-LGBTQ hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The group links gender incongruence on its website with mental illness.

When asked to comment on whether the national transgender survey refutes claims made by ACPeds, past president Quentin Van Meter said the group supports the belief that “realigning the personal identity and physical body to accommodate an incongruent gender identity” in youths can cause harm.

Other major medical groups – from the American Medical Association to the American Psychiatric Association – disagree and have lined up in support of gender-affirming care and against bills that criminalize it in recent years.

Hoge says it is a pivotal time to call out entities that push debunked science. “There is a very coordinated and strategic campaign that is good at confusing people. You have these very confusing named organizations that sound reputable,” she said. “But it’s connected to a larger movement that has strong ties to anti-LGBTQ sentiments.”

Misinformation 'dehumanizes' transgender people

Holmes left his South Carolina roots for Ohio in 2020. The Dayton resident says he has been fortunate to find resources to help with his transition, from medical to legal.  

Believing people’s stories is crucial, Holmes says. He recalls his first meeting with an endocrinologist who told him to “just talk” – which he did for almost an hour. The doctor then told him: “I believe you, and I’m going to help you.”

He also points to “misconceptions” about what it means to be transgender. “We aren’t a monolith. Who I am as a person is not the same as some of my other trans siblings.” 

Holmes says he knows there are times when he is the first transgender person someone has met, and his motto is just to “be human to them.” He will hear a familiar response of “well I didn’t know.” His answer: “You aren’t supposed to know.”

That is why the national transgender survey is so significant, he said. Misinformation “dehumanizes us,” he said. “When we can come together and respect and value each other, this is what this does: We have people that are happy. If can make this path, this road a little bit easier for this person, let’s do it. Let people have experiences they thought they could never have.”

  • Community News
  • Area Births
  • In the Courts
  • Marriage Licenses
  • Real Estate Transfers
  • West Virginia News
  • National News
  • International News
  • Local Sports
  • Local Sports Columns
  • West Virginia Sports
  • Ohio Sports
  • National Sports
  • News and Sentinel Races
  • Local columns
  • Letters to the editor
  • Anniversaries
  • Engagements
  • Coronavirus
  • Classifieds
  • Garage Sales
  • Terms of Service
  • Submit News
  • Browse notices
  • Place a notice

homepage logo

  • Today's Paper

Subscribe Today

West virginia house health committee re-opens gender affirming care debate.

re assignment surgery

Del. Anitra Hamilton urged fellow House Health Committee members to oppose eliminating all remaining exceptions for medical gender-affirming care. (Photo courtesy of WV Legislative Photography)

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

  • Daily Newsletter
  • Breaking News

re assignment surgery

Hamilton Middle School students don VR headsets to glimpse possible career paths

Vienna city council backs comprehensive plan with vote.

VIENNA — Vienna City Council voted to pass the comprehensive plan on first reading and hired Jack Mathers as a ...

re assignment surgery

Teen of the Week: Belpre’s Christopher Copen works toward career in sports medicine

re assignment surgery

West Virginia inmate enters plea in death of cellmate

re assignment surgery

White House, tribal leaders hail ‘historic’ deal to restore salmon runs in Pacific Northwest

re assignment surgery

West Virginia Watchdogs: Householder, Jackson make case to be next state auditor

Starting at $4.62/week..

re assignment surgery

  Law News

re assignment surgery

Phone Records Could Get Fani Willis Disbarred, Jailed, Legal Experts Say

re assignment surgery

EXCLUSIVE: Kentucky AG Investigates Company at Center of $200,000 Payment to Bidens

  Society Commentary

re assignment surgery

Sorry, Politico: You Don’t Get to Rewrite the Declaration of Independence  

  Politics Commentary

re assignment surgery

How All Americans Are Paying for San Francisco’s Pork-Barrel Spending

  Security Commentary

President Biden hugs Mexican President Lopez Obrador. Both men in suits.

Under Biden, US Failing to Push Latin American Nations to Stem Illegal Immigration: The BorderLine

re assignment surgery

San Francisco Put a Noncitizen in Office. This Is Part of the Left’s Plan to Demolish Our Republic.

   Security News

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas look ahead in a light blue button down shirt during a press conference with the DHS flag behind him.

These Republicans Demand a Full Senate Impeachment Trial for Mayorkas

  Economy Commentary

President Joe Biden delivers a speech behind a black podium Words behind him read "lowering costs for American families"

Biden’s Low Marks on Economy Reflect Reality

   Health Care News

re assignment surgery

What Federal Health Agencies Aren’t Disclosing About COVID-19 Vaccines

  Energy   Analysis

re assignment surgery

Why China Wants You to Drive an EV

  International Commentary

re assignment surgery

The Pandemic Treaty That Won’t Prevent a Pandemic

    Security Commentary

re assignment surgery

Don’t Be Fooled: This Bill Is Mostly Ukraine Aid

   Law Commentary

re assignment surgery

Blue Laws for Red Citizens

re assignment surgery

Blue City Law Allowing Noncitizens to Vote Ruled Unconstitutional

   Politics News

re assignment surgery

25th Amendment Push Intensifies Against Biden

  Politics News

Chip Roy and Andy Biggs wear suits

EXCLUSIVE: House Subcommittee Chairmen Pressure DC Mayor, Police to Preserve Aborted Baby Remains

Joe Biden in a blue suit gestures angrily in front of an American flag while wearing an American flag pin.

EXCLUSIVE: Here’s the Book the White House Suggested Amazon Should Ban

Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., looks down with a pencil in his hand.

EXCLUSIVE: Sen. Roger Marshall Tracks Serious Crimes Committed by Illegal Aliens During Biden Presidency

  International News

A group of international religious freedom experts are calling for Secretary of State Antony Blinken to testify at a congressional hearing about the State Department's decision to exclude Nigeria and India from a list of nations engaged in severe violations of religious freedom. Pictured: U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken attends the second international Libya conference on June 23, 2021 in Berlin, Germany. (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

EXCLUSIVE: Religious Freedom Advocates Demand Answers on State Department’s Exclusion of Nigeria, India From Persecution List

International   Commentary

re assignment surgery

While Biden Pushes Ukraine to Fight, He Demands Israel Surrender

re assignment surgery

A Troubling Moral Relativity Hangs Over Israel-Hamas Conflict

   Security Analysis

Houthi supporters protest in Yemen's capital, Sanaa, with one man holding a rocket and a Palestinian flag.

Biden Empowered Iran Proxies Attacking US Forces and Threatening Wider War Against Israel

re assignment surgery

Elites’ Strange Disconnect Between Israel and Ukraine

Law   Analysis

Former President Donald Trump looks to his side while on stage at a town hall. He is wearing a dark blue suit and red tie.

Trump’s Legal Cases 101: Where They Stand

President Reagen sits at the resolute desk filled with papers. He holds up a document looking at someone off camera.

The World’s Hostility Toward Conservatism Is Empowering Conservatives to Fight Back

re assignment surgery

How Many More Female Athletes Will Be Injured by Trans Players Before Biden Gives Up Trying to Rewrite Title IX?

Health Care News

Surgeon Who Performs Transgender Vaginoplasties: Complications ‘Can Be Pretty Bad’

Megan Brock / February 15, 2024

Surgeons at France's Lyon Hospital perform a vaginolasty to create an artificial vagina on a male-to-female transgender patient following an emasculation. Vaginaplasty is a highly risky procedure, one surgeon who performs them concedes. (Photo: BSIP/UIG/Getty Images)

A prominent surgeon stated that complications from vaginoplastic surgery that aims at removing male genitals and creating a vagina “can be pretty bad” and noted that there was “a growing number of programs throughout the world of gender affirmation, probably with a lack of training and not proper training,” according to the video of a presentation that the Daily Caller News Foundation obtained through a public records request.

“Complications can be pretty bad for vaginoplasty, and the most-dreaded complication is to perforate the rectum while you are dissecting the vaginal cavity,” Dr. Alex Laungani, a Canadian surgeon, who has “ expertise in trans surgical care ,” said at an event sponsored by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH).

dailycallerlogo

“You are essentially dissecting the vaginal cavity between the prostate and the rectum and there’s literally no space there,” he said. “So, you have to create a new plane in a spot that doesn’t exist. So, you’re very close to the rectum, and it’s very hard—it’s very easy to get in there. We don’t, I mean, the more you do it, the less risk you have, of course.”

WPATH  is a  medical organization  that has published an influential clinical guidance on transgender health care called  Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People (SOC) . Laungani’s presentation, titled “Foundations in Surgery,” was part of an educational series recorded in September 2022 for licensed clinicians seeking  WPATH certification  in transgender health care. Laungani is a  WPATH member .

The WPATH Standards of Care recommend that transgender surgeons be educated, trained and supervised on how to perform sex-reassignment surgeries. However, Laungani said in his presentation that as the number of sex-reassignment programs had  grown , it was likely some surgeons had not received adequate training.

“We’ve seen a growing number of programs throughout the world of gender affirmation, probably with a lack of training and not proper training, for now,” said Laungani. “And so, you know, better [care]—any care was better, probably, than no care. So, it did allow individuals to have access to surgery. But it’s time just to make sure that we have the right training and that everybody has the same standard because the patients deserve it.

“And, so, we need to make sure that, you know, we’ll build these training programs, fellowships and things,” he said. “And it’s really happening now. So, this is going to be something mandatory.

“Well, you do great only what you do often, right?” Laungani said. “So, if you do a vaginoplasty every two years, I don’t think you could consider yourself proficient. You’re going to have more complications.

“You’re not going to follow up, you know, and you’re not going to be that interested that you actually go and hang out at these kinds of conferences and learn from your colleagues, because you’re not going to do it as much,” he said. “So, I think you need to dedicate a huge part of your practice to gender-affirming care if you are going to do it at all.”

In this WPATH presentation, Laungani gave an overview of vaginoplasty, a surgery that seeks to create a vagina by  removing male genitalia , surgically creating a vaginal canal, and lining the canal with tissue which often comes from other parts of the body. Laungani discussed the details of a vaginoplasty procedure, saying: “So, you’ll use the skin of the penis to tack it down and invert it and start the beginning of lining of the canal. But you won’t have enough skin to line the entire canal—to some, there are some rare exceptions—so you’ll need some extra tissue there.”

Laungani said this tissue needed for the vaginal canal can be taken from the abdomen, scrotum or colon. However, he warned that using colon tissue could increase the risk of complications.

“Or, you could be using even a piece of colon,” he said. “So, to use colon vaginoplasty, umm, usually that’s reserved for secondary deepening. We don’t do it as a primary intervention because it’s more morbid. You get to, you know, you have to cut bowel. You know it’s more, you may have, encounter, more complications,” said Laungani.

One  article  published in 2023 in the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery stated: “Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) is a common procedure for trans-feminine patients, with the goal of creating a functional vaginal canal and clitoris and a natural-appearing vulva. Creation of the neovagina requires opening the prerectal space, most commonly from a perineal approach, and the reported rates of rectal perforation during this dissection range from 3% to 5%.”

A slide in the WPATH presentation listed possible complications of vaginoplasty, which include minor  wound dehiscence , vaginal stenosis, recto-vaginal fistula, pelvic floor dysfunction, and clitoris necrosis.

During the presentation, Laungani noted the rate of wound dehiscence, a complication in which a surgical incision reopens, could be as high as 75%. “I think for the dehiscence, you can expect as much as probably 75%,” he said.

In the recording, Laungani explained that within the first week after surgery, a vaginoplasty patient must begin regularly dilating the surgically created vagina, sometimes called a neovagina, to prevent closure. He described dilation as a sometimes painful, time-consuming process, saying patients have to dilate themselves up to four times a day.

“[A]s soon as we remove that vaginal stent, we start dilating because there will be a tendency from the body to want to contract and close that, considered as a wound, sort of. So, you’ll have to fight that contraction and then dilate quite a bit at first. Which is, you know, what the patients call a full-time job for the first few months, because it’s four times a day. It’s a lot,” said Laungani.

During a question-and-answer segment, Laungani was asked if there were any nonsurgical interventions to redilate a neovagina that had not been dilated for approximately two years.

“That scar tissue is really rock hard. It’s like concrete. You can’t, once it’s settled, you won’t be able to just go, even with tiny dilators, and then increase the size of the dilators. It’s just not going to work. So, it has to be surgical,” Laungani said.

He was also asked about sexual function after vaginoplasty. “Can they orgasm still?” a person asked him.

“I wish we had more data on that,” Laungani said. “But the answer is: Yes, they can. For some individuals definitely do relate that—either by self-palpitation or through penetration or other sexual activities that they have around the clitoris.”

“The only thing we know is that there’s going to be more tendency to be able to orgasm if you were to, if you were able to orgasm before surgery. So, but you know, some, the patients who were not masturbating before surgery, then you would have potentially more issues to reach that orgasm after surgery,” Laungani said.

The Daily Caller News Foundation  previously reported  that  Dr. Daniel Metzger , a WPATH-certified pediatric endocrinologist, warned that if puberty blockers are started too early, boys may not develop the genital tissue needed to create a surgical vagina later in life.

“When you think about vaginoplasty, the creation of a vagina in an ‘assigned male,’ you need tissue, genital tissue, to create that vagina,” said Metzger. “And if we are taking an 11-year-old boy, who does not have a lot of genital tissue and blocking puberty right there, we’re preventing the growth of the vagina for down the road.”

WPATH and Laungani did not respond to requests for comment.

Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation

Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email  [email protected]  and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.

re assignment surgery

Join the millions of people who benefit from The Daily Signal’s fair, accurate, trustworthy reporting with direct access to:

  • Intelligence from inside Washington
  • Deep policy understanding from over 100 experts

Don’t have time to read the Washington Post or New York Times? Then get The Morning Bell, an early morning edition of the day’s most important political news, conservative commentary and original reporting from a team committed to following the truth no matter where it leads.

Ever feel like the only difference between the New York Times and Washington Post is the name? We do. Try the Morning Bell and get the day’s most important news and commentary from a team committed to the truth in formats that respect your time…and your intelligence.

re assignment surgery

IMAGES

  1. What it’s Really Like to Have Female to Male Gender Reassignment

    re assignment surgery

  2. How Gender Reassignment Surgery Works (Infographic)

    re assignment surgery

  3. What it’s Really Like to Have Female to Male Gender Reassignment

    re assignment surgery

  4. 5-year-old child undergoes sex reassignment surgery

    re assignment surgery

  5. What is Involved in Gender Reassignment Surgery?

    re assignment surgery

  6. Obamacare Now Pays for Gender Reassignment

    re assignment surgery

VIDEO

  1. 3 Years Post-Op

  2. General surgery 401

COMMENTS

  1. Gender Affirmation Surgery: What Happens, Benefits & Recovery

    Overview What is gender affirmation surgery? Gender affirmation surgery includes several procedures that may help your body better align with your gender identity. Unlike sex assigned at birth (either male or female), gender identity is the way you understand your body and present yourself to others.

  2. How Gender Reassignment Surgery Works (Infographic)

    The cost for male-to-female reassignment can be $7,000 to $24,000. Between 100 to 500 gender-reassignment procedures are conducted in the United States each year. Contact me with news and...

  3. Gender Confirmation Surgery

    Gender confirmation surgery (GCS), known clinically as genitoplasty, are procedures that surgically confirm a person's gender by altering the genitalia and other physical features to align with their desired physical characteristics. Gender confirmation surgeries are also called gender affirmation procedures. These are both respectful terms.

  4. Gender Confirmation (Formerly Reassignment) Surgery: Procedures

    Top surgery is a procedure to remove the chest tissue and reconstruct the chest to have more of a masculine appearance. There are three basic top surgery options for AFAB folks: Double incision...

  5. Gender-affirming surgery (male-to-female)

    Gender-affirming surgery for male-to-female transgender women or transfeminine non-binary people describes a variety of surgical procedures that alter the body to provide physical traits more comfortable and affirming to an individual's gender identity and overall functioning.

  6. Gender-affirming surgery

    Gender-affirming surgery is a surgical procedure, or series of procedures, that alters a person's physical appearance and sexual characteristics to resemble those associated with their identified gender.

  7. How does female-to-male surgery work?

    A metoidioplasty is a method of constructing a new penis, or neopenis. Research from 2021 shows this procedure has a low risk of complication and a high satisfaction level. A metoidioplasty has...

  8. Sex Reassignment Surgery in the Female-to-Male Transsexual

    The two major sex reassignment surgery (SRS) interventions in the female-to-male transsexual patients that will be addressed here are (1) the subcutaneous mastectomy (SCM), often combined with a hysterectomy/ ovariectomy; and (2) the actual genital transformation consisting of vaginectomy, reconstruction of the fixed part of the urethra (if isol...

  9. Vaginoplasty for Gender Affirmation

    It involves removing the penis, testicles and scrotum. Vaginoplasty involves rearranging tissue in the genital area to create a vaginal canal (or opening) and vulva (external genitalia), including the labia. To create the vaginal canal, the surgeon uses a combination of the skin surrounding the existing penis along with the scrotal skin.

  10. Gender-affirming surgeries in US nearly tripled from 2016 to 2019 ...

    Gender-affirming surgery, also called gender confirmation or sex reassignment surgery, is a procedure or series of procedures that can help shape the body of a transgender or nonbinary person to ...

  11. Gender Affirmation Surgeries: Common Questions and Answers

    Gender affirmation surgery, also known as gender confirmation surgery, is performed to align or transition individuals with gender dysphoria to their true gender. A transgender woman, man, or non-binary person may choose to undergo gender affirmation surgery.

  12. A Pioneering Approach to Gender Affirming Surgery From a World Leader

    For years, the main challenge associated with sex reassignment surgery (SRS) has been the ability to provide patients with genitalia that is not only fully functional but also aesthetically acceptable.

  13. Gender Affirmation Surgeries

    Top surgery is surgery that removes or augments breast tissue and reshapes the chest to create a more masculine or feminine appearance for transgender and nonbinary people. Facial gender surgery: While hormone replacement therapy can help achieve gender affirming changes to the face, surgery may help.

  14. Female to Male Gender Reassignment Surgery (FTM GRS)

    Female-to-male gender reassignment surgery (FTM GRS) is a complex and irreversible genital surgery for female transsexual who is diagnosed with gender identity disorder and has a strong desire to live as male.

  15. Quality of Life Following Male-To-Female Sex Reassignment Surgery

    The findings of the studies permit the conclusion that sex reassignment surgery beneficially affects emotional well-being, sexuality, and quality of life in general. In other categories (e.g., "freedom from pain", "fitness", and "energy"), some of the studies revealed worsening after the operation.

  16. Gender-affirming surgery brings benefits

    Research we're watching. Gender-affirming surgery produces numerous benefits, according to a study by researchers from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. These include better mental health, a reduction in suicidal thoughts, and reduced rates of smoking. The study, published online April 28, 2021, by JAMA Surgery, drew on the 2015 U ...

  17. Feminizing surgery

    Mayo Clinic. Overview. Feminizing surgery, also called gender-affirming surgery or gender-confirmation surgery, involves procedures that help better align the body with a person's gender identity. Feminizing surgery includes several options, such as top surgery to increase the size of the breasts. That procedure also is called breast augmentation.

  18. Readiness assessments for gender-affirming surgical treatments: A

    Starting in the 1950s, surgeons and endocrinologists began treating what was then known as transsexualism with cross sex hormones and a variety of surgical procedures collectively known as sex reassignment surgery (SRS). Soon after, Harry Benjamin began work to develop standards of care that could be applied to these patients with some uniformity.

  19. Gender affirming surgery

    Bottom surgery is called 'genital reconfiguration surgery'. This was previously known as 'sex reassignment surgery' or 'gender confirmation surgery'. The name change shows that your genitals don't define your sex or gender. Feminising bottom surgery may involve a combination of the following procedures:

  20. Gender Affirming Surgery: Before and After Photos

    Gender Affirming Surgical Services. Before & After Photos. Appointments 216.445.6308. Request an Appointment. See before and after photos of patients who have undergone gender-affirming surgeries at Cleveland Clinic, including breast augmentations, facial feminizations, mastectomies and vaginoplasty.

  21. This is the beneficial effect of sex-reassignment surgery early on in a

    This is the beneficial effect of sex-reassignment surgery early on in a transition | World Economic Forum A study has found that trans people who had undergone gender-affirming surgery, the longer ago their surgery, the less likely they were to suffer anxiety, depression or suicidal behavior.

  22. What transgender women can expect after gender-affirming surgery

    Sex and sexual health tips for transgender women after gender-affirming surgery. Sex after surgery. Achieving orgasm. Libido. Vaginal depth and lubrication. Aftercare. Contraceptions and STIs ...

  23. Urethral complications after gender reassignment surgery: a ...

    The aim of the present systematic review is to evaluate the impact of gender reassignment surgery on the development of urethral complication. A systematic search in accordance the Preferred ...

  24. Transgender survey: Can the largest ever rebuke myths, misinformation?

    The bill prohibits doctors from prescribing hormones, puberty blockers, or gender reassignment surgery before patients turn 18 and requires mental health providers to get parental permission to ...

  25. Why are transgender healthcare waiting times so long?

    Winter James joined the NHS waiting list in July 2021 but said the "only option" was to go private Since 2018, the number of people waiting for a first appointment at a gender identity clinic in ...

  26. West Virginia House Health Committee re-opens gender affirming care

    Last year, the Legislature passed House Bill 2007, prohibiting physicians from providing irreversible gender reassignment surgery or medication for gender-affirming care, such as hormones or ...

  27. Surgeon: Trans Vaginoplasty Complications 'Can Be Pretty Bad'

    A prominent surgeon stated that complications from vaginoplastic surgery that aims at removing male genitals and creating a vagina "can be pretty bad" and noted that there was "a growing ...

  28. Nets Sign Knicks G Leaguer Jaylen Martin

    The Nets (21-33) are working through their first full season since moving on from their core led by Kevin Durant and James Harden. Brooklyn lost 18 of its final 24 under Vaughn, including a 50 ...